Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, March 24, 2026

President Donald Trump cast a mail ballot in an upcoming Florida special election, according to Palm Beach County records ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Trump casts a mail ballot again in Florida even as he calls the method 'cheating'

[image or embed]

-- Ryan J. Reilly "paints a vivid and urgent portrait of ... disarray" (@ryanjreilly.com) Mar 23, 2026 at 10:11 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Mail-in for me, none for thee!

What a lying POS

#1 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-03-24 07:44 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Mail-in voting means mail-in cheating ... ."

Which is probably why he does it.

That and terminal laziness.

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-03-24 08:00 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

No problem with requesting and sending a mail-in ballot, [I did a few times when in the military], BUT that is totally different from sending out mass mail-in ballots [COVID 'era']as seven Blue States do as those are subject to fraud.

Amazing how biden received millions more votes than the very popular obama, and then four years later, about 20 millions of those 'voters' seems t have evaporated - almost as if they never existed.....

#3 | Posted by MSgt at 2026-03-24 10:05 AM | Reply

"mass mail-in ballots [COVID 'era']as seven Blue States do as those are subject to fraud."

Yet said fraud is extremely rare. How do you explain that? You cannot.

As for "biden received millions more votes than the very popular obama, and then four years later, about 20 millions of those 'voters' seems t have evaporated"

Occam's razor They stayed home.

The 2020 election saw the highest turnout in 120 years, with roughly 66.7% of eligible citizens voting, driven by intense interest in the election and the high-stakes political environment.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many states expanded access to early and mail-in voting, which historically increases voter participation, particularly among certain demographics.

Since 2008, the U.S. population increased from roughly 304 million to over 330 million by 2020, leading to a larger pool of potential voters.

Too bad for you. Mail in voting will continue. You will just have to make sure you mail it in early this year. Maybe take a Tylenol when you try to think about it.

#4 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-03-24 11:06 AM | Reply

20 millions of those 'voters' seems t have evaporated
#3 | Posted by MSg

Voter participation was down in all states but 5 in 2024, those being the swing states of PA, MI, WI, GA along with the blue state of RI.

Show your math.
155 million Americans cast ballots in the 2024 Presidential election. 158 million in 2020. That's a difference of 3 million. What's this 20 million you are talking about?

The only mass election fraud that occurred was Trump fraudulently claiming there is mass fraud.

#5 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2026-03-24 11:22 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

What difference is it between requesting one and being sent one automatically? Same ballot. Same person. Again, even the sloppiest MAGAT hog-faced whore knows voter fraud is minuscule.

PEDO DONNIE raped little girls. Focus on that.

#6 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-24 11:45 AM | Reply

" That's a difference of 3 million. What's this 20 million you are talking about?"

Republican Math.

The equation is perfect for their use: 1+1 equals ...

... whatever today's talking points require!

#7 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-24 11:56 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Joe Walsh
@WalshFreedom

39m
Yesterday, Donald Trump said mail in voting was cheating and should be banned. Also yesterday, Donald Trump voted by mail in a Florida special election. He was down in Florida at the time, 15 minutes from his polling place.

Donald Trump will go down in history as one of the greatest frauds, one of the greatest con men, who ever lived.

#8 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-24 01:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Donald Trump will go down in history as one of the greatest frauds, one of the greatest con men, who ever lived.

And his supporters as the stupidest, most repulsively ignorant and gullible dumba&&es who ever lived.

#9 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-24 02:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

If the GOP didn't have hypocrisy they'd have nothing at all other than protecting child rapists.

#10 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-03-25 07:08 AM | Reply

Will we not mention that a convicted felon in FL who voted was jailed for voting fraud.

As a convicted felon, can he legally vote?

#11 | Posted by Wardog at 2026-03-25 09:21 AM | Reply

No sensible person can imagine Der Dotard standing in line at the local middle school or Methodist church to cast his ballot. Asking for ID or a passport would be a laughably futile exercise, because he would never show an official document with his true weight displayed...

#12 | Posted by catdog at 2026-03-25 11:52 AM | Reply

And again, it's about "maximizing for me, fcnk everybody else". These types of people create and sustain humanitarian crises

#13 | Posted by hamburglar at 2026-03-25 08:13 PM | Reply

"Trump Casts Mail Ballot Again in Florida"

"I call it mail-in cheating."
~DJT

#14 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-25 08:15 PM | Reply

Is Bill Johnson here to cry?

#15 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-03-25 08:43 PM | Reply

... Trump Casts Mail Ballot Again in Florida ...

Do as I dictate you to do, not as I do.


#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-25 09:43 PM | Reply

Msgt,

"No problem with requesting and sending a mail-in ballot, [I did a few times when in the military]"

That is an "absentee ballot".

Totally different thing just as you stated.

#17 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-25 10:57 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Donner,

"Mail in voting will continue"

Don't be so quick to assume there won't be problems showing up in the future with mail-in ballots that bring it's reliability into question.

"oh no....that will never happen"...I'm sure you believe.

Unless you have special powers of knowing the future, you just don't know what can happen.

I setup accounting systems and as experienced as I was, inevitably all these people using the system found some way to create problems.

It's nearly always the human factor and people not using the system exactly as it was designed and tested to be used.

Don't assume mail in voting will continue indefinitely.

#18 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-25 11:06 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

totally different thing just as you stated.

#17 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-25 10:57 PM | Reply

They both go through the mail for the most part. ------.

Your orange God is a felon and he voted by mail. But you're okay with that I'm sure.

#19 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-03-25 11:10 PM | Reply

Don't assume mail in voting will continue indefinitely.
#18 | Posted by BillJohnson

We don't even assume regular voting will continue, with Republicans in charge.

You shouldn't either.

#20 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-25 11:13 PM | Reply

Bill the FAGAT can go ---- off.

#21 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-26 12:09 AM | Reply

"Don't assume mail in voting will continue indefinitely."

Exactly! Why should cripples, the military, and the elderly vote? We just want their tax revenue, amirite???

#22 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-26 12:15 AM | Reply

@#21

OK, you're gonna need to get a different schtick.

Your court jester routine is becoming, well, repetitive and boring.

Jus' sayin'

#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-26 12:16 AM | Reply

**** Trumpf Family Voted by Mail ****

FTA:

"Dummkopf Trumpf wants Congress to ban most mail-in voting. But his Stepford Wife spouse Melanoma and his good-for-nothing son, Barron, like Trumpf, voted by mail in a special Tuesday election."

Source: www.usatoday.com

#24 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-03-26 12:18 AM | Reply

@#18 ... Don't assume mail in voting will continue indefinitely. ...

Why should it not?

Simple question.

...

#25 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-26 01:10 AM | Reply

Don't be so quick to assume there won't be problems showing up in the future with mail-in ballots that bring it's reliability into question.

Then perhaps you could point out the problems with the collective 56 years of experience of all mail balloting of CO, WA and OR.

I setup accounting systems and as experienced as I was, inevitably all these people using the system found some way to create problems.

So despite your best effort to fulfill your duty to establish systems and protocols to prevent such problems, factors beyond your control or contemplation defeated your effort.

Why do you think elections officials aren't in the same boat?

#26 | Posted by et_al at 2026-03-26 02:09 AM | Reply

Isaac Asimov, 1980...

...
It's hard to quarrel with that ancient justification of the free press: "America's right to know."

It seems almost cruel to ask, ingenuously, "America's right to know what, please? Science? Mathematics? Economics? Foreign languages?"

None of those things, of course. In fact, one might well suppose that the popular feeling is that Americans are a lot better off without any of that tripe.

There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."...

[emphasis mine]


#27 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-26 02:17 AM | Reply

Lamp,

"Why should it not?
Simple question."

Humans.

The less humans are involved in getting information from point A to point B, the better.

Show ID, fill in ballot. Feed ballot into scanner. Record your vote.

No need for all the checks and balances to insure everyone who sent in a ballot by mail got their vote recorded and catch possible attempts to defraud the system.

In person scanned ballots is so much easier to count with virtually no opportunity for lost votes and better verification of the voter eligibility to vote.

But...I'm wasting my time explaining this again.

Some day Congress will need to step into this issue and set standards states will work within.

#28 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 07:48 AM | Reply

Lamp,

People in rural areas or small precincts will likely mail their ballot.

There would be less need for extensive checks and balances.

#29 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 07:59 AM | Reply

Et,

Ive answered that question in the past.

Not doing again with you.

#30 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 08:01 AM | Reply

But...I'm wasting my time explaining this again.

Explaining bulls*&^ is usually a waste of time.

#31 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 08:54 AM | Reply

" People in rural areas or small precincts will likely mail their ballot. There would be less need for extensive checks and balances."

Wow.

So, suddenly, it's two sets of rules: one for somebody you think is going to vote for your candidate, and one for people who you think are going to vote against your candidate.

Your voter suppression intentions are duly noted.

But feel free to explain why rural folks would need less checks and balances than urban folks.

This should be good ... .

#32 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-26 11:27 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Bill will never address the headline. His hero daddy voted by mail.

#33 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-03-26 11:39 AM | Reply

"But feel free to explain why rural folks would need less checks and balances than urban folks."

Great question.

Stating there will be less security on rural elections seems like it makes rural elections a bigger target.

#34 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-26 11:59 AM | Reply

Something to think about:

i.imgur.com

#35 | Posted by MSgt at 2026-03-26 12:15 PM | Reply

Something to think about:
i.imgur.com
#35 | Posted by MSgt

We don't have Free National Voter ID
Why? Because Republicans don't support it.
Maybe you'd like to tell us why Republicans won't simply provide all voters with a Free National Voter ID.

#36 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-26 12:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Something to think about:

i.imgur.com

#35 | Posted by MSgt

The USA has voter ID idiot. You have to confirm your ID to register to vote.

Question - if the federal gov automatically sent a voter ID to every voter and added zero obstacles to voting, would you still support it?

#37 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-26 12:59 PM | Reply

Dan,

"So, suddenly, it's two sets of rules"

It's called "exceptions" like have always existed about many rules.

Either you are Anal-Retentive or you're a troll.

#38 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 02:11 PM | Reply

Alex,

"Bill will never address the headline. His hero daddy voted by mail."

I don't give a crap how Trump voted.

Apparently you think I secretly care...well...I don't.

#39 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 02:15 PM | Reply

I don't give a crap how Trump voted.

That is because you're a hypocrite in a cult.

#40 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-03-26 02:17 PM | Reply

Alex,

The logic from the left is really wacked.

It's like you just can't get it what my reasoning is about mail-in ballots (other than absentee or exceptions).

It is incomprehensible.

#41 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 02:23 PM | Reply

No one questioned the integrity of mail in voting until Trump lost the 2020 election and made a huge deal about mail in voting being rife with fraud.

Which in turn made deplorable Trumping MAGAts loses their minds and condemn, fear and hate mail in voting.

Trump and republican's narrative worked so well that even when Trump himself votes by mail, they're still gnashing their teeth trying to figure out how to end mail in voting.

BullJohnson, despite his lies about being concerned about the integrity of mail in voting, can't point to a time pre Trump when he ever questioned mail in voting results.

He's nothing more than a useful idiot for Trump.

#42 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 02:24 PM | Reply

It's like you just can't get it what my reasoning is about mail-in ballots (other than absentee or exceptions).

It is incomprehensible.

#41 | Posted by BillJohnson

We're still waiting on you to provide any evidence that there is a problem that requires a solution which would make it harder for many people to vote.

#43 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-03-26 02:26 PM | Reply

It's like you just can't get it what my reasoning is about mail-in ballots
#41 | POSTED BY BULLJOHNSON

It's pretty simple.

Trump told you the 2020 election was stolen, that mail in voting has a high margin of fraud, and you believed him so thoroughly that even when you see Trump vote by mail you're unable to realize you've been duped, that he was lying to you.

Meanwhile Trump is raping children and starting wars to distract from his raping of children.

#44 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 02:30 PM | Reply

The logic from the left is really wacked.

LOL pointing out that you have no evidence is "wacked"?

Pointing out that your conclusion isn't supportable without evidence is "wacked"?

#45 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-26 03:35 PM | Reply

Dan,

Ballot harvesting tends to show up more in places with high population density, large scale mail-in systems, and third-party ballot collection is allowed. It also becomes more feasible in areas with more transient populations.

Those conditions are more common in urban areas, which often vote Democrat.

I'm not arguing for weaker safeguards anywhere. The standards should be the same.

What changes is the scale, implementation, and manpower required. Rural precincts deal with lower volume and simpler logistics.

Large urban systems are far more complex and harder to monitor consistently.

#46 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 04:55 PM | Reply

BullJohnson.

You have no proof for anything you're posting.

You're an idiot who blindly believes anything Trump says.

Fuck off, retard.

Go rape children with your "wife" in the name of Donald Trump.

#47 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 04:58 PM | Reply

Dan,

Larger urban voting systems are more likely to bottleneck and require additional handling due to sheer volume.

That introduces more layers of processing and more points where errors can occur.

These are challenges that simply don't exist at the same level in smaller precincts.

#48 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 05:02 PM | Reply

Clown,

You've earned a time out.

Nothing you post to me will be worth my time.

I might want to not post comments about other posters families, if I were you.

It makes you look mentally unstable and in need of being watched closer.

#49 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 05:12 PM | Reply

More bloviation from the usual suspect. Anyone else here are surprised by this?? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

#50 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-03-26 05:16 PM | Reply

Nothing you post to me will be worth my time.
#49 | POSTED BY BULLJOHNSON

Nothing you've ever posted has been worth anyone's time.

You're a fucking liar.

You stupid pedophile.

#51 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-26 05:18 PM | Reply

Dan,

Well?

Care to respond? I took your request serious and provided a serious answer.

What assumption did I make you don't agree?

#52 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 05:43 PM | Reply

In the words of Beevis and Butthead,

Heh heh heh heh... heh heh heh..
Laura said blo.

#53 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-03-26 05:51 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort