The establishment dems lost to the worst person to ever run for president TWICE.

This is a bit of a...ummmmm...misstatement.

Let's rerun the tapes, shall we?

2016 - Hillary got "her turn," which was a mix of establishment and "progressives" gunning for a first woman POTUS. (FTR I think she was one of the most qualified candidates for POTUS of my lifetime)

2020 - Biden easily won. By record voter turnout. No question.

2024 - Harris got "her turn," which was baked into the cake in 2020 by "progressives" who were gunning for a first woman POTUS.

Yeaaaaaah.

No.

Chuck Schumer is the worst.

Schumer f*&^ing sucks and should have retired a decade ago.

But he's not the worst.

The worst are puling, self-righteous "progressives."

It's not even close.

Correct me if I am wrong ...

You're wrong.

Now STFU and f*&^ off.

Unfortunately I think...

#15 | Posted by oneironaut

I'll take things that didn't happen for $500.

Again, STFU and f*&^ off.

Biden only won because trump fumbled a pandemic.

And then he proved how useless establishment dems are by refusing to prosecute the fascists who had just attempted a coup, because he was blind to how insane his republican pals had become.

#19 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

I disagree with the first line. He won because he was status quo and people wanted normalcy.

He and those around him did prove useless in confronting the threat Trump and MAGA presented. I can't in any way disagree with the bold part.

But your delusional if you think "progressives" weren't involved in forcing Harris to the candidacy (woman POC asian blah blah blah) or that it wasn't a long term plan hatched in 2020.

There was ABSOLUTELY ZERO reason to choose her as VPOTUS. None. Nothing about her pick made sense outside of "progressive" identity politic bulls*&^.

You think Hillary and Harris were progressive?

That's not what I said.

If you can't accurately comprehend something posted in the recent past, just stop commenting on it.

I agree they were qualified, but I wouldn't consider them any more progressive than Biden, Bill Clinton or Obama.

#25 | Posted by ClownShack

Again, not what I said.

Of course you disagree. You're an idiot with fond memories of the 90s.

Of course, you can't see reality. You're a "p-p-p-progressive" who can't see reality.

You're a Trumper with a better worldview but less intelligence.

Progressives Do Not Support Harris. You stupid idiot.

So it was the middle of the road Dems who forced the laundry list of social wedge issue compliant, entirely useless candidate onto the Dem electorate in 2020 as VP?

It wasn't the 'white man patriarchy blah blah blah bulls*&^ only a moron like you would believe' insiders who picked the worst primary candidate as next in line for POTUS? Then, wait for it, they pushed her into the candidacy after they had ensured the placement couldn't be challenged?

Please. Her appointment was entirely at the whim of s*&^bag idiots like you who thought Trump was impossible to lose to so they teed up a "candidate" with a man social issue "wins" as they could muster.

You ran away from America.

You're a worthless coward.

#27 | Posted by ClownShack

You keep saying this because you're as stupid as pedoringer and as useless as lfthndpedo.

And I think that carried forward for him in 2020. The pandemic can't be ignored as a factor but Biden was a strong candidate regardless.

#29 | Posted by eberly

Maybe. However, their was metric tons of garbage piled on top to help their decision along.

I don't think too many people were thinking about Beau Biden's death in 2020.

They were thinking about the absolute utter s*&^show that was the first Trump administration.