Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, May 12, 2025

"Let's be clear, Republican leadership released this bill under cover of night because they don't want people to know their true intentions," the committee's ranking member Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.) said in a statement.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Late last night, Republicans released their bill to make catastrophic health care cuts so they can give tax breaks to billionaires and corporate interests. If this bill passes, millions of Americans will lose their health care. Democrats are going to fight like hell to stop (cont in reply ... )

[image or embed]

-- Rep. Frank Pallone (mirror) (@frankpallone.govpeeps.us) May 12, 2025 at 9:18 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"A 2023 CBO report found work requirements for people aged 19-55 would save about $109 billion over a decade at a cost of 600,000 people becoming uninsured, at a minimum. It would also shift $65 billion in costs to states."

Coulda sworn I heard the Lyin' King say there wouldn't be any Medicaid cuts...

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-12 01:44 AM | Reply

Linked article is from December 2023 and has nothing to do with Medicaid.

#2 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-12 08:06 AM | Reply

I support the cuts.

It's about time working Americans, especially the working poor, got exactly what they voted for.

They will literally die to own the Libs. Good Job, idiots.

#3 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-05-12 10:36 AM | Reply

"Hawley (R) warns GOP Medicaid cuts are morally wrong and politically suicidal'"

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is warning against his own party's push to slash Medicaid spending, just hours after House Republicans released legislation that could save billions of dollars and make millions of people lose health insurance coverage.

Hawley wrote in an op-ed published Monday in The New York Times that paying for President Trump's domestic agenda by slashing health care for the working poor "is both morally wrong and politically suicidal."

thehill.com

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-12 03:24 PM | Reply

^let them commit the suicide! This will only help build the blue wave already forming for 2026

#5 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-05-12 06:09 PM | Reply

This all must be confusing for Drumpf; people talking about all this, 'morality' nonsense.

Episcopalian Church just opted out of taking White Afrikaners into their relo program, by canceling much of the program, for this same kind of moral silliness.

Authoritarian Oligarchs don't do moral.

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-12 06:15 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

OK, so the Republicans seem to be abandon the new tax tier for the wealthy but choosing, instead, to target those who can least able to pay.


#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-12 06:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I can't wait to read how MAGAs will argue that these cuts "actually" will end up improving medical service for poor and elderly people, and also argue how these cuts really have nothing to do with giving billionaires any tax cuts. And MAGAs, being what they are, will believe it too. Hook, line and sinker.

#8 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-05-12 07:46 PM | Reply

Lord I hope it doesn't go through. A lot of people rely on Medicaid to live. I'm worried about this.

#9 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-12 08:01 PM | Reply

The fact that Democrats fight tooth and nail against anything that requires able bodied people to work to get benefits is why the Democrats are in the 20's for approval and will continue falling.

People CHOOSING not to work should not get free government handouts.

Section 8 housing is meant to be TEMPORARY - not a 20 year lifestyle choice.

Normal Americans support these changes and these programs never should have been allowing this fraud and abuse.

If Democrats think fighting for people to get free section 8 housing for 20+ years is going to get them votes from Gen Z and the Millennials that can't afford housing despite actually working - they are going to get a big wake up call.

#10 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-05-12 08:22 PM | Reply

Section 8 housing has what to do with Medicaid?

#11 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-12 08:27 PM | Reply

"Section 8 housing has what to do with Medicaid?"

They're both programs for poor people.

#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-12 08:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#9 ... A lot of people rely on Medicaid to live. ...

I agree.

The Republicans seem to be falling back on the lame excuse that people make a choice about needing, but unable to pay for, medical coverage.

I also note that those Republicans in Congress do not seem to be offering data to back up their assertions.


The Republicans just seem to want to take a chain-saw to Medicaid so they can justify adding another 2 or 3 trillion dollars to the deficit.



#13 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-05-12 08:30 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

You can use Medicaid to get Housing through Section 8, is the answer you were looking for.

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-12 08:30 PM | Reply

The Republicans are engineering it so five or ten million poor people will die off.

It will save the taxpayers money.

#15 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-12 08:31 PM | Reply

You can use Medicaid to get Housing through Section 8, i

Did not know that.

#16 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-12 08:32 PM | Reply

#11 | Posted by REDIAL

Next cut you are going to hear. Limit to 2 years and shift costs to the states - also, cut homelessness funding as it is completely ineffective as seen in LA.

#17 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-05-12 08:41 PM | Reply

Thank God I only have 2 to 5 years to live. The world that MAGA Trumpers want is no place for me. Just sayin

#18 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-12 08:44 PM | Reply

Thank God I only have 2 to 5 years to live. The world that MAGA Trumpers want is no place for me. Just sayin

#18 | Posted by LauraMohr

Oh no, it will be a god damn paradise.

I will LOVE driving through throngs of homeless, uninsured, starving, and suffering Trump supporters who got exactly what they voted for. Low pay. No healthcare. No food stamps. No section 8.

I will benefit heavily from Trump's tax cuts.

While these Republican Congresspeople tell people "College is evil!" I did the same thing they do with their sons and daughters. I went and got an advanced degree and high paying job in a recession proof industry.

I don't mind their suffering. After all, it's Patriotic! It's what they wanted! And it's precisely what they deserve!

Now should I buy some poor dumb bastard's foreclosed home in the big city or some poor dumb bastard's foreclosed home on a lake? Decisions decisions...

We can only hope that when these idiots like ScottS lay down and die to own the libs, they do so on the sidewalk. I don't want to deal with suspension issues on my SUV from driving over their "Patriotic, Liberal Owning, MAGA voting, Red Hat wearing, Trump loving" corpses.

#19 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-05-12 11:33 PM | Reply

No one is advocating for Medicaid benefits cuts for those that qualify. If you cut the waste and fraud their will be more $ to spend on those that qualify.
And btw, no talk of the prescription drug eo that Trump signed? This one will get interesting for the Dem spin doctors since Bernie and both parties have been advocating it for years knowing they won't actually get it done. The Dems will spin it saying it will hurt the poor black children of Africa but the American people will fight back after finding out they are paying $1000 for a med that people in other countries are paying $50 for.

#20 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 10:00 AM | Reply

"No one is advocating for Medicaid benefits cuts for those that qualify"

Yes they are.

#21 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 10:02 AM | Reply

Don't worry Snoofy you'll still get your free diapers.

#22 | Posted by fortfisher at 2025-05-13 10:06 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

"And btw, no talk of the prescription drug eo that Trump signed?"

Yes there's talk that the pharma corps are pushing back against the micro-managing President who poses a threat to their business.

Of course, the Republicans have always said that Americans pay high drug prices to fund future drug development.

So I guess America won't be developing drugs in the future. Interesting 180 by the Republicans, but not at all unexpected. Certainly it is in keeping with the cuts to things like cancer research and not even working on a flu shot for this fall.

The GOP is a Death Cult.

#23 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 10:08 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Don't worry Snoofy you'll still get your free diapers."

It's not me I'm worried about.

#24 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 10:09 AM | Reply

We can only hope that when these idiots like ScottS lay down and die to own the libs, they do so on the sidewalk. I don't want to deal with suspension issues on my SUV from driving over their "Patriotic, Liberal Owning, MAGA voting, Red Hat wearing, Trump loving" corpses.

#19 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-05-12 11:33 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

One thing is consistent here, Libs like Syco just get angrier every day proving that what Trump is doing is good for this country. People are seeing that the Dems have been ripping off the tax payers for years and it's finally going to stop. Look in the mirror, your party's approval ratings are in the toilet, the lowest they've ever been. You want to know why? Because your party has zero solutions and just cries because their grift is being taken away. I guess your so called "advanced degree" didn't teach you any common sense. And lastly thanks for ruining the planet by driving your big gas guzzling SUV. Hypocrite

#25 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 10:10 AM | Reply

"People are seeing that the Dems have been ripping off the tax payers for years"

If you had ever earned a paycheck, you'd realize not much of it goes to Medicaid.
These cuts in Medicaid are not going to find their way into your pocket.
These cuts are being made to fund tax breaks for the rich.

#26 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 10:15 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Because your party has zero solutions and just cries because their grift is being taken away."

Cancer research is a grift.
That' is really what Republicans believe!

#27 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 10:16 AM | Reply

"And btw, no talk of the prescription drug eo that Trump signed?"
Yes there's talk that the pharma corps are pushing back against the micro-managing President who poses a threat to their business.
Of course, the Republicans have always said that Americans pay high drug prices to fund future drug development.
So I guess America won't be developing drugs in the future. Interesting 180 by the Republicans, but not at all unexpected. Certainly it is in keeping with the cuts to things like cancer research and not even working on a flu shot for this fall.
The GOP is a Death Cult.

#23 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 10:08 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Sorry stupid, that lame argument has already be debunked. Plan calls for if America pays $100 for a pill and Britain pays $20 each would pay $60. Big pharma still gets the $120 to support research and more importantly to them their profits.
After Trump made the announcement pharma stocks dropped, then this was explained they went right back up. You're not going to win this one which even though it is good for the country is really bad for extreme TDS sufferers.

#28 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 10:18 AM | Reply

We can only hope that when these idiots like ScottS lay down and die to own the libs, they do so on the sidewalk. I don't want to deal with suspension issues on my SUV from driving over their "Patriotic, Liberal Owning, MAGA voting, Red Hat wearing, Trump loving" corpses.
#19 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-05-12 11:33 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)
One thing is consistent here, Libs like Syco just get angrier every day proving that what Trump is doing is good for this country. People are seeing that the Dems have been ripping off the tax payers for years and it's finally going to stop. Look in the mirror, your party's approval ratings are in the toilet, the lowest they've ever been. You want to know why? Because your party has zero solutions and just cries because their grift is being taken away. I guess your so called "advanced degree" didn't teach you any common sense. And lastly thanks for ruining the planet by driving your big gas guzzling SUV. Hypocrite

#25 | Posted by fishpaw

Angry?

Buddy, this is the happiest I've been in a decade.

I haven't laughed this much ever I think.

I'm enjoying your pain and suffering.

#29 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-05-13 10:19 AM | Reply

And btw, no talk of the prescription drug eo that Trump signed?

#20 | Posted by fishpaw

He didn't sign one.

He signed an EO saying "Y'all should look into lowering drug prices, please. *wink wink nudge nudge*" That's it. That's all it is and all it said.

#30 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-05-13 10:21 AM | Reply

"And lastly thanks for ruining the planet by driving your big gas guzzling SUV."

^
Did this Republican just try to shame you by saying Global Warming is real?
LMFAO!!!

#31 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 10:21 AM | Reply

Cancer research is a grift.
That' is really what Republicans believe!

#27 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 10:16 AM | Reply | Flag:

Sure, like pharma is going to stop cancer research because, you know, their wouldn't be any money in a drug that cures cancer.

#32 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 10:23 AM | Reply

Angry?
Buddy, this is the happiest I've been in a decade.
I haven't laughed this much ever I think.
I'm enjoying your pain and suffering.

#29 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-05-13 10:19 AM | Reply | Flag:

Well if you're happy about running over people with your SUV you must be the person everyone wants to hang out with.

#33 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 10:28 AM | Reply

"Buddy, this is the happiest I've been in a decade.
I haven't laughed this much ever I think.
I'm enjoying your pain and suffering."

Careful, people are likely to start comparing you to me.

Don't go and start taking the high road, being positive, and not piss and moan with every post.

You'll lose your leftie street cred.......

#34 | Posted by eberly at 2025-05-13 10:44 AM | Reply

#34 As we all know, misery is what makes Dems happy. Like they say, Dems are the party of weak men and angry woman.

#35 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 11:00 AM | Reply

#30 www.nbcnews.com

Your own network.

#36 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 11:09 AM | Reply

34 As we all know, misery is what makes Dems happy. Like they say, Dems are the party of weak men and angry woman.

Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 11:00 AM | Reply

Says the guy who worships Trump and his merry band of misfits.

#37 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-13 11:15 AM | Reply

Miserable losers like Fishpud smeared their ---- all over the halls of congress because the------------- lost an election.

#38 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-05-13 11:26 AM | Reply

Miserable losers like Fishpud smeared their ---- all over the halls of congress because the------------- lost an election.

#38 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-05-13 11:26 AM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Time to renew your ritalin prescription. Get the 3 and a half year dose, your gonna need it.

#39 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 12:27 PM | Reply

#39 | POSTED BY FISHPUD

Off some more cops, MAGAt loser.

#40 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-05-13 12:33 PM | Reply

Sure, like pharma is going to stop cancer research because, you know, their wouldn't be any money in a drug that cures cancer.
#32 | Posted by fishpaw

They're not going to stop.
They're going to do less of it because Uncle Sam decided to cut payments for cancer research.

Of course there's money to be made in drugs that treat and cure cancer.
You have not demonstrated that you understand how Capitalism works.
Specifically, you haven't demonstrated that you understand the ROI when government invests in the private sector research.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 01:30 PM | Reply

Republicans coming out in favor of Price Controls.

Today's Republicans don't even know why they are supposed to be against Price Controls.

It's really something to see, the complete lack of education across throughout an entire generation of Americans.

#42 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 01:33 PM | Reply

"Buddy, this is the happiest I've been in a decade.
Careful, people are likely to start comparing you to me.
#34 | Posted by eberly

Nobody is ever going to mistake you for being happy, Eberly.

#43 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 01:42 PM | Reply

Specifically, you haven't demonstrated that you understand the ROI when government invests in the private sector research.

#41 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 01:30 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

I understand that when government invests say 1 million into private sector research only about a 10th of it actually goes to the research.
And as I mentioned Trump's plan for drug prices spreads the costs equally over all nations, it does not lower the overall income to pharma.

But telling this to someone who has such severe TDS that anything that Trump does that benefits everyday Americans is crapped on is a waste of time.

#44 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 01:57 PM | Reply

"I understand that when government invests say 1 million into private sector research only about a 10th of it actually goes to the research."

Yeah, so you're just lying.
You don't know anything about government grants. You never got one or worked under one.

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 02:12 PM | Reply

#45 All you need to look at was the funding for EV stations around the country, unless of course you have your head up your ass.

#46 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 02:19 PM | Reply

You never got one or worked under one.

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 02:12 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

And you're right, worked on my own so I never needed one. But I did do some leasing to some tenant's who received them. A substantial amount of them went under after the money dried up which happened quickly.

#47 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 02:22 PM | Reply

Why'd you take their money if you're so opposed to them getting the money?
???

#48 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 02:26 PM | Reply

"#45 All you need to look at was the funding for EV stations around the country"

You meant the funding granted to the States that largely still hasn't been spent?
You're claiming it was spent on largesse, when in fact it still hasn't been spent.
Do you understand the difference between money that has been spent and money that has not been spent? Apparently not!

#49 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 02:27 PM | Reply

Dems are the party of weak men and angry woman.

Weak men worship strong men.

Weak men require authoritarian leaders. Strong men don't require leaders at all.

#50 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-05-13 02:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Section 8 housing is meant to be TEMPORARY "

It's exactly as temporary as poverty.

"-It's actually longer than that; it's multi-generational."

It's exactly as temporary as poverty.

#54 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 03:07 PM | Reply

"these programs never should have been allowing this fraud and abuse."

It's fraud and abuse, that poverty exists?
Show us the nations that don't have poverty, and show us how they did it.

#55 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 03:09 PM | Reply

"The principle is, if you're able-bodied and working age you shouldn't be paid by everyone else to stay home and be useless."

And you think these people make good employees?
That they can perform tasks worth two or three times their labor cost?

How many twenty hour a week welfare refugees work at your company?

#56 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 03:11 PM | Reply

"#45 All you need to look at was the funding for EV stations around the country"
You meant the funding granted to the States that largely still hasn't been spent?
You're claiming it was spent on largesse, when in fact it still hasn't been spent.
Do you understand the difference between money that has been spent and money that has not been spent? Apparently not!

#49 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 02:27 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Right. Here they were awarded 19 million to build 77 stations. That's 250k per station. After spending 15 million they installed 17 at a cost of 882k per station. So yes, before the Feds dole out more of our tax dollars they need to make sure it actually gets spent efficiently. That's way to much to ask of Dems apparently.

#57 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 03:22 PM | Reply

How many twenty hour a week welfare refugees work at your company?

#56 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 03:11 PM | Reply | Flag:
(Choose)

Only the Fed Government would hire them.

#58 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-13 03:26 PM | Reply

"That's 250k per station."

Is that low? Is that high?
How much should it cost?

#59 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 03:36 PM | Reply

Work requirements are code for if you Can Work you Don't Need Medicaid.

If you Can't Work You're Ineligible for Medicaid.

It's really just a way to stigmatize and cut Medicaid so more money is available to cut taxes on Millionaires.

Sick ----. Only -------- support this.

Not surprising in today's political climate.

Helping people is so unpopular....

What made so many Americans --------?

#60 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-05-13 05:03 PM | Reply

Section 8 is a back door pay off to rich Democrat land and slum lords. It is how they import more Democrats that accomplish only turning nice communities into Democrat voting ghettos.

#61 | Posted by Robson at 2025-05-13 07:29 PM | Reply

"Section 8 is a back door pay off to rich Democrat land and slum lords."

Jared Kushner and Tucker Carlson are not Democrats.
But they are Slum Lords.

#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 07:35 PM | Reply

"Section 8 housing is meant to be TEMPORARY - not awned a small apartment buiding ouderdalem she had tennants a small apartmwnt building here for years. She had tennants living in Swxtion 8 units for years; The Section 8 program dates back to the 1930's when the nation had huge problems in housing mostly families and the . Today, with the huge increases in rent thousands of working, low income people have places to live thanks to Section 8. Locally, I hear the complaints about homeless people coming from conservatives but then I hear the same people complain about programs to help them get places to live.zzthe extreme rises in rents are hurting millions of hard working people. I'm lucky that I could buy a place many years ago, if I had to rent today I'd be in trouble.

"But telling this to someone who has such severe TDS that anything that Trump does that benefits everyday Americans is crapped on is a waste of time."

Such as? What has Trump done that helps hard working low income people? Honestly I can't think of anything. Are tariffs going to help them?Quit just repeating Fox Lies as if they are facts.; makes you look stipid.

#63 | Posted by danni at 2025-05-14 06:38 AM | Reply

"Legislation introduced by House Republicans late Sunday would slash Medicaid spending significantly by imposing new restrictions on Medicaid beneficiaries such as work requirements and more frequent eligibility checks, but the most controversial changes floated to the program were not included"

I know why people like Snoofy Are against this - they're about to have to get off their asses and go to work.

"frequent eligibility checks" that pretty much points out the moochers.

#64 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-05-14 10:06 AM | Reply

"frequent eligibility checks" that means people with disabilities and transportation issues get kicked off Medicaid for not jumping through government hoops and filling out government paperwork.

Republicans Love Making Poor Americans and Old Americans Jump Through Government Hoops and Fill Out Government Paperwork.

#65 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-14 10:09 AM | Reply

"I know why people like Snoofy Are against this - they're about to have to get off their asses and go to work."

I'm at work right now.
You haven't had a job in years. Maybe decades.

I'm against this because it will hurt old people and poor people.
You're in favor of this because it will hurt poor people.

#66 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-14 10:28 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

"That's 250k per station."
Is that low? Is that high?
How much should it cost?

#59 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-13 03:36 PM | Reply | Flag:

they are high speed which are anywhere from 50k to 150 each. The higher number represents getting 3 phase power to the site. If that needs to be done it would be spread over 3 or more chargers which is the minimum they would install. So even if you use the $250 number as a budget it should leave plenty of room for unseens, so the 850k number has to involve a lot of grift.

#67 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-05-14 10:48 AM | Reply

"so the 850k number has to involve a lot of grift."

You need to spend some time outside the safety of your Alternate Facts bubble, and stop using Republican Math

Trump Misleads on the Cost of Electric Vehicle Chargers
www.factcheck.org

"Trump is likely referring to $7.5 billion approved by Congress to help build a network of EV chargers across the U.S. over five years. But not all of the money has been spent, or even made available to states yet."

"On at least eight occasions in the last two months, Trump has wildly exaggerated the government's costs of building EV chargers."

"At a conservative conference in Florida on July 26, Trump said it would cost the U.S. government $5 trillion to build the EV chargers at the designated locations countrywide."

"He recited nearly the same remarks the next day, at a rally in St. Cloud, Minnesota, except he increased the total cost to $10 trillion " and pledged to "end the Biden-Harris electric vehicle mandate on Day 1.""

"Just looking at the $5 billion program dedicated to building charging stations along major highways, Nigro said updated data from 10 states shows the government's share of building each port is $150,000, on average."
"More recently, in Atlanta on Aug. 5, Trump once again repeated the claim. "For eight chargers, they spent $9 billion. Is that a good deal? So at that rate, it would be $10 trillion to charge up the country," "

#68 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-14 10:59 AM | Reply

Trump's rollback of Biden's executive order on prescription prices sparks uncertainty in pharmacies January 21, 2025

SACRAMENTO, Calif. " President Donald Trump has signed a flurry of executive orders in his first two days in office, including repealing President Joe Biden's executive order lowering prescription drug costs for Americans.

ABC10 spoke with pharmacists Tuesday who are preparing for the future after this change. From being able to address patient questions to how this could impact your local pharmacy, there are still a lot of moving parts.

Hidden in the headlines of Trump's massive executive order release is something with the potential to impact more than 6 million Californians on Medicare.

"I was shocked," said Ten Acres Pharmacist Sonya Frausto.

It repeals Biden's Executive Order #14087 from Oct. 14, 2022, entitled Lowering Prescription Drug Costs for Americans.'

Biden's order set out to do three things: have Medicare prescription plans offer generics for $2 copays, improve Medicare recipient access to cell and gene therapy often used to treat things like cancer and speed up the process for access to effective new treatments.

"(We're) scrambling to understand what's going on and how are we as pharmacists going to be able to provide education to patients and physicians to allow patients to still have access to these medications at the lowest possible price," Frausto said.

Something still on Trump's chopping block is the Inflation Reduction Act. He ordered federal agencies to stop spending money on it.

According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, lower prices for some of the most expensive and most used medications would go into effect in 2025, and they were set to negotiate on 15 more big name drugs.

"Ozempic was one, Breo the inhaler used to help patients control their asthma or COPD, Linzess which is another medication - not generic - used to help patients with GI issues. These are medications we see very frequently, very common," Frausto said.

The Inflation Reduction Act also capped out of pocket expenses for Medicaid at $2,000 and insulin at $35 a month. Local pharmacies like Ten Acres and Pucci's were concerned how it would affect them.

"There were some problems with the proposal that pharmacies were going to have to carry the cost of those drugs that were going to be rebated. For independent pharmacies like ours, it could be as much as $27,000 per month on average," said Clint Hopkins, with Pucci's Pharmacy.

Both Ten Acres and Pucci's agree the fallout of the new executive order could result in access issues, especially as big box store pharmacies continue to close locations.

"Some of these medications are super expensive for even us to purchase and the reimbursement from the pharmacy benefit managers tend to below some of our costs associated with this so we've head to steer patients to go through mail order or to go to some of the big box chains to get their medications filled," Frausto said.

#69 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-05-14 11:06 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Without their constant flooding the zone with a firehose of lies (their own description of what they are doing) they would have NOTHING.

#70 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-14 12:38 PM | Reply

If you live in a rural area then this may hit you especially hard. Rural healthcare facilities and medical transport companies rely heavily on medicaid, frequently 25% or more. Facilities will close. I personally know of at least one hospital in Missouri that is only still open because voters approved Medicaid expansion a few years ago. My company was planning on closing it if that didn't pass. Big cuts to medicaid are likely to result in the closure of that facility and will mean that some of the people who rely on it will be an hour+ drive away from the next closest emergency department.

#71 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-14 12:46 PM | Reply

-I'm at work right now.
You haven't had a job in years. Maybe decades.

Fluffing at the bath house isn't considered "employment" and my guess is that when the system catches up to you, you'll be off the freebies.

I've held a job since I was a teenager. I also made a lot of wise investments over the years - something I'd bet you never did. I work when I want to now, you slimy, mooching loser.

-I'm against this because it will hurt old people and poor people.
You're in favor of this because it will hurt poor people.

Stop with the bullshit, you're against it because it will keep people from playing the system, moocher...

#66 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-14 10:28 AM | Reply | Flag:

#72 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-05-14 03:43 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort