#8 | Posted by oneironaut

And? Nobody said there were zero cases.

And how many of those were from raw dairy as opposed to, oh I don't know, the most common cause of infection, raw/undercooked chicken?

Onelumpofs*&^ is so in the bag for MAGA he's actually defending voluntary food poisoning by abject stupidity.

Raw milk isn't the issue and never will be, it's the lack of cleanliness in this specific instance.

Bacterial contamination can come from numerous sources.

It's a needless, stupid risk pushed by people too stupid to realize there was a reason pasteurization was developed.

Arguing for this is really, really dumb.

Pasteurization allows for a sloppy milk-to-table operation and a longer shelf life.

AKA food safety.

With proper cleaning techniques for the animals, raw milk is safe for human consumption.

"Proper"

Given the frequency of food-based outbreaks/illness from highly regulated, much cleaner production facilities than dairy farms, again, this is really dumb to argue for. We're literally discussing this on a thread about an article on INCREASED illness from drinking unpasteurized milk.

Seriously, how f*&^ing stupid can you get, lfthndpedo?

You're probably a little on the tarded side because you e never had any raw milk.

#29 | Posted by lfthndthrds

This from the dumbf*&^ blathering on that it's possible while discussing an article on the predictable results of drinking unpasteurized milk...