Jeff is a pos

We shall see. I think the women of America will have a lot to say come November.

We shall see.

BTW you might have missed the LAST Republican caused economic disaster circa 2008

So, Reagen, Dubya, ------.

Yeah republicans cause economic disasters.

I'm just glad Carter is still alive to see that he wasn't the absolute worst.

#5 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

You trying to argue ------- isn't ranked dead last?

I'm not surprised by how a bunch of left wing academics came up with their rankings.

#12 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

How do you come to the conclusion that they are left wing academics?

Vaugh and Rottinghaus acknowledged that academics tend to lean left, but they added that has not changed since the previous surveys.

But while Republican academics did not rank Trump last, they did not view him favorably, either, placing him 41st. Biden, meanwhile, was farther down their list " 30th " but he still fared better than Trump.

When it came to Biden and Trump, Democrats' rankings were largely in line with the overall results. The current president was 13th, while Trump was last.

Independents and members of other parties ranked Biden 19th and Trump 45th.

Truth Hurts Donut

Republicans and facts, never the ----- shall meet.
#8 | Posted by truthhurts at 2024-05-17 01:22 PM | Reply | Flag
LMAO
"Spectrum News"
The autistic view of presidential rankings...

#30 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRD

The survey, conducted online in late 2023, combined the responses of 154 experts " current or recent members of the American Political Science Association's presidential politics division as well as scholars who recently published peer-reviewed research in related journals or academic presses.

I'd trust them over you.

Of course even the right leaning historians could only rank ------- 4th from bottom.

I bet that truth hurts you.

Trump's a pile of dung AND Democrats are abusing the legal system in banana republic fashion.
It seems like it's not working as they intended.

#34 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

LOL, by all accounts ------- is going down in NY unless there is a trojan magat on the jury.

Regardless, he has been shown, once again to be total creep. A 60's old man with a wife at home who just had his child and he is out banging 20 year old porn stars.

What a guy!

Does his bucket of piss get heavy for you to carry piss boy? Or were you gunga dimwit? I can't remember.

Jeff your ass should be too sore on this topic as it has been reamed repeatedly when I and others have explained to you how wrong you are.

One can only conclude you like abuse.

Now, that's an image-a masochistic piece of ----. I am sure there is nothing too debasing that you won't do.

What is unheard of is Jeff posting a truth.

#40. What crime was furthered by allegedly fraudulent book keeping?
Use the prosecution's words.

#44 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You do realize that only the intent to commit a criminal act is required? You get that right?

You also realize that Cohen was convicted of crimes related to these fraudulent records, right?

You do realize that ------- need not have committed that underlying crime, right, that if he cooked the records to further Cohen's crime, that is it, right?

You get all that right?

I mean it has been explained to you countless times

it couldn't be you're nothing more than a lying piece of magat ----, right?

42. Can you show me any one of those 10,000 that didn't lay out the alleged crime?

#43 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER A

Campaign finance laws.

NY State tax laws

NY State election laws.

This has been explained to you countless times you piece of magat ----.

BTW you know what IS lawfare?

The delays by the SC to shield ------- from going to trial before the November election.

THAT is using the criminal justice system to thwart justice, to damage Biden's chance to face an opponent who has been properly adjudicated for his actions the last time he ran for office.

Or perhaps you could try justifying why the American people aren't entitled to know whether a presidential candidate tried to overturn an election?

#51. I understand intent can be a criminal act even if the act itself isn't carried out.
"Election fraud" is outside the DA's jurisdiction.

#52 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

It doesn't have to be you dingus.

Of course, even that statement is wrong, you pustule.

He violated state election law, you ------- wart.

" Campaign finance laws."
Outside of Bragg's jurisdiction.
"NY State tax laws"
Please show me where the prosecution specifically alleges that.
"NY State election laws"
Trump wasn't involved in a NY state election.
#56 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER A

The federal crime doesn't have to be under Bragg's jurisdiction for ------- to have an intent to break that law.
------- doesn't even have to understand the law he is breaking, only that he had an intent to break it
You can look up Bragg's statements I am not going to do your work for you, you piece of ----.
I am sure that the NY election commission would be amused to hear the argument that the presidential election in NY wasn't under their laws. In fact, I would argue you are an ignorant ass, if that wouldn't insult asses.

You know Twoothy is losing the argument when he starts doling out the personal attacks.

#57 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You known jeff is lying by the fact that he clicked preview comment and publish comment

Cause everything he posts is a lie.

Cause he is a piece of ----.

Hey jeff, post some legitimate link to state election laws not applying to a presidential race.

Please.

He was accused and is under trial for felony falsifying business records.

That has been explained to you countless times.

yet you continue to argue otherwise.

Because you are ----. You are a piece of filthy stinking magaty ----.

The element of the crime is his intent. Which bragg has MORE than satisfied in the trial. You would know that if a. you paid attention to the trial and b. weren't a piece of ----.

Jeff doesnt believe that there are state election laws.

That is all you need to know.

jeff do you believe there are limits on campaign contributions?

Do you believe there are reporting requirements for campaign contributions?

Do you believe that there are tax ramifications for reimbursements to attorneys vs paying for their time?

Do you believe that ------- could have falsified documents to skirt these laws?

What jeff fails to admit, because he is a piece of ----, is that Cohen was already convicted of the underlying crimes.

You can smell the desperation

Lolololololilololololol