Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, August 04, 2026

Although the United States has been the world's preeminent military power for decades, it apparently cannot fight a regional power such as Iran for more than a few months before experiencing an armaments crisis. Since hostilities with Tehran began on February 28, the U.S. has reportedly used up two-thirds of its Patriot missile interceptors, more than a third of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptors, and a third or more of its prewar stock of Tomahawk cruise missiles. The rate of consumption is all the more striking because a shaky cease-fire had halted most fighting for months. Based on recent production patterns, replenishing the supply of weaponry will take several years.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

The munitions shortfall doesn't just affect the current war. It also sends a worrisome message to allies around the world: The United States has been caught off guard by the latest evolution of warfare and lacks the armaments-production capacity to adapt quickly. Suddenly, relying on American military technology looks far less reliable as a security strategy than it did before President Trump went to war with Iran. And in the long run, governments that counted on the United States to equip their military are going to need a Plan B.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

The "latest evolution of warfare" noted above:

Making America's challenge still more daunting is a major shift in war-fighting technology toward cheap, unmanned aerial vehicles. The United States and its allies in the Persian Gulf have been forced to use expensive, advanced air-defense systems"such as Patriot PAC-3 missiles that each cost millions of dollars and have a long production cycle"to shoot down Iranian drones that can be swiftly assembled for about $30,000.

#1 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-08-04 05:31 AM | Reply

Unfortunately, the Trump administration has failed to learn from the war in Ukraine. Iran has learned to mass-produce cheap drones"ones that the Russians first imported and now produce themselves. In other words, their effectiveness had been tested, and their existence was widely known. But that seemed to make no difference to U.S. planners. Perhaps in the arrogant belief that a war with Iran would quickly end in a decisive victory, the Pentagon did not have cost-effective systems ready to intercept these weapons. Neither did the Gulf countries that have counted on American weaponry for their self-defense.

So many desalination plants, so much dependence, so cheap the drone ...
So quick to adapt, the smaller, "weaker" enemy.
So slow to learn, the too-proud, testosterone-heavy, imagination-lite giant.
Too much bowing to arrogance, not enough respect for savvy.
This is going to be very painful.

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-08-04 07:05 AM | Reply

"If the United States appears less powerful and less reliable than it once was and is running through munitions faster than it can produce them, many more countries will follow Ukraine's example. The Pentagon is belatedly ramping up its efforts to develop less expensive self-guided weapons. But those initiatives so far seem inadequate to address the problem that the war with Iran has revealed: a gap between America's military needs and what it is capable of manufacturing quickly and cheaply."

#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-08-04 07:12 AM | Reply

military needs and what it is capable of manufacturing quickly and cheaply

Same sort of problem they had with 155mm artillery rounds. More fired in a day than were made in a month.

And of course, now moving away from your basic $3,000 standard shell to fancy new $100,000 GPS guided wondershells.

#4 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-08-04 08:21 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Interesting, isn't it? The US should be able to win a war of attrition against Iran. Then again, Russia should have been able to win a war of attrition against Ukraine.

Why are these particular weapons systems being exhausted? Likely because they are being used for the wrong things, and that because the men in charge of this fiasco, Hegseth and Trump, have o idea what they are doing.

Donald Trump, the Dictator, started this war all on his own to prove the fact that he is Dictator.

What he's proving is that he is a stupid dictator. Unfortunately, the entire world already knew that. The man still left out is Trump himself: a person who won't even admit that a vandal didn't ruin his reflecting pool.

#5 | Posted by Zed at 2026-08-04 09:52 AM | Reply

Why are these particular weapons systems being exhausted?

#5 | Posted by Zed at 2026-08-04 09:52 AM | Reply | Flag:

Because they never made that many to begin with. They made 96 THAAD interceptors per year.

Because they are made to intercept Russian ICBMs, not for use in a war started by some retards with the one country that has spent decades actively hoarding MRBMs.

#6 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-08-04 10:06 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Incompetent and incontinent "Commander-in-Chief"

#7 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-08-04 10:33 AM | Reply

This may be exactly what it's being reported as......running low on weapons.

But.....is it possible this is being embellished or a deliberate misinformation campaign?

2 obvious reasons.....1. helps when asking congress to appropriate more $$$ for defense spending and 2. creates confusion with folks like Iran

there are plenty more reasons I'm sure but those are 2 off the top of my pointy little head.

#8 | Posted by eberly at 2026-08-04 10:34 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

#8 | POSTED BY EBERLY

All Iran has to do to win this war is concentrate on civil defense.

#9 | Posted by Zed at 2026-08-04 10:37 AM | Reply

there are plenty more reasons

Simple incompetence being the best one. Two TV hosts running a war cannot be expected to go well.

#10 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-08-04 11:14 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"U.S. has reportedly used up two-thirds of its Patriot missile interceptors, more than a third of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptors, and a third or more of its prewar stock of Tomahawk cruise missiles."

Who's fingerprints are on each of those decisions?

Someone asked for more and got told no. Who said "no"?

DTJ doesn't know shit from apple butter about those things so I'd be surprised he had any knowledge about this. There are only 24 hours in a day and he's busy enriching himself and going after his enemies. Deliberating on how many Tomahawk cruise missiles to have on hand in case of a conflict probably doesn't make it to his desk. Especially when you consider how such things are requested, and funding appropriated for.

It's on Trump's watch so he can take the blame but if it gets to a point where members of congress start screaming about this and fingers start getting pointed.......curious where they get pointed.

But I doubt it gets to that.

#11 | Posted by eberly at 2026-08-04 11:25 AM | Reply

It's on Trump's watch so he can take the blame

He's the idiot that started the war, so why not blame him?

#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-08-04 11:29 AM | Reply

"Why Is The US Running So Low On Weapons?"

When this happened to Russia, our conclusion was oligarchs were enriching themselves over keeping good stocks.

How is this any different?

#13 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-04 11:30 AM | Reply

Ours actually work.

#14 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-08-04 11:32 AM | Reply

"Ours actually work."

Not if we've run out after a few sorties.

#15 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-04 11:34 AM | Reply

That the blame falls on Trump's slumped shoulders seems obvious.
After all, he started it.
It's Donald Trump's Forever & Ever War of Choice.
Come on, GOPers, puff out your chests: this is what you wanted and voted for.
And inflicted on your own nation.

#16 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-08-04 11:35 AM | Reply

Not if we've run out after a few sorties.

What will be left after the "biggest attack since WW2" is over?

#17 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-08-04 11:35 AM | Reply

#15 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-04 11:34 AM | Reply | Flag:

You wanted to know what's different. The Slava had 104 missiles to defend itself from a single spotter drone and 2 anti-ship missiles. The Slava sank. It didn't even get off a shot afaik.

#18 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-08-04 11:36 AM | Reply

The Standard Missile 6 on the other hand does work. Production trend going the other direction, an initial bleed down, production ramping going on, and at this pace of operations, we go back to pre-war inventory level in 2028.

#19 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-08-04 11:38 AM | Reply

"You wanted to know what's different"

What works better: a munition that doesn't work, or a munition that doesn't exist?

#20 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-04 11:39 AM | Reply

Wrong question. Should be:

What works better? A democratic society that ramps production during shortfalls, or a fascist society where oligarchs steal everything not nailed down?

#21 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-08-04 11:40 AM | Reply

"so why not blame him?"

blame away. It's what you want to do anyway so enjoy.

#22 | Posted by eberly at 2026-08-04 11:43 AM | Reply

#9

Indeed. Iran simply "wins" by "not losing."

Under PM Mark Carney, Canada quickly joined the EU's Re-Arm Europe program to circumnavigate Dummkopf Trumpf and the US military-industrial complex.

Ottawa's Trumpf-proofing and the Re-Arm Europe program also insulates Canada and the EU from reckless wastes of resources in the Middle East, like the current idiotic Islamophobic misadventure (OPERATION AIPAC FURY) which is depleting our stocks to Vladimir Putin's utter delight. He want's the war to continue because it distracts from his Ukraine offensive and Israel wants the war to go on because it deflects public attention from their ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. China wants the war to continue because it weakens America while they make money and learn new military tactics for free.

Endnote: Canada will be leading the new DSRB, a specialized "World Bank" for international military funding.

Source: Funding more war

#23 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-08-04 11:47 AM | Reply

"This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. . . .Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. . . . In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Farewell Address
1/17/1961

Ka-effin-ching!

#24 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-08-04 11:53 AM | Reply

"What works better? A democratic society that ramps production during shortfalls, or a fascist society where oligarchs steal everything not nailed down?"

Lucky for the USA...we have BOTH!

#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-04 11:57 AM | Reply

Now that boom-boom supplies are down, down, down here comes shrieking for more, more, more at a ramped-up pace, as - coincidentally, of course - costs shoot up, up, up.

#26 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-08-04 11:57 AM | Reply

House already passed the NDAA for FY2027 afaik.

#27 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-08-04 12:00 PM | Reply

It doesn't happen in isolation. Ukraine findings started the ramp. Iran steps on the gas.

#28 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-08-04 12:01 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort