This is a joke right?

Bye bye abortion rights nationwide

Gaetz thinks only ugly women care about reproductive rights

He shows pics of nude girls to fellow representatives

I weep for what our country used to be

No it was dropped because his coconspirator was such a scum bag the doj was worried about his credibility. Gaetz had the Venmo payments to the child on his phone

Women's reproductive rights are now in the hands of a rapist and a man credibly accused of statutory rape.

Thanks magat scum

Women magat scum, do you feel good right now?

It is amazing that people defend someone credibly accused of raping a child for the highest justice official in the country.

I cannot imagine what women are experiencing at this moment.

JFC ---- this country and the ------- nihilistic hatemongers that now run it.

You magat scum are the worst people in the world.

Women's reproductive rights are now in the hands of a rapist and a man credibly accused of statutory rape.

Should be an interesting confirmation process...

Posted by moder8 at 2024-11-13 05:17 PM | Reply

You haven't heard Senate Republicans have ceded their confirmation powers to -------.

Women's reproductive rights are now in the hands of a rapist and a person credibly accused of raping a child.

------- has already directed a willing Senate republican group to allow his appointees to get approved as recess appointments, iow there will be no senate hearings

Best case answer is that they are too busy to follow the news.

Again, people seem quite incapable of conceiving the dramatic change that has already occurred.

We now live in an authoritarian state. Full Stop.

------- has completed his takeover of the republican party. THEY WILL NOT STOP HIM ON ANY SUBSTANTIVE ISSUE.

The best one can HOPE is that Gaetz and Gabbard are sacrificial lambs, so odious that they will make the other unqualified and evil people able to slide through.

But these are the appointments to keep an eye on cause this will be a test of how far ------- will push.

Women's reproductive rights will be in the hands of a rapist and a man credibly accused of----------.

Apparently, Gaetz (he of the world class punchable face) has resigned his seat, so, ummm yeah, pretty much guaran ------ teed AG

No bets?

#69 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You're betting that republicans will appoint a grossly unfit,------------ to the high office of AG? And you expect people to take that bet up?

Man you're dumb

OMFG where have we ever heard this before???

#77 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Your contention that magat scum have no morals is not the own you think it is, magat scum

You voted for a eugenicist.. I'll take my chances

#88 | Posted by lfthndthrds a

Your rapist cult leader believes people and races are pre-disposed to commit murder.

So, umm once again, every accusation is an admission.

I'm sorry about your mom.... reallly

#93 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I'm sorry you're a magat scum ----... nah just jibing.

Ummm, no... I'm going with the opinions of the guys from Alberta... Dumbass

#95 | Posted by lfthndthrds

If a piece of ---- had diarrhea it would be more appealing than you magat scum.

It's nihilistic trolls like -------------- that put our nation in the hands of a rapist, felon, thief, conman, insurrectionist.

the one silver lining is he will be hurt more than us when his cult leader ----- him over.

So, everyone, point and laugh at the evil magat scum.

Shut up ------, no one cares.

#98 | Posted by lfthndthrds a

---- you ----

Point and laugh at the magat ----

Now that's a really intelligent comment. Did your dad teach you that?

#107 | Posted by lfthndthrds a

My dad taught me not to defend a------------. Yours clearly did not you ------- ----

Hey magat scum, how do you feel defending, nay, cheering on a------------?

Hey magat scum, what happened to you in your life that you defend a------------?

Hey magat scum, do you rape children, like the man you are defending? Just curious.

#115 | Posted by lfthndthrds a

I have never commented on what I suspect is a nothing burger.

You, on the other hand, defend a------------.

You haven't answered my question, what in your life brought you to the point of defending a------------?

Did you need viagra and a power drink to "go all night" Like your child raping hero, magat ----?

Do you have pictures of the children you raped on your phone?

You should probably delete the pictures from your phone of the---------- victims.

Of ---- off you lying piece of ----.

HEY, wait, before you go, are you going to man up and admit you are wrong about the senate ceding power to ----ler?

Did you use it to do that to your child?

#126 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Are y ou using the "I know you are but what am I defense?" You------------ defender magat scum?

You know, I look back on my life and I can take great pride in the knowledge that I have NEVER defended a------------.

I'm saying that accusations are projections. You likely did some ---- like that if you're accusing others of it. you can keep accusing others but you own that ----, lewzer..

#130 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Wrong

You defended a------------.

I did not defend a------------.

You defended a------------, I suspect, because you have done something similar.

I condemn child rapists, cause that is what a normal person does-kind of a low bar too, which you couldnt get over, magat scum

Funny thing, I do sense a certain sensitivity to the topic in you, magat scum. I hit close to the mark didn't I. Did you pick up a teen hooker not too long ago?

I nailed you didn't I magat scum?

How was she? Or was it a he? or a they? I'm not judging.

Well, I am, but not over gender.

Republicans-the party of rape and----------.

I see my simple question cause the DR's resident trash person to run away.

------- magat scum are SOOOOOOOOOO predictable

Twoothy,

Since Harris has lost you have wished absolutely horrible things to happen to the loved ones of the people who didn't vote the way you demand they vote.

You are NOT the good guy'.

#136 | Posted by BellRinger a

Jeff, my dear turd/

I have only wished those people to get exactly what they voted for.

Why do YOU think that is "absolutely horrible things"?

Should a latino who voted for ------- not WANT his family and friends deported?

Should a woman who voted for ------- not WANT to be denied basic reproductive care?

Seriously, you magat scum are very difficult to read

Should a low-income person who voted for ------- not WANT to be a "net loser" under -------'s economic policies?

Should any many who voted for ------- not WANT to be wandering around a hospital begging for someone, anyone to help their loved one?

This is what they voted for, after all.

You magat scum are confusing.

And now I am being critized for wishing magat scum get what they voted for

There is simply NO PLEASING some magat scum.

before you go, are you going to man up and admit you are wrong about the senate ceding power to -------?

You always admit when you are wrong, right magat scum?

Point and laugh at the magat -----

That is all.

You're flailing around filled with impotence and rage and are asking questions' along the lines of, "Are you still beating your wife."

FFS. Grow the eff up. Cope. Channel your hyper-emoti9ns toward something positive.

#143 | Posted by BellRinger

I find it quite positive to point out that magat scum are defending a------------

I am honestly curious why you DON'T condemn a------------.

Odd I think.

BTW are you still raping children?

Won't answer the question too.

Point and laugh at the magat -----

That is all.

Are you going to man up and admit you are wrong about the senate ceding power to -------?

Third time I ask the question

Nothing sociopathic about that question. You brag about admitting mistakes.

"We must act quickly and decisively to get the president's nominees in place as soon as possible, & all options are on the table to make that happen, including recess appointments. We cannot let Schumer and Senate Dems block the will of the American people."

You said republican senators are not ceding power to -------.

That quote is from John Thune the Senate Majority leader if you weren't aware.

You know what jeff, I would have a scintilla of respect for you if you even said, shoot that does look like senate republicans giving up a core power to -------..

But you won't

Cause you are a ----.

It's too late jeff to pretend you honestly answered the question when I gave you the answer.

Did you not cheer congressional bypass for Biden to try and buy votes via transferring student loan debt to the taxpayers?

This is a lie. Biden had the authority and at a MINIMUM had the authority to interpret the laws as he saw fit=that is his role as president.

The SC exceeded it's authority by taking the case-no injury means no standing means NO ROLE FOR THE COURTS. Let me repeat, MOHELA was not injured (They would MAKE money on loan forgiveness). NO INJURY NO STANDING. NO STANDING NO ROLE FOR THE COURT. The SC acted as a legislature-this is irrefutable. IF CONGRESS didnt agree with Biden, they could have passed a law to stop him.

This is simple, basic civics which you constantly fail to recognize.

pushed to add statehood, to Puerto Rico and DC.(I support this-the whole taxation without representation thing) Pack SCOTUS with 4 new justices ALL chosen by Biden (I am fine with that given the stolen justice seat and the out of control and CORRUPT SC and it makes logical sense given the size of the country and the number of Federal court districts) and confirmed with a VP tie-breaker. Nationalize voting laws (I support protecting elections and am open to reasonable compromise=including IDs, as long as the federal government ASSURES everyone has an ID at no cost-pubes won't go for that though) and outlawing certain popular safe-guards at the state level like showing ID.

2. No congressional approval exists for Biden to buy votes buy transferring student loan debt to the taxpayers.

Apples and oranges? More like apples and pumpkins?

#159 | Posted by BellRinger

This is a lie pure and simple.

There are laws passed by Congress

the President INTERPRETS the laws so he can implement them.

If the president incorrectly interprets the law, there are 2 constitutional actions to address the incorrect interpretation

Congress can pass a law clarifying the law

A party injured by the president's action can sue for compensation for their injury.

Again, if the president takes an action that does not injure someone that is not against the law. no injury no role for the court.

Republican AGs used MOHELA as the claimant. MOHELA did not agree to be part of the lawsuit. And in fact MOHELA was going to MAKE MONEY on student loan forgiveness.

Thus the AGs did not show the most basic requirement for a lawsuit-standing.

They did not have standing to sue, because there was no injury. There was nothing for the courts to comment on.

When the courts comment on something that is NOT AN INJURY they are legislating-by definition. They are taking it upon themselves to say this is what the president is required to do or not do. That is Congress' role full stop.

I will say it is tiring, frustrating and annoying to have to repeat the same basic facts to people too dishonest to debate the facts

Oh and the "major questions doctrine" is made up BS that runs counter to the constitution plain and simple.

the courts do not have a role in policing Congress' delegation authority unless someone is injured by said delegation.

christ this is all first day of law school ----.

Standing, also known as locus standi, is the right of a party to bring a lawsuit in court. It's a condition that a party must meet before the court will consider the merits of their case.

To have standing, a party must:

Have a sufficient connection to the law or action being challenged

Have suffered or be threatened with harm from the law or action

Show that the harm is redressable, meaning a favorable court decision will likely make it better

MOHELA (the missiouri agency that was managing the student loan program) was the party in the student load forgiveness case.

MOHELA did not agree to be party to the lawsuit

MOHELA would have MADE money from the loan forgiveness.

Peacefully protesting at school board meetings

You forgot to add and sending terroristic threats to public officials via mail and email

What is the proper response when terroristic threats are mailed and emailed to public officials?

Like WTAF, how much more evidence do people need??

Let's just ignore the fact that SCOTUS shot it down and they continued with it any way.

#214 | Posted by BellRinger

You're a ----, --------, lying piece of ----.

I will ask again and you will not answer.

What was the injury that gave MOHELA standing?

You used to care about the SC legislating from the bench (not that they did it when YOU claimed they did).

I ask yet again

What was the injury that gave MOHELA standing?

You do understand basic civics, right, magat scum. Since I posted in detail the obscenity which was the SC student debt ruling, you should do better than just making dumbass proclamations.

But you won't, cause you can't, cause you're a dumbass piece of human septic waste.

You're a piece of ----, human trash. Vile magat scum

Oh and stupid ------- you doesn't know Biden successfully forgave $175 Billion in student loans regardless of the lawless supreme court.

----ler will hurt the economy and student loan borrowers by eliminating the student loan forgiveness program.

Sux for magat scum with forgivable student loan debt. Just another reason to point and laugh at the magat scum

Epic!!! LMAO

x.com

#218 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You're comparing trans people with a------------.

There are no sufficient words in the english language to describe how ------ a human being you are.

Your lack of morals is breathtaking.

#221. It's already been discussed ad nausuem. For your own mental stability I'm not going to ------ slap you on this again.

#222 | Posted by BellRinger

IOW you've got nothing, you diseased coward.

BTW you have NEVER responded with anything at all.

You're a piece of ----, magat scum

Watch this.

Hey jeff, what is the appropriate response by the federal government to death threats mailed and emailed to public officials?

I discussed at length when SCOTUS smacked down the regime.

#226 | Posted by BellRinger a

Then you should be an expert and should be able to verbalize a succinct and fact-based response to the question:

What was the injury that gave MOHELA standing?

Didn't answer the question did you.

bTW here is the DOJ Memo

And here is the letter from the NSBA (not the NEA dumbass)

And here is what the results of the federal government's involvement

That does not answer my question

what is the appropriate response by the federal government to death threats mailed and emailed to public officials?

To be even more specific, what is the appropriate response by the DoJ when they receive a request from a group representing public employees to provide assistance in response to threats of violence?

The threats were through email and mail. the threats were the responsibility of the federal government. IIRC the feds are in charge of phone threats, certainly if calls are made over state lines.

They were asked to provide assistance, the provided assistance, they found 6 cases that could be prosecuted, they referred those cases to the appropriate agencies for action.

This is actually an example of the federal government doing the right thing, correctly.

Unless you support making threats to public officials. And btw, "...authorized federal agents to harass parents who were peacefully protesting at school board meetings." is just a lie. It was not done, the DoJ did not do this. Why is the VP lying?

It was done to try and intimidate people and scare them into silence for speaking out against what had been (and in some cases still going on) going on in schools. They didn't have jurisdiction. And they did it anyway. And you supported it and still obviously support it.

#238 | Posted by BellRinger

Can you provide a reputable source showing the DoJ or FBI threatening, scaring, intimidating, harassing, or shoot even interviewing anyone as a result of this memo?

Please provide supporting proof as to the assertion that they didn't have jurisdiction. The Feds regulate and police the mail and interstate communication (that is what they do). it is obvious as the nose on your face they have the authority AND RESPONSIBILITY to respond and investigate threats against public officials. that isn't even debatable.

I fully support the federal government pursuing and prosecuting terrorists. Why don't you?

Again, they successfully identified 6 cases for prosection.

Why do you view that as a bad thing?

Buh Bye, I look forward to you lying and presenting this same -------- at a later date.

And, I know it's been said a thousand times, but jeff, this is why no one respects you around here. You lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie

That's what I thought jeff.

Remember when Jeff was against human trafficking?