Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, July 16, 2026

Preview now, Speech Later at 9:00

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Wherein he again lies about China interferring in the 2020 Election (thought he loved him some Xi!)

... also immigrants, blacks, women, and Democrats interferring with actual votes by... actually voteing!

This Preview lays out the facts about HIS OWN PEOPLE, the DOJ, the AG Bill Barr and SO many others quoted at the time, some under Oath, that there was NO EVIDENCE at all of any significant voter fraud.

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 06:13 PM | Reply

Why is he doing this?

#2 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-07-16 06:21 PM | Reply

#2

Reporting is that that's what a whole lot of Republicans who are trying to keep their cushy Congress jobs are asking... Why talk about this rather than push back on the economy or even the war?

Which answer is likely that DJT doesn't want to talk about those thing; not with his Base Only popularity polling.

He's not going win back swing voters with these well-proven LIES about the 2020 Election.

But he's a Drama Queen Extroidinaire, and riling up the Base is all he's really good at. I mean, telling the Truth at this point is pointless.

#3 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 06:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#4 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-07-16 06:35 PM | Reply

"Iran: Trump's Inner Circle Focusing on PERSONAL Profit, not Peace.
Thom Hartmann Program"

www.youtube.com

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 07:10 PM | Reply

alt vid

James Talarico on Morning Joe | Full Interview


Jul 16, 2026

"The first words out of my mouth when I launched this campaign back in September of last year was that the real fight in this country is not left vs right, it's top versus bottom.

My party talks about turning Texas blue. The Republican Party talks about keeping Texas red. I honestly think the best color for Texas is purple. I think she would look great in purple because we have to end one party rule."

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 08:05 PM | Reply

www.youtube.com

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 08:05 PM | Reply

'speech' and I use the term loosely, video:

www.youtube.com

They'll need AI to count the lies in this disaster.

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 09:23 PM | Reply

riling up the Base is all he's really good at

Are they not already riled?

#9 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-07-16 09:46 PM | Reply

The president said he was declassifying sensitive information that showed China had illicitly acquired 220 million U.S. voter files, including names, addresses and other data used to register to vote.

He asserted that members of the U.S. intelligence community deliberately suppressed information about the extent of China's activities.

His allegations contradict an unclassified 2021 U.S. intelligence community assessment that found no indications any foreign actor attempted to alter or succeeded in altering "any technical aspect" of the 2020 presidential election vote, including voter registrations, ballots, tabulations or results.

The assessment was conducted under John Ratcliffe, then Trump's director of national intelligence and now his CIA director.

www.huffpost.com

#10 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 09:50 PM | Reply

I repeat:

His allegations contradict an unclassified 2021 U.S. intelligence community assessment that found no indications any foreign actor attempted to alter or succeeded in altering "any technical aspect" of the 2020 presidential election vote, including voter registrations, ballots, tabulations or results.

The assessment was conducted under John Ratcliffe, then Trump's director of national intelligence and now his CIA director.

Trump is a lying pos.

#11 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 09:51 PM | Reply

Why is he doing this?

#2 | POSTED BY REDIAL

The Iran "war" is about China. This is about China.

China sent war manufacturing capabilities to Iran, they were in the middle of ramping up, US isreal attacked. The US has an issue in that its war machine relies on few expensive weapon systems. The new modern warfare is cheap and ubiquitous. I see the US trying to pivot but its going to take time.

War is coming, you might not like it, but it started under Bush. Now resources are being constrained by both sides.

War is coming.

#11 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

I don't imagine he cares about 2016, or 2020, he's setting the stage for China. You're hung up on the details and ignoring the reality.


The president said he was declassifying sensitive information that showed China had illicitly acquired 220 million U.S. voter files, including names, addresses and other data used to register to vote.

Your assertion and this could both be true. Isn't the whole point of "release the Eptsein files" about the government not being transparent?
If he's releasing this then you can ascertain the veracity of his claims. If you're just going to say well in 2020 yadayada said yada yada, then you really aren't very good when new evidence is ascertained.

#12 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-16 10:32 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Trumps speech was full of lies.

OneiroNUT is here to defend that because he's a liberal. LOL

#13 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 10:36 PM | Reply

This Preview lays out the facts about HIS OWN PEOPLE, the DOJ, the AG Bill Barr and SO many others quoted at the time, some under Oath, that there was NO EVIDENCE at all of any significant voter fraud.

When is it significant? What number?

He says he has evidence of, 278,000 noncitizen registrants, via aa DHS review of voter rolls and public records allegedly identified
Trump rightly asserts the true number is higher because Democrat-led states withheld their files.

But Blue states wont give the files, why not? What's to hide, its just voter rolls? Why should States not let the Federal Government know who is voting in Federal elections?

Democracy dies in darkness.

#14 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-16 10:37 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Democracy dies on TV when the most powerful man in the world lies nonstop, and you defend it.

You are part of the problem, enabler.

#15 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 10:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Trumps speech was full of lies.

It may have been, similar to Biden's speech in Philly.

OneiroNUT is here to defend that because he's a liberal. LOL

I am not defending him, I am asserting take the evidence to where it leads. Which only unscientific Lumpers don't want to do. You can't possibly fathom your elections are compromised.

This is a typical NAZI type attack on someone looking to find the truth, if I am not for you I am against you., welcome to Bush world..

You're weak Alexa, you don't have logic you have the emotion of tampon on your side.

#16 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-16 10:41 PM | Reply | Funny: 1


You are part of the problem, enabler.

A Nazi extremist would say exactly this. You have nothing but emotional outbursts.

#17 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-16 10:42 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Whatabout biden?

YOU NAZI!

-Oneironut

#18 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 10:42 PM | Reply

Trump lied. A lot.

That is not emotional, it's a fact. Calling me a nazi is emotional.

#19 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 10:43 PM | Reply

I am asserting take the evidence to where it leads.

Here's the evidence.

"His allegations contradict an unclassified 2021 U.S. intelligence community assessment that found no indications any foreign actor attempted to alter or succeeded in altering "any technical aspect" of the 2020 presidential election vote, including voter registrations, ballots, tabulations or results.
The assessment was conducted under John Ratcliffe, then Trump's director of national intelligence and now his CIA director."

#20 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 10:46 PM | Reply

- when new evidence is ascertained.
#12 | Posted by oneironaut

There is no relevent new evidence that China worked against him in that Election.

You are merely simping and pimping for they Cult you pretend not to belong to.

Worse, you only belong to it because it's your only way to strike out at liberals and progressives who dare to disagree with your asinine, fallacy-filled assertions about... well, about everything.

Truly pathetic.

#21 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 10:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

That is not emotional, it's a fact. Calling me a nazi is emotional.

Youre response is full of directed attacks instead of trying look at the evidence. Clearly you're in an emotional state.

Everyone can see it.

#22 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-16 10:49 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Youre response is full of directed attacks instead of trying look at the evidence. Clearly you're in an emotional state.
Everyone can see it.

#22 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-16 10:49 PM | Reply

GFY FULL STOP. lexandrite is one of the most honest posters here. Deal with it.

#23 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-07-16 10:51 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

My favorite trump lie during his "speech":

"Mail in ballots are inherently corrupt"

Gee...I wonder where Bill Johnson gets it from?

#24 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 10:51 PM | Reply

trying look at the evidence

Read #11 again. Slowly.

Then punch yourself for defending "evidence" from the world's orangest liar.

#25 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 10:53 PM | Reply

"No public evidence exists showing that China rigged or altered vote tallies in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. During a prime-time national address on July 16, 2026, President Donald Trump revisited his long-standing claims about the 2020 election.

He announced the declassification of intelligence reports alleging that China accessed 220 million U.S. voter records and engaged in a broad influence campaign against him. (Wall Street Journal)

However, U.S. intelligence agencies, cybersecurity experts, and independent reviews provide consistent information on several key points:

No Vote Tallies Were Altered: Independent assessments confirm that neither China nor any other foreign entity modified ballots, manipulated voting infrastructure, or altered final vote counts.

Data Access Does Not Equal Rigging: While declassified intelligence suggests Chinese intelligence analyzed or accessed public or semi-private U.S. voter registration logs for public opinion analysis, cybersecurity experts clarify that accessing voter records does not give an adversary the ability to manipulate actual vote tallies. (CBS NEWS)

Distinction Between Influence and Technical Interference:

Intelligence officials draw a clear line between influence operations"such as public messaging or social media disinformation campaigns"and technical interference.

While there was a minor dissenting view within the intelligence community that China utilized social media to denigrate Trump's campaign, all agencies agree that no technical infrastructure or tabulation was compromised. (The New York Times)

According to reports from CBS News and The Wall Street Journal, the newly declassified material highlights China's ongoing cyber capabilities and intent to monitor U.S. politics, but it does not support claims that the election outcome was fraudulent or rigged." (CBS NEWS)

www.google.com

Number 2 Son gullible as grasshopper in crow's beak. - Confusionus

#26 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 10:56 PM | Reply

There is no relevent new evidence that China worked against him in that Election.

This is the propaganda no matter the evidence, its always "no relevance", "no major affect" ... why does this matter?

Robbing a 7/1 doesn't affect the GDP why should we stop it? Fraud of $10M doesn't affect the budget of the US why allow it?

First it's it never happens.
Then it happens but it not big enough to be important.
Then ....

Everyone can see your defective assertions.

Do you hear yourselves. Should the US just wait until it does affect the elections? lets say it is proven without a doubt it affected the PResidential elections and the other side lost.
Would you give up the Presidency? If it was proven he/she was elected because of fraud? What do you think would happen?

Why would you wait for a catastrophe to happen before the US did something?

#27 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-16 10:58 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

This is the propaganda

You have no idea what that word means. I'll give you a hint.

It's what you read/post on X.

#28 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 10:59 PM | Reply

This is the propaganda

Was it propaganda when you lied here?

People won't come right out and condemn Islam
What people?

#16 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-04 09:42 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

What people?
#16 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

You in particular.

#17 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-07-04 10:03 PM | Reply | Flag

#29 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 11:02 PM | Reply

- its always "no relevance", "no major affect" ... why does this matter?

In 20 years, perhaps the most assinine assertion ever posited here.

Amazing, really.

#30 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 11:02 PM | Reply

No way did Oneironut watch trump talk for 20 minutes. He logged right onto X to be told what to think.

#31 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-07-16 11:05 PM | Reply

"No credible intelligence has emerged showing that the vote count in 2020 was manipulated by foreign actors.

Repeated audits and reviews -- manyrun by Republicans, including Trump's own then-attorney general -- have found no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

He did not raise doubts about his election wins in 2016 or 2024."

apnews.com

So difficult to know who to buh-lieve; all the experts as reported in major news orgs or 1Nut, whom ICE will likely sooner or later make aquintance.

#32 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 11:09 PM | Reply

"CBS News is fact-checking President Trump's speech on election security Thursday night, in which he raised new allegations regarding China's access to U.S. voter data and claimed that the "deep state" in the U.S. intelligence community sought to "actively suppress and downplay" China's actions.

He also made accusations about voter registration fraud in the U.S.

Here are some of the claims and CBS News' ratings and context for Mr. Trump's statements:"
more

www.cbsnews.com

ALL Trumps claims made tonight are rated either Misleading, False, Lacks Evidence, or Exagerated.

Good call, 1Nut!

#33 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-16 11:14 PM | Reply

Trump: "When I won in 2016 and 2024, during the Obama and Biden presidencies, the was no voter fraud. But in 2020, when I was president, there was rampant voter fraud!!! It's Obama's fault!"

Trumpers: "It's Obama's fault!"

#34 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-07-17 12:01 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

CBS cuts away from Trump's election fraud speech - as ABC and NBC refused to air it on TV

nypost.com

Sounds like FOX getting sued for lying about the 2020 election has other networks considering the results of airing Trumps lies.

#35 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-07-17 12:18 AM | Reply

"He says he has evidence of, 278,000 noncitizen registrants,"

Any in Utah?

After an exhaustive investigation, they found ONE illegal had registered to vote.

Hadn't voted...but had registered.

#36 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-17 12:32 AM | Reply

Well this was a massive nothingburger.

Where's all the Splitters at to pump it up?

#37 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-07-17 12:35 AM | Reply

"He says he has evidence of, 278,000 noncitizen registrants"

Let's not forget: this is from the guy who claimed 3,000,000 fraudulent votes in California.

And he's provided proof of fraud exactly ZERO times in court...which, coincidentally, is the same number of times Team Trump has claimed Fraud inside a courtroom.

#38 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-17 12:36 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Utah proof:
www.sltrib.com

"Why is he doing this?"

To lay the foundation of nullification come November. Only in the locations that vote AGAINST Trump, of course.

And just like J6, when there were multiple roads attempting the same destination, this November will see a litany of unforced irregularities.

#39 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-07-17 12:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Fourth Turning. We shall overcome.

#40 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-07-17 02:24 AM | Reply

Why is he (Trump) doing this?

#2 | Posted by REDIAL

He is laying the predicate for his second coup.

He got no punishment for the first one, so why not.

The bloodshed for the next one is not likely to be as localized as the last.

#41 | Posted by Zed at 2026-07-17 08:30 AM | Reply

#22 | Posted by oneironaut

Wants us to be "reasonable" with the pathological liar.

Because if we weren't so unreasonable we would all see how it is that no evidence of fraud has miraculously morphed into proof Trump won 2020.

The man didn't make a case last night. HE DID NOT MAKE A CASE.

That's what you do, you know. You use your "proof" to actually prove something, not release pages of heavily redacted BS to confirm the paranoid and self-serving fantasies of a lot of vicious Nazis, starting with Donald.

#42 | Posted by Zed at 2026-07-17 08:41 AM | Reply

"The man didn't make a case last night. HE DID NOT MAKE A CASE"

-Trust me bro

#43 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-17 08:53 AM | Reply

-Trust me bro

#43 | Posted by lfthndthrds a

You want to make his case for him?

Have on.

Try to find something not already litigated.

#44 | Posted by Zed at 2026-07-17 08:54 AM | Reply

I don't imagine he cares about 2016, or 2020, he's setting the stage for China. You're hung up on the details and ignoring the reality.

You're hung up on being a Trumper piece of unAmerican s*&^.

This isn't about China. This is about control of elections.

#45 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-17 09:45 AM | Reply

But Blue states wont give the files, why not? What's to hide, its just voter rolls? Why should States not let the Federal Government know who is voting in Federal elections?

Democracy dies in darkness.

#14 | Posted by oneironaut

STFU you unAmerican piece of s*&^.

They shouldn't share because the Constitution gives zero power to the federal government to oversee elections. Period.

You'd know that if you weren't such an unAmerican pile of lying s*&^.

#46 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-17 09:47 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Do you hear yourselves. Should the US just wait until it does affect the elections? lets say it is proven without a doubt it affected the PResidential elections and the other side lost.
Would you give up the Presidency? If it was proven he/she was elected because of fraud? What do you think would happen?

Why would you wait for a catastrophe to happen before the US did something?

#27 | Posted by oneironaut

Except our elections are actively kept secure, which is why the levels of fraud are extremely low and perpetrators are usually caught (which is why we know they're usually Republicans).

So go step in front of a bus s*&^bag.

#47 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-17 09:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

There will always be folks like 0neironaut who use back-door rhetorical tactics in order to downplay the telltale observable behaviors of nascent fascism.

This is done in order to confuse or delay action by the opposition so that extra time is alloted for producing additional propaganda that seeks to normalize obvious fascistic behaviors.

#48 | Posted by NerfHerder at 2026-07-17 10:11 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Hadn't voted...but had registered.

#36 | Posted by Danforth

That's the beauty of Trump's method.

He'll never claim they actually voted. He just tells his idiot supporters that they, as you point out, registered, and his supporters will fill in the rest then go along with every anti-American assault on our elections Trump pushes in the coming months.

Future history books will be rife with examples of the irony of the supposed patriotic, small government, America loving above all but God voters being the active participants in its destruction. The only shame will be the lack of mention that their low IQ and extreme gullibility were their primary flaws that were ruthlessly exploited.

#49 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-17 10:13 AM | Reply

Abolish the Senate. Abolish the Supreme Court. Abolish the Office of the President.

Abolish borders, prisons.

Never happen?

That is the agenda. So, how to make it happen?

Win the Dem primary. That is all. Once these candidates win the primary, would any Dem vote Republican to prevent this agenda?

The Constitution and the Law can be amended. It's just a matter of filling the ballots with like minded people.

Would you vote against a DSA candidate if they are on the ballot?

The single lever voter will.

#50 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-07-17 10:53 AM | Reply

The single lever voter will vote against any Republican to have a DSA candidate win.

#51 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-07-17 10:54 AM | Reply

Why should States not let the Federal Government know who is voting in Federal elections?
#14 | Posted by oneironaut

What Federal purpose does that serve?

#52 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-17 11:16 AM | Reply

#14
Uh ... ..
Constitution of United States of America?
Specifically, Article I, Section 4?
It's often referred to as the "States and Elections Clause."
No, you look it up and find out why.

#53 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-07-17 11:28 AM | Reply

The States are Sovereign in Elections.

The Fed is just a conglomerate of States.

As Written the constitution gave the Fed almost no Authority over the states.

Republicans generally are against a strong Federal government, or were, until Trump told them not to be.

Republicans LOVE local control if it means Exploiters can destroy ecosystems for profit or Public lands can be sold.

But they suddenly HATE local Control of Elections when the President is a Criminal and has a 30% approval rating.

Why?

What happened to the Party of "Limited Government"?

Why do they Suddenly want FEDERAL control of Elections?

Something always since Forever,and Constitutionally mandated as Being Controlled and Administered by the States?

Trump himself gives the Reason when he states that if the SAVE act is passed Republicans will win Federal Elections for 100 years.

Trump wants the SAVE act, to Save his Own Ass.

#54 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-07-17 11:33 AM | Reply

Why should States not let the Federal Government know who is voting in Federal elections?
#14 | Posted by oneironaut
What Federal purpose does that serve?

#52 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-17 11:16 AM | Reply | Flag:

If you're of the same thought as that raetard JPW - that illegals register, but don't vote - why does it matter to you at all? Why do you care if the feds police that? Surely there's nothing to see there...

#55 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-17 01:38 PM | Reply

Why do you care if the feds police that?
#55 | Posted by lfthndthrds

The Feds have no Constitutional or statutory right to police that.
Why don't you care about that?
Because you're a fascist.

#56 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-17 01:51 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort