Wall St set for strongest quarter in years as risk appetite holds despite US-Iran war
www.reuters.com

Supreme Court Mail-In Election Ballot Decision Impact on 1.3M Active Military, Veterans
www.military.com

... The Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling on Monday to uphold a grace period for mail-in election ballots has drawn strong rebukes from conservatives, while military organizations and other groups praised the ideologically lopsided judicial body for preserving voting options -- notably for displaced active-duty military personnel. ...

Impact on Active-Duty Military, Veterans

The ruling brought a mixed bag of positive and negative responses based on ideological grounds.

Vet Voice Foundation is one of those groups in favor of the decision. The nonpartisan, national organization intervened in the case to, as it described, defend the rights of military families, veterans and overseas voters whose ballots are often delayed through no fault of their own.

"Today's decision is a victory for every American who follows the rules, mails their ballot on time, and deserves to have their vote counted," Janessa Goldbeck, U.S. Marine Corps veteran and CEO of Vet Voice Foundation, said in a statement. "For service members stationed around the world, military spouses, veterans and other Americans who rely on voting by mail, this ruling recognizes a simple principle: voters should not lose their voice because of circumstances beyond their control. Our democracy is strongest when every eligible voter has a fair opportunity to participate."

They pointed to the statistics, notably how in the 2024 general election almost one-third of U.S. voters cast ballots by mail in the 2024 general election, including millions of military families, veterans, seniors and rural voters. The previously existing grace period still led to more than 100,000 ballots being rejected nationwide for arriving after state deadlines. ...

3-year-old shot dead in Gaza as U.N. report accuses Israel of targeting children
www.nbcnews.com

... The report alleged Israel has a "deliberate strategy" of targeting children in the occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip, resulting in genocide, which Israel rejects....

Supreme Court ruling guts government's use of geofence warrants
arstechnica.com

... SCOTUS falls short of deeming geofence warrants unconstitutional, though.

The Fourth Amendment protects a user's "location history," the Supreme Court ruled Monday.

The same logic already applied to a cellphone's tracking, and the high court found "no good reason exists to reach a different result for Location History" collected by third parties like Google.

Split 6-3, the majority agreed that the government needs a warrant and must show reasonable cause to turn a phone's location-tracking services into a government surveillance tool.

The decision came in a case where cops used so-called geofence warrants to track down an armed bank robber from a list of all phones logged in the area. Applying a three-part process, cops worked with Google to narrow down the list of suspects and eventually arrested Okello Chatrie, who had opted in to share his location with Google every few minutes. Chatrie was sentenced to 12 years in prison but challenged the geofence warrant as an unconstitutional search.

The US tried and failed to argue that no search was conducted under the Fourth Amendment, partly because they only searched a little bit of Chatrie's location data, which the government considered too small to warrant privacy protections. ...