From the article:

"Those details are not directly related to her accusations against Trump, but suggest that she was truthful about other matters she raised with the FBI."

Do you agree that the evidence suggests the woman was truthful with the FBI?

Curious when you try to talk this down from "Rape" to "Sex she regretted afterwards."

Because that's your next move after you accept the incident took place.

I didn't deny anything
#22 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Sure you do.

You deny Trump raped those girls.

Or are you finally waking up to the fact that you don't care whether or not Trump raped them?

I don't think you're strong enough to admit you don't care if Trump raped those girls.

I'm not sure why you can't do it. You seem confident enough in other things.

I'm smart enough to understand that no amount of inconvenience I suffer, or any amount of money I pay will change the climate of this planet.
#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Really, one person out of eight or nine billion won't move the needle?

You do a good job of ignoring the issues by pretending you aren't part of the human race.

You are a tree, alone in a forest that hates you and thinks you're a loser. So you just ignore everyone else. You hide.

Oh look at Snoofy, another ------- moron who cant read basic English.
#18 | Posted by lfthndthrds

There's plenty of evidence Trump raped those girls.

I don't know why you keep bothering to deny it.

Everybody here understands you wouldn't dare stop supporting Trump, even if these multiple rapes beyond that of E. Jean Carroll were somehow proven to your satisfaction.

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

As for other non-normative situations (intersex, kleinfelter, etc) they are varying stages of something else.
#9 | Posted by censored

So they're neither man nor woman.

What the hell are they then?

Give us examples from history of this third type of person actually existing and being recognized as the aforementioned third sex, one that is neither man nor woman.

I bet you can't, because I bet you just made all that BS up on the spot.

"The woman's claims of assault against Epstein, Trump, and Atkins remain unproven"

You know Trump raped those girls.
That's what you admire about him.

Nick Fuentes ordered the hit on Charlie Kirk because Charlie Kirk wasn't pro ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Charlie tried to change his tune in the weeks before his death, but the damage was already done.

Kash Patel is covering for Nick Fuentes, the spiritual leader of the CPAC extreme right wing of the post-Trump Republicans.

"It's kind of scary to realize that people have no stomach for the truth"

Quite the opposite.
Trump raped those girls.
Tens of millions of Republicans know it.
Tens of millions of Republicans don't care.

That's the actual awful truth in all this, Eberly.

Your beliefs are no different than the Nazis on this topic,
He's also a fan of genocide.
#11 | Posted by ClownShack

The two go hand in glove.

Denying transgender existence is a first step to transgender ethnic cleansing.

Noem, posing for the camera in large fake breasts and hotpants

Now this is what I voted for, Baby!
--Austin Powers

You brought it up. So I'm curious. Can YOU define what a "woman" is?
"An adult female" would be fine with me.
#9 | Posted by censored

Of course it would be fine with you.

Your beliefs are no different than the Nazis on this topic, denying the notion of gender and replacing it with sex, as chosen by the State, and forced upon the individual.

The transgender issue really separates the men from the boys, when it comes to truly believing in individual liberty and the right to self-determination.

They might've wanted to avoid the death threats.
#9 | Posted by Danforth

Getting blackballed is probably a more realistic concern.

The construction business leans heavily Republican, as Republicans are more likely to give developers zoning easements and tax incentives to build their ------ properties.

If someone is stupid enough to place their retirement funds in these investments, they deserve to have their a&& handed to them.
#4 | Posted by jpw

Yeah that's a ------ way to provision a nation's financial footing for its retirees.

It's like the government ordering banks to leave handguns lying around the lobby, and then saying if anyone tries to rob the bank and gets shot by security guards, well it's their own dumb fault.

Republicans openly support child abuse.

Has anyone ever doubted it?

I have no problem believing architects expressing concern over something like this but not quoting them is a red flag.
#8 | Posted by eberly

Red flag for what?

You believing it, which you just said you don't have a problem with?

I don't get it.

This would have worked better as a rug pull a year ago, before the economy started collapsing.

I can't imagine anyone dumping their 401(K) into crypto in current market conditions. But I'm sure some people will.

By the way I predict no winners in this war, only losers and bigger losers. Winners are the non-combatants like Saudi Arabia and China.

Iran's oil income has doubled since Feb 28.

"Steel wins battles, gold wins wars."