Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Several studies suggest that people in red states have more babies than those in blue states. A new report from a conservative-leaning group says that could have implications for politics and culture.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

MCCAMMON: And these authors looked at young adults ages 25 to 35 who self-identify as liberal or conservative. They found that young liberal women today are much less likely to have children than young conservative women, with a gap of more than 30 percentage points. And that's a big change since the 1980s, when there was a much smaller gap between liberal and conservative women.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

If liberals just had more children would the birthrate issue disappear?

Extremely conservative men 35-45 now have almost 4x as many children as extremely liberal men.

35-45 (2021-204):
Ext Liberal: 0.55
Liberal: 1.25
Sl Liberal: 1.19
Moderate: 1.55
Sl Con: 1.58
Conservative: 2.09
Ext Con: 2.14

#1 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-13 02:33 PM | Reply

Several studies suggest that people in red states have more babies than those in blue states

CSAMRUNT is proud to leech off of blue states.

#2 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-04-13 02:42 PM | Reply

States where women are treated like livestock have more births? I'm shocked, SHOCKED!!

#3 | Posted by qcp at 2026-04-13 02:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

OneIronTurd is unaware of the prophetic tale of Idiocracy.

#4 | Posted by censored at 2026-04-13 02:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Are Liberals the problem in birthrate conundrum?
Posted by oneironaut

Fake Bernie Bro, Real Paid Russian Troll, OneIronTurd attacks Liberals. Story at 11.

#5 | Posted by censored at 2026-04-13 04:27 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Is Ballwasher a pedophile? Why yes, yes he is

#6 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-04-13 05:31 PM | Reply

Several studies suggest that people in red states have more babies than those in blue states.

They're also lower socioeconomic status with higher dependency on welfare.

Imagine that.

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2026-04-13 05:51 PM | Reply

"Several studies suggest that people in red states have more babies than those in blue states."

Several studies suggest that people in red states need more handouts than those in blue states.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-13 06:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

As birthrates tumble, some progressives say the left needs to offer ideas and solutions
www.npr.org

... When Emma Brennan and Lauren Wright got married last year, the couple began weighing seriously whether or not to have a child. "A lot of people our age are not having kids, or are waiting, and they have a great life regardless," Brennan said.

Wright and Brennan, who live in what they describe as a liberal enclave of Baltimore, said they lean toward wanting to be parents, but the world often feels like a scary place to raise children. They worry about climate change, rising income inequality, and America's polarized politics. "We have conversations about the state of the world," Wright said.

Like a lot of young, liberal-leaning Americans, they've heard about falling birthrates, and the world's rapidly shifting demographics. But they said the most prominent voices offering ideas and solutions are coming from the political right. "That whole Trump thing, we'll give you a bunch of money" to have a baby, Brennan said, sounding skeptical.

Emma Brennan, Lauren Wright and their cat, TV, sit in their home, in Baltimore, MD on Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2026.
Wesley Lapointe for NPR

A growing number of researchers, and thinkers on the left, told NPR they worry that progressive leaders have largely opted out of the growing public discussion over birthrates and shrinking families, ceding the policy space to right-wing voices.

"If progressives don't want to talk about it, and self-censor, then no one is going to talk about things that might impact progressives," said Alice Evans, who studies gender issues at Kings College London and is currently a visiting professor at Stanford University. ...

As families shrink, the right takes the lead

Birthrates around the world, including in the U.S., are dropping steadily, to a level that demographers say falls well below the number of children per woman -- roughly 2.1 on average -- needed to maintain a stable population. The "total fertility rate" in the U.S. has fallen to a record low of 1.6, while in many countries the rate has dropped below one child per woman on average. ...


#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-13 08:02 PM | Reply

@#4 ... States where women are treated like livestock have more births? ...

imo, that is a correct assertion.

I have an in-law who once told me that women should just ~stay in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant, and have dinner on the table when the man comes home from work.~

I was taken aback at that comment. But the current stats seem to bear it out.




#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-13 08:07 PM | Reply

The correlation is education, not political party. You ------- pedophile coward bitch.

