Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, May 21, 2024

The Biden administration authorized the use of deadly force during the FBI's raid on former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida in August 2022 as part of its investigation into classified records, court documents revealed. An "Operations Order" produced in discovery as part of Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Trump's alleged improper retention of classified records revealed that the "FBI believed its objective for the Mar-a-Lago raid was to seize classified information, NDI, and US Government records,'" as described in the search warrant. The order, according to a court filing, contained a "Policy Statement" regarding "Use of Deadly Force," which stated, for example, "Law Enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force when necessary."

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Given the level of classified documents involved, and fmr Pres Trump's apparernt attempt to hide his possession of such documents, why do you seem to have an issue here?

Is loyalty to fmr Pres Trump so important to you that you ignore possible national security issues?

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-21 09:21 PM | Reply

Ron Filipkowski
@RonFilipkowski

Trump, the crazies, and the monetized click baiters are hyperventilating over standard search warrant language that they claim meant that DOJ/FBI planned to assassinate Trump except they knew that Trump and Secret Service weren't there. But don't let me interrupt the crazy.

#2 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-05-21 09:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Deadly force?

Jeezus Christ can you be any more of a hyperventilating cooze?

#3 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-05-21 09:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#1 Why does your current alias continue to assign opinions to me when I merely posted an article and made no comment. Please cite your proof to back up your post.

#4 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-05-21 09:32 PM | Reply | Funny: 2 | Newsworthy 1

Seriously, unless Bella from Twitter can link what @RonFilipkowski was wearing when he posted that, your post is meaningless.

#5 | Posted by gracieamazed at 2024-05-21 09:33 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#2 ... and the monetized click baiters ...

As I noted in an earlier comment of mine..

drudge.com

... When I ran a message board a couple decades ago (never again, btw. And major kudos to RCade for this most august site. ... ) one of the concerns I had was posters who seemed to post comments only attempting to generate replies. At the time my guess was that there may have been a "pay per reply" agreement in place. That is the only way the trolling seemed to make sense to me. ...

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-21 09:34 PM | Reply | Funny: 2 | Newsworthy 1

Mueller, She Wrote
@MuellerSheWrote

Not only did FBI know they weren't there, they didn't wear their windbreakers, and didn't bother to check a closet because the door was locked. And they issued a subpoena first. Had Trump simply complied with the subpoena instead of hiding boxes and avoiding surveillance cameras and lying to his lawyers, they wouldn't have had to execute a search warrant.

#7 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-05-21 09:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Alex Mallin
@alex_mallin
New: FBI issues rare statement directly responding to this attack from Trump and his allies.

Says "standard protocol" was followed - "No one ordered additional steps to be taken and there was no departure from the norm in this matter."

x.com

#8 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2024-05-21 09:38 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

@#4 ... #1 Why does your current alias continue to assign opinions to me ...

Did I assign an opinion to you?

And, "continue?" What other examples do you have? Links would be appropriate.

Or did I merely ask you a question?

For the record, here is the entire content of my #1 post you replied to... (typos included... :(     )

... Given the level of classified documents involved, and fmr Pres Trump's apparernt attempt to hide his possession of such documents, why do you seem to have an issue here?

Is loyalty to fmr Pres Trump so important to you that you ignore possible national security issues? ...


How is that assigning an opinion to you?

I merely asked a question.

But now, my question becomes, why are you deflecting from answering that simple question?


#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-21 09:39 PM | Reply

@#8 ... FBI issues rare statement directly responding to this attack from Trump and his allies. ...

Why do fmr Pres Trump and his allies seem to be so concerned about this particular case?


Are, e.g., the photos of United States classified documents being stored in a Mar-A-Lago [public?] bathroom a concern for them?


#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-21 09:43 PM | Reply

Law Enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force when necessary."
POSTED BY GRACIEAMAZED

Gracie thinks this is newsworthy? Hahaha!!! Welcome to America, noob

#11 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-21 09:56 PM | Reply

The------------- used deadly force on Herman Cain.

#12 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-05-21 10:00 PM | Reply

Only those who take issue (i.e., the "assigned opinion" to GRACIe) would consider this topic newsworthy.

JFC any law enforcement official across the entire country adheres to the common knowledge that "Law Enforcement officers ... may use deadly force when necessary."

Hey GRACIE, Trump once again was caught with classified documents he said he didn't have.

Swallow it.

#13 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-21 10:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Biden admin authorized 'Use of Deadly Force' at Mar-a-Lago"

This is the part where Deplorables forget to say:
Back The Blue.

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-05-21 10:23 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

FBI responds to Trump claim about Mar-a-Lago search
www.axios.com

... The FBI in a statement on Tuesday said that their search at former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence followed standard protocol, which "includes a standard policy statement limiting the use of deadly force."

Why it matters: The statement was a response to a Truth Social post from Trump earlier in the day that inflamed his conservative allies and included misleading claims about President Biden's Justice Department.

- - -"The FBI followed standard protocol in this search as we do for all search warrants, which includes a standard policy statement limiting the use of deadly force," the FBI said in the Tuesday statement, according to multiple reports.

- - - "No one ordered additional steps to be taken and there was no departure from the norm in this matter," the FBI said.

Zoom in: Trump posted on his Truth Social account on Tuesday that Biden's Justice Department "authorized the FBI to use deadly (lethal) force."

- - - Trump's allies seized on his post, with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) falsely claiming that the DOJ and FBI were "planning to assassinate Pres. Trump and gave the green light." ...



#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-21 11:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#15 ... Trump's allies seized on his post, with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) falsely claiming ...

So....

What else is new?

Trump allies "falsely claiming?"

That's a new thing?

#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-21 11:05 PM | Reply

Back The Blue.
#14 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

They differentiate between fed blue and local blue. Especially under a Dem administration, they do NOT support the fed blue.

#17 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-21 11:14 PM | Reply

They differentiate

"We're gonna need some more FBI guys I guess."

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-05-21 11:37 PM | Reply

Of course, gravy is stupid enough to be taken in by this.

#19 | Posted by jpw at 2024-05-22 12:21 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

They wanted to be able to shoot anyone who witnessed them sniffing Melanie's panties as they ransacked her wardrobe.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-22 12:27 AM | Reply

@#20 ... They wanted to be able to shoot anyone who witnessed them sniffing Melanie's panties as they ransacked her wardrobe. ...

Really?

That's the best your current alias has got here?


Let me phrase that differently....

Why does your current alias seem to strive to attain the appellation of "Troll" that some on this most august site seem to ascribe to it?


#21 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-22 12:45 AM | Reply

"This is the part where Deplorables forget to say:
Back The Blue.
#14 | POSTED BY SNOOFY"

This is not 'the Blue' - this is Biden's SS or Brown Shirts.

#22 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-22 12:45 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

Fun tune...

Edelweiss - Bring Me Edelweiss (Tourist Version) (1988)
www.youtube.com

genius.com

...
So when you really love me
Darling bring me Edelweiss
So when you really love me
You should bring me Edelweiss

Freibier! Oh yeah!
Freibier! Oh yeah!
That's the way we like it!

So when you really love me
Darling bring me Edelweiss
So when you really love me
You should bring me Edelweiss

Woman
I need some Austrian loving
I know what it means
I better start climbing
For the dopest flower on the top of the
Mountain

I know what you want
They don't grow the ground
Hiking up North like Cooly C
You see eye to eye
We're picking the one and only flower that shows love
As you look into my eyes
So we can show it with Edelweiss
...



Alpine yodeling in a rock song? I'd never heard that before.

Wow. Kudos to Edelweiss for this.



#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-22 12:50 AM | Reply

@#22 ... This is not 'the Blue' - this is Biden's SS or Brown Shirts. ...

Please substantiate that assertion.

thx.

#24 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-22 12:51 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"#24 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

These are not police - this is the FBI, which Biden has turned into political organization used to hunt down and prosecute his enemies. No different than how Hoover used it - no different than how Hitler used the SS or Stalin the NKVD. Far past time to defund and end the FBI as it has been continually abused.

#25 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-22 12:56 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

@#25 ... These are not police - this is the FBI, which Biden has turned into political organization used to hunt down and prosecute his enemies. ...

Yeah, your current alias is gonna need to provide a whole lot more substation for that assertion.

It is easy to say things.

It is more difficult to back up what is said.

So...

... this is the FBI, which Biden has turned into political organization used to hunt down and prosecute his enemies. ...

Got links?

Or is your current alias' comment just venting analpore gases?


Step up or step out...


#26 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-22 01:09 AM | Reply

"It is more difficult to back up what is said.
#26 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

Providing links for something that is self-evident is a waste of my time, though I get how it would probably benefit a ------ like you.

#27 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-22 01:12 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

"#26 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER"

By the way, don't run away from the Chinese property thread just because my link just shut down all you --------.

#28 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-22 01:13 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#27 ... Providing links for something that is self-evident is a waste of my time ...

Quite the contrary.

Providing such links should be quite easy.

So the question becomes, why is your current alias so afraid of proving such links?

#29 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-22 01:21 AM | Reply

@#28 ... By the way, don't run away from the Chinese property thread just because my link just shut down all you --------. ...

Huh?

if your current has an issue with something I post on a thread, please respond to my post on that thread.

imo, your current alias seems to be losing it.

#30 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-22 01:22 AM | Reply

" Really?

That's the best your current alias has got here?

Let me phrase that differently....

Why does your current alias seem to strive to attain the appellation of "Troll" that some on this most august site seem to ascribe to it?

#21 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER AT 2024-05-22 12:45 AM | FLAG: "

Lighten up, It was a joke.

#31 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-22 01:47 AM | Reply

@#31 ... Lighten up, It was a joke. ...

With the comments a current group of aliases seems to upchuck upon this most august site, sometimes ascertaining whether one particular comment is a joke or not has become difficult.


#32 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-22 02:03 AM | Reply

If someone shoots at the FBI, the FBI shoots back.

End of story.

#33 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-05-22 02:06 AM | Reply

And like cops, FBI agents are trained to "shoot to kill," not wound. AKA "deadly force."

#34 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2024-05-22 02:17 AM | Reply

"Biden has turned into political organization used to hunt down and prosecute his enemies."

If that's true, you should be able to point to at least one of Trump's remaining indictments you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

#35 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-22 03:40 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

"Biden admin authorized 'Use of Deadly Force' at Mar-a-Lago"

LOL ~ Against whom? The Secret Service? ~ LOL

#36 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-05-22 04:20 AM | Reply

Trump allies "falsely claiming?"
That's a new thing?
#16 | POSTED BY LAMPLIGHTER

False claims are a hallmark tradition for republicans.

#37 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-05-22 04:24 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"If that's true, you should be able to point to at least one of Trump's remaining indictments you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions.
#35 | POSTED BY DANFORTH"

Your logic is faulty. The question should be: what acts are his political friends able to get away with that his enemies are not (selective prosecution)? - and the answer is keeping classified records, which in the case of Pedophile Biden, were documents he had no right to possess EVER, were stored completely unsecured, and were shared with a ghostwriter for one of Pedophile Biden's books that NO ONE buys (according to his latest financial disclosures).

#38 | Posted by Claudio at 2024-05-22 05:27 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

Republicans are dangerous lying idiots

#39 | Posted by hamburglar at 2024-05-22 08:46 AM | Reply

Republicans are the most pathetic little snowflake dumb fkks I have ever seen. Standard operational procedures are a HUGE offense to them. They look deep and hard to find anything - anything that can offend them.

Alpine yodeling in a rock song? I'd never heard that before.
Used to dance to this in the clubs. I know it well! :)

#40 | Posted by YAV at 2024-05-22 08:56 AM | Reply

Oh, and creating a headline "Biden admin authorized" is such utter bullshht. I doubt it was "authorized" any more any any other operation is "authorized."

This is the most basic of operations and procedures. They'd have to go out of their way to get a waiver not to use standard procedures.

Did I say right-wingers are morons?

#41 | Posted by YAV at 2024-05-22 09:09 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Every warrant served by the FBI includes the review of deadly force protocol as SOP.

Frank Figliuzzi
@FrankFigliuzzi1

14h
Yep, every FBI operations order contains a reminder of FBI deadly force policy. Even for a search warrant. Deadly force is always authorized if the required threat presents itself.

#42 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-05-22 09:48 AM | Reply

If that's true, you should be able to point to at least one of Trump's remaining indictments you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions.

Ask Reality Winner what it's like to be an ordinary citizen when caught with classified documents.

If anything sh*tler is being given lots of preferential treatment because of who he is.

If he were anyone else he would have been taken into custody the day of the raid and would be sitting awaiting trial in a jail cell.

#43 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-05-22 09:52 AM | Reply

which Biden has turned into political organization

Post your proof.

So why hasn't Biden ordered the FBI to take sh*tler into custody and lock him up?

Why is the Biden DOJ and FBI allowing sh*tler to remain a free person AFTER being caught violating the terms of his bail in every single case?

Why are the "brown shirts" being so lenient to him?

#44 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-05-22 09:59 AM | Reply

Lighten up, It was a joke.

#31 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

No. You're the joke. And a boring one.

#45 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-05-22 10:08 AM | Reply

#1 Why does your current alias continue to assign opinions to me when I merely posted an article and made no comment. Please cite your proof to back up your post.

#4 | POSTED BY GRACIEAMAZED

So you merely post articles you don't believe in and support?

Sorry. It's not plausible deniability. You posted the damn thing. (Merely)

Which meant you wished everyone to know. (Merely)

Go back to the nooner where you are safe to merely post your hateful maga garbage and not need to back any of it up.

#46 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-05-22 10:41 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

" Your logic is faulty. "

My logic is impeccable. If Trump is being treated unfairly, you should be able to point to at least one charge you or I could do without fear of legal repercussions.

Instead of tap dancing, why not just state the truth?

#47 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-22 11:59 AM | Reply

When a warrant is being served, they all come heavy. Nothing special.

#48 | Posted by fresno500 at 2024-05-22 12:07 PM | Reply

Bee Eff Dee.

Of course, under the rules of the game Trumpf's mouthpieces warbled out at that SCOTUS session, Seal Team 6 could've shown up at that beachfront pile in Palm Beach (where lewzers go to live and die) on Biden's orders, deliberately snuffed everyone on site, and Biden would be immune from all negative consequences.

That's the way Trumpf sees it.

When it isn't Trumpf.
.

#49 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-05-22 12:33 PM | Reply

For those on the right who view this authorization of the use of deadly force as problematic - here is a right leaning source that goes into length explaining that this is routine:

www.nationalreview.com

#50 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-22 12:45 PM | Reply

#50 - nice to know that *some* sanity and reason, at least on the most blatantly obvious, still exists on the right.
And then there were the comments from the right-wingers that followed...

Oh my god.

#51 | Posted by YAV at 2024-05-22 01:28 PM | Reply

Bellringer, does it bother you that you are associated with trump and the "gop"?

#52 | Posted by YAV at 2024-05-22 02:30 PM | Reply

OK, so now this is utterly insane. Right-wing echo chamber is flat out calling this an assassination attempt on Trump. "Truth" Social is all over it, Bannon is promoting it as an assassination attempt, and of course the right-wing MAGAts (MTG, etc.) are all calling it an assassination attempt.

Holy shht, you right-wingers are fkkkinng NUT cases.

#53 | Posted by YAV at 2024-05-22 03:10 PM | Reply

It's standard operating procedure, you bloated drunken manatee.

#54 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-05-22 03:29 PM | Reply

" Bellringer, does it bother you that you are associated with trump and the "gop"?

#52 | POSTED BY YAV AT 2024-05-22 02:30 PM | REPLY | FLAG:"

No. Because I speak for myself. On this site I know I've made a good argument when it's followed by a litany of DR lefties responding with nothing but personal attacks.

#55 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-22 04:09 PM | Reply

"I speak for myself."

Who were you speaking for when you lied about the FEC concluding Trump had not committed an election violation?

#56 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-22 04:16 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

No. Because I speak for myself. On this site I know I've made a good argument when it's followed by a litany of DR lefties responding with nothing but personal attacks.

#55 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Well known liar thinks he is an independent thinker.

Well, I suppose you are speaking for yourself because you lie so much.

Jeff, seriously, you NEVER make a good argument.

Your arguments are REGULARLY torn apart.

Yet you shamelessly return with the same lies over and over and over and over and over and over and over.

You're a pathetic worm.

And remember jeff, no one here has the least bit of respect for you.

#57 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-22 04:40 PM | Reply

Twoothy is exhibit A.

#58 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-22 04:48 PM | Reply

Sorry jeff but you're simply not a good person. You do not deserve to be taken seriously with anything you post.

You may think I am an -------, I just might be, but I am not a lying piece of ---- like you. People respect me, they don't you.

sorry about that but,

Truth Hurts

#59 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-22 04:50 PM | Reply

FBI Was Prepared to Use deadly force at Mar-a-Lago Raid!!

Use deadly force: BIDEN GREEN-LIT FBI raid to go nuclear on Trump... Of course they did!

Cant Jail him or Bankrupt him.

"It's not fascism ....when we do it."

#60 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2024-05-22 04:59 PM | Reply

" FBI Was Prepared to Use deadly force at Mar-a-Lago Raid!!"

You mean just like every other raid?

If there was a difference in protocol, please link to proof.

#61 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-05-22 05:04 PM | Reply

Did Trump say it was wrong to do that?

#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-05-22 05:04 PM | Reply

So Sir Gracie posted another -------- article:
It must be a day ending in Y.

#63 | Posted by a_monson at 2024-05-22 05:46 PM | Reply

Did Trump say it was wrong to do that?

Oh he and the other MAGATs are screaming it was an FBI assassination attempt.

#64 | Posted by YAV at 2024-05-22 06:02 PM | Reply

------- loons.

#65 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-05-22 06:23 PM | Reply

Is there ever a time when FBI agents aren't authorized to use deadly force in the performance of their duties when circumstances necessitate it?

More importantly, why do Republicans hate the white-collar cops so much?
Rhetorical question. We know.

#66 | Posted by anton at 2024-05-22 07:23 PM | Reply

Who were you speaking for when you lied about the FEC concluding Trump had not committed an election violation?
#56 | POSTED BY DANFORTH

The bears are repeating.

Come on, JEFFY. You can admit that you were wrong. It's okay.

Swallow it.

#67 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-22 07:26 PM | Reply

Christopher Wray is the current FBI director. Trump appointed Wray to his current position. So, the argument coming from the MAGAts is that Biden convinced the FBI director, who was appointed by Trump, to assassinate Trump.

Let that sink in for a moment, MAGAts.

#68 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2024-05-22 07:28 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Biden convinced the FBI director, who was appointed by Trump, to assassinate Trump."

That's just how Deep the Deep State goes! /sarcasm

Trump has made a virtue out of being a huckster.
Think about the example that sets, as we traverse this age of unprecedented global crisis after unprecedented global crisis.

Every President makes unforced errors.
Trump is running on a platform of making as many as possible.

#69 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-05-22 07:39 PM | Reply

So Biden told the FBI to assassinate himself when he had them search his residence too?

Do you hyperventilating coozes ever tire of looking like poo flinging howler monkey fools?

#70 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-05-23 09:29 AM | Reply

This is not 'the Blue' - this is Biden's SS or Brown Shirts.

#22 | POSTED BY CLAUDIO

You can always tell the people whose familiarity with history is from pop culture references.

This guy is such an idiot.

#71 | Posted by jpw at 2024-05-23 11:10 AM | Reply

Isn't deadly force always authorized if necessary?

I wouldn't want to be the cop who was told to execute a raid, but to also not use deadly force because the people involved in the raid are considered protected.

#72 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-05-23 11:36 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Isn't deadly force always authorized if necessary?

Which is why Trump wasn't lying, they were locked and loaded, ready to kill.


I wouldn't want to be the cop who was told to execute a raid, but to also not use deadly force because the people involved in the raid are considered protected.

Which surprisingly doesn't make you wonder about the raid. Imagine raiding a facility with Secret Service agents protecting Trump. They were so concerned they had ambulances in the waiting.

Also its not boiler plate, as many would like you to believe it was edited by Garland DoJ..

So Biden told the FBI to assassinate himself when he had them search his residence too?

They didn't raid his residence. Are you paying attention?

#73 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-05-23 11:46 AM | Reply

"Biden convinced the FBI director, who was appointed by Trump, to assassinate Trump."

The FBI didn't want to go. They were hesitant and reluctant thought talking would be a better option.

But not to authoritarians, as Snoofy says show of force is a feature not a bug.

#74 | Posted by oneironaut at 2024-05-23 11:49 AM | Reply

#73 posted by IAMRUNT

Orc-loving -------, the smelly------------- was 1200 miles away from Mara Pedo during the search.

#75 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2024-05-23 11:49 AM | Reply

Fact Check: Did FBI Plan Donald Trump's 'Assassination?'
www.newsweek.com

... MAGA Donald Trump supporters have rallied behind the former president after he released FBI paperwork, connected to its search of his Mar-a-Lago residence, showing agents were permitted to use "deadly force."

On Tuesday, Trump shared on his social media platform Truth Social the information revealed by an unsealed search warrant in his classified documents case which said that federal agents were prepared to use "deadly force" when executing the raid of his Florida resort.

After the news broke, former Trump strategist Steve Bannon and Trump ally Mike Davis discussed what they called an "assassination" plot by the bureau. ...

There is no evidence that the FBI search of the Mar-a-Lago was part of an "attempted assassination" on Trump.

The story comes from the release of a recent court filing connected to the search of Mar-a-Lago in August 2022. An unsealed search warrant in that case revealed that federal agents were prepared to use "deadly force" when executing the raid of his Florida resort.

An "operations order" of the 9 a.m. raid that was produced in discovery contained a "policy statement" regarding the "use of deadly force," which said in part: "Law enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force when necessary."

A contingencies plan was also created in cohesion with the raid, showing that a paramedic should be at the scene in case someone is injured. The name of the nearest local trauma center, complete with an address and a phone number, was included on the same form.

However, the use of deadly force is standard FBI procedure as per the bureau's online resources that state "FBI special agents may use deadly force only when necessary"when the agent has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the agent or another person.

"If feasible, a verbal warning to submit to the authority of the special agent is given prior to the use of deadly force."

An FBI spokesperson sent Newsweek a statement issued in response to claims about the search warrant that said: "The FBI followed standard protocol in this search as we do for all search warrants, which includes a standard policy statement limiting the use of deadly force.

"No one ordered additional steps to be taken and there was no departure from the norm in this matter." ...

Retired FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi wrote on X in response to the "deadly force" comments "Yep, every FBI operations order contains a reminder of FBI deadly force policy. Even for a search warrant. Deadly force is always authorized if the required threat presents itself."

As noted in a recent report by Axios, former FBI Assistant Director in Charge Steven D'Antuono told Congress last year that the Secret Service interacted with the FBI to make sure it could get into Mar-a-Lago "with no issues," saying "it wasn't even a show of force."

Newsweek has contacted a representative for Steve Bannon via email for comment. ...

False.

There was no "assassination attempt" on Donald Trump by the FBI. The use of "deadly force" as contained in now unsealed search warrant documents is boiler-plate procedural text used by the bureau. ...


#76 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-23 12:36 PM | Reply

the master of distraction is back at it again. instead of discussing his further theft of classified documents the conversation surrounds the patently absurd notion of assassination.

------- Americans are stupid.

#77 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-23 01:16 PM | Reply

"The FBI didn't want to go. They were hesitant and reluctant thought talking would be a better option."

Just trolling amirite?

They tried the talking option for over a year and Trumpy lied obstructed and tried to destroy evidence. The FBI had to go in because they knew Trumpy was lying (isn't he always?) and they made the decision along with the justice Dept at the request of NARA.

No one other than Trumpy forced them to raid merdo Lago to recover US govt property from private citizen Trumpy.

#78 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-05-23 01:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

For those on the right who view this authorization of the use of deadly force as problematic - here is a right leaning source that goes into length explaining that this is routine:

www.nationalreview.com

#50 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-05-22 12:45 PM | Reply | Flag:

The question that begs an answer is; was the same type of "routine" suthorizations issued when they had to go get classified docs from Biden's garage and at the Penn office?

Is a search warrant executed for a president/former president's home "routine"?

#79 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2024-05-23 02:27 PM | Reply

"The question that begs an answer is; was the same type of "routine" suthorizations issued when they had to go get classified docs from Biden's garage and at the Penn office?"

YES. That's already been answered on here with links by several people.

Trump is a liar. The "deadly force" is SOP.

#80 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2024-05-23 02:29 PM | Reply

The question that begs an answer is; was the same type of "routine" suthorizations issued when they had to go get classified docs from Biden's garage and at the Penn office?
Is a search warrant executed for a president/former president's home "routine"?

#79 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

YES. That's already been answered on here with links by several people.
Trump is a liar. The "deadly force" is SOP.

#80 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

LFTHANDTuRDS doesn't read the news.

But its funny to see his Gotcha question turned around on him.

#81 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-05-23 02:35 PM | Reply

-------- can't read.

#82 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-05-23 08:08 PM | Reply

@#79 ... The question that begs an answer is; ...

Why does that question beg an answer?

It has already been answered.

Do try to keep up.



#83 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-23 08:44 PM | Reply

#76

I work in this weird compound, most of the people here would think it's weird anyways...there are signs every hundred feet or so on the fence surrounding the compound stating that the "Use of Deadly Force is Authorized."

I don't think deadly force has ever been used by against anyone in the vicinity of my office. But it is authorized if it becomes necessary.

#84 | Posted by madbomber at 2024-05-24 03:53 AM | Reply

#84 - that's the entire state of Florida.

#85 | Posted by YAV at 2024-05-24 12:25 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort