" That's a difference of 3 million. What's this 20 million you are talking about?"

Republican Math.

The equation is perfect for their use: 1+1 equals ...

... whatever today's talking points require!

"Trump Casts Mail Ballot Again in Florida"

"I call it mail-in cheating."
~DJT

"Don't assume mail in voting will continue indefinitely."

Exactly! Why should cripples, the military, and the elderly vote? We just want their tax revenue, amirite???

" People in rural areas or small precincts will likely mail their ballot. There would be less need for extensive checks and balances."

Wow.

So, suddenly, it's two sets of rules: one for somebody you think is going to vote for your candidate, and one for people who you think are going to vote against your candidate.

Your voter suppression intentions are duly noted.

But feel free to explain why rural folks would need less checks and balances than urban folks.

This should be good ... .

"These are challenges that simply don't exist at the same level in smaller precincts."

Except your theory is that bullies within the same household would be either be stealing the ballot, or intimidating others into voting their way.

That has nothing to do with rural v urban. Or the size of the precinct.

Are you claiming it does???

Also, mail in ballots would solve the problem: plenty of opportunity to vote, plenty of time to count.

How about this: explain to us why every time there's a four hour line, it's always minorities. It took me seven minutes from leaving my car door to returning to my car door last time, in my white person precinct.

It's one of the at least half a dozen ways voting can be suppressed if you force in person, day of, voting.

Meanwhile, mail-in ballots means anyone who wants to participate, can.

Which is the one thing BillJohnson doesn't want.

"What assumption did I make you don't agree?"

That an operation ten times the size can't handle ten times the volume.

Do you think folks are actually more accurate in rural areas???

And, while I know this is like pissing in the wind, do you have any proof??

So far, after five years, all you have is your own gut. Not a single person coming forward with your theory. Ever.

And that still doesn't tell you anything.

Bill, are you afraid if there are universal mail-in ballots, that your wife will force you to vote the way she wants, and not the way you want? That she'll bully you , and watch you vote carefully before she allows it to be mailed back???

Is THAT why you're so invested in the election lies???

"Don't bring my wife into the conversation unless I have."

You brought up people within the household bullying others regarding their vote.

You believe this so firmly, despite ZERO evidence over the last 5 years. It's a fair question to ask if you're describing YOUR situation.

Are you?

"Large urban systems are far more complex and harder to monitor consistently."

What a stupid claim: The Urbans can't scale up.

"Obviously you're daring me."

On the contrary; I'm saying you might have proof of your theory in your mirror.

Do you?

Google AI checks in:
Both rural and urban areas generally utilize the same legal, technological, and procedural standards for counting votes, making neither inherently more accurate than the other. Accuracy depends on local, professional election administration and the use of certified, tested voting machines rather than geographic location, with technology often outperforming manual hand counts.

1600
1,323,299,041

=

To MAGA, that's just the percentage Trump will reduce Rx prices, over the number of illegals Biden allowed in.

Here's some more math for you:

The assumption is both sides do it, right? And it's a fact: If the two sides commit equal amounts of vote fraud, ZERO net votes are gained.

However...If one side does it 50% MORE than the other (a stunning gap, if true), 1600 episodes of vote fraud, a.k.a. 1600 chances to get a $10K fine and a year in jail, would result in...

...320 net votes.