Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, June 18, 2025

In President Donald J. Trump's first five months in office, real wages for hourly workers have seen their largest increase under any administration in nearly 60 years " and we're just getting started with pro-growth, pro-prosperity policies that finally put America First.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Blue-collar workers have seen real wages grow almost two percent in the first five months of President Trump's second term " a stark contrast from the negative wage growth seen during the first five months of the Biden Administration.

The New York Post notes: "Since Richard Nixon in 1969, Trump has been the only president to record positive growth for blue-collar workers in his first five months. He also achieved 1.3% in his first term ... The recovery from a 1.7% decline recorded in Biden's first five months, as inflation outpaced earnings, suggests a shift in economic conditions for this financially stressed segment of the workforce."

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Personally, I don't care if the streets are paved with gold. Fascism is not worth it. I prefer people over profits.

#1 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2025-06-18 05:42 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Source: WH press release.

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-06-18 05:57 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 6

Trump data. No reason to trust the Liar.

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-18 10:24 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

If your source is from the most corrupt administration in history, your story is bunk

#4 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-06-18 10:29 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

No reason to trust the Liar.

I'm sure Grok backs it up. :-)

#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-06-18 10:33 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

Where is the actual data?

#6 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-06-18 10:33 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Wait wait wait, you mean a POTUS inheriting a good economy is likely to have better metrics than a POTUS inheriting a bad economy?

Surely that's not the reason they cherry picked the data the way they did...right?

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-18 10:35 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

www.epi.org

The real picture when you don't cherry pick the s*&^ out of the data...

#8 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-18 10:37 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Wait wait wait, you mean a POTUS inheriting a good economy is likely to have better metrics than a POTUS inheriting a bad economy?"

You mean the "good" economy where real wages declined over 4 years so Americans are poorer today? That economy?

#9 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 10:51 AM | Reply

"Declined"

From the spike caused by emerging from the pandemic back to historical levels that are well above those seen following 2008...

In an economy that was inherited by the current s(*&stain in office who failed when real leadership was necessary...

Sit down, Junior. You're out of your depth.

#10 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-18 11:22 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#I0. You are clearly knowledgeable about mucus. When it comes to economics you are pretty bad. You are certainly not in any in if position to condescend when it comes to economics.

#11 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-18 12:22 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"When it comes to economics you are pretty bad."

You're joking, right?

Look at the economy Trump was handed the first time, versus the dumpster fire he handed off.

Similarly, look at "envy of the world" economy Biden handed to Trump, and the schittshow he's turned it into since.

Now go ahead...enlighten us regarding your economic theories.

#12 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-06-18 12:31 PM | Reply

You're joking, right?

He's a troll, looking to get fed.

#13 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-18 12:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Shutting down most of the economy due to a goal pandemic resulted in bad economic output?

What a shocker!!!

To the extent that POTUS policies affect our current economic output the results are mixed. Cutting bad regulations and expanding access to natural resources certainly drives growth but it's being at least partially (if not more) offset by the imposition of tariffs.

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-18 12:35 PM | Reply

This article is a White House press release, and has nothing to do with reality.

It's literally propaganda for deplorable Trump supporters to consume.

#15 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-18 12:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Celebrating a 1.7% increase when inflation is running 2.6% is like praising the band playing on the deck of the Titanic.

#16 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-06-18 01:08 PM | Reply

When it comes to economics you are pretty bad. You are certainly not in any in if position to condescend when it comes to economics.

#11 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

All I did was read a graph, sport.

#17 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-18 01:19 PM | Reply

Cutting bad regulations and expanding access to natural resources certainly drives growth

Bulls^*%.

tradingeconomics.com

If you remove the clear outliers in 2020 and draw a trend line, it will be horizontal.

You're spreading a lie that righty economic policy is better for growth despite a simple graph and some basic analytical skills proving that to be pure garbage.

#18 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-18 01:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You're spreading a lie

Every chance he gets.

#19 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-18 01:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

What a ------- clown.

#20 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-06-18 02:34 PM | Reply

My company just informed me that I, along with most people on my team, will not be receiving a pay increase. We also just laid off people for only the third time in the past 30 years. Things are feeling an awful like 2008 again based on my personal experience.

#21 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-06-18 03:09 PM | Reply

" Things are feeling an awful like 2008 again based on my personal experience.

#21 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE AT 2025-06-18 03:09 PM | FLAG: "

It has probably will happen. Our fiscal policy is terrible. How many years did the fed run 0% interest. $trillion deficits. $37 trillion in debt with no end in sight. Medicare costs rising at an unsustainable pace. A totally predictable government created crash is imminent.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-18 04:53 PM | Reply

A totally predictable government created crash is imminent.

#22 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

That's exactly what Trump is doing.

Along with his totally predictable major war.

#23 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-18 05:05 PM | Reply

Zed,

The problem I described goes back decades.

#24 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-18 05:51 PM | Reply

probably will happen. Our fiscal policy is terrible.
#22 | Posted by BellRinger

I work for a regional healthcare company and for us I know the reason we are having a downturn is due to increased difficulty in obtaining payment from public health insurers.
On the financial update call, the leader who was presenting financials, who is a slightly outspoken republican, was asked if the current layoffs were in anticipation of public insurance funding cuts being discussed in congress. The response was "No. We will have to reevaluate should that occur. My current hope is that the big beautiful does not pass in its current form."

That statement, along with the reason for our current cutbacks, signaled to me that should the new budget reduce public healthcare funds then we will likely respond by closing facilities with higher ratios of patients on public insurance plans than private, e.g. rural facilities.

#25 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-06-18 05:52 PM | Reply

"Celebrating a 1.7% increase when inflation is running 2.6% is like praising the band playing on the deck of the Titanic.
#16 | Posted by Nixon"

Typical liberal - shoots off their mouth with 100% confidence when they have no idea what they are talking about.

REAL WAGE INCREASE = Increase NET of inflation

The nominal wage increase is 4.3% vs. 2.6% inflation.

So yeah, this is a big deal and a great accomplishment.

#26 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 06:24 PM | Reply

So yeah, this is a big deal and a great accomplishment.

#26 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

Oh? Did Trumpy possibly fix another problem that he himself caused?

What a superhero!

Magaman!! He can kill hundreds of thousands of Americans and not lose a single vote! His real superpower is his shameless ability to fix the very problems that he causes! He should star in his own marvel movie.

#27 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-06-18 06:33 PM | Reply

"#27 | Posted by donnerboy"

An alternative explanation that you clearly have not considered: Trump doesn't lose votes because his policies create jobs and make people's lives better.

#28 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 06:41 PM | Reply

I prefer people over profits.
#1 | Posted by TFDNihilist

Has there ever been a time where profits in the aggregate don't help people?

What's the point of profits if not to help people.

#29 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-06-18 06:56 PM | Reply

#25 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce

You're part of the problem.
- Luigi Mangione

#30 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-06-18 06:58 PM | Reply

What's the point of profits if not to help people.
#29 | POSTED BY ONENUT

Profits don't help anyone but the rich.

Especially in America.

#31 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-18 07:00 PM | Reply

The orange rapist deserves all of the credit for being the worst jobs president since Hoover.

#32 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-06-18 07:03 PM | Reply

"#32 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

Yes, which explains why he was reelected based on his economic track record. Keep living in fantasy land dipshit...yes, your Democrat approval can go below 20%.

#33 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 07:05 PM | Reply

The daughter-boning child rapist finished dead fucking last.

www.axios.com

#34 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-06-18 07:19 PM | Reply

which explains why he was reelected based on his economic track record.

That's not why he was reelected.

I'm pretty sure even you don't believe that.

#35 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-18 07:27 PM | Reply

"#34 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"

I am more interested in how the American people rank him rather than some dipshit liberals stuck in academia. They ranked him in Nov 2024.

#36 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 07:27 PM | Reply

I am more interested in how the American people rank him

Dead last.

#37 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-18 07:28 PM | Reply

"Dead last.
#37 | Posted by ClownShack"

That explains his crushing victory in 2024 and the Democrat party's 20% approval rating in your mind.

Now, as a militant homosexual, I know YOU don't like Trump. But, your lifestyle and beliefs is what has been destroying the US. So, in voting FOR Trump, we are also voting AGAINST you.

#38 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 07:55 PM | Reply

That explains his crushing victory in 2024 and the Democrat party's 20% approval rating in your mind.
Now, as a militant homosexual, I know YOU don't like Trump. But, your lifestyle and beliefs is what has been destroying the US. So, in voting FOR Trump, we are also voting AGAINST you.

Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 07:55 PM | Reply

Crushing victory my hiney. Trump barely won by 1.6%. He didn't even get 50% of the votes. Please do try again.

#39 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-18 08:04 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"#39 | Posted by LauraMohr"

He won EVERY swing state. He won the bellwether counties. It was a landslide.

He would have had over 50% if not for the Dems cheating with mail in ballots to steal a few senate seats. BTW, new report in how China helped Biden cheap with mail in ballots in 2020 - report from the FBI.

#40 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 08:10 PM | Reply

You and those mail in ballot meme. That's not cheating. What a dingledorfer.

#41 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-06-18 08:19 PM | Reply

" Profits don't help anyone but the rich.

Especially in America.

#31 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK AT 2025-06-18 07:00 PM | REPLY | FLAG:"

Ever heard of small business? Ever hear of a 401K?

#42 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-06-18 08:27 PM | Reply

Straight from the bovine's colon.

#43 | Posted by Angrydad at 2025-06-18 08:37 PM | Reply

"Dead last.
#37 | Posted by ClownShack"
That explains his crushing victory in 2024 and the Democrat party's 20% approval rating in your mind.
Now, as a militant homosexual, I know YOU don't like Trump. But, your lifestyle and beliefs is what has been destroying the US. So, in voting FOR Trump, we are also voting AGAINST you.
#38 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 07:55 PM

ClownShack might be gay, but you're the c0cksucker. I had to, you set it up.;]

As for your theory on propagandizing here, the unemployment, underemployment are staggering. With the invention of hundreds of thousands now unemployed as the template for all Federally funded agencies I can't understand how those that remain employed consider this as growth.

It's obvious the contractions in industry from the ICE abductions, the tariffs and those tax cuts increase costs and pricing, so who's saving what with who's money?

#44 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-06-18 09:38 PM | Reply

"#44 | Posted by redlightrobot"

Over 1M illegals have self-deported already - those illegals being removed from the labor force will result in wages increasing for Americans and the end to those illegals abusing the social services and school system.

Underemployment is VERY high - but, there are 2 factors for this. First, a lot of this is related to people 'with college degrees' working in jobs where one is not required. That is not a problem with the economy - that is a problem with the school system giving out useless degrees. Second, this is caused in part by the wage suppressing nature of the illegal aliens. For the average American - if you make $100,000/year - do you care if you use your degree or not? The US median per capita income is ~$43,000. The issue is not 'underemployment' - it is WAGES TOO LOW. So, treat the factors leading to low wages: 1.) foreign imports undercutting US products (via tariffs), 2.) discourage US firms from moving outside of the US (via regulation relief, cheap energy, and tariffs), 3.) encourage foreign firms to expand manufacturing in the US (via tariffs), and 4.) get rid of the wage suppressing illegals

Now - you may not agree that tariff work - that is a fair stance. But, you cannot state that Trump's entire economic plan is not centered around this 100% scientifically backed belief system so it doesn't make sense.

#45 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-06-18 10:23 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort