Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, October 04, 2026

America's military footprint in the Middle East is shrinking, as the U.S. assesses its role in Gulf conflicts following extensive base damage during the Iran war.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

The Pentagon's public tally of troops wounded during the Iran war was quietly increased this week without explanation from Trump's Defense Department. The total number of troops now wounded during the war is 861, according to DCAS.

[image or embed]

-- Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1.bsky.social) 12:45 PM · Sep 27, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... The last U.S. troops pulled out of Iraq Wednesday, highlighting a shifting " and shrinking " American military footprint in the Middle East.

That footprint is expected to become even smaller as Pentagon officials, surveying extensive damage to U.S. bases in the Persian Gulf caused by the war in Iran, are reportedly considering shuttering some of those installations.

From Tehran's perspective, these are exciting developments. It's just what its leaders have been hoping for, and demanding, for decades. That doesn't necessarily make the U.S. base closures a bad idea, some analysts say. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-04 12:05 AM | Reply

reportedly considering shuttering some of those installations.

I bet Qatar won't be affected.

#2 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-10-04 12:17 AM | Reply

A yuge rethink and reformulation is required from a regime in the thrall of ensh#ttification.

#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-10-04 09:27 AM | Reply

Because it would cost too much to rebuild them.

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-10-04 11:24 AM | Reply

Good for America.


I bet Qatar won't be affected.
#2 | POSTED BY REDIAL

Well given the US doesn't actually own any bases in Qatar this would make sense.

#5 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-10-04 11:28 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#2 ... I bet Qatar won't be affected. ...

Maybe it depends upon if they were damages and how much damage they have.

Al Udeid Air Base
en.wikipedia.org

... Al Udeid Air Base ... is one of two military bases to the southwest of Doha, Qatar, in the municipality of Al Rayyan. It is the largest US military base in the Middle East, hosting approximately 10,000 military personnel as of 2026.[5] ...

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-04 01:18 PM | Reply

Article conveniently leaves out America's largest terrorist ME military base of them all: the ethnosupremacist, colonialist state of Israel.

#7 | Posted by Pumpkinhead at 2026-10-04 02:05 PM | Reply

The rancid orange pedo is doing a wonderful job protecting American military bases.

www.cbsnews.com

#8 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-10-04 03:52 PM | Reply

Was this Grok's idea?

#9 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2026-10-04 05:20 PM | Reply

US removes all bombers from RAF Fairford base

www.bbc.com

Stinky got chased out of Britain by diesel thieves. Lol

#10 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-10-04 05:40 PM | Reply

They don't want to lose all their chit after they kick us out.

#11 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2026-10-04 06:55 PM | Reply

WTG Loser!

#12 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-10-05 05:14 PM | Reply

You bitch when they were put there and bitch when this administration closes them.

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-10-05 06:29 PM | Reply

and bitch when this administration closes them.

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You act like this is a budgetary decision or a directed policy.

It's because these inept piles of s*&^ (or corrupt, more likely) are closing bases damaged beyond use.

It's more abandonment than closure.

It's funny how supposed MAGA "patriots" like you still can't bring yourselves to admit just how unAmerican and f*&^ed this administration is.

#14 | Posted by jpw at 2026-10-05 06:55 PM | Reply

@#10 ... Stinky got chased out of Britain by diesel thieves. ...

imo, this rapid exit is more serious than that.

For example, the bombers seemed to have been removed before the refueling planes were ready to accompany them.

iow, it looks like a scramble to get those bombers the f*** out of there. And quickly.

OK, if this was all just a routine security incident that led the US to remove the bombers from that RAF base, then the haste with which they were removed just handle the Iranians a significant PR upside.

Iran eventually may be crowing, ~hey, look what we caused to happen...~

But for now, Iran seems to be staying silent in their denials.

imo, more to develop here.


#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-05 07:34 PM | Reply

@#15 ... For example, the bombers seemed to have been removed before the refueling planes were ready to accompany them. ...

The Planes Left Before the Tankers Were Ready
americanlibertypac.com

... On Sunday the United States pulled every B-1 bomber off a British airfield and sent it home. Twelve of them, parked for seven months at Fairford in Gloucestershire, where they had been flying the war against Iran. The crews were ordered up so fast that the tankers meant to get them across the Atlantic were still being fueled when the bombers rolled. By Sunday night at least three had landed in South Dakota. The rest followed. A peacetime ally, a base we have used for decades, and the planes left in a day. ...

#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-05 07:36 PM | Reply

For the record

We are being chased out of these bases. Because we are unable to defend them in light of the new technologic revolution in warfare.

Cheap drones and ever more sophisticated and relatively cheap to build and our inability to have prepared for defensive munitions are revolutionizing warfare.

Iran, a 3rd rate military, defeated us because we did not learn the lessons of the Ukraine war. We have not had the vision or will to evolve our fighting forces.

That is a simple fact

Losing these bases impacts us operationally, strategically and profoundly in our foreign policy.

Operationally we no longer have bases to project power. the USS Lincoln fiasco is a perfect exemplar. Where previously it would pop into our Bahrainian base to refuel and replenish, now it has to remain on station with active operations. For it to spend a couple of weeks going back and forth to Diego Garcia would leave our naval assets in the Gulf region without CAP and susceptible to attack

That is a massive operational blow.

Amateurs study operations, experts study logistics

Iran is demonstrating an increased capability to expand its offensive power-Piggy was shocked when our base in Jordan was hit hard. There must be some scary intelligence for Piggy to pull out of the UK.

I am sure that there are many other bases throughout Europe but with Putin acting aggressively and with his ability for drone warfare makes our Europe bases vulnerable.

So all of these operational blows are impacting our strategy-not that we ever had one to be honest.

Think of strategy as the plan to meet your goals. Operations are the ways and means to fulfil the plan.

Since WW2 America has been able to project our military power where ever we choose, generally with impunity
Not that that project guarantees success, but it does permit us to dictate operations. Half of victory comes from having the initiative, which we have generally always had, because our military was everywhere supplemented by our navy

We are withdrawing from the ME; we have withdrawn from Iraq. We have lost our bases. We have limited naval capacity to meet the demands

that limits our strategic options. It limits the goals we are able to achieve.

Of course, Piggy has no strategic goals, cause he is a moron.

but, if generally speaking, the goal is to get Iran to surrender, well it ain't going to happen.

But he is certainly betting that we can inflict far more harm on them then they on us leading them to surrender

But, with the operational blows we have taken we have no realistic strategy to meet any realistic goal.

Are we going to run bombers from US bases all the way to Iran, bomb and return? How will we protect vulnerable infrastructure in gulf countries? How will we able to project and commit the level of force we had back in March, when we don't have bases in the region to work from? That means naval aircraft from carriers which has limited operational capacity-see the USS Lincoln

All of that doesn't even touch on the fact that Iran simply will not quit, under any circumstances.

We have made it clear that Piggy will accept nothing but something the Iranians will see as existential.

#17 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-10-05 07:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Compound that with Piggy demonstrating himself as unquestionably not a trustworthy partner, leaves Iran with no option for surrender. they will fight on no matter what because to not do so means the loss of everything.

So, the devastation of our defense doctrine since WW2 is going to have profound ramifications.

Our economy relies heavily on our military capabilities.

Our allies and partners, competitors and enemies are seeing a military that failed to recognize the change in military doctrine (drones and ballistic missiles) see our flight from bases and will react

The least problematic is that they create pacts excluding America or including us but as an unreliable partner. the Gulf states are looking at regional alliances and will soon turn to China

The worst is if these countries stop viewing America as an economic force. that would mean they stop buying our debt and OOOOO we don't want that to happen.

The all, friend and enemy alike, realize the danger of an American economic collapse and certainly have little incentive to push us to that

But

If we continue with the Piggy doctrine-tarrifs, aggressive foregin policy, insulting partners, not living up to treaties like NATO, continue with the war on Iran, if we do not find a way to avoid the coming famine (its being reported that global fertilizer stockpiles are down 40%) well the worst will be inevitable

#18 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-10-05 08:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

And I want to stress that fertilizer thing.

Over one-third of the world's traded agricultural fertilizer supply has been disrupted or curtailed due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and related Middle East conflicts over the past year

one third

Some of the loss of product yield can be overcome with changing crops but the most vulnerable areas live by a "just in time" food model, meaning the loss in fertilizer will result in lower crop yields, leading to starvation, famine and higher prices

A 10% reduction in global crop yield would trigger severe food price spikes, widespread economic instability, and acute malnutrition for hundreds of millions of people worldwide.

that sort of thing results in global migration.

So, yeah, we ------

thanks magat scum

#19 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-10-05 08:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#17, 18, 19

NW.

#20 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-05 08:19 PM | Reply

This is proof Iran is maintaining the Initiative.

The US Withdrawal from Iraq and ME Bases is Actually giving the Strategic Initiative to Iran.

Israeli leaders are probably shitting themselves over this Development.

The War is being Waged on Iran's terms.

Not a good development for Israel...

Lol.

#21 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-10-06 12:29 AM | Reply

@#19 ... And I want to stress that fertilizer thing. ...

Yup.

While the news seems to be focused upon the barrels of oil leaving the Middle East (which, btw, using alternate and more expensive routes, now seems to be about the same as the pre-war volumes), there are other commodities that have suffered curtailed deliveries because of Pres Trump's unprovoked war of choice.

#22 | Posted by lamplighter at 2026-10-06 12:43 AM | Reply

TRUTH -
Thank you for your concise, though provoking, and deeply concerning posts at 17-19.

#23 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-10-06 07:11 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Thank you

I am hoping that Piggy doesn't escalate after the mid-terms and just TACOs, that would be the best of many really bad options.

But people haven't woken up to the profound impact this war has and will have on history.

America's relationship to the world is going to have a sea change and not for the good

What MAGAT and Piggy don't understand is that our way of life, our security, has been based on our unique position in the world as an arbiter of peace and stability. Piggy is throwing all of that away for good relations with El Salvador, NK and Russia. It's insanity

Best case is piggy doesn't escalate and we live in a new normal with a $30 toll on oil. Low gas prices are a thing of the past.

#24 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-10-06 07:31 AM | Reply

The fuel price shock due to disruptions in the supply chain are the obvious immediate signs people can see and react to. In America those shocks are relatively light compared to other countries where basic services had to be curtailed due to a lack of fuel. (Typ. American policy that harms other people and we only care when we are harmed).

but the fertilizer issue is a problem that will play out for years

Loss of fertilizer will result in lower crop yield resulting in less food going to vulnerable areas of the world.

That will inevitably lead to local conflicts that push people to migrate to where food is available-that is inevitable and unavoidable.

And when those people show up on our shore, the zero tolerance immigration policy will be useless. Desperate people will take desperate measures.

And magat scum will accept no responsibility or culpability for this mass migration. They will say go back to where you came from even though OUR actions have made those areas unlivable.

Haiiti is an example of this dynamic. Imperialist countries exploited the nation for centuries and then when they pulled out the left the Haitians with a debt that prevents investment. That leads to sustained poverty and violence. Regular meddling in their affairs leads to constant instability. Combine that to a number of natural disasters results in Haitians wanting to flee, need to flee because people need and want to actually live. Then you get assholes like Piggy and Vance screaming their eating cats and dogs, never acknowledging these people are here, in part, because we fucked up their country

#25 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-10-06 07:45 AM | Reply

"But people haven't woken up to the profound impact this war has and will have on history."

That's the chord that struck with me, Truth. It reinforced your observation about "that fertilizer thing" at #19 - the seismic effects of compounded alterations in the status quo.

There's a fair chance some briefer informed Trump about this, but zero chance he paid it any attention.

#26 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-10-06 07:46 AM | Reply

And be aware that we have already lost 2 to 3 growing seasons so 2027 is screwed.

And the supply chain isn't fixed at all

We have gotten oil through the strait to around 80% of prewar levels (for the nonce) but fertilizer? NOPE still restricted.

And tankers are still being hit on a regular basis

#27 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-10-06 07:51 AM | Reply

So it's not just cuz they're Black?
~ MAGA

#28 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-10-06 07:55 AM | Reply

#28 was a response to observations re Haiti at #25.

The carving out of Haitians as villains by craven Republicans is heinous.

#29 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-10-06 07:57 AM | Reply

Trump giving OBL and Putin and the Ayatollah what they always wanted.

#30 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-10-06 08:04 AM | Reply

Speaking of OBL, god forbid we have a significant terrorist attack here esp. given Piggy inviting Iran to blow up LA

#31 | Posted by truthhurts at 2026-10-06 08:12 AM | Reply

"And I want to stress that fertilizer thing."

Failing farms are good for J.D. Vance investment portfolio.
Dots aren't hard to connect:

www.farmlandgrab.org

JD Vance funded AcreTrader. Here's why that matters.

Vance invested up to $65,000 in private investments in AcreTrader during his stint as a venture capitalist, according to his 2022 financial disclosure to the Senate ethics committee. The investment firm Narya Capital"which Vance launched in 2020 with backing from PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel"was a vehicle for these investments, and a key backer in early funding rounds of the farmland startup. And while Vance is no longer listed as a partner at Narya Capital, according to his 2023 financial disclosure, he appears to still be an investor in the firm"or more technically, multiple legal entities with names including Narya.

#32 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-10-06 08:17 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort