Electing a D student who bankrupted six casinos who raped children on tape was a really bad idea.

#15 | Posted by Nixon

And even with all this happening right in front of their faces, the stupid piles of s*&^ keep bleating their support.

Can we please stop this timeline? I want to get off.

That "new" footage makes me laugh. How come they had near instant access to the s*&^ quality video, but it took 3 days to get the one where he actually looks armed?

Shocker. Zero Trumpers have commented on this...

#20 | Posted by eberly

Chinese peacekeepers for the UN are spreading goodwill in the Third World and collecting intelligence while Americans are now treated as pariahs.

If Trump was a foreign asset sent to destroy the US and its influence from within, I can't think of anything different that he could or should be doing.

So, a Fox News contributor who went to a for profit "medical school" (owned by Devry...) in the Caribbean...

This is what you clowns voted for?

I had a friend regurgitate Trump's claim that this "war" is the largest display of complex, multi-force military action "in history."

He got pissed when I laughed and pointed out Normandy. He still didn't believe me after I explained the full scale of that invasion to him.

He also got pissed when I said this war is showing Trump to be a complete clown, that our leadership is rudderless with no clear strategy to decipher and that it's analogous to revealing the man behind the curtain a la Russia/Ukraine. We've showed our ass and have revealed that we're fighting yesterday's war with yesterday's tactics. Meanwhile, Ukraine has showed us exactly what we should have needed to know about how this war would go down - cheap small size quantity over grand large-scale quality.

He got even more pissed and started ranting on how could I think we're "losing" (his word, not mine) this war. It didn't matter when I pointed out that despite our using huge numbers of high precision, multi-million-dollar interceptors we still lost multiple multi-billion-dollar radar installations and took massive damage to multiple bases across the region from lawn mower engine-powered cheap drones and had absolutely zero strategy to counter that nor to counter the obvious first move of closing the Strait of Hormuz.

Him: "But what do you mean we don't have a strategy? It didn't take any strategy to have stealth bombers take off from Missouri, bomb the nuke sites and return to Missouri??!?!"

Me: "That certainly took planning, but that's not strategy."

Him: "How is it not?!?!?! You're being ridiculous, dude..."

It was a pointless conversation. The US military has been fetishized for so long based on shallow expectations from bombing goat herders with high tech planes and curated clips of SOF guys decked out with the latest gear killing a few guys in a remote mud hut that people think dropping bombs is strategy and that a tally of targets successfully bombed is proof of "winning."

More proof of "winning"?

Him: "We took out their entire leadership!"

Me: "And new leadership immediately stepped into their places and continue to prosecute an effective slow strangulation of the global economy."

Him: "We've killed many of the new ones too! How can you say we're not winning?!?!"

Me: "We learned over 50 years ago in Vietnam that body counts aren't effective measures of winning and we're seeing it here as well as evidenced by the regime in Iran still in place."

Him: "Whatever, dude..."

F*&^ing pointless.

Of course, this piece of s*&^ makes it all about him.

NONE of this rhetoric is incitement yet a district map with bullseye targets (no pol names even given) IS incitement???
#13 | Posted by BellRinger

Ahhhh yes, dips*&^ is back to act like the right doesn't regularly use violent rhetoric featuring guns and shooting stuff in run of the mill political ads.

This is nothing more than another accusation being an admission by the right.

They're by far the most violent prone, especially in the recent past. They have to do whatever necessary to paint their opposition as the guilty party, no matter how absurd.

#37 | Posted by Effeteposer

Do you have any positive outlooks in your life?

So how can a liberal see it this way when the Dem party is busy hating anyone who doesn't agree with them?

It isn't hate to treat people how they deserve to be treated.

The problem with people like you is you don't like what's reflected back at you. Your response, however, is not to reflect and reconsider, it's to lash out at the mirror.