Like I said, there's alot of Democrats that will get caught up in this. Dont really know if it was a good idea for them to have these files released.

Especially if there is no smoking gun on Trump in there. But I guess it's good for the country to see all this. I'm wondering what other Republican "dogs that didn't bark" are going to be caught up in this as well.

No one even remotely suggested she was.

But even dealing with the man in the first place is the problem. Even after he was convicted the first time, she was still texting him, basically on the phone with him, while she was in a hearing.

Got to be a no-no.

"Just incredibly dishonest. Plaskett helped Epstein while serving in the Virgin Islands gov w/ tax credits, went on to work directly for Epstein's fixer, then received lavish campaign support from Epstein and his aides to clinch her election victory," Fang said in response to Raskin's comments.

Fang previously reported in 2023 that Plaskett, despite attempting to distance herself from the disgraced financier and claiming she had no knowledge of campaign donations made to her from Epstein, that was not the case.

"Plaskett not only repeatedly sought financial contributions from Epstein and had multiple face-to-face encounters with him, but she also worked directly for a St. Thomas-based law firm that played a role in cultivating influence for Epstein's clandestine activities," Fang wrote at the time.

He also added that Plaskett's involvement with Epstein could potentially even go further back because she previously served as an attorney on the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority that granted Epstein hundreds of millions in alleged "improperly obtained tax exemptions over the course of two decades."

And this was all after he was convicted the first time.

"I heard recently from someone that I was taking advice from him," Plaskett added in her defense from the House floor Tuesday. "Let me tell you something. I don't need to get advice on how to question anybody from any individual. I have been a lawyer for 30 years."

But they were actively talking about how to question someone DURING THE HEARING. He even said "Good job" to her when she finished.

Nothing sketchy here.

Not a standard you hold Trump to, so why bother?

I do. Trump got rid of him. I don't care why. Just that he did drop Epstein.

She was talking to this guy AFTER he was convicted and a known pedo. During a congressional meeting, questioning his enemy no doubt.

Why did the decomposing orange pedo spends hours with Virginia Giuffre in his wingman's lair?

No context here. All I know is, Giuffre said Trump never bothered her. He never fucked her. That's all that matters.

Why are YOU trying to insinuate something else?