Would these "administrative" warrants hold up before the supreme court?
~ Galaxy
Probably ...
Interesting tidbit, since immigration/removal is a civil proceeding, the FifthAmendement doesn't apply.
supreme.justia.com
Second, although in a criminal procedure, the court must instruct the jury that it cannot draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's failure to testify about facts relevant to his case, Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), in civil cases, "the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976).
www.litigationandtrial.com(1923)).
If you're a here legally speak up, silence can be admission of guilt, carry and show your ID, while you don't have to carry one an officer can detain you until your ID is established.
The FBI has nothing better to do.
They went after people that prayed at an abortion clinic, and you said nothing.
it's not that they're blue states...that's for simpletons like "you people"
to use in your quest....successful quest ...to be the most dishonest people
this side of Joe Scarborough.
--violate federal law...lose federal money..WHICH BTW is a comment
I borrowed from several of you when red states were defying the stupid
F/G crud woke freaks and fanatics were inflicting upon normal people....
should be simple enough even for you bozos.