"We don't know why anything exists at all. Nine things we still can't explain about the Universe" (2/26)

Clearly, must be God then...

God of the Gaps! God of the Gaps! God of the Gaps!
Ya gotta lotta lotta gaps... more and more each year it seems.

Do you have any idea how foolish you look shrugging off your intellectually lazy logical fallacy? It completely belies your supposed quest for truth.

And no, there aren't more every year. Just more questions once we get some answers, as good science always goes.

I could go on.... we gotta a lotta Gaps!

#144 | Posted by Corky

Like a good little trained monkey, you centralize your God of the Gaps nonsense around the admittedly most perplexing and difficult to support scientific idea. Meanwhile, your crusty old man discussion went super deep with the insight that the Big Bang supports Genesis because it says...there is a beginning...

Wow. Super solid, paradigm shifting work there. Holy. S*&^.

You know what else it supports then? Every other God damn origins myth ever to come from a human's brain.

Glad you found a box to put me in... we wouldn't want you going around all confused.
#145 | Posted by Corky

Confused? No. But it did clarify several things, like why you have zero arguments. Ever. Why you throw around logical fallacies like it's your job. Always. Why you fundamentally misunderstand the science you purport to know. Also always. What you've learned is through a distorted lens of charlatans and pseudointellectuals who came to a conclusion first and use the non-existence of answers to their loaded questions as answers, all while producing zilch as far as knowledge of actual usefulness and substance.

Yes, there was indirect evidence that led physicists to seek direct detection in the first place.

Direct detection confirms its existence and gives us the physical characteristics of it.

Now go ahead and say something stupid about truckers and frat boys, pedo supporter.

Pedo? This is what loser leftists do when they can't have their way. Sick little bastard.

This stupid pile of s*&^ doesn't think we remember Pizzagate, QAnon, the nonsense about Wayfair ect ect.

They casually threw around the accusation of pedophilia for YEARS with zero evidence or cause but now want to act like it's verboten because it turns out the man pushing it all is their Lord and Savior Donald "Epstein Files" Trump, who is and was one of the world's worst sexual predators and whom they continue to support without question.

So, f*&^ off you pedo supporting dips*&^. You earned it.

The MSM isnt dying a slow death, it's slowly committing suicide.

#85 | Posted by BellRinger

Yes, largely because polarization has led people to seek "independent media" that tells them what they want to hear or that conforms to their "side."

That's not to say they haven't made mistakes, they have. But those mistakes have been blown out of proportion to justify listening to other sources that are blatantly and demonstrably far far worse.

Trust in corporate news media is at a historic all time low, Zed.
It's why I stand by my last post.

#77 | Posted by BellRinger

You stand by your post for the same reason you wrote it - intellectual laziness.

Labeling is SO juvenile.

Or it's, you know, using language to communicate and understand. Why are you afraid of the label?

Let me ask you, when you see a new model car on the street, what is your assumption?
Do you assume that it was the result of hundred of billions of years of molecular shenanigans in a mindless process, or do you assume there was a car designer and builder?

Do you not understand the biological underpinnings of evolution? Because only in that context could you ask this question with a straight face.

Snoofers is right about the Universe, btw. We really haven't a clue... current debates in astrophysics include does matter really exist, does dark matter exist?
What about gravity, how does that really work?

You're playing God of the Gaps. BTW they just directly measured dark matter.

And science has a really low bar, btw... if we find phenomena that we can attribute to an even semi-plausible source, then that assumed source... some effect that we see... it becomes a working theory.

No, it doesn't. Don't throw around the lay usage of the word theory and expect to be taken seriously.

So, I take into account all sorts of information when I consider my opinions, which, also btw, I know are opinions rather than confusing them with facts.

#135 | Posted by Corky

So, all of that just to avoid saying yes, you are an intelligent design proponent. Got it.