All you clowns have is personal attacks. These documents are very damning and you all got nothing.
#50 | Posted by BellRinger
No, they're not. They're just the usual rightwing distortion that fools those looking for an excuse to support a pedophile.
Documents revealed that in the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community consistently assessed that Russia was "probably not trying ... to influence the election by using cyber means."
Cherry picked line (see ...) that only means they probably weren't trying to use this singular method, a finding that was at odds with other assessments and evidence at the time.
Then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper's talking points stated: "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome."
The claim was never Russia hacking and putting their thumb on the electoral scale. It was them using false or misleading information on social media platforms to confuse and anger gullible idiots.
"We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure," the Presidential Daily Brief stated. "Russian Government-affiliated actors most likely compromised an Illinois voter registration database and unsuccessfully attempted the same in other states."
Again, not the central claim or findings and, again, this doesn't support the conclusion you're pushing.
The brief noted that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence assessed that any Russian activities "probably were intended to cause psychological effects, such as undermining the credibility of the election process and candidates."
So the claimed activities were happening...
As usual, right wing "news" sources bury an accurate assessment of reality far enough down that your average bellringer won't read far enough to get to it. That's the MO for all "news" sources from righty sources.
And you fall for it every single time.
"suppressed intelligence from before and after the election showing Russia lacked intent and capability to hack the 2016 election."
Again, direct interference was never the claim.
I'm not going to keep going as it's clear this is just a distortion piece meant to support a narrative, not report reality.
I can't help but notice that it also projects massively on the Dems the arguments and unsupported claims you idiots made about 2020.