Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, July 26, 2026

More than a million children across the US have lost access to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap) food benefits since Congress approved the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in July 2025, according to a new report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP).

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

NEW: In the 9 months after last year's reconciliation law enacted unprecedented SNAP cuts, the number of people receiving SNAP fell by more than 4.5 million. Based on available data, we estimate that at least 1.5 million fewer kids are receiving SNAP. www.cbpp.org/research/foo ...

[image or embed]

-- Katie Bergh (@katiebergh.bsky.social) 12:24 PM · Jul 21, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Kids? Unless they have some allowance money in their pocket, there's seldom anything worth stealing. Ever seen Trump with kids? Yeah, wrapped in a cloud of natural affinity. And his own? Whew.

#1 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-07-25 05:10 PM | Reply

"Let them eat Big Macs!" - youknowwho

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2026-07-25 05:33 PM | Reply

Why do this? Bread, bird and broccoli are not expensive to produce. Is the "one other thing" an intestinal parasite?

The Trump kids made two billion by selling national secrets. Everyone elses children are victims of their treason economy.

#3 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-07-25 11:44 PM | Reply

Hey, I know where can replace those berry pickers we ran out of the country. And they will work for less than the people they replace ...
-GOP functionaries trying to solve the farm labor problem

#4 | Posted by catdog at 2026-07-26 11:11 AM | Reply

"Why do this?"

Because this is what these dirtbag trumpers voted for.

#5 | Posted by Angrydad at 2026-07-26 12:35 PM | Reply

Republicans hate Americans.

Everything Trump and republicans have done has made life worse for Americans.

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-07-26 12:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Because it hurts black and brown kids more than it hurts white kids, Republicans support this.

#7 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-26 01:15 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Because it hurts black and brown kids, Republicans support this."

FTFY

#8 | Posted by Angrydad at 2026-07-26 01:19 PM | Reply

Trump loves starving kids almost as much as he loves raping them.

#9 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-07-26 01:29 PM | Reply

Take from the poor to give to the very rich in the form of major tax cuts...top of the list of projects of the Trump gang. It is how he gets the billionaire oligarchs to fund his stupid everything.

#10 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-07-27 06:48 AM | Reply

FTA
"The legislation tightened eligibility rules for food assistance and increased state screening requirements"

It's called reform.

"Today, I have signed into law H.R. 3734, the "Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996." While far from perfect, this legislation provides an historic opportunity to end welfare as we know it and transform our broken welfare system by promoting the fundamental values of work, responsibility, and family.

This Act honors my basic principles of real welfare reform. It requires work of welfare recipients, limits the time they can stay on welfare, and provides child care and health care to help them make the move from welfare to work.

~Pleased to meet you, can you guess my name?

#11 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 09:28 AM | Reply

Pleased to meet you, can you guess my name?

#11 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Pee Wee Herman?

#12 | Posted by Zed at 2026-07-27 09:40 AM | Reply

Pee Wee Herman?

#12 | Posted by Zed at 2026-07-27 09:40 AM | Reply | Flag:

www.presidency.ucsb.edu

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 09:41 AM | Reply

#13 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Hungry children are always a bad idea.

Always.

#14 | Posted by Zed at 2026-07-27 09:51 AM | Reply

POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

This makes me wonder, not for the first time: What do you people actually care about?

#15 | Posted by Zed at 2026-07-27 09:52 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS
This makes me wonder, not for the first time: What do you people actually care about?
#15 | Posted by Zed at 2026-07-27 09:52 AMFlag: | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Horrible things.

Harming the innocent, helpless and needy.

Wishing for everyone to be productive or employed comes after starvation, demoralization and poverty.

His language and manner depict a world of needless poverty.

Education and housing are a privatized, they don't want access to non-privatized food either.

Capitalist parasite enjoy subsidies and access to public owned resources while crushing alternatives and subverting democracy.

Economic interests supercede all reason thus Luigi Mangioni performed according to his belief that must stop.

Revolt against the lfthdthrds of this world is happening in drips and drabs.. until the deluge when you with that your position in society becomes obsolete.

Imo.

#16 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-07-27 02:21 PM | Reply

Or, "wish", even.

#17 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-07-27 02:22 PM | Reply

#18 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-07-27 02:31 PM | Reply

#16 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-07-27 02:21 PM | Reply | Flag

Ask your compatriot Zed if it was ok when Clinton did it...

#19 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 02:59 PM | Reply

Ask your compatriot Zed if it was ok when Clinton did it...

#19 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Clinton also deregulated wall street. And ------ girls with epstein.
We dont worship clinton the way you pathetic submissives worship trump.
That's why we don't go around buying bill clinton bibles and cryptocurrency.

Youre in a cult, so nothing will ever change your submission to your cult leader.

#20 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 03:19 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

#20 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 03:19 PM | Reply | Flag:

This is a thread about welfare reform. I don't buy Trump bibles, crypto or wear a MAGA hat. I was given two choices to vote for. I chose the one who could make complete sentences and didn't go around in circles of unburdenisms... BTW I believe Bill Clinton did the right thing when he signed the welfare reform piece.

#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 03:45 PM | Reply

This is a thread about welfare reform. I don't buy Trump bibles, crypto or wear a MAGA hat. I was given two choices to vote for. I chose the one who could make complete sentences and didn't go around in circles of unburdenisms... BTW I believe Bill Clinton did the right thing when he signed the welfare reform piece.

#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Your post implied that because clinton did something that dems should support it.

Clinton made massive mistakes. Dems can admit that and we don't worship the man. You can't admit trump makes massive mistakes because you're in a cult.

3 times you chose trump over a rational reasonable leader. In none of those occassions was he the better choice by any measure. But you'll forever claim that biden's faults were worse than trump, with zero evidence when it comes to results. And you'll claim that harris WOULD HAVE been worse than trump, a pure fantasy from the cult that lives in delusion. Everything in the country was on a better course when biden left than it is now.

#22 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 04:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

This is a thread about welfare reform.
#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds

It is?

Cool!

Explain why the "reform" of more hungry kids is an improvement for America.

#23 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-27 04:05 PM | Reply

I seems like the majority of the people removed were adults. 3 million out of the 4.5 million.

That appears deliberate. They were trying to remove adults but 1.5 million kids were included in the cuts.

How, exactly, did they come up with the determination? Who was cut from the benefit? Too much income? I assume the line was re-drawn somewhere.

#24 | Posted by eberly at 2026-07-27 04:14 PM | Reply

Your post implied that because clinton did something that dems should support it.

#22 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 04:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

Nonsense. I posted it because this isn't a republican only position on welfare reform. Democrats have taken the same position, but when it happened this time, you claim hE's sTaRvInG bAbIeS!!!!

#25 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 04:22 PM | Reply

How, exactly, did they come up with the determination? Who was cut from the benefit? Too much income? I assume the line was re-drawn somewhere.

#24 | Posted by eberly at 2026-07-27 04:14 PM | Reply | Flag:

I don't know and don't even care anymore - maybe just give the SNAP to everyone and be done with it. Just getting tired of the people who claim this is some kind of sick trick to starve children. Especially when the people they've voted for did the same/similar. Same with immigration and trade.

#26 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 04:26 PM | Reply

Clinton made massive mistakes.

#22 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 04:00 PM | Reply | Flag:

That's putting it lightly. Killing the middleclass wasn't a mistake, they all knew what would happen with NAFTA. Now most of our vibrant rust belt cites and the Midwest cities are slums with no opportunity. You can work your way out of poverty with some opportunity, but you're dead in the water with poverty/no opportunity.

#27 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 04:32 PM | Reply

Just getting tired of the people who claim this is some kind of sick trick to starve children. Especially when the people they've voted for did the same/similar. Same with immigration and trade.

#26 | Posted by lfthndthrds

No its a sick trick to fund tax cuts for the rich, who don't care if kids have to starve as a result.

#28 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 04:43 PM | Reply

That's putting it lightly. Killing the middleclass wasn't a mistake, they all knew what would happen with NAFTA. Now most of our vibrant rust belt cites and the Midwest cities are slums with no opportunity. You can work your way out of poverty with some opportunity, but you're dead in the water with poverty/no opportunity.

#27 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Of course repubs blame clinton for NAFTA.

In reality Here's the timeline:

Ronald Reagan is often credited with promoting the idea of a North American free trade area. During his 1980 presidential campaign, he advocated closer economic integration with Canada and Mexico.

Brian Mulroney and Reagan negotiated the Canada"United States Free Trade Agreement, which took effect in 1989 and became the foundation for a broader North American agreement.

Carlos Salinas de Gortari was a major driving force behind expanding free trade to include Mexico. In 1990, he formally proposed a free trade agreement with the United States.

George H. W. Bush agreed to negotiate. His administration, led by U.S. Trade Representative Carla Hills, conducted the negotiations with Canadian and Mexican counterparts.

The three countries completed the negotiations in 1992, and Bush, Mulroney, and Salinas signed the agreement in December 1992.

When Clinton entered office in January 1993:

He supported NAFTA but sought additional agreements on labor and environmental standards to address criticism.

After negotiating those side agreements, his administration worked to secure congressional approval.
Congress passed the implementing legislation, and Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993. NAFTA took effect on January 1, 1994.

the vote on NAFTA did not follow party lines.

House vote (November 17, 1993)
Passed 234"200
Republicans:
132 Yes
43 No
Democrats:
102 Yes
156 No

A majority of Democrats voted against the agreement, while a majority of Republicans voted for it.

Senate vote (November 20, 1993)
Passed 61"38
Republicans:
34 Yes
10 No
Democrats:
27 Yes
28 No

Again, Republican support was stronger than Democratic support.

#29 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 04:46 PM | Reply

#20 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-07-27 03:19 PM | Reply | Flag:
This is a thread about welfare reform. I don't buy Trump bibles, crypto or wear a MAGA hat. I was given two choices to vote for. I chose the one who could make complete sentences and didn't go around in circles of unburdenisms... BTW I believe Bill Clinton did the right thing when he signed the welfare reform piece.
#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 03:45 PM

Innocent people will not meet your invented standards.

What's your plan? How should we expect any other written law to not deprive citizens of respect and living conditions?!

Just writing people away doesn't change their condition, so you just live with it as if they should too.

Economic decisions that negatively impact society such as AI are completely subsidized, but ask for a soup kitchen and you're "promoting communism".

However you were raised it wasn't with logic or compassion.

#30 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-07-27 04:53 PM | Reply

However you were raised it wasn't with logic or compassion.

#30 | POSTED BY REDLIGHTROBOT AT 2026-07-27 04:53 PM | FLAG:

You have no idea how I was raised, nor any idea what my wife and I have contributed to charity.

#31 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 05:06 PM | Reply

-That's putting it lightly. Killing the middleclass wasn't a mistake, they all knew what would happen with NAFTA. Now most of our vibrant rust belt cites and the Midwest cities are slums with no opportunity. You can work your way out of poverty with some opportunity, but you're dead in the water with poverty/no opportunity.

Now now....I don't think they wanted to screw the middle class with NAFTA. Nor did they intend to screw the middle class.

I realize there are absolutely morons here who believe the GOP intended on screwing the middle class but the dems were simply fooled.

Whatever.....let them wear the dunce caps like they do every day here.

#32 | Posted by eberly at 2026-07-27 05:07 PM | Reply

My last paycheck??? 50% of the total. I have great health insurance so that only accounts for about 2% of my gross.

The rest is taxes and retirement contribution.

It's crazy....and my income and net worth isn't likely to offend anyone here.

God forbid I get a break because if I do then I'm cheating some poor kid.

#33 | Posted by eberly at 2026-07-27 05:10 PM | Reply

However you were raised it wasn't with logic or compassion.
#30 | POSTED BY REDLIGHTROBOT AT 2026-07-27 04:53 PM | FLAG:
You have no idea how I was raised, nor any idea what my wife and I have contributed to charity.
#31 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-27 05:06 PM

Factually, I know that in the past you support "work requirements" among other reasons to deny the innocent food.

Even "good enough will" isn't too different from "papers, please!" today.

Children need food. That's universal regardless how you ignore it.

#34 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-07-27 05:19 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort