Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, January 05, 2026

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Monday that the Pentagon had begun a process to demote Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona and cut his retirement pay over a video in which Kelly, a retired Navy captain, called on service members to "refuse illegal orders."

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

The Department of Defense will seek to demote Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a retired Navy captain, as punishment for reminding troops in a video last year that they are obligated to refuse illegal orders. www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/ ...

[image or embed]

-- Marc Elias (@marcelias.bsky.social) Jan 5, 2026 at 2:45 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Hegseth is a pu--y, like his boss.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2026-01-05 12:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

When push comes to shove, there is, unfortunately, really no particular reason in light of the Trump purge to believe the US military will support the Constitution.

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-01-05 01:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

I think the Maduro kidnapping shows quite clearly that we should have zero faith that the military will resist illegal orders.

They will go along with anything they're told to do, and we need to be ready for that when they start patrolling our streets.

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2026-01-05 02:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" I think the Maduro kidnapping shows quite clearly that we should have zero faith that the military will resist illegal orders."

Faulty premise. This wasn't illegal.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-01-05 02:18 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

think the Maduro kidnapping shows quite clearly that we should have zero faith that the military will resist illegal orders."
Faulty premise. This wasn't illegal.

Posted by BellRinger at 2026-01-05 02:18 PM | Reply

It absolutely is illegal. Sadly we won't be punished for it.

#5 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-01-05 02:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Faulty premise. This wasn't illegal.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger

Sure thing, ballwasher.

You pathetic hack.

#6 | Posted by jpw at 2026-01-05 02:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"This wasn't illegal."

You're soaking wet from all that water you're sloshing around.

#7 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-01-05 02:42 PM | Reply

"As a retired Navy Captain who is still receiving a military pension, Captain Kelly knows he is still accountable to military justice," Hegseth bleated.

~Kegsbreath never made it passed US Army Major and he commands Flag Officers. Those Generals and Admirals know he is an incompetent buffoon and a drunkard way above his head, like Kashyap Pramod Vinod Patel as D/FBI.

~Kegsbreath should know that US military personnel don't receive "pensions," we receive "military retirement pay." This distinction was taught to us on Day One. We are not union workers or civil servants.

~If this malice from Hellbreath succeeds after the 30-day rebuttal process, this will be just another reparation the next Democratic administration will address. Senator Kelley's former rank would be restored and he would receive the lost retirement pay retroactively. Last century I witnessed an officer receive TWO back-to-back promotions in one day over an injustice that was finally remedied years afterwards.

Senator Kelley's words and actions are a mere trifle compared to what former officers and enlisted personnel did to protest the Vietnam War. Just ask former USN Seal/USSECSTATE John Kerry.



#8 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-01-05 03:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

A drunk misogynist racist who spilled state secrets over the phone and paid off a rape victim for her silence is in charge of the world's most powerful military and ordering defenseless smugglers on boats killed, abducted a couple from another country, is persecuting a decorated astronaut who is taking care of his invalid wife because she was shot in the head years ago by a Republican gun nut.

This is the world we live in now: Bizarro World


#9 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-01-05 04:19 PM | Reply

Hegseth is an incompetent fox news bobble head. Drunken sexual abusing man-child.

#10 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-05 04:47 PM | Reply

People need to start ending up in the morgue.

#11 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-01-05 07:18 PM | Reply

FTA: Kelly added that Hegseth "wants to send the message to every single retired servicemember that if they say something he or Donald Trump doesn't like, they will come after them the same way," calling it "outrageous" and "wrong."

According to Republicans, it is Necessary and Proper.

How long untill veterans who protest the invasion and protest Trump get sent rounded up and sent to camps?

#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-05 07:19 PM | Reply

#4

Why are you still here? You've been outed as nothing more but a cock-gargling MAGAT ---- that lies every time your fat little fingers slop grease all over your keyboard.
---- off, you pathetic cowardly whore.

#13 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-01-05 07:20 PM | Reply

Faulty premise. This wasn't illegal.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-01-05 02:18 PM | Reply

I see Bell didn't learn a thing. Surprise!

#14 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-05 07:22 PM | Reply

This wasn't illegal.

Neither was the Nazi invasion of Poland.

#15 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-01-05 07:27 PM | Reply

So is it retired officers that are denied first amendment rights or is it officers and enlisted that can war for democratic rights but don't have them at home?

#16 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-01-06 12:00 AM | Reply

They were talking about reinstating Kelly to active duty so they could prosecute him. What Kelly stated along with the others was not resurrection material. It was right out of the UCMJ, which all military members are under. As a retiree, he's not subject to these illegal actions and it is doubtful it would hold up in court. This is Hegseth being an arse and trying to get revenge for what he didn't want out in public eye.

#17 | Posted by BBQ at 2026-01-06 04:34 AM | Reply

BBQ

"They were talking about reinstating Kelly to active duty so they could prosecute him."

JAG probably told Hegseth that he didn't have a case.

#18 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-01-06 04:49 AM | Reply

Mark Kelly's reelection campaign folks should thank their mega fundraiser: Pickled Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Warrrrrr. (Reality hint: Still officially the Department of Defense. Eat it up, MAGAts.)

#19 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-01-06 05:42 AM | Reply

If anyone in America earned the right to stand tall and express himself forthrightly, it is someone who served for many years and retired.

#20 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-01-06 07:55 AM | Reply

What exactly did Kelly say that wasn't true?

Don't follow illegal orders is an absolutely true and factual statement that the military is aware of. Isn't he just re-emphasizing it, and as former military, I think he has the right.

And no, I don't think the Maduro capture was illegal. It may not be prudent - but it's not illeagl IMO. There's precedent for this.

#21 | Posted by brass30 at 2026-01-06 08:21 AM | Reply

Is anyone going to capture tRump?

#22 | Posted by YAV at 2026-01-06 09:57 AM | Reply

"JAG probably told Hegseth that he didn't have a case."

I'm not an insider on this, but I don't think Hegseth can even demote him.

All officer promotions must be approved by congress. Even lower ranking officer promotions. My promotion to O-5 was held up in 2018 because congress was not in session due to a government shutdown.

I find it hard to believe that demotions, especially in circumstances like this, would not require some sort of oversight. Any lawyer can easily point out that Kelly did not violate the UCMJ or US law.

#23 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:04 AM | Reply

"It absolutely is illegal. Sadly we won't be punished for it."

Is it more illegal than going after Noriega, or Saddam, or Khaddafi?

Would you consider it illegal if a Ukrainian strike team went into Russia and bagged Putin?

#24 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:08 AM | Reply

Y'all think that norms and laws apply?

We're living the nightmare the right always claimed they thought the government was and would be compliments of the right's chosen POTUS.

Laws and norms mean nothing in the face of personal retribution and revenge.

#25 | Posted by jpw at 2026-01-06 10:11 AM | Reply

"Is it more illegal than going after Noriega, or Saddam, or Khaddafi?"

Yes.

#26 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 10:25 AM | Reply

"I find it hard to believe that demotions, especially in circumstances like this, would not require some sort of oversight."

Why?

Invading Venezuela and kidnapping Maduro and his wife didn't require any sort of oversight.

#27 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 10:27 AM | Reply

If we had a real Supreme Court Hegseth couldn't get away with this but with the court we have today the Constitution is "just a piece of paper."

#28 | Posted by danni at 2026-01-06 10:29 AM | Reply

"Is it more illegal than going after Noriega, or Saddam, or Khaddafi?"

We had a coalition and congressional and/or NATO approval for those attacks.

Madbomber is high on drugs.

#29 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-06 10:30 AM | Reply

"Is it more illegal than going after Noriega, or Saddam, or Khaddafi?"

Yes. It was all based on lies. I mean they actually labeled fentanyl a WMD for Christ sake. Narco terrorism" is just another made up term for justification of their refusal to following international laws and norms. And shipwrecking and killing sailors in distress on the open seas after they bombed their vessels is inhumane disgusting and against maritime law. And now he is blatantly planning on stealing their oil and other natural resources?

So yes. Even more illegal than those previous illegal actions by our government.

#30 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-06 10:33 AM | Reply

"Yes."

Under what statutes?

#31 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:34 AM | Reply

"Why? Invading Venezuela and kidnapping Maduro and his wife didn't require any sort of oversight."

Fair.

It could be that congress has ceded those authorities to someone else as well.

#32 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:36 AM | Reply

"It could be"

Brave stand you've taken, as usual.

#33 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 10:37 AM | Reply

"If we had a real Supreme Court Hegseth couldn't get away with this but with the court we have today the Constitution is "just a piece of paper."

The Supreme Court is a few echelons down the road. The problem is with congress.

#34 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:38 AM | Reply

The problem is with congress.
#34 | Posted by madbomber

More accurately,

The problem is the Republican Party, who holds all three branches of government.

#35 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 10:41 AM | Reply

More accurately, the problem is with almost half the American people.

#36 | Posted by YAV at 2026-01-06 10:45 AM | Reply

"We had a coalition and congressional and/or NATO approval for those attacks."

I don't think there was a coalition for Panama. And congress was not notified of the attacks on bin Laden and or/other individuals who had been designated as terrorists.

The big difference is that attacks on Islamic terrorists took place under the auspices of the 2001 AUMF, which was authorized by congress and granted the president the authority to conduct operations without notifying congress. I don't think the AUMF applies here since this was, on paper, an LE operation.

#37 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:53 AM | Reply

"Brave stand you've taken, as usual."

You have no idea what stand I've taken. And it wouldn't matter one way or another.

#38 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:54 AM | Reply

Congress had approval for Obama's Bin laden Kill.

You should know this stuff, which is why i suspect you're high right now.

#39 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-06 10:54 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which Congress passed after September 11, 2001, attacks.

#40 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-06 10:55 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"More accurately, the problem is with almost half the American people."

I think the polling suggests about 30% of the US population supports the operation to capture Maduro.

And this is the period where the nation is usually experiencing euphoria. The blowback from this has yet to be seen, but from my vantage point this thing has the potential to be the dumpster fire of all dumpster fires.

#41 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:56 AM | Reply

"Congress had approval for Obama's Bin laden Kill."

You didn't read #37, did you.

#42 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:57 AM | Reply

Your "both sides" posts are crap. Shame on you, you should know better.

#43 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-06 10:57 AM | Reply

And I looked it up. Trump is using AUMF as the justification for why he did not notify congress.

#44 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:58 AM | Reply

"Your "both sides" posts are crap. Shame on you, you should know better."

Objectivity is crap and I should be ashamed of it?

Should I just let you tell me how to think?

#45 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:58 AM | Reply

Yeah, I read it.

The big difference is that attacks on Islamic terrorists took place under the auspices of the 2001 AUMF, which was authorized by congress and granted the president the authority to conduct operations without notifying congress. I don't think the AUMF applies here since this was, on paper, an LE operation.

#37 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 10:53 AM | Reply | Flag:

Which makes this post make no sense at all:

Is it more illegal than going after Noriega, or Saddam, or Khaddafi?

You clearly answered your own question, so what was the point of asking that?

#46 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-06 10:59 AM | Reply

Objectivity is crap and I should be ashamed of it?

No, posting out of both sides of your mouth us crap.

#47 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-06 11:00 AM | Reply

Bueller? Bueller?

#48 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-06 11:05 AM | Reply

The blowback from this has yet to be seen, but from my vantage point this thing has the potential to be the dumpster fire of all dumpster fires.

#41 | Posted by madbomber

I keep asking the people I know who support this if they'll still want to take credit for it when civil war/strife breaks out as the power vacuum is filled.

Have yet to receive a positive answer to that...or even any answer, for that matter.

It's Iraq but on a stripped down, accelerated timeline. Trump's press conference was already the "Mission Accomplished" debacle and that was the day of.

#49 | Posted by jpw at 2026-01-06 11:12 AM | Reply

And I looked it up. Trump is using AUMF as the justification for why he did not notify congress.

#44 | Posted by madbomber

So, basically, they're throwing buckets of s*&^ against the wall hoping something sticks?

#50 | Posted by jpw at 2026-01-06 11:13 AM | Reply

"You clearly answered your own question, so what was the point of asking that?"

Technically, I didn't answer my own question. I went and looked up AUMF after the fact, and it is the justification the Trump admin is using as to why they did not notify congress.

#51 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 11:23 AM | Reply

Actually they've created language to use to try and make using the AUMF at least semi-believable for some. The AUMF does not apply. Read it.

#52 | Posted by YAV at 2026-01-06 11:38 AM | Reply

-Bueller? Bueller?

Calm down, little fella.

-I keep asking the people I know who support this if they'll still want to take credit for it when civil war/strife breaks out as the power vacuum is filled.

You need to stop having these kinds of conversations with people other than here.

Or.....stop lying about having such conversations.

Because if you're actually having them in person or directly with folks who know who you, then you're likely getting your ass kicked every day or at the very least, being threatened. Especially if you're approaching them with even 5% of the hostility you display here.

#53 | Posted by eberly at 2026-01-06 11:40 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

the AUMF has been used to allow military deployment in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Georgia, Yemen, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Iraq, and Somalia.[10] The 2001 AUMF has enabled the US president to unilaterally launch military operations across the world without any congressional oversight or transparency for more than two decades. Between 2018 and 2020 alone, US forces initiated what it labelled "counter-terror" activities in 85 countries. Of these, the 2001 AUMF has been used to launch classified military campaigns in at least 22 countries.[11][12]

en.wikipedia.org

#54 | Posted by eberly at 2026-01-06 11:49 AM | Reply

I went and looked up AUMF after the fact, and it is the justification the Trump admin is using as to why they did not notify congress.
#51 | Posted by madbomber

And you believed them?

Or is believing things a threat to your objectivity.

#55 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 11:49 AM | Reply

I don't think the AUMF applies here since this was, on paper, an LE operation.
#37 | Posted by madbomber

You still think that?

#56 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 11:50 AM | Reply

Of these, the 2001 AUMF has been used to launch classified military campaigns in at least 22 countries.
#54 | Posted by eberly

Relevance?
This was a DEA warrant being served.

#57 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 11:51 AM | Reply

You still think that?

LMAO!

This'll be good.

#58 | Posted by YAV at 2026-01-06 11:52 AM | Reply

"I think the polling suggests about 30% of the US population supports the operation to capture Maduro."

30% of Americans are maga lunatics.

It's definitely a dumpster fire.

This fire is so big all we can do is try and contain it.. it will have to burn itself out.

The mid terms are the way out of this ---------. But will America take the exit?

Time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the Great American FAFO. It's going so well!

#59 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-06 11:53 AM | Reply

Trump will launch a seizure of Greenland to distract everyone from this clusterfcck.

#60 | Posted by YAV at 2026-01-06 11:54 AM | Reply

-I don't think the AUMF applies here since this was, on paper, an LE operation.

Everyone agrees with this but it won't stop them from crying like the ------- they are.

I think it shouldn't apply here as well.....but it's been pointed out that it's been inappropriately used many times since its inception.

#61 | Posted by eberly at 2026-01-06 11:55 AM | Reply

"but it's been pointed out that it's been inappropriately used many times since its inception."

I missed that part.
Which non terror groups did we target?

#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 11:58 AM | Reply

Because if you're actually having them in person or directly with folks who know who you, then you're likely getting your ass kicked every day or at the very least, being threatened. Especially if you're approaching them with even 5% of the hostility you display here.
#53 | Posted by eberly

I've said multiple times that me here is persona because this place stopped being a serious, decent place for conversation a long time ago.

You're a fool if you think behavior here is indicative of real life in any way, shape or form.

#63 | Posted by jpw at 2026-01-06 11:59 AM | Reply

I don't think the AUMF applies here since this was, on paper, an LE operation.

#37 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

A law enforcement operation?

Enforcement of OUR laws INSIDE of another sovereign country against a citizen of that country??

How does that make any sense?

#64 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-06 12:03 PM | Reply

Especially if you're approaching them with even 5% of the hostility you display here.
#53 | Posted by eberly

Cute.

Now do Fishpoo and lefthanturds and vistard.

#65 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-06 12:04 PM | Reply

-You're a fool if you think behavior here is indicative of real life in any way, shape or form.

Fair enough.

#66 | Posted by eberly at 2026-01-06 12:06 PM | Reply

-Now do Fishpoo and lefthanturds and vistard.

Perhaps I've missed it but I didn't think they disclosed they are talking to others in real life about these issues as JPW had indicated.

Do you?

#67 | Posted by eberly at 2026-01-06 12:07 PM | Reply

"I keep asking the people I know who support this if they'll still want to take credit for it when civil war/strife breaks out as the power vacuum is filled."

That's a pretty obvious question.

My question would be, what happens when Delcy Rodriguez or Vladimir Padrino requests the Russians or Chinese move a couple of divisions into Venezuela to defend their sovereignty. I wonder if Trump would still claim to be in charge under those circumstances.

And honestly, unless the US has flipped some high-level Venezuelan government officials, I would expect this. Not sure if anyone saw Stephen Miller's speech with Jake Tapper, about how we live in a world that is governed by strength, force, and power.

You don't think the rest of the world heard the same speech I did?

This idiot, BTW, makes Dimitry Peskov sound articulate.

#68 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 12:16 PM | Reply

You have no idea what stand I've taken.
#38 | Posted by madbomber

Neither do you.

#69 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 12:19 PM | Reply

So... basically stating the Law is now a punishable offense?

1984 is definitely here, and Herr Miller is it's public face.

#70 | Posted by Corky at 2026-01-06 12:23 PM | Reply

That's a pretty obvious question.

Of course, it is. Made all the more obvious by the obvious lack of planning, thought or considerations of this action and the consequences by the administration.

I considered whether this could lead to introduction of Russian/Chinese troops to the Western Hemisphere but didn't think they'd be foolish enough to be that blunt. I figured weapons and money would simply flow to allow this proxy war to drain and distract the US.

The US's retreat is basically opening the rest of the world to Russian/Chinese dominance. Why would they waste significant resources on Venezuela when they can basically isolate the US in our regional sphere of influence and split the rest?

Trump has basically, it seems, turned us into what Russia was following the Ukraine invasion. Probably intentionally, although he didn't know that that is what Putin was aiming for when he manipulated Trump into doing this.

Not sure if anyone saw Stephen Miller's speech with Jake Tapper, about how we live in a world that is governed by strength, force, and power.

I saw him slurring his way through the word superpower a few times while being fauxraged about something. And yes, I have no doubt Russia and China looked on gleefully while that heavy lidded eyed creeper impotently raged at the camera.

#71 | Posted by jpw at 2026-01-06 12:37 PM | Reply

The US's retreat is basically opening the rest of the world to Russian/Chinese dominance.
#71 | Posted by jpw

It is vital to remember, the US retreat from the global stage is what Republicans wanted.

NATO was too expensive.
Being the world's policeman was too expensive.
Somehow, policing Venezuela isn't too expensive, but they don't address that.

Republicans want foreign students to stop coming to American universities.
Republicans want foreign tourists to stop coming to American attractions.
Republicans want America to be a --------- nation in the eyes of foreigners.

#72 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 12:41 PM | Reply

" So... basically stating the Law is now a punishable offense?

The first question should be if they'd prosecute him for telling soldiers to Go Ahead and Follow Illegal Orders.

When they answer yes, turn to the judge and ask for a dismissal.

#73 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-01-06 12:52 PM | Reply

"And yes, I have no doubt Russia and China looked on gleefully while that heavy lidded eyed creeper impotently raged at the camera."

I think it goes beyond that. It sent a message to everyone, include allies, close allies like Poland and South Korea. Not to mention peripheral allies like Saudi Arabia.

Nuclear proliferation in the west has been kept in check under the notion that it was not necessary. That the US would provide that capability.

I wonder what the Germans are thinking right now about Miller's speech?

#74 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 12:57 PM | Reply

#72

You forgot to add in something about trans rights, abortion, racism, and income inequality.

Please do better next time.

#75 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 12:58 PM | Reply

"The first question should be if they'd prosecute him for telling soldiers to Go Ahead and Follow Illegal Orders."

Kelly was just reiterating what was in the LOAC courses I was required to complete each year while on active duty.

Apparently, those courses were discontinued in the 1st trump admin.

#76 | Posted by madbomber at 2026-01-06 12:59 PM | Reply

@#76 ... Kelly was just reiterating what was in the LOAC courses I was required to complete each year while on active duty.

Apparently, those courses were discontinued in the 1st trump admin. ...

The following is along the lines of what I have been hearing ...

nevadacurrent.com

... U.S. service members take an oath to uphold the Constitution. In addition, under Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the U.S. Manual for Courts-Martial, service members must obey lawful orders and disobey unlawful orders. Unlawful orders are those that clearly violate the U.S. Constitution, international human rights standards or the Geneva Conventions.

Service members who follow an illegal order can be held liable and court-martialed or subject to prosecution by international tribunals. Following orders from a superior is no defense. ...


- and -

www.justsecurity.org

... There are potentially severe penalties for disobeying lawful orders. A disobedient soldier might simply be "chewed out" or given nonjudicial punishment if the commander considers the disobedience a minor offense. But disobedience of a lawful order can, depending on the circumstances, lead to the death penalty in time of war and in peacetime to confinement for up to five years, a stigmatizing punitive discharge (dishonorable or bad-conduct for enlisted personnel, dismissal for commissioned officers), loss of pay, and other sanctions.

Only lawful orders have to be followed.

This is what the Manual for Courts-Martial says about the lawfulness of orders: ...


#77 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-06 01:21 PM | Reply

Not sure if anyone saw Stephen Miller's speech with Jake Tapper, about how we live in a world that is governed by strength, force, and power.
#68 | Posted by madbomber

Pee Wee German trying his level best to signal the end of Pax Americana.

#78 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 02:32 PM | Reply

Is anyone going to capture tRump?

""""

Good question, Regime change starts at home.

#79 | Posted by a_monson at 2026-01-06 05:24 PM | Reply

Imaging thinking that micromanaging one veteran's pension is the type of work the United States Secretary of War should be doing.

Republican Veterans, we should cut the benefits of every Veteran who dared speak against Trump, right?

#80 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-06 05:29 PM | Reply

Secretary of American Fascism...says what? Do they really want to face Mark Kelly in the coming 2028 Presidential elections?

#81 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-01-07 06:59 AM | Reply

'''interesting development.

#82 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-01-07 07:12 AM | Reply

^^^

#83 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-01-07 07:14 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort