Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, September 10, 2026

Some U.S. Postal Service facilities failed to properly handle ballots during this year's primary elections, according to a new audit from the agency's Office of Inspector General.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

NEW: The U.S. Postal Service's new mail voting rules overstep the authority granted to it by Congress, pro-voting groups argued in a brief asking a federal appeals court to keep the rule frozen before the upcoming elections www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/ ...

[image or embed]

-- Marc Elias (@marcelias.bsky.social) 10:55 AM · Sep 8, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Some U.S. Postal Service facilities failed to properly handle ballots during this year's primary elections, according to a new audit from the agency's Office of Inspector General. Election experts say the findings call into question the agency's ability to meet even greater demands for the November election that are under consideration by the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is by design.

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-09-10 01:08 AM | Reply

... Some U.S. Postal Service facilities failed to properly handle ballots during this year's primary elections, according to a new audit from the agency's Office of Inspector General. ...

imo, by the intent of the current occupant of the Oval Office.

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-09-10 01:09 AM | Reply

LET'S SET THE PEDO ON FIRE

#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-09-10 01:49 AM | Reply

#4 | Posted by americanunity at 2026-09-10 11:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Isn't the the argument Bill Johnson has been making?

#5 | Posted by eberly at 2026-09-10 11:08 PM | Reply

Eb,

From the article,

"An inspector general's audit found a lack of training for post office staff"

This article is supporting and proving my point.

Human error has always been part of my objection to mail-in ballots. What Trump is proposing is more closer to absentee ballot handling which has more checks and balances.

Anything that involves moving uncounted ballots that are handled by humans increases the risk.

This article is saying people in the post office didn't receive adequate training. That can happen at any point in the ballet handling.

There's other things that can occur with people, too.

The people handling ballots can just get tired and more inclined to make mistakes at that point.

Or some who may just not take their job that serious.

Or not enough staff so ballots bottleneck.

I am considering not only the next election, but the next 10 elections or 20.

I've always said "Don't put in systems that just meet your needs today. Put in systems that will meet your needs in the future"

#6 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-11 12:07 AM | Reply

" Human error has always been part of my objection to mail-in ballots. What Trump is proposing is more closer to absentee ballot handling which has more checks and balances."

Absolute nonsense.

Mail in ballots ARE absentee ballots. Every one of them is watermarked, serialized, and tracked. The armed services have been using mail-in ballots for over a century and a half. Oregon has been doing it for 30 years.

If your theory was correct, we'd have thousands of complaints and questionable instances. Where are they? WHERE ARE THEY??

The real problem is, ANY steps taken to add another barrier will doubtless cause a magnitude more votes suppressed, than illegal votes thwarted.

As has been shown, even with a 99.99% accuracy rate (impossible, I know) it would take 4,400 YEARS for voter fraud in your home state of VA to equal the LEGAL VOTES suppressed in ONE ELECTION CYCLE.

You're not trying to protect the vote. You're trying to suppress "certain " legal voters you'd rather not vote.

#7 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-09-11 12:54 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Mail in ballots ARE absentee ballots.

Well, duh.

#8 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-09-11 01:11 AM | Reply

Eberly loves Trump.

Just like BJ Boi.

He's a lying bitch.

Voter suppression is his latest ,"Who Cares" gotta protect those Ballots.

Nobody is That Stupid, except, Maybe, BJ Boi.

Nah, even he's lying too.

#9 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-09-11 03:39 AM | Reply

Q: What do the post office and JC Penny's have in common?

#10 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-09-11 04:52 AM | Reply

Oregon's vote by mail has worked wonderfully for years, but then, there is a system for all voters to go online and make sure that they ballots were received and counted.

#11 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-09-11 06:32 AM | Reply

>they ballots were received and counted.
they ballots was received and counted.

#12 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-09-11 06:46 AM | Reply

Vote by mail cannot be hacked.

Vote by mail has a paper trail that can be examined and verified.

That is why stinky hates vote by mail.... except when he does it.

#13 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-09-11 08:40 AM | Reply

... Some U.S. Postal Service facilities failed to properly handle ballots during this year's primary elections, according to a new audit from the agency's Office of Inspector General. ...

What does this even mean? How are mail in ballots handled differently than any other mail by the Postal Service? Isn't it just prepaid mail that has a delivery address? What extra training is required?

#14 | Posted by MBlue at 2026-09-11 08:55 AM | Reply

American elections are a system

A system of voting

No system is ever perfect.

Literally no system

Errors in the voting system can be either an invalid vote is counted (generally considered voter fraud) OR an eligible voter's vote is not counted (generally considered voter suppression).

It is an irrefutable truth that the ability to have invalid votes count on a significant basis approaches nil

As an aside, even if invalid voting occurs the system does not prevent either side from using this highly inefficient method of voter fraud, thereby, inherently, there is partial balance in how actual voter fraud would play out. IOW, since both sides of the election can insert invalid votes there is a natural way of these countering each other, making the impact of inserting invalid votes as even less effective.

That is because sufficient invalid votes need to be inserted into the vote tally that would a. change the results of the vote and b. offset any counterbalancing invalid votes. This is an incredibly high hurdle to get over.

Consider that in general the entity committing voter fraud will have imperfect knowledge of how many invalid votes are required or will prevent suspicion. Too few and the results do not change, too many and red flags appear due to polling and voter turnout numbers.

It approaches an impossibility to insert sufficient invalid votes in an election on a meaningful basis.

Therefore, the incentive to insert invalid votes simply is negligible.

The capacity for the system to REJECT or DENY valid votes is infinitely greater that it is to insert invalid votes

To insert an invalid vote, one has to create a voter OR to change a vote OR to impact individual voters.

That is a far more difficult task than to PREVENT a voter from casting their vote.

All one has to do is to place regulatory hurdles in the path of voting or make voting onerous or limit access to the voting process or categorize certain voters as ineligible at the time of voting (assuring the process to validate a vote is onerous) thus denying their votes are tallied or scare voters from the election process.

So, I ask the basic question.

Which is a bigger danger to the democratic process-voter fraud or voter suppression?

#15 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-09-11 10:11 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Danno,

"Mail in ballots ARE absentee ballots"

You're wrong.

Absentee ballots are mail-in ballots.

But not all mail-in ballots are absentee ballots.

#16 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-11 01:53 PM | Reply

Danno,
"Mail in ballots ARE absentee ballots"
You're wrong.
Absentee ballots are mail-in ballots.
But not all mail-in ballots are absentee ballots.

#16 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-09-11 01:53 PM

And the handling of them is different, how?

And how is it any different than ordinary mail for the Postal Service? Why would it require extra training?

#17 | Posted by MBlue at 2026-09-11 02:41 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort