Advertisement
The Looting of America
Just to be clear, if you're a U.S. taxpayer, this action means that almost $1.8 billion of your money will be handed ...
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
retort
Joined 2003/04/04Visited 2003/04/04
Status: user
MORE STORIES
The Looting of America (11 comments) ...
See How Trump's Accounts Were Busy Trading Big Tech Stocks (1 comments) ...
Taxpayer-Funded Prayer Gathering (27 comments) ...
Former Top Russian Official Admits the Country is Over Putin (15 comments) ...
Penile Implant Specialist with History of Far-right Comments Led Hantavirus Presser (17 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Stealing US taxpayer money to give to your political allies.[image or embed] -- Brian Finucane (@bcfinucane.bsky.social) 11:53 AM · May 18, 2026
Stealing US taxpayer money to give to your political allies.[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Not to be a nudge, but this takes me right back to the first and most confusing thing about GOP/MAGA---The absolutely don't care when they are stolen from.
This not only contradicts what I used to understand as being conservative values, it contradicts what I used to understand as being ordinary human nature.
So where did I go wrong? GOP/MAGA was never conservative? Never human?
But I note that this special strain of craziness continues right up until this moment. If there are any MAGA here pissed off about Trump looting their public treasury I haven't seen them.
And so I extend an open invitation. This is a clear chance for anyone to get back on the side of conventional sanity.
It will feel good, trust me.
#1 | Posted by Zed at 2026-05-19 10:59 AM | Reply
If divided equally among the approx. 1600 people convicted and pardoned for their actions on Jan 6th, this equates to more than $10 million each. That's a pretty nice payday for being traitors.
#2 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-05-19 11:13 AM | Reply
How do you settle a million dollar lawsuit for a billion?
#3 | Posted by Brennnn at 2026-05-19 11:19 AM | Reply
This is what I voted for.
-pedoringer -boaz aka "mooch" -lfthndcuck -onelumpofs*&^ -fartfisher
#4 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-19 11:30 AM | Reply
"Trumpism is more about following the leader than it is about adhering to a particular set of ideological or political principles."
Will Gottsegen
#5 | Posted by SomebodyElse at 2026-05-19 11:36 AM | Reply
And keep in mind that Trump is claiming that he was irreparably harmed because an IRS subcontractor gave two-years worth of his tax returns to the New York Times. If this had ever gone to court it would have been thrown out. After all, ever since Nixon was president, all presidential and vice-presidential candidates have released years worth of their income tax returns and there's no record that any of them have ever been harmed by those releases, so how could Trump make that claim unless he was afraid that it would show that he had cheated on his taxes or that he was not as wealthy as he claimed that he was.
OCU
#6 | Posted by OCUser at 2026-05-19 11:39 AM | Reply
Trump claims he knows nothing about what was agreed to between his lawyers and the DOJ when they set up the nearly $1.8 billion slush fund, referred to as the Anti-Weaponization Fund'. If that's true, then the bar association needs to open an investigation as lawyers are required, by law, to get their clients concurrence before they're allowed to accept any deal in their client's name.
But that aside, it appears that the agreement that Trump's lawyers made with the DOJ and the Treasury Department is that Trump will appoint five individuals, whom he can remove anytime he wishes for whatever reason he wishes, to a panel which will decide who gets money from this slush fund. And the way it's set up, conceivably it will only take two individuals to agree for a payment to be made since three individuals will constitute a quorum and only a majority is needed for a decision, which would therefore only need to be two individuals.
Also, the payouts will be confidential and the individuals receiving them will not have to pay any taxes on the money. Also, there will be no restrictions on how the money is spent, meaning that it could be used to fund a criminal enterprise or it could conceivably be paid to individuals who are not US citizens or who don't even reside in the United States. Basically, there are NO restrictions on who can receive a payout, even to a member of the Trump family. The only individual, who is barred by law from taking any of the money, is Donald Trump himself.
#7 | Posted by OCUser at 2026-05-19 11:41 AM | Reply
This is what I voted for. --Boaz
#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-19 11:45 AM | Reply
Wait. For those of us who were pardoned on J6 and then went back to jail on other charges, do we get paid twice? Just don't tell my three ex-wives and two baby mommas...
#9 | Posted by catdog at 2026-05-19 12:13 PM | Reply
The government politically targeted Americans. It was weaponized lawfare, misconduct and an abuse of power.
Hey, who was in charge of the government on Jan 6, 2021?
#10 | Posted by Derek_Wildstar at 2026-05-19 12:29 PM | Reply
The funny sad haha about this administration is they are the closest thing to the caricature my stridently anti-government friends have always presented as an accurate picture of the government anywhere from 2000 to 2016. Oddly enough, it was always claimed to be perpetrated by the Dems.
Those friends today? At best, silent. At worst, strong advocates for all of this. They differ in their rationales, but each of them has become accepting and even supporting of this massively corrupt, intrusive, constitution shredding administration and they not only don't bat an eye, they get pissed off when it's pointed out to them.
#11 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-19 12:47 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy