He may have been practicing for his ICE interview... gaining experience and sharpening up that Resume.

"CBS News is fact-checking President Trump's speech on election security Thursday night, in which he raised new allegations regarding China's access to U.S. voter data and claimed that the "deep state" in the U.S. intelligence community sought to "actively suppress and downplay" China's actions.

He also made accusations about voter registration fraud in the U.S.

Here are some of the claims and CBS News' ratings and context for Mr. Trump's statements:"
more

"No credible intelligence has emerged showing that the vote count in 2020 was manipulated by foreign actors.

Repeated audits and reviews -- manyrun by Republicans, including Trump's own then-attorney general -- have found no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

He did not raise doubts about his election wins in 2016 or 2024."

- its always "no relevance", "no major affect" ... why does this matter?

In 20 years, perhaps the most assinine assertion ever posited here.

Amazing, really.

"No public evidence exists showing that China rigged or altered vote tallies in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. During a prime-time national address on July 16, 2026, President Donald Trump revisited his long-standing claims about the 2020 election.

He announced the declassification of intelligence reports alleging that China accessed 220 million U.S. voter records and engaged in a broad influence campaign against him. (Wall Street Journal)

However, U.S. intelligence agencies, cybersecurity experts, and independent reviews provide consistent information on several key points:

No Vote Tallies Were Altered: Independent assessments confirm that neither China nor any other foreign entity modified ballots, manipulated voting infrastructure, or altered final vote counts.

Data Access Does Not Equal Rigging: While declassified intelligence suggests Chinese intelligence analyzed or accessed public or semi-private U.S. voter registration logs for public opinion analysis, cybersecurity experts clarify that accessing voter records does not give an adversary the ability to manipulate actual vote tallies. (CBS NEWS)

Distinction Between Influence and Technical Interference:

Intelligence officials draw a clear line between influence operations"such as public messaging or social media disinformation campaigns"and technical interference.

While there was a minor dissenting view within the intelligence community that China utilized social media to denigrate Trump's campaign, all agencies agree that no technical infrastructure or tabulation was compromised. (The New York Times)

According to reports from CBS News and The Wall Street Journal, the newly declassified material highlights China's ongoing cyber capabilities and intent to monitor U.S. politics, but it does not support claims that the election outcome was fraudulent or rigged." (CBS NEWS)

- when new evidence is ascertained.
#12 | Posted by oneironaut

There is no relevent new evidence that China worked against him in that Election.

You are merely simping and pimping for they Cult you pretend not to belong to.

Worse, you only belong to it because it's your only way to strike out at liberals and progressives who dare to disagree with your asinine, fallacy-filled assertions about... well, about everything.

Truly pathetic.

'speech' and I use the term loosely, video:

- like Biden did.

From the World's Most Dependable Source of Logically Fallacies; the Whataboutism.

Not an argument at all, but a charge of supposed hypocracy by or for someone else.

So, a waste of space.

alt vid

James Talarico on Morning Joe | Full Interview

Jul 16, 2026

"The first words out of my mouth when I launched this campaign back in September of last year was that the real fight in this country is not left vs right, it's top versus bottom.

My party talks about turning Texas blue. The Republican Party talks about keeping Texas red. I honestly think the best color for Texas is purple. I think she would look great in purple because we have to end one party rule."