Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

"On this day (June 22) in 1971, Joni Mitchell released Blue. It was an intensely honest and emotional release in which Mitchell bared her soul to the world. Songs like "Case of You," "Carey," "California," and "This Flight Tonight" have become cornerstones of her discography."

"In the decades since its release, it has been hailed by multiple critics as one of the greatest albums of all time.

Several life events inspired songs from the Blue. The end of Mitchell's relationship with Graham Nash, her ongoing relationship with James Taylor, and putting her daughter up for adoption in 1965 were the major contributors, though.

"Why I wrote the songs on Blue, the point is that soon after I'd given up my daughter for adoption, I had a house and a car and I had the means and I'd become a public figure," she recalled.

"The combination of those situations did not sit well. So, I kind of withdrew from music, began to go inside, and question who I was. Out of that, Blue evolved.

"We had to close the doors and lock them while I recorded Blue," Joni Mitchell recalled in a 1996 interview.

"I was in a state of mind that, in this culture, would be called a nervous breakdown. In pockets of the Orient, it would be considered a shamanic conversion," she added.

She recalled playing Blue for Kris Kristofferson. "God, Joan, save something of yourself," he exclaimed upon hearing it.

"He was embarrassed by it," she reflected. "I think, generally, at first that people were embarrassed by it, that in a certain way it was shocking, especially in the pop arena."
(excerpts)

americansongwriter.com

Decades and decades of useless US sanctions have hardened the Iranian economy and drove them to Russia and China.

And Iran still managed to obtain Western funds through Bitcoin exchanges. Dummkopf Trumpf had pardoned one of these notorious crypto-currency goniffs.

Living in the neighborhood of belligerent Israel, the Iranians developed inexpensive asymmetric countermeasures, drones, which they have sold to the Kremlin-- the Shaheeds, for example.

One of Iran's cabinet ministers confessed that his country still has stockpiles of drones left.

I believe him.

Just imagine the ammunition stockpiles in North Korea after decades and decades of isolation.

For oil-poor Israel, the US shunned oil-rich Iran.

Under the notorious Shah, Iran was a US military ally in CENTO, a now defunct NATO analog in the Middle East.

Decades of foreign interference in the US body politic-- followed up with healthy dollops of irrational Islamophobia-- have prevented detente between Wash DC and Tehran-- and the 1980s Iran-Contra Affair exposed American duplicity.

Note that on 12 Nov 2001, Iran still tried to become friends again with the US. The Iranian IRGC-QF helped USSOF topple the Taliban in the city of Herat, paving the way for the US to initially depose the Taliban and root out al-Qaida operatives in Afghanistan.

Years later, Dummkopf Trumpf would later assassinate that IRGC-QF commander, a beloved military hero named General Qasem Soleimani.

The $300bn will go far in Iran to rebuild the country we attacked on behalf of Israel, replenish Tahran's drone stockpiles, and provide 100% universal healthcare for all their residents. Presently Iran is at 95%, which is a galaxy farther down the road than the US and our 'BBB.'

Endnote: The airwing of the Chinese PLA have developed these aerial drone carriers while the US will be wasting billions and billions of dollars building sinkable paleolithic Trumpf-class battleships.

More from the article in #12 ...

... Another key factor would have been how the pool's walls and floor were prepared before they were painted "American flag blue" during the renovation. The cost of that renovation, originally estimated at less than $2 million, has since ballooned to almost $15 million.

"It's actually a really specific process to add a coating like this to any basin," Auerhahn says.

When applying coats of polyurea, workers need to make sure they paint on a new coat within 24 hours, or less, of the last layer, depending on the specific type of the substance being used. That ensures the polyurea layers adhere to one another and form a solid mass, blocking water from seeping through. And different methods of application can result in stronger or weaker molecular bonds.

Given the renovation's short timeline -- around eight weeks -- it's possible the material wasn't applied adequately to prevent damage. The bottom of the pool may also have been affected by the presence of heavy equipment and trucks"and a presidential motorcade that drove through at one point"while the coating was being prepared and applied.

The decision to use polyurea in the first place will also require investigation, Auerhahn notes. "The material that you're adhering that polyurea coating to is questionable," he says. "They were adhering it to granite."

The precise material in question, Rhino Linings' Pipeliner 5000, can bond to "virtually all substrates," according to the company's commercial data sheet, but granite is not specifically listed. Rhino Linings was not the contractor that applied the coating to the Reflecting Pool. The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

"There's a big question mark as to whether or not there was some compatibility there for the adhesion with granite," says Auerhahn, adding that questions also remain as to how the substance might react to the high levels of ultraviolet exposure and hot temperatures of the Washington, D.C., summer. ...


Why is the paint peeling off the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool? An investigation
www.scientificamerican.com

... Poor preparation and a failure to properly apply the coating may be just a few of the reasons why the Reflecting Pool's new paint job appears to be peeling off

The Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool's makeover was supposed to inspire patriotism, but chunks of material peeling off the pool's surface have instead garnered more puzzlement and speculation.

President Donald Trump ordered the pool's renovation in April, and that order included painting its floor and walls blue. Yet within weeks of the work's completion, photographs and videos of floating chunks of a cerulean material that appears to have detached from the pool's walls have gone viral. This material is polyurea coating"a fast-curing and durable surface membrane that can seal in water and is often used to coat swimming pools.

We spoke to engineering and pool experts to find out what could be going wrong at the beleaguered monument.

For one, the blue material likely has no direct relation to the large algal blooms that are also plaguing the monument, according to Tim Auerhahn, chairman of the Aquatic Council. Nor is it merely a reaction to the hydrogen peroxide that the National Park Service (NPS) dumped into the water in an apparent effort to kill the algae"although that likely didn't help, either.

At this point, pinning the blame for the floating coating on any one factor would be premature, says David McFayden, CEO of the paint and coating inspection company KTA-Tator.

Auerhahn agrees: "The failure of the adhesion to the substrate of that product probably could have been caused by many factors," he says. Still, based on the videos of workers dumping hydrogen peroxide from the edges of the pool, he says that "it could have contributed to the issue, but it's probably not the only cause." The Department of the Interior, which oversees the NPS, did not respond to a request for comment.

Hydrogen peroxide can be used as a paint stripper, but the water in the pool would likely dilute it to the point that it couldn't cause the current level of damage, he adds. ...


"Although my personal experience won't have any effect on your view, from my perspective you are elitist, cruel and unrealistic - not a leader."

Homeless, jobless, penniless. Your personal experience? That was mine at twenty.

Now, harsh reality. People want to live life easy.

Life isn't.

So, bitch and complain.

You must live according to your own means. You have to live where you can afford and it might mean living where you don't want to. Living with less and living with nothing.

Why do all those poor folk from South of the border come to the US? How far are they willing to go and with nothing (even with little or no English).?

Guess they had it easy and gave it all up just to come to the rotten North.

How often do we hear, they came here for a better life, are at least trying, raising a family, they're not the bad people.

Well, there seems to be a lot of belly aching from citizens who can't see that the Southern destitute are doing better than they are.

There is work to do and cheap places to live. Nobody is saying it's great, but it's all there. Why are Americans looking down on where they don't want to live or work.

Over 99% of US citizens live above the international poverty line.

All you have to do is make the poverty line anything you want it to be to be considered poor in the US.

From homeless, destitute, penniless, no assets but the shirt on my back to made a difference because nobody else was going to do it for me. Damn, I was the less than 1% below the International poverty line. Get to that point and you begin to count what suffering is.

Guess anecdotal doesn't count.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy