LOL California elections are rigged. Just rigged.

Notice I didn't say illegal, or fraudulent, just rigged.

Did you know you can submit ballots 7 days after the "election" by using a "drop box" and it doesn't need to be dated?? Whats so funny is there was one right out side the Morgan Hill library all week AFTER the election was supposedly "over".

But its all LEGAL ... the thing is built to WIN by the party in charge. Chinese news is having afield day with this election, and all the BS excuses that it was legit.

Everyone knows its ---------.

#3 | Posted by oneironaut

Oh look mr "I'm not maga" pops up to parrot his maga propaganda as usual.

Allowing people to vote by mail is not rigging stupid.

Republicans are so anti democracy that for them, if people get to vote then its RIGGED!

It wasn't about winning, no one that Platt would win, its that he would expose the rot in LA, which he was doing.

Now the rot in LA will be swept under the rug, and the debate will be about bikelanes and BBQs.

#44 | Posted by oneironaut

If you cared at all about rot and corruption you wouldnt be maga.

In my home in Wisconsin I just printed a valid LA ballot. It is the ballot for the current election that happened weeks ago. I didn't lie or break any laws. They just let me download and print a current ballot.

#41 | Posted by visitor_

You should send it in and see what happens.

Hope you're willing to risk prison time.

Now how many people do you think are willing to risk prison time in order to change an election by ONE VOTE?

California legalized ballot harvesting and ballot curing. It is legal but justly sows distrust in California's election integrity.
The optics are terrible and so is the process. The people deserve to know the outcome of an election on Election Day,
Not weeks later and it's amazing how the late arriving ballots always deliver the outcome the establishment wants.

#55 | Posted by BellRinger

The only thing that sows distrust in election integrity is the fascist propaganda machine that you parrot.

Your party doesn't win unless you find ways to prevent enough people from voting, which is why methods that make voting easier make you so so angry.

It's not AMAZING that the late arriving mail in ballots tend to be the most liberal. It's what was predicted beforehand, it's what happened in 2020, and why trump declared victory before the full count was in. If it's so AMAZING, then why are the results matching up to the polls so accurately?

#84. Exactly. It's crooked as hell. Pratt had a very low likelihood of winning. That doesn't mean that California's voting process isn't messed up.

#86 | Posted by BellRinger

You sound just like your cult leader. Except you don't have the sense to storm out of the room when asked for proof of your claims.

Your entire cult is built around trusting the word of a con man. And you're too dumb to be embarrassed by that.

If you want proof of homeless voting ... its up 130% and there are less homeless .... LOL

But hey Democracy is at stake... LMAO

#84 | Posted by oneironaut

Hang on - are you suggesting homeless people aren't allowed to vote?
What year do you think it is?

#87. Learn how to -----------. You are so indoctrinated in your cult that you can't comprehend written word. You are programmed. You are exactly what you describe your perceived adversaries as.

#97 | Posted by BellRinger

You can't deny that republicans are a cult so you call your enemies a cult.

Trump/Putin 101 - accuse your opponent of your own crimes

Flag:

I have been contacted twice via text message by parties offering to pick up the ballot I downloaded.

#105 | Posted by visitor_

Send it in. If you're so confident that the system is rigged then you won't have to worry about going to jail.

Why would you go to jail?

There was a REPUBLICAN dog that voted in CA State elections, no problem. Next election, due to Federal Election rules they caught the dog......

#113 | Posted by oneironaut

So try it. Prove youre right.

All you need is an ID. Cali accepts gym membership IDs. If you want to vote, there's still time. I used my ID from "Totally Real Not Made Up Gym." It's a gym based in India owned by Nithya Raman's parents.

#121 | Posted by visitor_

All you need is an ID of SOMEONE ON THE CALIFORNIA VOTER ROLLS.

Are you on the california voter rolls?

A javascript program could register to vote tens of thousands of times and get as the required unique IDs to reqest ballots online. Just ask Nithya Raman how.

#138 | Posted by visitor_

Yes it's all an elaborate conspiracy...when the results end up exactly like the polling.

Let's go to motive - why would anyone risk jail time to cast one fraudulant vote? Mental illness?

That is the most disingenuous post ever. Republicans have no power in Cali.

#143 | Posted by visitor_

That's why it's the 4th largest economy in the world and the most desirable state to live in, aside from possibly hawaii.

That's why it's the 4th largest economy in the world and the most desirable state to live in, aside from possibly hawaii.
#147 | Posted by SpeakSoftly

Then why are companies moving out of the state, and there's a net negative migration?

#151 | Posted by oneironaut

Because businesses are run by ungrateful sociopaths who want to avoid repaying the people who made them successful. So they flee to states run by other
sociopaths who will allow them to abuse workers and ruin the environment.

But none of the employees who have to relocate from CA to a red state are happy to be doing it, unless they've been brainwashed by maga propaganda.

California holds approximately 17% of total U.S. net worth, making it the wealthiest state in the nation with a median household wealth of around $303,000. Despite this high aggregate wealth, California faces severe wealth inequality, with 20% of the state's net worth concentrated in just 30 zip codes that house only 2% of the population.

Income inequality is even more pronounced than wealth inequality. The richest 1% of Californians account for up to one-third of all income reported for state tax purposes, earning in just days what the average middle-income earner makes in an entire year.

Very progressive.

#155 | Posted by visitor_

Yes the more wealth a place has, the more wealth inequality it will have.

Sounds like you're suggesting CA should tax the rich even more?

Flag:

Election fraud is a debunked conspiracy theory, except for 2016 when Russia hacked the election. There's zero evidence of fraud, and all the evidence there is of fraud isn't evidence of meaningful fraud, and the evidence of meaningful fraud doesn't prove systemic fraud, and even if there was systemic fraud, you can't prove it affected the outcome of elections. And even if it did, that's a good thing.

#163 | Posted by john_savage2

No one said russia HACKED the 2016 election. They said russia influenced the 2016 election to help trump, which are proven facts.

Ever wonder why our enemy wanted trump to be in charge?

...The authors cite Malcolm Nance's book, "The Plot to Hack America," published just days before the 2016 election, as "influential in shaping popular understandings of the Russian influence campaign" ever since.

#176 | Posted by john_savage2

Did malcom nance make trump hire russian asset paul manafort as his campaign manager?

If not, what is your innocent explanation for that hire? Why would trump hire a russian asset as his campaign manger, out of everyone in the world he could have picked?

[Nostradamus says You will dodge this question]

No one said russia HACKED the 2016 election. They said russia influenced the 2016 election to help trump, which are proven facts.

What? This isn't influence, this is claiming Russia hacked Hillary's computers.

RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES; FALSE REGISTRATION OF A DOMAIN NAME; AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT; CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MONEY LAUNDERING

On July 13, 2018, a federal grand jury sitting in the District of Columbia returned an indictment against 12 Russian military intelligence officers for their alleged roles in interfering with the 2016 United States (U.S.) elections. The indictment charges 11 defendants, Boris Alekseyevich Antonov, Dmitriy Sergeyevich Badin, Nikolay Yuryevich Kozachek, Aleksey Viktorovich Lukashev, Artem Andreyevich Malyshev, Sergey Aleksandrovich Morgachev, Aleksandr Vladimirovich Osadchuk, Aleksey Aleksandrovich Potemkin, Ivan Sergeyevich Yermakov, Pavel Vyacheslavovich Yershov, and Viktor Borisovich Netyksho, with a computer hacking conspiracy involving gaining unauthorized access into the computers of U.S. persons and entities involved in the 2016 U.S. presidential election,
www.fbi.gov

Ever wonder why our enemy wanted trump to be in charge?

LOL Bill Clinton was making hand over fist from Russian speeches.

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company's chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
www.newsweek.com

The Clintons were for sale, why would Russia want Trump?

They lose the election then the foundation dollars dry up ... Why?? I mean if it was for the kids....

#179 | Posted by oneironaut

Yeah stupid. Hacking hillary's computers isn't the same as "hacking the election" - a phrase that implies the russians got into the actual voting software.

What about you? Have you asked yourself why our enemy was trying to help trump get elected? If hillary was subservient to putin, why did putin help trump beat her?

You are saying is that wealth inequality is good, and that more of it is better. It is reasonable therefore we should support policies to maximize wealth inequality.

#178 | Posted by visitor_

Nowhere did I say that. I said places with more wealth automatically have more wealth inequality.

But stop pretending you care about wealth inequality. You vote for the party that makes it worse instead of better.