Several women who survived abuse by Jeffrey Epstein have come together for a public service announcement video demanding that Congress release all files ...
Epstein survivors just demanded the release of the files in this new PSA. Watch it here.[image or embed]
-- The Bulwark (@thebulwark.com) Nov 17, 2025 at 9:16 AM
... Several women who survived abuse by Jeffrey Epstein have come together for a public service announcement video demanding that Congress release all files ...
From what I understand, there may be to be a press conference tomorrow with many of the Epstein victims and Congresspeople.
Also, I just saw this ...
In reversal, Trump says House Republicans should vote to release Epstein files
apnews.com
... President Donald Trump said House Republicans should vote to release the files in the Jeffrey Epstein case, a startling reversal after previously fighting the proposal as a growing number of those in his own party supported it.
"We have nothing to hide, and it's time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party," Trump wrote on social media late Sunday after landing at Joint Base Andrews following a weekend in Florida.
Trump's statement followed a fierce fight within the GOP over the files, including an increasingly nasty split with Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who had long been one of his fiercest supporters. ...
The president's shift is an implicit acknowledgement that supporters of the measure have enough votes to pass it the House, although it has an unclear future in the Senate.
It is a rare example of Trump backtracking because of opposition within the GOP. ...
@#14 ... Joe Dems said it wasn't his. ...
The concerns expressed about the laptop were not whether it was Mr Hunter Biden's, but the provenance of the laptop, i.e., who else had access to that laptop while it was in that shop.
It could not be shown that the laptop was not tampered with.
Provenance
en.wikipedia.org
... The primary purpose of tracing the provenance of an object or entity is normally to provide contextual and circumstantial evidence for its original production or discovery, by establishing, as far as practicable, its later history, especially the sequences of its formal ownership, custody and places of storage. The practice has a particular value in helping authenticate objects. ...
@ #38 | Posted by pumpkinhead at 2025-11-17 03:41 PM
From 21 Jan 2021 to 19 Jan 2025, USAG Merrick Garland sat on this pile of burning dynamite full of Credible Derogatory Information (CDI) on Dummkopf Trumpf, Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a legion of sinister people and entities. And a NYT reporter knew about the Epstein's mysterious financial transactions and unique massage services BEFORE the 2016 election: drudge.com
So, who was USAG Merrick Garland shielding for four years while Special Counsel Jack Smith worked his tuchus off when the FBI Epstein files could have taken down Dummkopf Trumpf as a pedophile?
Moreover, state agencies could have run parallel investigations into Trumpf. Too bad NYS AG Letitia James didn't have access to the FBI Epstein files when she prosecuted her civil case against Trumpf. I guess that's another reason Trumpf took away her security clearance, as well as Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's. The statute of limitations in NYS would have allowed them to prosecute crimes of pedophilia.
@#61 ... A 2020 Justice Department report into the case found "poor judgment" was made in giving Epstein a sweetheart deal at the time."...
Ya think.
Yet Pres Trump appointed Mr Acosta to his Cabinet.
As a reward?
Alexander Acosta
en.wikipedia.org
... In 2007"2008, as U.S. attorney, Acosta approved a plea deal that allowed child-trafficking ring-leader Jeffrey Epstein to plead guilty to a single state charge of solicitation, in exchange for a federal non-prosecution agreement.[2]
After Epstein's arrest in July 2019 on sex trafficking charges, Acosta faced renewed and harsher criticism for his role in the 2008 non-prosecution agreement, as well as criticism and calls for his resignation as Secretary of Labor; he resigned on July 19 and was replaced by Eugene Scalia.
Since March of 2025, Acosta has been a member of the board of directors of Newsmax and serves as its Audit Committee chair.[3] ...
The Epstein emails reveal that the oligarchs and elites have their own moral and communication code.
This writer contends the emails prove conspiracy theories about the elites are true, as seen in the 1999 film Eyes Wide Shut: www.thewrap.com
Apostle Paul said in a letter, "For even when we were with you, we would give you this command: If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat."
#64 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON
Paul never knew Jesus when He was alive.
I'll take Jesus' words about the poor and suffering over an egotistical rich kid whose parents bought him Roman citizenship, who crucified Christians, and claimed to have had a visit. Probably a ruse to set himself up as the figurehead of the post-Jesus era.
Read Matthew 25:31-46 and see if you pass the test. The GOP doesnt, what with trying to cut school lunch programs and cut affordable, life-saving health care so they can fund tax cuts for billionaires.
Ain't nothin' Jesus about that! He spoke out against hoarding money while others suffer. To use it to help others.
Redial,
And now a ex President of Harvard has quit making the rounds because he has been implicated?
Mail voting in the US: Data points to very low fraud and significant benefits to voters
www.brookings.edu
STUDY SHOWS THAT INCREASED VOTING BY MAIL DOES NOT REDUCE THE SECURITY OF U.S. ELECTIONS
www.sra.org
Mail-in voting does not appear to benefit one political party over the other, according to Stanford study
news.stanford.edu
Heritage Foundation's fraud database and found 143 cases of fraud using mailed ballots over 20 years, or about 0.00006% of total votes cast"roughly one mail-ballot fraud case per state every 6"7 years.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-report-points-to-restrictive-rules-on-mail-in-voting-worldwide
Universal vote-by-mail does not cause large increases in Democratic vote share, contrary to popular claims
effectivegov.uchicago.edu
Mail Voting is Safe and Secure
bipartisanpolicy.org
Fraud is rare in U.S. mail-in voting. Here are the methods that prevent it
www.reuters.com
Fox News: Studies show the rarity of mail-in and absentee voter fraud
https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-warned-readers-about-vote-by-mail-concerns-in-2012-now-
claims-thats-a-false-narrative
Numerous studies and audits have confirmed that mail-in voting fraud is extremely rare.
electioninnovation.org
#137 | Posted by BellRinger
Maybe it's this:
Research shows that in typically nonwhite voting districts, especially those composed predominantly of Black residents, the average wait time to vote in person is significantly longer than in typically white voting districts.
One notable study using smartphone geolocation data from the 2016 presidential election found that voters in entirely Black neighborhoods waited 29% longer on average to cast their ballots and were 74% more likely to experience wait times exceeding 30 minutes compared to voters in entirely white neighborhoods. This racial disparity in wait times persisted even after controlling for differences in population density, poverty, and geographic location within the same states and counties. The mechanisms for the disparity appear complex and include factors beyond voter congestion or intentional partisan actions, pointing toward systemic resource allocation and administrative challenges at polling places in minority communities.[1][2][3]
More recent data from the 2024 elections indicated that Black, White, Hispanic, and Asian in-person voters reported more similar wait times, suggesting some improvements in mitigating these disparities may be occurring; nonetheless, longstanding disparities have been documented over multiple election cycles in previous years.[4]
So the average in-person voting wait times have historically been longer in predominantly nonwhite districts than in white districts, reflecting persistent racial disparities in election administration and resource distribution at polling sites. These issues have drawn attention for their potential to disenfranchise minority voters by creating additional barriers to voting.[2][3][5][1][4]
[1](www.chicagobooth.edu)
[2](www.anderson.ucla.edu)
[3](www.nber.org)
[4](www.pewresearch.org)
[5](www.brennancenter.org)
[6](www.scientificamerican.com)
[7](direct.mit.edu)
[8](usafacts.org)
[9](calmatters.org)
[10](cawp.rutgers.edu)
And if you can't put 2 and 2 together, here's the underlying context:
Evidence indicates that lengthy wait times at the polls contribute to lower voter turnout, and this effect can disproportionately impact nonwhite voters who often face longer waits.
Research shows that every additional hour a voter waits in line decreases their likelihood of voting in the next election by about 1 percentage point. This relationship holds when controlling for other factors such as race, location, and voting history. The negative experience of waiting causes frustration, decreased confidence in the voting system, and ultimately discourages voters from returning.[1][2][8]
Since predominantly nonwhite districts tend to have longer average wait times, this systemic disparity contributes to a lower turnout rate among nonwhite voters compared to white voters. Studies specifically highlight that long waits, administrative inefficiencies, and lack of resources at polling places are key barriers dampening turnout in these communities.[3][4][6]
The longer wait times faced by nonwhite voters at the polls are a significant factor tied to lower turnout, as longer lines and delays have a measurable and negative impact on the likelihood that people will vote in subsequent elections. Efforts to reduce wait times, allocate resources more equitably, and improve election administration are crucial to addressing turnout disparities.[2][4][6][1][3]
[1](www.democracydocket.com)
[2](pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
[3](digitalcommons.ursinus.edu)
[4](www.apmresearchlab.org)
[5](electionlab.mit.edu)
[6](www.brennancenter.org)
[7](www.kareemhaggag.com)
[8](www.sciencedirect.com)
[9](votingrightslab.org)
[10](bipartisanpolicy.org)
You should be supporting change to the above; instead, it sounds like you're just supporting the status quo.
#171 Hey, the position I am assigning to you fits all available requirements and content, as proven here, over and over and over again: drudge.com
Drudge Retort Headlines
Trump to Scrap Biden-era Fuel Economy Rules (62 comments)
Russias' Putin Summit Talks with India's Modi in Delhi (34 comments)
DOJ Orders Prison Inspectors to Stop Considering LGBTQ Safety Standards (34 comments)
SCOTUS to Hear Case Challenging Birthright Citizenship (32 comments)
Trump, 79, Fuming over Coverage of His Deteriorating Health (24 comments)
Trump Wants Japanese Kei Cars Sold in U.S. (23 comments)
Fighting Breaks Out Between Pakistan and Taliban (20 comments)
ICE Pepper Sprays Newest Congresswoman from Arizona (20 comments)
Maduro Asked Trump for $200 Million to Leave Venezuela (16 comments)
Manufacturers Shrink for 9th Month in a Row (14 comments)
