Thursday, January 09, 2025

Supreme Court Allows Trump's Sentencing

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Donald Trump's bid to block a New York judge from sentencing him on Friday in his hush money trial. In the 5-4 decision, the court's three liberal judges were joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

Posted by retort at 07:54 PM | 101 COMMENTS | permalink

More

The Supreme Court in a 5-4 vote refuses President-elect Trump's emergency request to halt his sentencing on his hush money criminal conviction.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett join the three liberals in the majority.

It is set to take place as scheduled tomorrow morning.[image or embed]

-- Zach Schonfeld (@zschonfeld.bsky.social) January 9, 2025 at 7:18 PM

Comments

4 idiots on that court. on a good day.

nice to see the 3 trump appointed justices didnt recuse themselves.

#1 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-09 07:59 PM

Roberts and ACB let it go forward because the trial court said it's going to let the Orange Pustule walk. That's the only reason they decided to put on this show of fairness.

#2 | Posted by censored at 2025-01-09 08:08 PM

Sometimes the Ask is too difficult for the Court to do and retain any sort of confidence at all.

So the Mob Boss has to take a hit. He's petty enough that someone somewhere sometime will pay.

#3 | Posted by Corky at 2025-01-09 08:10 PM

He also has liquor licenses which could be withdrawn because he's a criminal.

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2025-01-09 08:15 PM

Lock him up?

Can he Govern from Custody?

America never holds the Powerful to Account for their Crimes.

It's Like, Lawless. You know.

#5 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-01-09 08:27 PM

Wow... Vancypants might have his day.

#6 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2025-01-09 08:31 PM

why is the supreme court deciding anything here?

i guess 4 justices want to ignore the tenth amendment.

states rights sometimes maybe never.

#7 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-09 09:03 PM

He's gonna get sentenced, it's gonna be meaningless.

His inauguration is in ten days and he'll just pardon himself.

#8 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-01-09 09:05 PM

#7 | Posted by Alexandrite

Because the request raises a federal Constitutional question. The state did its thing. The question is whether the federal Constitution prevents such a thing. Tenth Amendment not implicated.

#9 | Posted by et_al at 2025-01-09 09:13 PM

more Drama... You clowns are setting yourselves up for a crying session.

#10 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-01-09 09:26 PM

you voted for a twice impeached felon, clown.

#11 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-09 09:27 PM

You clowns are setting yourselves up for a crying session.

What's there to cry about.

Was it democrats who ran to the Supreme Court begging for protection?

No. That was the fat orange loser you idolize.

As for the sentencing.

Pretty sure everyone realizes it's meaningless and mostly procedural. For posterity.

Like the impeachments.

#12 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-01-09 09:32 PM

The only impeached president I voted for was Bill Clinton.

Just kidding

I never voted for Clinton.

#13 | Posted by eberly at 2025-01-09 09:33 PM

" You clowns are setting yourselves up for a crying session."

Germans elected Hitler but cried in happiness when America rescued them from that psychotic dictator.Of course though, milliions of Jews and. other minorities had to suffer and die first; much like America for the next few years. I just wish I knew a way to prevent the suffering that the MAGAs can't wait to cause.

#14 | Posted by danni at 2025-01-09 10:01 PM

He is not going to be there and they are not going to lock him up.

#15 | Posted by Miranda7 at 2025-01-09 10:04 PM

#15

Because he's the Once and Future King. Otherwise he would be standing IN Court and lucky if he was not getting heavily fined.

#16 | Posted by Corky at 2025-01-09 10:25 PM

I never voted for Clinton.
#13 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Too young?

#17 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-01-09 10:25 PM

Merchan should make -------- wear a tether.

#18 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-09 10:29 PM

17

Nope.

#19 | Posted by eberly at 2025-01-09 10:44 PM

there is still time for biden to ship ------- to gitmo and dare anyone to do anything about it. A drum head court martial and swift justice.

---- ALL Insurrectionists. You magat scum

#20 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-09 10:46 PM

2024 Election Results:

Democrats - Get to call Trump a Felon. Now the man viewed as leader of the future for the party, Newsom fiddles while LA sadly burns to the ground.

Republicans - Complete and unfettered control of the government to implement Pax Americana Imperialism via the Monroe Doctrine.

#21 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-09 10:52 PM

#21

Living in the Past

www.youtube.com

#22 | Posted by Corky at 2025-01-09 10:55 PM

Democrats - Get to call Trump a Felon. Now the man viewed as leader of the future for the party, Newsom fiddles while LA sadly burns to the ground.

Republicans - Complete and unfettered control of the government to implement Pax Americana Imperialism via the Monroe Doctrine.

Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-09 10:52 PM | Reply

God are all you millennials this dumb or are you just a special case of dumb?? Just checking??

#23 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-01-09 11:04 PM

No Corky, I'd say we're going back to the future. Again, congratulations on getting to call the man a Felon. At least you guys got something out of all of this.

#24 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-09 11:14 PM

"getting to call the man a Felon."

If you did it, you'd be a felon. If I did it, I'd be a felon. What makes Trump above the law?

#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-01-09 11:23 PM

- call the man a Felon.

The Leader of your Republican Party IS a felon. Also an Adjudicated Insurrectionist. 3 times in Court.

He's also they guy who sold you out to the richest other Fascist in the world and all the big Corporations and all the other richer than him Oligarchs after telling you he wouldn't.

I suspect he will eventually turn on them to the way Vlad did the Russian Crony Capitalist Oligarchs.

#26 | Posted by Corky at 2025-01-09 11:29 PM

He's also a rapist

#27 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-09 11:32 PM

I bet the ones who voted against them have increased security right now.

#28 | Posted by Corky at 2025-01-09 11:43 PM

Where are we in America when the SC abiding by the Rule of Law is a surprise.

#29 | Posted by Corky at 2025-01-09 11:45 PM

At least the drunken gang rapist came through for Putin's bitch.

#30 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-01-09 11:46 PM

Corky, I genuinely don't give a ---- if the man is a felon and clearly neither did the majority of America. Republicans have the power to the entire government and that's the only thing that matters. Have fun watching!

#31 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-09 11:56 PM

Corky, I genuinely don't give a ---- if the man is a felon and clearly neither did the majority of America. Republicans have the power to the entire government and that's the only thing that matters. Have fun watching!

#31 | Posted by Bluewaffles

Clearly your parents/guardians ------ you over during your impressionable years.

I learned by kindergarten to not vote for a rapist.

#32 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-09 11:58 PM

"Again, congratulations on getting to call the man a Felon."

No the honor is all yours. We did not convict him. A jury of his peers did that.

And we did not vote for him. This is what you wanted.

Gratz on electing the first convicted felon for president.

So now we all know he is a criminal. And you elected him. Gratz on helping him escape accountability for all his other crimes, too.

#33 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-01-09 11:59 PM

I had a great childhood Truth, I'm sorry you didn't?

#34 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-09 11:59 PM

Corky, I genuinely don't give a ---- if the man is a felon and clearly neither did the majority of America. Republicans have the power to the entire government and that's the only thing that matters. Have fun watching!

Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-09 11:56 PM | Reply

The majority of Americans didn't vote for Trump. Just sayin

#35 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-01-09 11:59 PM

- I genuinely don't give a ---- if the man is a felon

Obviously not. Not even that he's a traitor insurrectionist. There was a time in this country, even in your Party, when those might cause at least a bit of concern. Not now though.

- that's the only thing that matters

Of course it is... if you have no concience.

#36 | Posted by Corky at 2025-01-10 12:01 AM

I had a great childhood Truth, I'm sorry you didn't?

#34 | Posted by Bluewaffles

I pity you not knowing what you missed out.

#37 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:04 AM

Republicans have the power to the entire government and that's the only thing that matters. Have fun watching!

#31 | Posted by Bluewaffles

May you get everything you voted for.

#38 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:05 AM

Yes they did Laura, he won the popular vote. That's what the idiots within your party bemoaned the first time he won. Also ... if you guys on the Left really wanted to uphold your "convictions;" you would have handed over Harris's Electoral Votes from the states who have all enacted the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.

But alas you didn't and shows how truly full of it the Left collectively is.

#39 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-10 12:05 AM

I had a great childhood Truth, I'm sorry you didn't?

#34 | Posted by Bluewaffles

Did anyone ever tell you about the moral failings it takes to rape a woman? And what that says about a man's character?

#40 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:06 AM

Republicans have the power to the entire government and that's the only thing that matters. Have fun watching!

I can't wait. This lame duck thing is dumb. Like, bring it on!!

#41 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-01-10 12:07 AM

Bluewaffles, how did you find voting for a rapist to be an acceptable option?

I am generally curious.

#42 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:08 AM

Careful with that wording Truth, you might find yourself facing a defamation case and forking over 15MM to the Trump Presidential Library.

#43 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-10 12:10 AM

Yes they did Laura, he won the popular vote. That's what the idiots within your party bemoaned the first time he won. Also ... if you guys on the Left really wanted to uphold your "convictions;" you would have handed over Harris's Electoral Votes from the states who have all enacted the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.

But alas you didn't and shows how truly full of it the Left collectively is.

Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-10 12:05 AM | Reply

God you really are THIS dumb. Only 22% of the US Population voted for Trump. Not even a quarter of them. Nice try Dummkopf.

#44 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-01-10 12:12 AM

A jury of his peers found that he pushed a woman up against a wall and shoved his fingers inside her vagina against her will.

TODAY that would be considered rape in NY (they changed the laws if you weren't aware).

That is acceptable to you.

Your morals are ------.

#45 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:15 AM

That's cool Truth, maybe they'll change the laws in NY to actually help stop innocent women from being set on fire on the Subway by the illegals your party let in. That would be progress.

But I forget you guys only give a ---- about women when it's aborting children.

#46 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-10 12:20 AM

Why are you changing the subject. Explain your choice. You voted for a man that forced his fingers inside an unwilling woman's vagina. She claimed he stuck his dick in her.

Why is that acceptable to you for a president?

What does that say about your morals?

#47 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:22 AM

---------- like ---------- attacked DC because Putin's butt ---- lost an election.

#48 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-01-10 12:23 AM

Just to summarize.

The coming president is

1. a Felon
2. an insurrectionist
3. a rapist.
4. corporate fraudster
5. a liabler

All adjudicated in US courts of law, by juries of his peers.

#49 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:26 AM

#49

Don't forget he's a racist pos.

www.nbcnews.com

#50 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-01-10 12:28 AM

Truth, I personally do not believe E. Jean Carrol's story for the following reason: her credibility is shot to ----.

1) Not Trump's type even in the 90's
2) The Dress she claimed to have been purchasing wasn't released until a few years later (this was acknowledged by the department store)
3) The woman writes about salacious and sexually depraved subject matter
4) If the case had been tried anywhere else outside of Manhattan I don't believe he would have been found guilty
5) The NY legislature changed the "rape laws" so they could go after Trump and sunset the law after a specific period of time again for the sole purpose of going after him.

It's ---- like this as to why I don't bother answering your questions.

#51 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-10 12:34 AM

LOLLOLOLOL

Thanks for proving my point

Again, you lack any integrity.

#52 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:37 AM

Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing.

#53 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-10 12:40 AM

As an aside, YOU don't get to pick and choose reality.

Donald Trump was found to have liabled E. Jean Carroll by stating she was lying when she said he inserted his fingers in her vagina against her will.

That means according to the law, ------- raped (colloquially speaking) E. Jean Carroll.

You HAVE to deny that reality to reach your conclusion, with obvious nonsensical reasoning.

Just as an example.... rape isn't about looks it is about power. ------- wanted to impose himself on E. Jean Carroll and a jury found that he did. That imposition is the power that a rapist seeks. It does not matter whether E. Jean Carroll was his "type" cause his actual "type" was a woman he could force himself on.

But you do you. Your man is a rapist. Deny he is a rapist, that doesn't make him any less a rapist.

Then you have to deny he is a felon, which he is.

Then you have to deny he is an insurrectionist, which he is.

Then you have to deny he committed corporate fraud, which he did.

Then you have to deny he liabled E. Jean Carroll, which he did

Then you have to deny he discriminated against African Americans, which he did.

That is a whole -------- of denial.

I get it, you don't like to answer my questions, but truth hurts bitch.

You can act like reality isn't reality, but reality rarely arrives lubed.

Truth Hurts Donut

#54 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:45 AM

Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing.

#53 | Posted by Bluewaffles

Even if it takes a coup? or rape?

You may wonder why you haven't won a couple of years from now, while ------- is winning, winning, winning.

Hint, it is because he does not care about you. At all.

EVERYTHING he says is a lie.

Because winning isn't everything, it's the only thing.

You remember that when it is he winning and you losing.

#55 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:47 AM

Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing.

#53 | Posted by Bluewaffles

How'd that work out for Ashli Babbitt btw?

#56 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-10 12:51 AM

How'd that work out for Ashli Babbitt btw?

She's a loser. Never even got nominated for a Medal of Freedom. Killer Kyle did. I guess you have to be the shooter to qualify.

#57 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-01-10 12:56 AM

What's sad is, Waffles somehow associates Trump winning with himself personally winning.

This is how a cult works.

#58 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-01-10 01:09 AM

Rcade, I got the ----- riled up for you at least until inauguration day. You're welcome.

#59 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-10 01:22 AM

This is the -------- who said he was leaving more times than goatshart.

#60 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-01-10 01:26 AM

He is Goatman.

#61 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-01-10 01:30 AM

I got the ----- riled up for you

You posted stupid shht and people responded?

Bravo.

#62 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-01-10 01:31 AM

Rcade, I got the ----- riled up for you at least until inauguration day. You're welcome.

Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-10 01:22 AM | Reply

Says the guy who craps where he eats. RCADE aught to go LZK medieval on your hiney. Just sayin

#63 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-01-10 02:10 AM

I'm late to the blame-game party on this thread and don't have time to scroll through all 62 comments. So I'll just get to the point and suggest that the U.S. Supreme Court did not redeem themself with that 4-5 decision against Trump.

I fully believe they'll end up vacating the sentence on appeal.

#64 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-01-10 02:32 AM

I fully believe they'll end up vacating the sentence on appeal.

Ms. "I worked in a law office once upon a time" opines.

I'm more circumspect. I'll wait for the Appellate Division to opine and narrow the issues before jumping off the cliff. Then I wait for the Appeals Court to have their say. After all that, in a few years, the USSC might be asked to weigh in. I'll hold my speculation for the future.

#65 | Posted by et_al at 2025-01-10 03:17 AM

Oh, and in the mean time, an officially convicted felon will take the oath of office of the President of the United States on the next January 20th.

And a S**T Ton of American persons are okay with that. That concerns me. It should you.

#66 | Posted by et_al at 2025-01-10 03:24 AM

Oh, and in the mean time, an officially convicted felon will take the oath of office of the President of the United States on the next January 20th.

It's frightening and embarrassing at the same time.

#67 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-10 03:59 AM

It's a disgrace what it is. Oh and a traitor to the United States of America as well.

#68 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-01-10 04:14 AM

"It's a disgrace what it is. Oh and a traitor to the United States of America as well"

Unfortunately, Trump's cultish, uninformed followers don't see it that way, at least at the moment. They're in for a rude awakening when he starts to reduce them to paupers. When he cuts all social programs, cuts social security and they start to get sick and die because they can't afford the cost of private medical insurance. Their news outlets will all be reduced to State Run media, at which they'll be force-fed only what the Imperial Presidency wants you to know.

Too late will come sooner than they think. But by then, Trump will be fully entrenched in his Imperial Presidency with a bobblehead Supreme Court and Congress and there's not a damn thing anybody can do about it. The whole system of checks and balances will already have collapsed. Not to mention that future elections will be a sham. (like in Russia.)

Trump's cult will be crying in their beer if they can afford it.

Eventually, maybe we'll see a mass immigration in the other direction.

#69 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-01-10 05:32 AM

Oh please...it is rich people's justice from the sold out Supreme Corrupt Court, and Trump faces little to no consequences for all of his crimes, including the coup attempt and stealing public secret documents...

#70 | Posted by Hughmass at 2025-01-10 07:07 AM

TWINPAC

Trump's cult will be crying in their beer if they can afford it.

"What do ya want, an egg in your beer?"

#71 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-01-10 07:12 AM

HUGHMASS

I think the "sold out" Supreme Court is going to reach much deeper than just this one-off for Trump or "rich people" as you suggest.

They're going to play a major role in the GOP's master plan to turn this country into a fascist state whether it be with Trump on the throne or one of their many chosen successors over their very own thousand year Reich.

#72 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-01-10 07:31 AM

Democrats - Get to call Trump a Felon.

Republicans - Complete and unfettered control of the government to implement Pax Americana Imperialism via the Monroe Doctrine.

#21 | Posted by Bluewaffles

1) That Donald is a felon, like that meth freak convicted of stealing beer from that convenience store, is a simple fact.

2) Nazis have to be imperialists. Just like they have to say that "winning is the only thing".

3) You're edging closer to being comfortable with the adjective "Nazi". Well, you'd have to, given who you are. One day soon you'll crow about it.

#73 | Posted by Zed at 2025-01-10 08:42 AM

Pax Americana

#21 | Posted by Bluewaffles

As vainglorious as Donald is himself. Yep, edging closer....

Donald is going to fail. It's his history. We can only pray that his failures are not bloody and impoverishing.

#74 | Posted by Zed at 2025-01-10 08:45 AM

Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing.

#53 | Posted by Bluewaffles

If you ain't winning you are losing!

Shake and Bake!

#75 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-01-10 10:50 AM

Some sentence.

#76 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2025-01-10 11:10 AM

Laura, I would hope Rcade knows that I actually do respect him. While he and I have policy disagreements, I generally try my best to abide by his rules. I don't stoop to the level of behavior that I've seen out of Legally and Truth (they are whom the ----- comment was made towards).

Also for Clown, I am not Goat. If Rcade ever decides to ban hammer me. I'll respect his wishes on the matter and simply go back to reader status only like I used to be.

#77 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-01-10 11:16 AM

3) You're edging closer to being comfortable with the adjective "Nazi". Well, you'd have to, given who you are. One day soon you'll crow about it.

#73 | Posted by Zed a

aaaah ahahhahahhahahaaa

class A

class A idiotic moron.

----too early for you to bogart tbe "toot toot"

#78 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-01-10 11:38 AM

77 | Posted by Bluewaffles

One day I hope to see that you have stopped trying to be nice to these f /g people.

but I doubt it.....these jack arse-------- lying sax of shvt..... don't deserve you....

#79 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-01-10 11:43 AM

heh heh / heh heh

listen to this phrase....." jury misconduct."

has a nice "ring" to it,,,,doesn't it >

#80 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-01-10 12:01 PM

" Why are you changing the subject. Explain your choice. You voted for a man that forced his fingers inside an unwilling woman's vagina. She claimed he stuck his dick in her.

Why is that acceptable to you for a president?

What does that say about your morals?

#47 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS AT 2025-01-10 12:22 AM | FLAG: "

You voted for Clinton twice.

You might want to quit trying to play the morality card and sit this one out.

#81 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-01-10 12:07 PM

"You voted for Clinton twice."

Bill Clinton is not a convicted felon.

Trump is. Gratz on lowering the bar to the lowest it's ever been in what is acceptable in American politics.

#82 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-01-10 12:18 PM

No jail time; not even a fine!
America has failed. The rich can delay their justice by endless motions while running for political office.

#83 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-01-10 12:31 PM

You voted for Clinton twice.

One of the better presidents of my lifetime.

#84 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-01-10 12:34 PM

Bell, just let these morons go on about how much they care about the personal morality of a president.

It's extremely well documented what Clinton did, according to his accusers.

It doesn't matter to any of them.

they can pretend all they want and there are literally hundreds of other reasons to not support Trump. I didn't need any of the sexual assault stuff to be a reason. I was convinced to support Trump's opponent long before we got to that stuff.

But for anybody who will defend Clinton's sexual assault, extra-marital affairs, etc.....and then pretend to be so offended by Trump.....well, those folks are just plain ------- retarded to drag the conversation there.

Again, hundreds of other reasons to oppose Trump.

#85 | Posted by eberly at 2025-01-10 01:21 PM

-Bill Clinton is not a convicted felon.

He's been impeached, disbarred, and accused of sexual assault from multiple women.

and I don't go around running the guy down for it.

but let's not pretend otherwise....

oh wait....I forget who I'm talking to.

#86 | Posted by eberly at 2025-01-10 01:23 PM

It's extremely well documented what Clinton did, according to his accusers.

Yes, he sexually harrassed women.

He wasn't proven in court to have shoved his fingers in a woman in a department store, then lose a defamation lawsuit calling her crazy.

Look. Clinton is a bad dude. But Trump is worse. That's just an objective fact. Trump is a convicted felon, Clinton isn't. Trump was impeached twice. Trump led an insurrection.

trying to pretend both parties are exactly the same and using talking points to go back to 1996 isn't helping. The both siderism is insulting to anyone with an IQ over 100.

#87 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-10 01:25 PM

For a little background here:

I left the democratic party in the 90's because of Clintons perjury and the endless "it's only a BJ" defense democrats were puking up. Bill Clinton wasn't a great president either.

#88 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-10 01:30 PM

-trying to pretend both parties are exactly the same

I'm not pretending anything of the kind.

the fact you would go there just proves you can't live in the real world.

You want cry and moan about Trump but want everyone to shut up about Clinton by making these absurd comparisons.

it's a waste of time and it's so meaningless.

But continue on if it gets you off. clearly it gets others here quite wet.

"The both siderism is insulting to anyone with an IQ over 100."

LOL for many reasons......

1. anybody with an IQ above 100 wouldn't, in a million years go down this road opening up the door to Clinton comparisons
2. There is literally nobody left to argue this with
3. there is absolutely no point to this argument

but again.......continue on.

#89 | Posted by eberly at 2025-01-10 01:31 PM

-I left the democratic party in the 90's because of Clintons perjury and the endless "it's only a BJ" defense democrats were puking up. Bill Clinton wasn't a great president either.

I appreciate that but it buys you zero credibility. What do you mean left the democratic party? for how long? 3 months?

Clinton's tenure as president is an illustration of how the WH can work with an opposition party to generate positive results. It doesn't mean I agree with everything he did but nobody is going to earn that distinction.

#90 | Posted by eberly at 2025-01-10 01:35 PM

-Yes, he sexually harrassed women.

You're saying all the women who accused Clinton of sexual assault, not harassment, were all lying?

#91 | Posted by eberly at 2025-01-10 01:38 PM

Eb,

"I'm not pretending anything of the kind."

How about the democrats "pretending" Joe Biden is actually making decisions and that his people didn't know he was losing his mind?

#92 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-01-10 03:13 PM

BW: Winning is neither "everything" or the " only thing". Only fascists and authoritarians think that way.

Decency, ethics, and doing the right thing, regardless of the outcome are all that matter in the end. When you die and must answer for your lies, your hypocrisy, your selfishness, and disdain for people who are different from you, it will not suffice to tell God, "But we won and that is all that matters".

#93 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-01-10 03:15 PM

92

which democrats? voters or Biden's inner circle?

that handful of people knew what they were doing.

Not sure who else deserves any scrutiny for those actions......

#94 | Posted by eberly at 2025-01-10 04:08 PM

" What do you mean left the democratic party? for how long? 3 months?"

for some reason i keep hoping youre an honest and reasonable person arguing in good faith. my error.

#95 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-10 04:34 PM

How about the democrats "pretending" Joe Biden is actually making decisions and that his people didn't know he was losing his mind?

#92 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-01-10 03:13 PM | Reply
Your dishonesty is duly noted

#96 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-01-10 04:38 PM

95

just answer the question.

I might be the only person here who will believe your answer.

Don't attack me for that.

how long?

#97 | Posted by eberly at 2025-01-10 04:42 PM

" I might be the only person here who will believe your answer."

just make one up, its what you do.

#98 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-01-10 04:44 PM

So how do we get rid of the four unAmerican s*&^bags that would make a POTUS completely untouchable?

On another note, I never would have thought Crazy Eyes McOpusDei would be the voice of reason among the righty justices.

#99 | Posted by jpw at 2025-01-10 08:51 PM

Oh come on, the game is so rigged that the rule of law was murdered long ago, Trump is now the Fascist king, strutting about the world, certainly about the US, above the law. He killed the rule of law, it lies battered and bloody on the streets of Washington DC.

#100 | Posted by Hughmass at 2025-01-11 07:27 AM

more Drama... You clowns are setting yourselves up for a crying session.

#10 | Posted by lfthndthrds

LOL this idiot calling others a clown while he runs on base emotion like fear and duuhhhh CrYiNgZz!!

#101 | Posted by jpw at 2025-01-11 10:32 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

European Officials Reportedly Now View US as an Adversary (285 comments)

Republicans Mum as Trump Turns Toward Russia Against Ukraine (120 comments)

Bannon: Musk 'wants to impose his freak experiments' on US (39 comments)

Trump Seeks Control of Independent Agencies (37 comments)

Europe Preps Huge Defense Package in Boost to Ukraine (30 comments)

Is Elon Musk Right About Widespread Social Security Fraud? (30 comments)

MAGA Seeing Red over Tom Hanks Skit (26 comments)

Republican Introduces Bill to Make Trump's Birthday a Federal Holiday (25 comments)

New York Governor Weighs Removing NYC Mayor Adams (23 comments)

Trump: Russia 'have the Cards' in Peace Negotiations (19 comments)