It's very alarming how much the left embraces politically motivated violence.
#49 | Posted by BellRinger

When ICE sends people to camps, that's the Right enacting politically motivated violence.
Why isn't that very alarming?
Because it's enforcing the law.
#80 | Posted by boazreborn

When The Riiiiight embraces politically motivated violence,
They don't call it politically motivated violence.
They call it "enforcing the law."

And when someone on the Left points out that the German NAZIs were likewise "enforcing the law"
The Riiiight really doesn't like that!
They cry
"Claiming anything America is doing is anywhere near what the German NAZI's were doing is dishonest."

Let's review the claim: Both America and Germany are enforcing the law.
Which laws am I apparently dishonest in comparing?
Laws, both American and German, that send the Undesirables and other enemies of the state to camps.

But no matter. We don't have to leave this country to demonstrate the truth I'm elucidating.
So I switched it to Americans enforcing the law.
It's okay to compare Americans enforcing the law with... Americans enforcing the law, like happened to Dred Scott, and thousands of Japanese? That should be an okay comparison, right?

And then the Riiiiight
Simply ends the discussion
Because they know they've got nothing.

NOTHING

"I think Freedom of Speech affords the right not to be shot."

And that's where you and Charlie Kirk part ways.
Which is good, because that guy was an incredible asshole.

But that's not why Charlie Kirk got shot.
The Charlie Kirk assassination has nothing to do with the First Amendment.
The Charlie Kirk assassination has everything to do with the Second Amendment.

"Claiming anything America is doing is anywhere near what the German NAZI's were doing is dishonest."

There's a deep level of dishonesty here all right.
The dishonesty is pretending the Nazis didn't learn this stuff from the Untied States.
The German NAZIs learned how to do this... by modeling their laws after the United States.

Whoever said that isn't being expected to be taken seriously. They don't mean that.
They just want your attention.
It's not possible anybody with a room temperature IQ could make that comparison with a straight face.
#94 | Posted by eberly

What happened, little Eberly.
Did somebody say Roe v Wade will never be overturned?

Define woman:
A man using a chatbot
--JeffJ

I guess if you stir up shit....don't whine when the violence is directed towards you and your staff, the press core, your cabinet, etc.
right?
#89 | Posted by eberly

That Martin Luther King, Jr. sure did stir up a lot of shit, though.
So did Malcolm X.

"When did it become okay to explain such things away by hammering away at the target of such violence?"

When you don't like the people stirring up your shit.

"When did it become okay to explain such things away by hammering away at the target of such violence?"

Fascists have always been okay with that, little Eberly.

-Claiming anything America is doing is anywhere near what the German NAZI's were doing is dishonest.
...
It's not possible anybody with a room temperature IQ could make that comparison with a straight face.
#94 | Posted by eberly

Would it be better, little Eberly,
if instead of Anne Frank,
the historical legal analogue were Dred Scott, or FDR's interment camps?

You, like all Republican men, are not man enough to have this conversation.
So kindly stop flapping your gums.

Giffords however was completely innocent. I agree she was completely innocent.
I guess if you stir up shit....don't whine when the violence is directed towards you and your staff, the press core, your cabinet, etc.
right?
#89 | Posted by eberly

Both of those work for me.
But you're the only Republican who thinks that way, Eberly.

Charlie Kirk deserved it, I suppose....correct?
#89 | Posted by eberly

You're correct that Charlie Kirk's argument is that Charlie Kirk deserved it.
Have you still not figured out that we're simply pointing out that Charlie Kirk got what Charlie Kirk said Charlie Kirk deserved?

Are you still really playing dumb on that?

What in the hell are you look8ng at that causes you to believe this was staged?
#181 | Posted by BellRinger

The comment from White House staff prior to the event saying there would be "shots fired."
Trump's ever declining poll numbers.
Trump's close ties to executives at an entertainment company whose story lines are full of "surprises" and where the entertainers secretly bloody themselves from imaginary wounds.

"We have his affiliation with a far left group"
"far left"

Is three any other kind of left?

Detainees, not awaiting a criminal trial, may leave the camps at any time by saying the magic words: "I want to go home."
#84 | Posted by visitor_

Congratulations on also finding a way to blame the victims.
Somebody ate their Wheaties today. Was it the one with Bruce Jenner on the box?

The camps are legal
#84 | Posted by visitor_

Again, that's the the correct answer!
It was legal for FDR to send the Japanese to the camps.

So why in your mind did Reagan apologize for that?
Why did Reagan apologize for upholding the law?

Because it's enforcing the law.
#80 | Posted by boazreborn

Yes, that's the correct answer!
The law must be enforced.

When Germany sent people to camps, that's the Right enacting politically motivated violence.
Why wasn't that very alarming?
#78 | Posted by snoofy

Because it's enforcing the law.
#80 | Posted by boazreborn