If this is genuine we are witnessing several right-wing neugenics in progress.

Randy Rainbow, please "Cleanse the negative until it is transluscent, polish it until it positively glows!"

I subscribed to his YouTube channel just this morning after watching him interview Huckabee. How ironic.

He has my attention.

Let's take that Presidency, Tucker.

Get back to me when he repudiates his buddies Orban and Putin.
Until then, Tuckyo Rose is just fishing for his next pool of suckers.
#13 | Posted by morris at 2026-06-23 02:09 PM

Agreed - I'm certain he knows this. We shall see..

Carlson is sub-human filth. No person who is not sub-human filth fives a flying rat's ass what he says or does.
#14 | Posted by Angrydad at 2026-06-23 03:22 PM

I respect your view, as I shared it until he interviewed Mother Agapia Stephanopoulos.

This veering away from Republicans is to be expected - if he took her words to heart and is repulsed by the Israeli.

So far, so good, imo.

Tucker Carlson, his whole life a beneficiary of white privilege and political and media connections, is now a frustrated outcast, a ronin.
Our hearts bleed for this creature who for years propagated the Republican Party line and the hated status quo.
As a broken clock, Tucker Carlson is correct about Israel and their monstrous genocidal campaign against Palestinians and Tel Aviv's undue power over the US Congress and the DOD through the nefarious AIPAC, but that is probably the limit of his worth.
Enjoy the tar pit, Tucker.
#17 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-06-23 05:45 PM

Both of his parents are CIA, so it's assumed he is Republican by design from early on.

He is effectively peeling supporters away from the genocide.

I'll take it.

Tucker works for putin.
Looks like tucker will run as an anti-israel independent in order to siphon votes from dems so that putin's preferred party can keep the white house.
It would work too since dems are too dumb to run someone who stands up to israel, and their young voters are too dumb to vote for the lesser evil when it comes to gaza.
#19 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-06-23 06:58 PM

Two cheeks on the same ass, yes.

As for your fear - good. "Dumb" is supporting a genocide.

Both of his parents are CIA, so it's assumed he is Republican by design from early on.
#18 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-06-23 06:26 PM | Reply | Flag:
I knew about his dad, but I didn't know his mother was also CIA. Tucker claimed he petitioned to join the apparatus and was turned down. Not sure I believe him.
#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-06-23 10:55 PM

His mother is apparently not CIA, she was absent from his life since 6. Her beau was part of the "Bradford Mafia" (a British art collective), but not CIA, my bad.

After her death from cancer in 2011, it appeared that Lombardi had disinherited her two sons, though after the case went to appellate court (opens in new tab), the brothers were eventually allowed to keep their shares.

"She didn't raise us; she was horrible," Carlson said on the podcast The Adam Carolla Show (opens in new tab). "Then she dies and causes us all these problems because it's just perfect"she's a bitch from the grave."

#21 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS
pinklightrobot is lying ....
Tucker Carlson's mother, Lisa McNear Lombardi, was a free-spirited artist who mostly disappeared from his life when he was six years old
www.businessinsider.com
And no his father wasn't in the CIA either...
So is he a Democrat by Design ... FFS lyingliteBot you're worse than DonorBot.
#22 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-06-23 11:27 PM

Those a fine. "fleshlightrobot" might be better.

With your accent my handle could sound like "redrightrobot", that's verging on hilarious. /s

Here's what AI and Tucker claim:

CIA Allegations

No Public Evidence: There is no public evidence that Richard Carlson was ever a member of the CIA.

Tucker Carlson's Claims: Tucker Carlson has claimed that his father "worked in conjunction" with the CIA, but these statements lack verification.

Acknowledged Encounters: Richard Carlson acknowledged having interactions with the intelligence world during his career, particularly while leading the Voice of America, which sometimes operated in environments where intelligence activities were present.

"Dumb" is supporting a genocide.
#20 | Posted by redlightrobot
Dumb is refusing to vote against the guy who attempted a coup because of a war on the other side of the globe.
#33 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-06-24 12:32 PM

In case you haven't been paying attention Progressives are going to replace your centrist corporate legislators.

BY POPULAR DEMAND.

In case you haven't been paying attention Progressives are going to replace your centrist corporate legislators.
BY POPULAR DEMAND.
#35 | Posted by redlightrobot
You haven't been paying attention because i hate centrist corporate dems. But anyone who didn't vote for kamala because of gaza is a brainwashed moron.
#36 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-06-24 01:36 PM

If you don't consider THE GENOCIDE it's easy to hold faith in either party to also ignore it.

From what I understand this was a low voter turnout for Dems. Why? Dumb is contagious?

Or, maybe... possibly.. When Kamala met with Nethanyahu after accepting her nomination and then vocalizing support for Israel caused a lack of "enthusiasm"?

By design, imo.

Now Israel have their golum.

What is a "gaza-obsessed voter?"
Somebody who thinks ethnic cleansing and mass murder is wrong?
#53 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS
Someone who thinks voting over the death of gazans is more important than voting over the deaths of iranians, ukrainians, the poor who had their USAID taken away, or the billions who will suffer from worsened climate change.
#59 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-06-25 01:49 PM

What a ------- lie.

I had no idea this is how you think.

What is a "gaza-obsessed voter?"
Someone who despises Trump but doesn't vote for Democrats, because "sending a message" matters more than Democrats winning.
So now the Democrats are powerless to do anything with the vitally important "message" you think they received.
#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-25 01:59 PM

Morally repugnant find it pragmatic to vote for their interests alone, such as not voting for the populist agenda.

"message" received.

Looks like I'm losing friends left and right on this board over the subject of Gaza long after it's determined to be a genocide.

However, back when people were expressing it is a genocide we were also rebuked.

I suppose there are no friends to be had, only pragmatists.

"Morally repugnant find it pragmatic to vote for their interests alone, such as not voting for the populist agenda."
Lacking the moral awareness that Gaza isn't on the table... is the opposite of being pragmatic.
#65 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-25 02:59 PM

You can set your table however you deem suitable. DNC learned that nobody of good moral standing wants to sit there.

Ignoring how impactful that subject has been is part of the DNC structure, thus no "autopsy".

AIPAC owns both parties, after all.

Screw Israel and screw it's supporters.

What a ------- lie.
I had no idea this is how you think.
#61 | Posted by redlightrobot
Yes I think about which binary choice to make in order to minimize damage to the future of humanity.
Shocking.
#66 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-06-25 03:07 PM

This is your ethical dilemma?!?!

Knowing how totally infested military, government, intelligence and corporations are functioning on behalf of a Nazi regime still persuing a genocide?!

"Pragmatism" would be a revolt if you meant it, otherwise is plainly acquiescence to continue the slaughter.

People who willingly vote in centrists are no different from the right wing, particularly as they profiteer from the same Israel-funding trough.

"Knowing how totally infested military, government, intelligence and corporations are functioning on behalf of a Nazi regime still persuing a genocide?!"
Just don't vote then.
There's no White Knight coming to save Gaza.
Or rather, you're a white knight, tilting at windmills.
#73 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-25 03:25 PM

We cannot normalize genocide.

Israel has larger plans and that was known at the time of Kamala's partnership with Netanyahu.

If you do not fight for anything there is no winning.

We cannot normalize genocide.
#74 | Posted by redlightrobot
What's Mount Rushmore?
What's Columbus Day?
Who is Kunta Kinte?
We built a national mythology on normalizing genocide.
#75 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-25 03:47 PM

You forgot Thanksgiving.

This is your ethical dilemma?!?!
Knowing how totally infested military, government, intelligence and corporations are functioning on behalf of a Nazi regime still persuing a genocide?!
"Pragmatism" would be a revolt if you meant it, otherwise is plainly acquiescence to continue the slaughter.
People who willingly vote in centrists are no different from the right wing, particularly as they profiteer from the same Israel-funding trough.
#71 | Posted by redlightrobot
Of course. Ethics is the pursuit of the good. PURSUIT. Not childish demand for it.
Why are you more concerned with the nazis running israel than the nazis running the USA?
It can't be compassion or defense of human life, because republicans are causing a much greater loss of life than israel.
#76 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-06-25 03:56 PM

You must not have seen much of the devastation or the children suffering.

Incentives such as stopping the funding and government capture is paramount, not childish.

Kamala was on board with funding Israel, Epstein class will be ignored and the ownership society continue to absorb all resources on behalf of a psychotic agenda - so what is that party "distinction" again?

EVERYONE IN POWER was on board with funding israel kiddo.
So you could choose between israel supporters who support american democracy, or israel supporters who attempted a fascist coup, cut USAID result in hundreds of thousands of deaths, increased climate change resulting in millions of future deaths, and corrupted the USA beyond belief.
If this was a hard choice for you, you dont have an ethical dilemma, you have an intellectual handicap.
#79 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-06-25 05:12 PM

That is an excellent line, however disingenuious.

Sure, I have less education, little ambition toward political ends and cannot abide what I do not like.

A lifetime of "forgiving myself" wouldn't erase the psychological damage of accepting your view towards the murder of innocents.

Perhaps I am not qualified to rationalize my loathing as anything less than an incompentant comprehension.

However, it would appear that oxymoron is spreading - when the two choices are untenable how can I choose wisely?

when the two choices are untenable how can I choose wisely?
#81 | Posted by redlightrobot
Both choices suck for Gaza.
But you don't care about Anything Else At All?
Apparently not.
#82 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-25 05:35 PM

Bitch, look the fuck around yourself. NOBODY WORTH A DAMNED VOTES FOR GENOCIDE.

The DNC is fighting against Progressives.

Screw your impotent argument.

Recognize that your centrist favorites are on their way out by popular DEMAND.

Snoofy, SpeakSoftly, et al:

Democrat leadership are not in alignment with it's base.

A Kamala Harris presidency would still be run by supporters for Israel and backstabbing Dinos = nothing changes.

what you're witnessing here with redlightrobot is a little of yourselves in the mirror.
He believes he is much higher minded than everyone else but yet the Democratic Party is out of touch with "progressives" which he believes describes himself.
So...it's the same ole dilemma. Everyone is like me.....or goddamit...they should be.
"Nobody is a real progressive unless they are as progressive as me. Anything less just isn't progressive"
#86 | Posted by eberly at 2026-06-25 05:59 PM

If you actually knew anything about Progressive agenda then I would care about your assessment.

Until then, I have mainly ire to share.

Can you name ONE progressive news outlet or anchor you have watched?

Didn't think so.

Since you agree there no difference between parties when it comes to muslims in the ME....now it's appropriate for you to minimize dead muslims.
#97 | Posted by eberly
I dont agree to that. Assigning straw man positions as usual.
I stated that obsessing over thousands of deaths in one location, to the point of causing, millions of deaths in another location, indicates that saving lives is not your motivation.
#98 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-06-25 06:19 PM

How was that issue of USAID framed during the election?

I mean, since projecting a false narrative is so easy for you..