Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, July 27, 2026

As early as October 2024, New Jersey lawmakers heard that some noncitizens were registering to vote through state Motor Vehicle Commission offices. The issue, county election officials said at a public hearing, appeared to be tied to the state "motor-voter" system, which can add residents to votor rolls when they do vehicle-related transactions. The commission offices' computer system asked in English whether users were U.S. citizens and eligible to cast ballots, and some people did not appear to speak or read the language well.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

It's amazing how that thing we are told doesn't happen manages to happen.

#1 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-27 12:28 PM | Reply

"yearlong software glitch"

#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-27 12:33 PM | Reply

#2 which the software company is denying.

#3 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-27 12:40 PM | Reply

At an April 15 budget hearing, the topic of potential voter fraud came up, and Assemblyman Brian Rumpf (R-Ocean) suggested that New Jersey could improve upon matching signatures to verify a voter's identity.

Typical Republican response. Typical because it wouldn't fix the problem, but would introduce new problems, and disenfranchise legitimate voters.

Matching signatures would simply confirm the improperly registered voter is indeed the improperly registered voter. It wouldn't stop them from voting.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-27 12:44 PM | Reply

So, iow, a minor issue arose in a very complicated system and was resolved.

You're right we SHOULD appoint Piggy Dictator for Life. that is the only logical conclusion to draw.

#5 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-07-27 12:51 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

It's a Democrat run state and Snoofy is trying to fault the GOP.

#6 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-27 12:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#5. That makes no sense.

I wonder how much this is happening in other states.

#7 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-27 12:57 PM | Reply

Republicans have always been afraid of voters; the People, which is why they under-fund education and healthcare, and overfund the billionaires and corporations that they serve instead.

Right now they are running scared, though, as at least 1 out of 5 of their own voters aren't going to support them this year.

Can you say, Blue Wave?

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-27 12:57 PM | Reply

Corky is calling illegal aliens voters now.

#9 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-27 01:04 PM | Reply

@#5 ... So, iow, a minor issue arose in a very complicated system and was resolved. ...

Not only was it resolved, the state was very transparent about the issue from the time the issue was discovered until it was resolved.


#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-07-27 01:05 PM | Reply

I wonder how much this is happening in other states.

#7 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Oh I bet you do. I bet you think it's happening everywhere. It must be true. Right? People don't want to believe that someone would fabricate something so outrageous.

Especially Americans.

So..

Mission Accomplished

#11 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-07-27 01:44 PM | Reply

The State is doing an Independent Investigation now, but TrumpyBelle already knows that the infidel illegals are, "EATING ALL THE CATS!" in New Jersey.

How Cultish of him.

#12 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-27 01:45 PM | Reply

Just a bit of perspective, 6,000 out of 9.5 million is 0.06315789473684211% of the population.

#13 | Posted by qcp at 2026-07-27 01:50 PM | Reply

"The State is doing an Independent Investigation now"

On 6,600? I'll take the under.

Usually, the result is more like this:
www.fox13now.com

#14 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-27 01:51 PM | Reply

At least there was no fraud involved.

#15 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-07-27 01:56 PM | Reply

Can you say, Blue Wave?
#8 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-27 12:57 PM | Reply | Flag

LMAO... No... Over half of the DNC is fighting with the Democrat Socialists of America.

#16 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 02:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Just a bit of perspective, 6,000 out of 9.5 million is 0.06315789473684211% of the population.

#13 | Posted by qcp

And again, issue caught and addressed

And these people only registered incorrectly very likely clicking a button wihout thinking about it

So, enough of a problem to do away with democracy

#17 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-07-27 02:15 PM | Reply

I see that LHT has his Red Whine on... good luck with that; perhaps when the Oligarchs get a final win, they'll take pity on you...... BWAHAHAAHA!

#18 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-27 02:26 PM | Reply

#2 which the software company is denying.

#3 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-27 12:40 PM | Reply | Flag:

And rightly so, they were never supposed to verify the voting registration, simply record the ones who registered at the DMV and pass that along to the proper county/state offices.

A very weak argument for NJ to use.

#19 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 04:36 PM | Reply

---- you losers. All of you MAGAT whores can ---- the hell right off.

#20 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-07-27 05:39 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Statistically insignificant and the State dealt with it appropriately.
More outrage, signifying nothing. As usual.

#21 | Posted by morris at 2026-07-27 06:30 PM | Reply

#13 | POSTED BY QCP
#21 | POSTED BY MORRIS

The Four Stages of Dismissal

First stage: The idea or threat does not exist at all.
Second stage: It exists, but it is not significant or harmful.
Third stage: It is significant, but its damage is completely acceptable. <-- WE HAVE MOVED TO HERE...
Fourth stage: It is so important that we knew it all along.

#22 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-27 08:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

You're nothing but a stupid ------- ----. ---- off bitch.

#23 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-07-27 09:17 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#22 | Posted by oneironaut

100 %

#24 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-07-27 09:20 PM | Reply

Over 400 of these noncitizens have voted since 2023.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-27 10:23 PM | Reply

And rightly so, they were never supposed to verify the voting registration, simply record the ones who registered at the DMV and pass that along to the proper county/state offices.
A very weak argument for NJ to use.

#19 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I agree it's weak. Sounds like more of a State of New Jersey process error than a computer error. I think NJ is saying, the screens should have been in other languages, and the people clicked the wrong thing because their English isn't very good. But that doesn't address how they got registered to vote.

Best thing for the State would be if the vendor was supposed to be determining eligibility status. The State Department can outsource that function, as Florida famously did in 2009 to a Georgia company, to avoid discovery under Florida law.

#26 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-27 11:01 PM | Reply

Over 400 of these noncitizens have voted since 2023.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger

If its a software glitch, ID won't fix it. Proof of Citizenship won't fix it.

Vender ------ up. The noncitizens were truthful.

Wait, do you know how software works? Or do I need to break out the crayons?

"But if there were some kind of national requirement to document citizenship before registering, it would still require a system that collected and stored that data in a proper way, so that wouldn't have affected this at all."

#27 | Posted by Sycophant at 2026-07-27 11:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Over 400 of these noncitizens have voted since 2023.

That would be 0.16% of the popular vote differential in 2024.

#28 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-07-28 12:06 AM | Reply

That would be 0.16% of the popular vote differential in 2024.

#28 | POSTED BY REDIAL AT 2026-07-28 12:06 AM | REPLY | FLAG

We're talking about one state here. New Jersey

#29 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-28 12:29 AM | Reply

We're talking about one state here. New Jersey

I know.

#30 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-07-28 12:35 AM | Reply

Over 400 of these noncitizens have voted since 2023

400! All in the same election in the same town, city or province!?

The can easily take over a group of 399!

Trump did win in 2020!

BullBringer has cracked the case of Encyclopedia Brown and the Bewildered Orange Man.

#31 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-07-28 05:29 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

That would be 0.16% of the popular vote differential in 2024.

#28 | POSTED BY REDIAL AT 2026-07-28 12:06 AM | REPLY | FLAG

We're talking about one state here. New Jersey

#29 | Posted by lfthndthrds

So, if we're rounding that's 2/10's of a percent. What is the affect on the New Jersey electoral vote count? More granular, what is the affect spread across the state (2 senate votes) and each of it's congressional districts (12)? If we go further down this fantasy rabbit hole, "one state," what is the affect across the 538 electoral votes nation wide? The questions are central to the legal, "affects the outcome," standard.

Get to work. Report back.

Or STFU because the non-citizen vote BS is meaningless except as a talking point to stir up idiots.

No need to raise your hand.

#32 | Posted by et_al at 2026-07-28 06:33 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Of course, the maga idiots will fill in the massive gap between this and "illegals vote in our elections" without any other shred of evidence or information.

Thats why Trump is so compelling to those morons. Most of what they think Trump is saying is a figment of their imagination filled with their wishful thinking.

Problem is they refuse to listen when told this and get all butthurt when they're rightfully called stupid for doing so.

#33 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 07:38 AM | Reply

Get to work. Report back.
Or STFU because the non-citizen vote BS is meaningless except as a talking point to stir up idiots.

#32 | Posted by et_al at 2026-07-28 06:33 AM | Reply | Flag:

The funny thing with idiots like you is, you refuse reconcile the fact that most on the left have no issue with non-citizens voting in our elections. So, making a big deal of it would definitely rattle your cage. If you didn't want the non-citizen vote, you'd be the one STFU and moving along.

#34 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-28 10:17 AM | Reply

" Vender ------ up"

You know this how, exactly?

" 32 | POSTED BY ET_AL AT 2026-07-28 06:33 AM | FLAG: "

So you are dismissing this because the number of noncitizens who have been shown to vote are too low in your book. So, what is your threshold then? Do you have one? Does a number odor percentage exist where you say, "Okay, this is a real problem."

#35 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-28 10:20 AM | Reply

#34 lol he mops the floor with you and all you've got in response is strawmen and bulls*^%.

#36 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 10:37 AM | Reply

So you are dismissing this because the number of noncitizens who have been shown to vote

Took only two f*^%ing posts for this pedo protecting terard to do exactly what I said they would do ...

#37 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 10:38 AM | Reply

you refuse reconcile the fact that most on the left have no issue with non-citizens voting in our elections.
#34 | Posted by lfthndthrds

^
Now you're just making stuff up. But it's also a "tell."

Here's how. You have an issue with non-citizens merely existing in our country.
And since you can't figure out why we don't take umbrage to non-citizens existing in our country:
You went ahead and penciled in that we must also be okay with legal immigrants voting illegally.

#38 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-28 10:42 AM | Reply

What is your threshold, JPW?

Do you have one?

In 2000 we had a presidential election decided by 527 votes. We've seen congressional races closer than that. Every noncitizen vote effectively cancels out the vote of an actual citizen. So when we hear Democrats and lefties say, "We want to count every vote." do they mean it? Or do they actually want noncitizen votes counted too?

#39 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-28 10:44 AM | Reply

"In 2000 we had a presidential election decided by 527 votes."

Incorrect.
In 2000, we had a Presidential election decided by five votes, and the vote took place at the Supreme Court.

#40 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-28 10:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#39 shove your non sequitur up your a&& you unAmerican s*^%bag.

Even the right's own database has too few votes to effectively change any national election.

But you're following an anti-America administration off the cliff because you're too stupid to realize they're playing you like a big, dumb fiddle.

#41 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 10:55 AM | Reply

#41. Why are you losing your shht? All I did was ask you a question. Of course, you provided no answer.

#42 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-28 11:31 AM | Reply

There is no system that can prevent 400 non eligible voters from voting. None.

Certainly not in a manner efficient to be effective with 10s of millions of people voting

This story reflects a system that is actually working.

Millions of ineligible people did not vote
Millions of ineligible people did not register to vote
The system caught the incorrect registrations
The system caught the incorrect votes

this story reflects an incredibly sucessful system

#43 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-07-28 11:44 AM | Reply

Our voting system is as nearly a perfect system as can be engineered by man.

The magat "solution" to the lie of non-eligible voters will disenfranchise 1000s, 10s of thousands, 100's of thousands of voters

You want to fix the voting system?

Fix the system that makes 10s of millions of people's votes irrelevant.

#44 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-07-28 11:51 AM | Reply

#42 only an idiot with a poor understanding of math would think your just asking questions' shtick provocative.

To everyone else you just look foolish.

#45 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 11:59 AM | Reply

Is Michelle Obama a man?
Hey, I'm just asking questions!
--JeffJ

#46 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-28 12:01 PM | Reply

"#45. You still haven't answered the question nor have you addressed the fact that congressional races have been decided by fewer than the number of votes by noncitizens in New Jersey.

#47 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-28 12:08 PM | Reply

"Why are you losing your shht?"

I think the question is why YOU seem to be losing your shht over a software glitch that was discovered and corrected.

Those people did not register to vote. Only 400 voted because they thought they were eligible. So no fraud.

They were registered to vote by faulty software.

Software that has since been corrected.

What's YOUR exact problem then?

#48 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-07-28 12:10 PM | Reply

I agree with twoothy about our voting system.

But we aren't getting rid of our current congressional system.

Why so much complaining about a system we aren't changing?

Also, FWIW, the 10 least populated states? The senate makeup is 10 R and 10 D.

All this whining about Wyoming having 2 senators.

So does Vermont, Delaware, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire.....

#49 | Posted by eberly at 2026-07-28 12:12 PM | Reply

the fact that congressional races have been decided by fewer than the number of votes by noncitizens in New Jersey.

#47 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

That's not really true tho is it? Races for the U.S. Congress?

Can you list them ? Or even just one?

#50 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-07-28 12:21 PM | Reply

What's YOUR exact problem then?
#48 | Posted by donnerboy

Brown people voting

#51 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-07-28 12:25 PM | Reply

So, what is your threshold then?

And your solution is the Save America Act?

To give the federal government (who you hate and want traumatize) control of the nations elections? You think their software is going to be better? That the software Trumpy's government buys (on no bid contacts to fatten the wallets of his buddies) is gonna somehow work better?

Like the reflecting pool does now? Like DOGE?

No sir. The odds are NOT in your favor.

#52 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-07-28 12:32 PM | Reply

"Over 400 of these noncitizens have voted since 2023."

That's what...ten elections? Let's pretend it's six; two per year on average.

And there are 12 congressional districts in NJ.

So we're talking about an average of FIVE votes per election, per district.

And that's IF the administration isn't lying about the numbers...which, given all their prior shenanigans, can't be discounted.

#53 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-28 12:41 PM | Reply

"So, what is your threshold then?"

How about proof in a court of law?

How about UTTERING the word FRAUD inside of a courtroom, instead of ONLY the outside, where that lie CAN'T get you in trouble.

#54 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-28 12:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"the fact that congressional races have been decided by fewer than the number of votes by noncitizens in New Jersey."

Fewer than five votes?

Or are you pretending ALL the illegal votes were...
a) cast in ONE race
b) cast in THE SAME district, and
c) cast for THE SAME candidate...?

Let's not forget the unavoidable math: if one side commits the crime at a 50% higher rate than the other...that's an average net of LESS THAN TWO VOTES per election.

#55 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-28 01:05 PM | Reply

You still haven't answered the question

It's a stupid question devoid of any meaningful substance that's driven by the innuendo the administration is using to manipulate you.

You're an idiot.

nor have you addressed the fact that congressional races have been decided by fewer than the number of votes by noncitizens in New Jersey.

#47 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Not have you addressed the fact that that many have never voted in any election.

There's zero evidence that this subject is driven by any meaningful reality or objective problem.

And you're doing exactly what I said you stupid pikes
If unAmerican s*^# would do.

Because you're a predictable idiot.

#56 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 01:30 PM | Reply

Danforth,

You make a lot of assumptions:

1. You assume that it's 400 votes when she said 400 people voted. That's not the same thing.
2. With assumption #1 you assume that those 400 votes were spread evenly over the 24 and 26 election cycles.
3. You further assume those votes were evel,y spread over New Jersey's 12 districts.
4. Your assumption that not every one of those noncitizens voted in one way is fair, but if we are being honest we know it's pretty heavily skewed in favor of Democrats.

JPW,

Please sit this one out. The adults are talking.

#57 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-28 01:39 PM | Reply

You're an idiot. STFU unAmerican s*^%bag.

Anyone stupid enough to support Trump isn't an adult who deserves a seat at any table.

#58 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 01:40 PM | Reply

"Your assumption that not every one of those noncitizens voted in one way is fair, but if we are being honest we know it's pretty heavily skewed in favor of Democrats.

Not based on the overwhelming proof on The Heritage Foundation's website.

Kansas's Kris Kobach famously found ONE illegal voting...for a Republican.

And of course, the most common reason WHY, when one is give by a vote fraud convict? I thought the other side was doing it.

#59 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-28 01:45 PM | Reply

Look at that pedo supporting dips*^% trying to be all intellectual and sophisticated to argue for a lying conman bloated bag of pedo s*%# to unconstitutionally assume control of elections over 400 or so votes.

He's either beyond disingenuous or doesn't grasp basic math.

#60 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 01:45 PM | Reply

"With assumption #1 you assume that those 400 votes were spread evenly over the 24 and 26 election cycles."

Pick your election, pick your percentage of participation, pick your split. Even a whopping 75% participation rate, with an 80/20 split(!) means a net of only 180 votes.

Can you point to ANY election over that time period, decided by less than 200 votes??

#61 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-28 01:54 PM | Reply

We also shouldn't assume the governor of New Jersey is being completely forthright with her numbers. Her claim that it was a software glitch is being disputed by the software company. Are playing CYA or is the governor? Or is it a little of both?

#62 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-28 01:56 PM | Reply

"He's either beyond disingenuous or doesn't grasp basic math."

Bellringer?

I just showed how the net change was less than 200 votes.

Even the most ludicrous of numbers (93% participation, 90/10 split) nets less than 300 votes.

What say you?

#63 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-28 01:59 PM | Reply

" A razor-thin margin decided the 2008 Senate race in Minnesota when former Democratic Sen. Al Franken faced off against Republican incumbent Norm Coleman.

An automatic recount was set off when Coleman led Franken by 206 votes on election night, The Washington Post previously reported. Nearly 3 million votes were cast in total"

www.foxnews.com

The Bush Gore election was decided by 527 votes in Florida.

Fact is we've seen very tight elections over the years. According to the governor 6600 noncitizens recently registered to vote. That's a number that could swing a tight race with national implications. Even if it's just a state level race it matters.

#64 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-28 02:01 PM | Reply

Danforth,

No evidence that the fraud in New Jersey affected any of the Jersey races. That doesn't make it okay for noncitizens to be registered to vote and actually vote in our elections. That is the point of posting this thread.

#65 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-07-28 02:03 PM | Reply

"Her claim that it was a software glitch is being disputed by the software company."

I blame the government, for not making a change the first time someone reported it. And for not requiring multiple languages in the question. Whose idiotic decision was THAT?

As for the 400 who voted...did they ALL follow the same path? All non-English speakers, for example?

#66 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-28 02:03 PM | Reply

"That doesn't make it okay for noncitizens to be registered to vote and actually vote in our elections. "

Thx Captain Obvious!

That's why we don't allow noncitizens to vote in our federal elections. Local elections are a different matter.

That's why it was discovered reported and fixed. So. It's not a problem.

I still don't see YOUR problem and how you think the federal government.. especially THIS federal government (which even federal courts no longer trust) will or could possibly do any better than the states.

#67 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-07-28 02:13 PM | Reply

Fact is we've seen very tight elections over the years. According to the governor 6600 noncitizens recently registered to vote. That's a number that could swing a tight race with national implications. Even if it's just a state level race it matters.
#64 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Oh, you mean, like: "I just want [you] to find 11,780 votes"?

#68 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-07-28 02:16 PM | Reply

"No evidence that the fraud in New Jersey affected any of the Jersey races"

Duh.

"That doesn't make it okay for noncitizens to be registered to vote and actually vote in our elections"

I never said it should. I'm just saying the safeguards work. I'm also saying these should've been addressed when first reported.

BTW, if you study The Heritage Foundation's vote fraud website, you'll learn the plurality of vote fraud isn't committed by the voter. It's committed by the canvassers, cullers, or counters...and NONE of those are addressed with Real ID.
electionfraud.heritage.org<>

#69 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-28 02:16 PM | Reply

No evidence that the fraud in New Jersey
#65 | Posted by BellRinger

What fraud?

There's no evidence of fraud in New Jersey, buttface.

#70 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-28 02:16 PM | Reply

electionfraud.heritage.org

#71 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-28 02:18 PM | Reply

PS

Thanks for 64. That's an honest answer tho you chose a dishonest link.

I knew there was one somewhere but couldn't remember it.

Did the checks and balances work in that election?

Was there any fraud found?

Also. Were you ok with the Supreme Court deciding the Bush v Gore decision?

That was not a potential fraud problem that's an electoral college problem. Get rid of that crap and I can guarantee we will never have a presidential election that's within 500 a vote margin.

#72 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-07-28 02:23 PM | Reply

We also shouldn't assume the governor of New Jersey is being completely forthright with her numbers.

If your view requires unprovable dishonesty by the other side to stand up, it's a s*^# view.

#73 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 02:50 PM | Reply

That is the point of posting this thread.

#65 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

The point is you're a trump knob gobbling moron who's filling the intentionally vague space created by Trump's innuendo.

How's it feel to be so reliably stupid you fall for their bulls*^% every time?

#74 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 02:52 PM | Reply

Which is worse?

400 non-eligible voters voting in an election?

40,000 eligible voters not being able to vote in an election they are entitled to vote in?

#75 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-07-28 02:57 PM | Reply

We also shouldn't assume the governor of New Jersey is being completely forthright with her numbers.
#62 | Posted by BellRinger

What about the DHS numbers. Completely forthright?

Quite the delta between what the Governor provided evidence for, vs what the Department of Homeland Security asserted, without evidence:

"New Jersey alone, the letter said, had 35,152 such individuals. The department as of Tuesday had not provided New Jersey with evidence of those numbers, Sherrill said."

#76 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-28 02:57 PM | Reply

We have the President of the US asking HIS Supreme Court to force States to give over Voter Rolls, but an ongoing Investigation in NJ that hasn't come to any conclusion of abuse is the important issue?

What unpatriotic turds Trumpers are.

#77 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-28 03:03 PM | Reply

40,000 eligible voters not being able to vote in an election they are entitled to vote in?

#75 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS

Which one means republicans win?

-pedoringer

#78 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-28 03:25 PM | Reply

#22 | Posted by oneironaut

Your typing voice reminds me of Marc Levin. This annoyingly loud screech that is, shall we say, very selective about the parts of reality it champions.

#79 | Posted by morris at 2026-07-28 03:52 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort