__________
#38 | Posted by boaz at 2025-01-30 03:02 PM
I don't know where you ... are getting your "polling" LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
From your own link - www.newsweek.com :
|------- ... [Trump] remains one of the least popular U.S. presidents in history. According to the Gallup poll, Trump still has the lowest approval rating of all elected presidents, dating back to 1953, and he remains the only elected president with sub-50 percent initial approval ratings.
An Ipsos poll conducted between January 24 and 26 showed 46 percent of voters disapprove of Trump, while 45 percent approve.
-------|
Don't you think it's pathetic and weird to celebrate Trump's "honeymoon" poll that is much lower than all previous presidents' at this stage except only his poll from 8 years ago?
|------- Trump began his presidency in 2017 with a 44.6 percent approval rating and a 41.4 percent disapproval rating, based on applying our current averaging methodology retroactively. Before that, the record low for initial net approval rating was set by former President George W. Bush in 2001, at +28 points. However, former President Joe Biden started his first term at +22 in 2021.
-------|
"Joe Biden started his first term at +22 in 2021" - despite being lower than all (except Trump-45) was still far and away better than Trump's "new and improved" second term... and how did that end?
What all these polls really show is that, while people rejected Dems and try to give GOP a benefit of the doubt, they really don't like... Trump.
This poll, like many others, just confirms that most people didn't vote for Trump, they voted against and "fired" Biden / Harris incompetent administration and campaign - just like voters in most European countries are attempting to 'flip' their unpopular governments, most of which happen to be left-of-center. But in UK, where they 'flipped' Tories, the Labour is already less popular than Tories were.
People want "change," no matter how pathetic and weird that "change" may be.
Just to show how bad Harris / Dems campaign was:
House was lost by about 7K votes - one of the closest in decades.
Harris lost 3 "Blue Wall" states by less than 230K votes - underperformed the margins of win for Trump in 2016 (lt 75K) and Biden in 2020 (lt 45K).
She underperformed in 4 states where 4 Dem Senators (3 of them women!) won - AZ, NV, MI, WI - wins there would put her within 5-6 EC votes, but still not enough to win! She absolutely needed PA but didn't choose the popular centrist Dem Governor of PA as her VP - which could have changed the tone and professionalism of campaign. Critical decision / mistake that right off the bat made electoral math and path to winnig incredibly difficult, and punctuated how unserious she / her campaign was to begin with. Tim Walz kept talking about guns and hunting - that shows they had no clue what the voters were concerned about, and how little they thought of the voters they needed to reach.
She underperformed J-Biden by a mile - when Trump reached 74M votes (same as his total in 2020) she had 11M less votes than Biden had in 2020 - again, EC voters that count (ex-CA/OR/WA) stayed home in droves / voted against Harris.
She needed and tried (once) to distance herself from Biden/Bidenomics but couldn't, because:
a) Loyalty
b) Her campaign was essentially run by [inherited] Biden's election team, even though she had time to put together her own - another critical mistake
c) She never had a "Sister Soulja moment" and kept trying to please "all sides" on many issues
Campaigns should add from a pool of available "undecided" voters, she managed to divide and subtract.
__________