How is BillJohnson not commenting on this?
I don't get it.

He has departed the site.
#9 | Posted by REDIAL

NoooooooooOOOOOOOOOOooooooooo!
-Darth Vader

What happened to Censored?

duck://player/J5k8ZQsZJpk

Maybe it's rigged, maybe it isn't. It sure as hell looks like it.
#18 | Posted by BellRinger

What specifically are you referring to?
You. Sound. Just. Like. Your. Daddy.

JeffJ and BillJohnson cast illegal ballots for Spencer Pratt, in that district where he got zero votes.

That's how they know it's rigged. There should have been at least two, if our elections are honest.

"for the candidate who conceded"

Republicans are trained to know when women concede to men, and it's permanent and irrevocable, and never rape.

have a better system since there are obviously better ways to do it than this.
#30 | Posted by kwrx25

Like Florida in 2000?

Thanks for bringing this up, I like it when others can make my point for me.
#37 | Posted by kwrx25

I'm glad you agree that Florida 2000 had "the possibility of looking fraudulent."

"You can't say the same about LA? Or is it defend defend defend, because it's viewed as your teams?"

I don't see what's happening in LA as anywhere close to Florida 2000. What exactly do you see as being so problematic in LA? Is it just that it's taking a long time?

Are lawyers even involved in LA? Because they sure were in Florida.

Is there a Brooks Brothers riot type of event happening in LA?

All I see about this "controversy" comes from right wing disinformation; known propaganda outlets.

Are you, personally, seeing something different?

"The people deserve to know the outcome of an election on Election Day"

And who deserves to pay for that?

"The people deserve to know the outcome of an election on Election Day,
Not weeks later"

2000 on Line 1.
2020 holding on Line 2.

Serious question, for people who believe there is "the appearance of fraud" here:

How long should it take for California to count 1,693,093 mail-in ballots and 397,392 in-person ballots?

A day?

OH, sorry, Not really fair to pin this on "California."
How long should it take for Los Angeles County to count two million ballots?

And, uh, about that appearance of impropriety: Do you allege it's sufficient to change the outcome of the elections?
Or just that something fishy is going on, but you're not sure what, just that it's fishy.

California legalized ballot harvesting and ballot curing.
#55 | Posted by BellRinger

Ballot harvesting in California, legally referred to as third-party ballot return, is the practice where any person can collect a completed vote-by-mail ballot from an eligible voter and return it to a polling place or registrar's office.

Ballot curing in California is the legal process allowing voters to fix missing or mismatched signatures on their vote-by-mail ballot return envelopes after submission but before election certification.

^
How do these activities give rise to "Maybe it's rigged, maybe it isn't?"

They don't, according to you:
My understanding is the count is not what is driving the controversy. It's that the late counted ballots skewed so heavily for the candidate who conceded on Election Day to move her to second place that the ballots themselves have the appearance of being fraudulent.
#24 | Posted by BellRinger

So what's the relevance of California legalized ballot harvesting and ballot curing?
Nothing. You're just trained to respond that ballot curing and ballot harvesting are "controversial."
You are a prolific fear monger.

The most informative part of this ginned-up "controversy" is Republicans can't say anything they'd change to "fix" it.

What the real issue is, is Los Angeles, I'm pretty sure all of California, does paper ballots.
So it's harder to hack.
#75 | Posted by ClownShack

We should use paper ballots nationwide.
Ask Republicans to explain why they don't think we should use paper ballots for all elections.

Which of these is easier.
Stuffing a physical ballot box with 10,000 fraudulent ballots, each having been filled out 10,000 fraudulent times
Or: Adding 10,000 fraudulent votes, once, to a number in an Excel spreadsheet.

I want it to be open and transparent. California's system is neither.
#62 | Posted by BellRinger

What specifically fails to be open and transparent about California's system?

The most informative part of this ginned-up "controversy" is Republicans can't say anything they'd change to "fix" it.
#81 | Posted by snoofy

"You sound just like your cult leader. Except you don't have the sense to storm out of the room when asked for proof of your claims."

Actually I think he just left.

Notice I didn't say illegal, or fraudulent, just rigged.
#3 | Posted by oneironaut

So the election was legal, and free of fraud.
Glad we cleared that up!

conspiracy mongering ... AIPAC
#98 | Posted by BellRinger

AIPAC isn't a conspiracy. It's a public operation with a public political agenda called Zionism.

I have been contacted twice via text message by parties offering to pick up the ballot I downloaded.
#105 | Posted by visitor_

That was nice of the Nigerian Prince to offer to do that for you.

Most if not all states provide sample ballots