#11 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-04-13 08:11 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Thanks to rightwing policy, starting with Reagan, for average Americans, raising a family of more than one or two children has become impossible, unless you want spend those child raising years with both parents working one to two jobs, barely making enough money to keep the family head above water.

So, yeah...drop in birth rate among people who are not completely stupid.

WTF did these dirtbags expect?

#12 | Posted by Angrydad at 2026-04-14 08:29 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

There is actually fodder here for a real discussion about the birthrate, and young people who skew towards being more liberal are not dating or engaging in sex nearly as much as in the past. But no one here can resist the urge to just sling insults at the others party.

I've said it before, and I don't know why I continue to hope it can be like it used to, but this site used to actually have meaningful discussions about the topics of the day. Now it's just a cesspool of trolls and insults.

#13 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-04-14 10:24 AM | Reply | Funny: 2

It's too expensive to have kids.
If both parents work, then you pay for day care. Too expensive.
Healthcare is too expensive.
College is too expensive.
Team sports that turn into all-year travel leagues, dance class, etc. : too expensive.

The rent it too goshdarn high.

The consequences of monetizing every last aspect of existence = less existences.

#14 | Posted by schifferbrains at 2026-04-14 12:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

It makes sense. Steeped in Marxism leftists are trained to despise the nuclear family and regard children as wards of the state. Why go through parenthood just to surrender your kids to government?

#15 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-04-14 12:18 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Could it be cannabis use?

Cannabis is detrimental to sperm: even if they can fertilize, there can be DNA damage. Many miscarriages and (in the case of IVF) "day 3 crashes" which is when paternal DNA normally kicks in, are cannabis related. Dr Natalie Crawford on the Huberman Lab podcast out now.
x.com

The person that changed the TITLE doesn't understand the study or the data.

#16 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-14 12:40 PM | Reply

Where's the incentive to have kids?
They're expensive. By all indications, their chances for success will be fewer than their parents. There are already too many people on the planet.
Something about being aware of what a mess the world's in that makes people not want to add to it.

#17 | Posted by morris at 2026-04-14 01:20 PM | Reply

Pedophiles like Jeff like to rape 12 year olds

#18 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-04-14 02:08 PM | Reply

It makes sense. Steeped in Marxism leftists are trained [...]
#15 | Posted by BellRinger

#19 | Posted by censored at 2026-04-14 02:29 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

-Extremely conservative men 35-45 now have almost 4x as many children as extremely liberal men.

Well, for crying out loud look at the extremely liberal men on this site. Half of them are gay and the other half can't get a date.

#20 | Posted by eberly at 2026-04-14 02:31 PM | Reply | Funny: 2 | Newsworthy 1

-It's too expensive to have kids.

It's expensive, for sure. So it's either worth it to you or it's not.

and involves making sacrifices. You can either make them or you can't.

#21 | Posted by eberly at 2026-04-14 02:33 PM | Reply

-Extremely conservative men 35-45 now have almost 4x as many children as extremely liberal men.

Well, for crying out loud look at the extremely liberal men on this site. Half of them are gay and the other half can't get a date.
#20 | Posted by eberly

You better watch the way you talk, or they'll give you such a pinch! And cry.

#22 | Posted by censored at 2026-04-14 02:52 PM | Reply

"Extremely conservative men 35-45 now have almost 4x as many children as extremely liberal men"

Most of whom will grow up to become extremely liberal men (and women).

#23 | Posted by NerfHerder at 2026-04-14 03:58 PM | Reply

Most of whom will grow up to become extremely liberal men (and women).
#23 | Posted by NerfHerder

Nope!

Most U.S. parents pass along their religion and politics to their children
sr 2023 05 08 religious 2
pew.org

#24 | Posted by censored at 2026-04-14 04:21 PM | Reply


Most of whom will grow up to become extremely liberal men (and women).
#23 | Posted by NerfHerder

Only if they go to college, which isn't education today, but indoctrination.

#25 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-14 04:38 PM | Reply

I'll throw this in there for you....

#26 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-14 04:39 PM | Reply

#24. A teen isn't a grown-up, dummy.

#27 | Posted by NerfHerder at 2026-04-14 04:46 PM | Reply

#20 one is a woman.

#28 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-04-14 04:55 PM | Reply

#24. A teen isn't a grown-up, dummy.
#27 | Posted by NerfHerder

Fair point. Still nope! Although GOP female children do tend to grow up into Dem female adults.

Adults Parents Poltiics

#29 | Posted by censored at 2026-04-14 05:00 PM | Reply

not surprised....look at 8 of 10 "karen's out on the street OR WORSE....screaming and crying

on video in car and you'll see baboons' butt ugly broads.

#30 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2026-04-14 06:38 PM | Reply


#20 one is a woman.
#28 | POSTED BY KWRX25

Female?


#24. A teen isn't a grown-up, dummy.
#27 | POSTED BY NERFHERDER

You seem to be pretty much out of ideas, hey Sponge?

#31 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-14 06:49 PM | Reply


on video in car and you'll see baboons' butt ugly broads.
#30 | POSTED BY SHRIMPTACODAN

idk Shrimp, women can be liberal and good looking BEFORE college.

As I stated during college something happens, there's even a meme about the degradation.

#32 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-14 06:51 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Well, for crying out loud look at the extremely liberal men on this site. Half of them are gay and the other half can't get a date.

#20 | Posted by eberly

Our gays are honest about it. Yours are self loathing closet cases who take out their sexual frustration on the world.

#33 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-04-14 07:06 PM | Reply

As I stated during college something happens, there's even a meme about the degradation.

#32 | Posted by oneironaut

Yeah in college people meet others who aren't like them, and realize that people who aren't like them aren't evil like they were raised to believe, which causes them to question all the lies that their regressive parents and communities tried to brainwash them with.

Republicans hate that.

#34 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-04-14 07:08 PM | Reply

There is actually fodder here for a real discussion about the birthrate, and young people who skew towards being more liberal are not dating or engaging in sex nearly as much as in the past. But no one here can resist the urge to just sling insults at the others party.
#13 | Posted by kwrx25

Have you listened to what young people are saying about why they aren't having kids?

Seems like any reasonable person would start there.

The Main Reason Why Fewer People Are Having Kids
In not having children, as in staying single, adults are following their hearts.
Updated July 27, 2024
Key points
The number-one reason people under 50 don't have kids is that they just don't want to.
The expense and concern about the state of the world are factors in the decision not to have kids.
Some people don't like children or simply prefer to pursue other interests and goals in life.
www.psychologytoday.com

When asked why they are unlikely to have children, the top answer for adults younger than 50 is that they just don't want to. Over half of these adults (57%) say this is a major reason, much higher than the share of adults 50 and older who say the same (31%).

Similarly, by differences of 12 to 25 percentage points, those in the younger group are more likely than those ages 50 and older to say each of the following is a major reason they are unlikely to have children:

They want to focus on other things (44% vs. 21% in the older group)
Concerns about the state of the world (38% vs. 13%)
They can't afford to have a child (36% vs. 12%)
They don't really like children (20% vs. 8%)
www.pewresearch.org

#35 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-14 07:16 PM | Reply

This thread is absolutely hilarious.

Republicans have been preaching Abstinence Only sec education for thirty years.

Now, kids are doing a better job of abstaining from unwanted pregnancies.

The fact that Republicans aren't taking credit for the success of their Absence Only sex education lowering the birth rate is how we know Republicans never actually believed Abstinence Only sex education works.

Right, KWRX25?
Right, JeffJ?
Right, Eberly?

#36 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-14 07:23 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Yeah, those cowards won't respond

#37 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-04-14 09:38 PM | Reply

#32

Jeff is a pedophile.

#38 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-04-14 09:39 PM | Reply

"Where's the incentive to have kids?"

On the 1040.

Childless couples subsidize parents and children all the time.

#39 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-04-14 11:51 PM | Reply

Yeah, those cowards won't respond
#37 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

You are correct sir.
They are moral cowards
They know that about themselves.
They feel powerless to change it.

Learned Helpnessness is why.

#40 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-15 01:54 AM | Reply

And don't forget that it is the tax dollars of the blue states that are propping up and supporting the red states

#41 | Posted by gypsydiane8177 at 2026-04-15 08:29 AM | Reply

Extremely conservative men 35-45 now have almost 4x as many children as extremely liberal men.

#1 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-13 02:33 PM | Reply

Idiocracy was a documentary.

The irony hits so hard. The Autism Causes Vaccines crowd are the ones causing autism with their old man ----.

#42 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-04-15 08:44 AM | Reply

Another item to consider: many Red States have a higher infant mortality rate.
For example: last year's (2025) infant mortality rate in Mississippi is about four times the rate in Massachusetts.

#43 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2026-04-15 09:00 AM | Reply

You throw advocating for abstinence at me like a gotcha.

1. I never preached it, and thought it was foolish at the time
2. I never said that anyone is right or wrong on this topic, just that it would be an interesting discussion to have.

Why such adversarial reaction to me pointing out that the topic was being used as a cudgel to beat the other party rather than discuss why different demographics are swinging so wildly away from each other?

#44 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-04-15 01:41 PM | Reply

and it's laughable that I'm a coward... give me a ------- break you self congratulating troll

#45 | Posted by kwrx25 at 2026-04-15 01:42 PM | Reply

I haven't seen the study on this ... but ... on Joe Rogan Abigail said the following....

"Boys from liberal families now show higher anxiety than girls from conservative families."
~ Abigail Shrier

Which is surprising, because girls generally report more anxiety.

#46 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-15 05:29 PM | Reply


Another item to consider: many Red States have a higher infant mortality rate.
For example: last year's (2025) infant mortality rate in Mississippi is about four times the rate in Massachusetts.

#43 | POSTED BY TRUEBLUE

Such a stupid metric when Black infants experience the highest mortality rates"over twice the rate of white infants (roughly 10.9 vs. 4.5 per 1,000 live births)

Mass: 6-7% black.
Missippi: 36-40% black.

#47 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-15 05:33 PM | Reply

States with highest infant mortality rate: (all red states)

Mississippi: 8.94 per 1,000
Arkansas: 8.22 per 1,000
Alabama: 7.64 per 1,000
Louisiana: 7.37 per 1,000
West Virginia: 7.32 per 1,000
Alaska: 7.21 per 1,000
Indiana: 7.16 per 1,000
Ohio: 7.11 per 1,000
Georgia: 7.07 per 1,000
Oklahoma: 6.89 per 1,000

Highest & Lowest: Mississippi consistently reports the highest infant mortality rates (often over 8-9 per 1,000), while Massachusetts and New Hampshire consistently report the lowest (often 3-4 per 1,000).

www.cdc.gov

www.usnews.com

#48 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 05:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@48 MAGA, MIGA, MAHA all at once!

#49 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-04-15 05:43 PM | Reply

#47 | Posted by oneironaut

You want to start guessing WHY the infant mortality for Blacks is higher?
Poverty? Access to healthy food? Access to quality healthcare? Education?

#50 | Posted by morris at 2026-04-15 05:46 PM | Reply

I wonder why OneTrumper thinks it's a stupid metric to include Black Americans in the study.

Does he not consider Black Americans to be Americans?

Who knows what's in the heart of our fake open border Chinese liberal troll.

#51 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 05:46 PM | Reply

I wonder why OneTrumper thinks it's a stupid metric

Because his whole shtick is that everyone is wrong about everything, except him.

#52 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-04-15 06:02 PM | Reply

his whole shtick is that everyone is wrong about everything, except him.

All facts to the contrary.

#53 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 06:06 PM | Reply

= his whole shtick is that everyone is wrong about everything, except him

Which is SO over the top from reality that it's like watching Trump hitting on someone 60 years younger than him... and expecting to get good results.

#54 | Posted by Corky at 2026-04-15 06:20 PM | Reply

"Boys from liberal families now show higher anxiety than girls from conservative families."
~ Abigail Shrier

Which is surprising, because girls generally report more anxiety.

#46 | Posted by oneironaut

Ignorance is bliss. Boys OR girls from liberal families are taught more about the real world, which creates anxiety when fascists are busy destroying the real world.

#55 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2026-04-15 07:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It's not fertility. It's birth rate.

When millions are aborted yearly, fertility is not the issue.

#56 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-04-15 07:02 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Mortality rates would go down if people would stop aborting healthy babies.

#57 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-04-15 07:04 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Research indicates a complex, positive correlation between anxiety and higher intelligence, often linked to increased verbal intelligence, worry, and rumination. Highly intelligent individuals may experience more anxiety due to superior analytical skills, higher self-awareness, and a greater capacity for predicting potential negative outcomes.

www.rtor.org

www.anxietycentre.com

www.sciencedirect.com

#58 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 07:09 PM | Reply

Mortality rates would go down if people would stop aborting healthy babies.
#57 | POSTED BY PETROUS

You're really this stupid, aren't you.

#59 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 07:11 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

You must be stupid. Killing healthy babies affecting the birth rate of healthy babies.

Based on available data, an estimated 95% or more of abortions in the U.S. are for reasons other than major fetal anomalies or risks to the mother's life. The vast majority of abortions, over 93%, occur within the first 13 weeks of pregnancy.

#60 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-04-15 07:19 PM | Reply

Why such adversarial reaction
#44 | Posted by kwrx25

Take a step back.
Republicans are using this to argue we need to ban abortion.
We're adversaries on that issue, unless you'd like to inform me you support abortion rights.

#61 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-15 07:45 PM | Reply

Republicans never actually believed Abstinence Only sex education works.
Right, KWRX25?
#36 | Posted by snoofy

1. I never preached it, and thought it was foolish at the time.
2. I never said that anyone is right or wrong on this topic,
#44 | Posted by kwrx25

1. Good.
2. Then stop weaseling and say it's wrong.
Don't say you don't know if it's right or wrong.

#62 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-15 08:10 PM | Reply

Killing healthy babies affecting the birth rate of healthy babies.
#60 | POSTED BY PETROUS

What? It's difficult discussing something with someone as stupid as you are.

Killing healthy babies is murder and has zero impact on the birth of the healthy baby.

Meanwhile:

"Induced abortions are not counted in the infant mortality rate.

The infant mortality rate (IMR) is strictly defined as the number of deaths of infants under one year of age per 1,000 live births."

www.cdc.gov

www-doh.nj.gov

#63 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 08:16 PM | Reply

As for who's right and who's wrong about why people aren't having kids, the people who aren't having kids are right about why they're not doing it.

Anyone else is just projecting their biases and grinding their political axes.

Even the stupidest asshole on the planet should be able to figure that one out, so I'm confident you can too.

Why are you adversarial to just listening to what they have to say?

#64 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-15 08:23 PM | Reply

Have any of the Republicans noticed that black people in red states have a higher birth rate than white people in red states?

Hopefully a Republican can explain why they're proud of having more welfare babies.

#65 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-15 08:33 PM | Reply

You really are stupid?

IMR doesn't include abortions as the cause of death.
If you don't abort a healthy baby,the IMR is affected. Another healthy baby is born. Are you really unable to understand that infant mortality is affected every time a healthy baby is born.

Infertility would make abortion unnecessary, or are you too stupid to understand that too? Fertility rates are false numbers considering millions of fertile moms killed their offspring

#66 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-04-15 09:12 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Yeah, it seems apparent that red state parents are having more babies than blue states parents.

Perhaps that is why the GOP wants to taint the education system with teaching their politics, instead of teaching actual history?



#67 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-15 10:01 PM | Reply

Yeah, it seems apparent that red state parents are having more babies than blue states parents.

READ, its not STATES its that Conservatives everywhere are having more children.

This could affect Blue states soon turning them Purple. Thats the concern.

#68 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-15 10:21 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#68 ... Thats the concern. ...

Why does your current trolling alias seem to be so concerned about that?

#69 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-15 10:26 PM | Reply

If you don't abort a healthy baby
#66 | POSTED BY PETROUS

Well, considering it's a baby, you didn't abort it.

Is English a second language for you?

Let me know if you're a Chinese immigrant.

#70 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 10:33 PM | Reply

#65 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Its not about States. Its about conservatives outpacing liberals.

Over the past three decades, Republicans have generally given birth to more kids than Democrats have.
www.theatlantic.com

Some interesting thoughts on the topic.

The key takeaways of this are three-fold: first, Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, increasingly inhabit different worlds in terms of family life. Republicans tend to live in communities with low rates of childlessness and larger families; Democrats are more likely to live in places where childbearing is rarer and families are smaller. This informs how family policy is approached: Democrats see smaller and fewer families, and so see a cost barrier with which families need help, perhaps because in communities with a lot of Democrats, childbearing is less universal and frequent. On the other hand, Republicans tend to live in places with much higher birth rates and more uniform childbearing, and so tend to think that kids are just a part of life, and people adjust to afford them. Democrats tend to live in places with pricier housing, while Republicans tend to live in places where it's easier to afford more bedrooms
ifstudies.org

#71 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-15 10:33 PM | Reply

"IMR doesn't include abortions as the cause of death."

Would you like it to?

Fetuses aren't infants.
How much do you think abortion contributes to the fetal mortality rate?

Do you think women should be allowed to rid them selves of unwanted fetuses? I sure do. The alternative is a bunch of lowlifes causing problems and commuting crimes.

You ever notice how the crime rate dropped significantly after Roe v. Wade?

Connect the dots.

#72 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-15 10:36 PM | Reply

Well, considering it's a baby, you didn't abort it.

It a colloquialism. Its like when Snoofy uses Women when he means female.

#73 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-04-15 10:37 PM | Reply

READ, its not STATES its that Conservatives everywhere are having more children.

FTA:

"Several studies suggest that people in red states have more babies than those in blue states."

I doubt you're Chinese.

Chinese people tend to be intelligent and you're not.

#74 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 10:37 PM | Reply

Fertility rates are false numbers considering millions of fertile moms killed their offspring
#66 | Posted by Petrous

I'm fine with letting women nip those unwanted babies in the bud.

I can't imagine anyone who is capable of experiencing empathy would feel different.

If there's a person who claims they can empathize, and they still oppose abortion, clap back.

But I don't think people like that exist.

#75 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-15 10:38 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It a colloquialism.

What is?

#76 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 10:39 PM | Reply

imo, the discussion point here seems to think that political opinions (i.e., party preference) remains fixed.

I remain to be convinced of that.

The current election in Hungary is a prime example.

The recent special elections in the US are also an example of that.

imo, my view of the question is not "red states have more babies" as the thread title states, but will those Red States stay red?

#77 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-15 10:46 PM | Reply

will those Red States stay red?

The only constant in life is change.

Will America survive Trump is more pertinent.

#78 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-04-15 10:56 PM | Reply

@#78 ... Will America survive Trump is more pertinent. ...

I do hope that America survives Pres Trump.

And I also wish I can be positive about an outcome with that survival.

But the current Trump admin sees the writing on the wall, and it is not pretty for them.

Have the policies of the Trump admin started to move "red states" away from being "red?"

I wish I knew.

#79 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-04-16 12:25 AM | Reply

"will those Red States stay red?"

Republicans have deliberately impoverished Red states since the Civil Roghts Era to make sure blacks never achieve economic parity with Whites.

Poor, uneducated white people motivated by racial animus will continue to vote Republican.

For example, Al Gore couldn't even win his home state of Tennessee.

This is also why 1 in 3 black men have a felony conviction. To keep them from voting.

Georgia is the wealthiest Deep South state, and it's the Bluest. Republicans are terrified of other Southern states becoming as prosperous as Georgia.

#80 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-16 12:36 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort