U.S. Department of War
Employees could find themselves changing Defense Department seals on more than 700,000 facilities around the world.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
C0RI0LANUS
Joined 2023/01/13Visited 2025/09/04
Status: user
MORE STORIES
West Point Snubs Veteran's Advocate Tom Hanks (7 comments) ...
Trump Pardoned Jan. 6 Rioter Arrested on Animal Attack Charges (3 comments) ...
JD Vance on US War Crimes: “I Don’t Give a S**t” (37 comments) ...
DOD to Prioritize Western Hemisphere Over China, Russia (5 comments) ...
Chinese Hackers Stole Data from Almost Every American (4 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
President Donald Trump says he's "not sure" if Congress needs to approve his rebranding of the Department of Defense as the "Department of War."[image or embed]" NBC News (@nbcnews.com) Sep 5, 2025 at 10:00 PM
President Donald Trump says he's "not sure" if Congress needs to approve his rebranding of the Department of Defense as the "Department of War."[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
"the EU and Canada have been "Trumpf-proofing" their collective security with the Re-Arm Europe program"
And France tells their hospitals to prepare for war in 2026.
Everybody but a Republican can tell which way the wind is blowing.
#1 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-09-05 05:24 AM | Reply
#1: Hi Snoofy: Perhaps the only Republicans who see which way the wind is blowing are Dick Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, and the Lincoln Project folks. Lots of fired DOD and USIC personnel see the writing on the wall: d39raawggeifpx.cloudfront.net
#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-09-05 05:35 AM | Reply
See also Tom Nichols, " Pete Hegseth's Department of Cringe: Renaming the Defense Department is a pathetic stunt" (www.theatlantic.com):
I have a better idea. Let's skip the "War" name and go right to the "Department of Cringe." It may not strike fear into the hearts of evildoers overseas, but it will resonate with Americans who take national defense seriously, because it is the emotion many of them already feel every time the former Major Hegseth says "lethality" and "warfighter." If the leaders of the United States are going to make fools of themselves and of the dedicated men and women who serve in uniform simply to own the libs and put on a show for the party faithful, any name will do. They might as well choose one that's accurate."
#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-09-05 05:55 AM | Reply
#3: Hi Doc, thanks for the article. Dept of Cringe, indeed.
#4 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-09-05 07:04 AM | Reply
Everything he does is to benefit Russia.
Period.
He is a traitor.
#5 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-09-05 07:05 AM | Reply
Step aside, Benedict, you've been replaced.
#6 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-09-05 07:25 AM | Reply
So no on the quest for that Nobel Peace Prize, just go for the Ignoble Pieces Prize? Counter Russia's move by "collecting" Canada, Greenland, Mexico, and maybe just keep on going South at least through Panama?
#7 | Posted by YAV at 2025-09-05 07:45 AM | Reply
Putin is saying that any foreign troops in Ukraine will be considered targets.
btw... that Daily News cover says it all.
#8 | Posted by Corky at 2025-09-05 10:50 AM | Reply
Department of Drunk -------
#9 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-05 09:36 PM | Reply
"Pentagon officials grappled Friday with the Herculean task of fulfilling President Donald Trump's executive order to remold the enormous, global agency into the Department of War.
Many expressed frustration, anger and downright confusion at the effort, which could cost billions of dollars for a cosmetic change that would do little to tackle the military's most pressing challenges " such as countering a more aggressive alliance of authoritarian nations."
;;
"This is purely for domestic political audiences," said a former defense official.
"Not only will this cost millions of dollars, it will have absolutely zero impact on Chinese or Russian calculations. Worse, it will be used by our enemies to portray the United States as warmongering and a threat to international stability."
www.politico.com
Trumpers are now stuck making excuses for all the idiotic Propaganda expenses their Cult Leader incurs keeping them barefoot and pregnant, er, stupid.
"Yeah, lets spend billions to Rebrand to the f'n by God, "WAR Dept!".
Patsies for the Billionaires every one of them.
#10 | Posted by Corky at 2025-09-05 09:38 PM | Reply
Nothing says "I deserve a Nobel peace prize" like having a Department of War.
#11 | Posted by qcp at 2025-09-05 09:44 PM | Reply
He must be going after the Nobel War Prize now.
#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-09-05 09:44 PM | Reply | Funny: 2
Nothing says "I deserve a Nobel peace prize" like having a Department of War. #3 | POSTED BY QCP
Yes because calling it the "Department of Defense" is sooooo truthful.
He must be going after the Nobel War Prize now. #4 | POSTED BY REDIAL
I don't see why Trump nor Biden shouldn't have one, Obama received his nomination for one before he was even in office.
Because nothing says meaningful and prestigious like nominating a President for the award before he's even in office.
Westerner's are so cooked.
#13 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-05 10:10 PM | Reply
*Yawn*
#14 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-09-05 10:13 PM | Reply
Jeff is such a a stupid little ----.
#15 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-05 10:16 PM | Reply
"The Department of War
Let's talk about Trump's executive order today, in which he seeks to rename the Department of Defense as the Department of War.
What's curious about this is that Trump has this duality to his personality.
He proclaims himself as the President of Peace, and how he has already stopped 7 wars in his second term, and that he is the one who will bring peace to the entire world.
But simultaneously, he has this obsession with a military that has to be the strongest, most powerful, and most intimidating in the world. He loves military parades, because it's all about power with him."
www.youtube.com
5 mins
#16 | Posted by Corky at 2025-09-05 11:43 PM | Reply
He's a demented pedophile.
#17 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-05 11:51 PM | Reply
Anda yuuge wuss. Bigly. As usual, overcompensating. War, grrrrrrrr. Hilarious, coming from Old Bonespurs and Major Plastered.
#18 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-09-06 06:58 AM | Reply
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
General military dictum.
#19 | Posted by Augustine at 2025-09-06 08:06 AM | Reply
He hung up a sign that said Secretary of War, snapped a picture for the socials, shut the door, took a swig of Jameson straight from the bottle, then sat down and fondled the revolver in his desk drawer like a little boy playing with his penis.
Visions of cruise missiles danced through his head, aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines and tiny middle eastern bodies blown to bits by glorious inventory. Mushroom clouds flashed in his eyes as he caressed the trigger with an index finger.
"They call me the Secretary of War," he said. "They call me the Secretary of War."
He did not feel the robins in his chest or hear the red-winged blackbirds trilling in his hair. The electricity of the flesh was a stranger to him. Exuberance was a deadbeat dad who never called.
Outside the Pentagon walls a cicada roared unnoticed and the grass sang ancient hymns to the sun god. People bustled in and bustled out, their minds buzzing with Palantir porn, their lips casting spells of Raytheon and ruin.
Under the rubble of a far away building a child reached out a hand in the darkness. Her cries were silenced by gulps of whiskey in the office of the Secretary of War.
-Caitlin Johnstone
#20 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-09-06 08:32 AM | Reply
It's about time we where honest about it.
Well, in all honesty it should be "The Department of Profiting from War".
Just channel your inner snoofy. You'll get it :)
#21 | Posted by HeliumRat at 2025-09-06 08:52 AM | Reply
"Department of War"?
Appropriate.
The Peace President will get us into more than one.
If you don't count Iran (I do), Venezuela is first.
#22 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-06 08:52 AM | Reply
Our mentally-ill president wants a war because his diseased ego demands "glory".
But he also wants to be war president to help him control things here at home.
#23 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-06 08:54 AM | Reply
Just Like Everything Else He Does, Another Stupid, Costly & Ineffective Directive... How ------- Worthless...
#24 | Posted by kmtahir2023 at 2025-09-06 09:03 AM | Reply
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" General military dictum. #9 | POSTED BY AUGUSTINE
Well it is broken ... just look at the US uniforms to know that. Build a dock? Withdrawal? Can't even destroy the Houthi's.
So now ...
Pentagon plan prioritizes homeland over China threat www.politico.com
Like I said and have been saying the US will lose, and Pentagon understands that, and is refocusing.
Has America, in fact, already withdrawn from Asia? arnaudbertrand.substack.com
This is good, America as a #2 for the world will be good.
#25 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-09-06 09:30 AM | Reply
Trump is taking on the real problems that plague Main Street America!
#26 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-09-06 09:40 AM | Reply
" Can't even destroy the Houthi's."
Destroy the Houthi's what? Which Houti?
Does anyone know how to use apostrophes anymore?
#27 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-09-06 10:10 AM | Reply
They don't.
#28 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-06 10:33 AM | Reply
Despite the fact that Trump is not sure whether he needs the approval of Congress, he's already ordered that the marque on the Pentagon be changed from 'Department of Defense; to 'Department of War' (there was a video of an employee scraping off the letters of the word 'Defense' on the news last night).
Trump is now suggesting that when the War Department was changed to the Department of Defense after WWII, that the Pentagon had gone 'woke' and that this cost us victories in Korea and Vietnam:
www.huffpost.com
OCU
#29 | Posted by OCUser at 2025-09-06 11:18 AM | Reply
FYI: On this day, 72 years ago, September 5, 1952, 21-year-old Hospital Corpsman Third Class Edward Clyde Benfold was serving with Company E, 2nd Battalion, 1st Marines, 1st Marine Division near Panmunjom, Korea during the Korean War. His company came under heavy artillery and mortar barrages followed by a determined enemy assault estimated at battalion strength during the dark hours of the night. Benfold moved resolutely from position to position under intense hostile fire, treating wounded Marines and lending words of encouragement. When the platoon area he was working in was attacked from both front and rear, Benfold left his sheltered position and moved forward to an exposed ridge line where he observed two Marines wounded inside a large crater. As he approached to aid them, two enemy soldiers threw grenades into the crater and charged the position. With great courage, Benfold leapt out of the crater holding a grenade in each hand and hurled himself against the attackers, pushing the grenades against their chests and killing both. Mortally wounded in this act of self-sacrifice, he directly saved the lives of the two Marines. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his gallantry and intrepidity above and beyond the call of duty. The Medal of Honor was presented to his son by Rear Admiral John H. Brown Jr. on July 16, 1953. Benfold is buried in Beverly National Cemetery, New Jersey, and the guided missile destroyer USS Benfold (DDG-65) was named in his honor.
Now that the reason to name a naval ship - not named after some activist....
#30 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-09-06 11:20 AM | Reply
Grrrrrrrrrrr,
#31 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-09-06 11:41 AM | Reply
"the Pentagon had gone 'woke' and that this cost us victories in Korea and Vietnam:"
MSgt, you're a Vietnam Vet. How's it feel to have the guy you voted for call you a loser?
#32 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-09-06 11:42 AM | Reply
#18 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-06 10:33 AM | Reply | Flag:MEH
Nonsense... they use them creatively.
#33 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2025-09-06 11:59 AM | Reply
"the Pentagon had gone 'woke' and that this cost us victories in Korea and Vietnam"
Don't forget how hard we lost in Iraq and Afghanistan too!
Some of Trump's biggest fans are OIF/OEF losers.
#34 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-09-06 12:02 PM | Reply
This is about playing by the left's rules - controlling the language. Unfortunately the left's rules are stupid which makes this stupid.
#35 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-06 12:04 PM | Reply
" If you don't count Iran (I do), Venezuela is first.
#12 | POSTED BY ZED AT 2025-09-06 08:52 AM | FLAG: "
By what metric as it pertains to Iran?
#36 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-06 12:05 PM | Reply
Zed,
Was 10/7 an act of war from your POV?
#37 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-06 12:06 PM | Reply
By what metric as it pertains to Iran? #26 | Posted by BellRinger
Probably when we bombed them.
#38 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-09-06 12:09 PM | Reply
Was 10/7 an act of war from your POV? #27 | Posted by BellRinger
War is a conflict between states. Is Gaza a state?
#39 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-09-06 12:09 PM | Reply
But to the extent a few thousand guys on mopeds can go to war, sure, it was an act of war.
But to understand what that means, you have to realize it was just one act, in a war that started in 1947, when the non-Jewish people living in what is now the Jewish Colony were forcibly exiled to Gaza, where they have remained, stateless, for 78 years.
So, that's why it's not appropriate to really call it a war.
It is a rebellion against the colonists.
#40 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-09-06 01:08 PM | Reply
If they win, and establish their own state, history will call it a war.
Until then it's an uprising or whatever you want to call it.
#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-09-06 01:16 PM | Reply
Zed, Was 10/7 an act of war from your POV?
#27 | Posted by BellRinger a
Hamas are terrorists by Israel's and the world's definition.
As of 10/7 neither Hamas nor the Palestinians living in Gaza had a country, therefore, 10/7 was not an act of war.
Israel does not recognize a nation of Palestine, in fact, are adamantly against a two state solution.
In fact, the Palestinians in Gaza are de facto Israeli citizens (by right of conquest).
Therefore, one can conclude that makes Hamas's actions an uprising.
It also means Israel is currently conducting a genocide.
You have been informed and educated. Be a better person.
#42 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-09-06 04:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
MAGATS can all ------- burn in Hell. Right after we hang them and piss on their corpses.
#43 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-06 07:53 PM | Reply
JeffJ is too busy giving his wife the Dutch Oven to talk about 10/7.
#44 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-09-06 07:57 PM | Reply
"This is about playing by the left's rules - controlling the language. Unfortunately the left's rules are stupid which makes this stupid."
Are you referring to the apostrophe abuse here? Either way, I disagree; whether it's the left claiming they're playing by the right's "rules", or vice versa, it's just a lame excuse to avoid owning one's own behaviour and/or to carry the water for others.
#45 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-09-07 10:50 AM | Reply
#13 | Posted by oneironaut
Says the guy who is supposedly from a country that only does s(*& by stealing it from someone else or forcing people to do stuff top make numbers on paper look good.
#46 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-07 12:07 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy