#32 ridiculous stupid piece of s*^% or a troll.

Either way, no need to interact with it.

You must like him to bring him up?

#26 | POSTED BY JUSTAGIRL_IDAHO

He's a stronghold state dem with roughly the same length tenure in Congress.

There's a few other differences but I'm curious how perceptions of him will stack up against AOC.

and is hands down the worst president in modern history.

Well, if anybody didn't think you were an idiot yet, this certainly stakes a giant flag on that territory that is unmistakable to interpret.

That's a reality. You can preach about how you're looking down on them for not sharing your exact standards, but then you're coming across a lot like the purity ponies.

#20 | Posted by sentinel

That's not what a purity pony is.

In any case, it's hilarious watching people argue for apathy and ignorance in voting without apparently realizing that that's what they're arguing for.

I absolutely do not lower my expectations because she is a woman, and AOC is too liberal for my taste. However, there have been MANY men in the primary with less experience than she currently has and so I will not discredit her simply for that.

#19 | Posted by justagirl_idaho

I'm not "discrediting" her for entering the primary.

I'm saying she doesn't have what it will take to be POTUS and we'd be incredibly foolish to elect her to that position.

BTW would you say Pete Aguilar is a good candidate for POTUS?

The fact that is never even a portion of their methods or rationale speaks volumes.

#210 | Posted by redlightrobot

The fact that your views rely on a political reality that is DOA is why you're not taken seriously.

Without gaining significant support beyond a single election cycle, you'll never get the political capital to push through meaningful tax increases.

But "progressives" make the same mistake every single time the Dems take a majority - they try to cram everything through while acting as if you're immoral and the devil if you don't agree 1,000%.

So you wanted someone else?

Not Bernie, not Harris, option 3?

Who the hell is that?

So because I don't have a specific candidate in mind at this point (I've stated two or three already in the other joke of an AOC thread, your inability to comprehend isn't my problem) means AOC is qualified? You tried that last time and it only belies your happy participation in the race to the bottom.

It's an expression, look it up.

I'm aware. I laughed because I remember what progressives "fighting for it" looks like - it looks like a GOP takeover of both houses of congress in midterms.

Lfthndpedo thinks decades of participating in an international child trafficking/sex ring is a-OK because he can point to a misrepresented narrative the person who is the subject of it says isn't real but it's a Dem so...

Stop and think about it, lfthndpedo, and try to objectively see what a disgusting pile of s*&^ you look like.

Funny how you not only give Biden a pass for what he did to his own daughter,

Ashley Biden herself disputes your representation of her private thoughts.

Like the idiot you are, you've bought a narrative intentionally crafted to cover the right's actual pedos.

you also think Trump is a pedo and Biden did nothing about it. Raetards - the whole lot of you.

#23 | Posted by lfthndthrds

This nonsense has been rebutted over and over and over.

If you're going to call someone a terard, at least say something that isn't itself terarded.

F*&^ig idiot.