Advertisement
Women Could Be Paid $5,000 to Have Babies Under Trump
Women could be paid "baby bonuses" of $5,000 as part of plans by the Trump administration to drive up birth rates.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
censored
Joined 2008/09/17Visited 2025/04/23
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Women Could Be Paid $5,000 to Have Babies Under Trump (30 comments) ...
China Warns Against Trade Deals with US at Its Expense (22 comments) ...
CNN Data Guru Has a Warning for Trump About Defying Supreme Court (12 comments) ...
CNN's Data Guru Reveals How Many Trump Supporters Regret Their Vote (39 comments) ...
Teen Girls Arrested - Deported While Backpacking in Hawaii (53 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Baby bonus of $5000 & menstrual cycle classes are among ideas Trump considers as he aims to boost US birthrate. But these ideas dont address the real problems-kids cost a lot. $5000 doesn't begin to cover child care, housing costs, all the needs of each child www.nytimes.com/2025/04/21/u ... [image or embed]" Mia Farrow (@miafarrow.bsky.social) April 22, 2025 at 10:36 AM
Baby bonus of $5000 & menstrual cycle classes are among ideas Trump considers as he aims to boost US birthrate.
But these ideas dont address the real problems-kids cost a lot. $5000 doesn't begin to cover child care, housing costs, all the needs of each child
www.nytimes.com/2025/04/21/u ... [image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Five thousand whole dollars to have a baby! What a bargain!
#1 | Posted by censored at 2025-04-22 07:44 PM | Reply
Yeah, but see it's a $10K Penalty for non-white kids.
#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-04-22 07:52 PM | Reply | Funny: 1
So we're moving onto publicly funded prostitution
Yay
#3 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-04-22 07:54 PM | Reply
Just wait, won't be long until Black women are attacked for having children.
"They're taking advantage of the system!"
#4 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-22 08:03 PM | Reply
"Also discussed was funding for programmes to educate women on their menstrual cycles so they can better understand when they are ovulating."
That is so the government can track and enforce their reproductive choices on women.
Why, ask the Republicans.
Because when was your last period determines when you can have an abortion, or when the State makes the choice that you cannot have an abortion.
#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-22 08:46 PM | Reply
Fascism and the survival of the superior white race are interlocking. Il Duce also provided incentives for Italian mothers to have as much children as possible. Seven was the target, if I recall correctly.
"You will not replace us!"
Link:
paperspast.natlib.govt.nz
#6 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-04-23 03:13 AM | Reply
"The team responsible for managing US national guidance on safe and effective use of contraception has been dismissed, causing concern that an essential public health resource could be lost. The eight person team responsible for managing the guidance was dismissed on 1 April along with another 2,400 employees in the Women's Health and Fertility Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Division of Reproductive Health.'
www.bmj.com
#7 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-04-23 04:15 AM | Reply
"For a long time we were going away from Gilead and then we turned around and started going back towards Gilead ... ." Margaret Atwood, 2019
#8 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-04-23 05:55 AM | Reply
#8: Hi Doc: Appropriate quotation. Our nightmare began when we lost Roe vs Wade and now it's coalescing splendidly. The publicly-available Project 2025 should have been a five-alarm fire for us in 2024. Too bad the Democrats didn't stand up to Benjamin Netanyahu during the Nakba. We might not have lost the 6,265,888 votes we had in 2020. 2024 was just like 1968 when Hubert Humphrey lost for supporting the Saigon regime and the Vietnam War. Now we have to live with the stench of this faux Judeo-Christian Gileadean dystopia and Murder-Death-Kill for at least four years: www.zdf.de
#9 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-04-23 07:22 AM | Reply
So the US will pay women to be breeders.
That's a good look.
Nevermind that daycare for one child is more than $5000 per year let alone the cost of raising a child to 18 is somewhere around $400,000. What a deal.
#10 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-04-23 07:34 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
#9 Point for point, on point.
#11 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-04-23 08:18 AM | Reply
"Blood and soil."
#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-23 09:00 AM | Reply
Lots of countries give incentives to have more kids. Think of it this way Snoopy Trump will give your daughter $5000 to swallow instead of spit.
#13 | Posted by fortfisher at 2025-04-23 02:57 PM | Reply
Lots of countries give incentives to have more kids.
Is that why republicans keep eliminating programs for children and single parents and poor families?
But hey! $5,000 dollars. That's something.
Until it's seen as going to too many poor minorities.
Then it will be eliminated as well.
#14 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-23 03:01 PM | Reply
"Lots of countries give incentives to have more kids."
Do other countries do it to offset domestic population reductions from mass deportations, and legal immigration reductions from mass deportations?
#15 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-23 03:02 PM | Reply
"The average cost of raising a child in the US from birth to age 18 is estimated to be around $310,605 for a middle-income family, according to a study by the Brookings Institution."
www.brookings.edu
www.investopedia.com
abcnews.go.com
#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-23 03:08 PM | Reply
It's way more than $300k, it's more like $2M.
Unless you're a poor.
#17 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-23 03:09 PM | Reply
Investopedia sheds some light on that number:
"spend $310,605 to raise a child born in 2015 (latest information)"
So. The figure comes prior to Trump destroying our economy. Twice.
#18 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-23 03:15 PM | Reply
There's been no mass deportation. You're in a TDS narrative bubble if you think mass deportation is happening more than what Biden did. www.nbcnews.com
#19 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-04-23 03:37 PM | Reply
This is patently illegal since men can't also get the $5,000.
Republicans will surely stop by any moment to Mansplain how this cockamamie proposal turns Men into Second Class Citizens.
#20 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-23 04:14 PM | Reply
I remember when Boaz was calling black women welfare queens and insisting they were only having kids to collect money from the government.
Insisting that's how democrats kept black people on their plantation.
Yet, here we are, with republicans offering checks for childbirth.
And make no mistake. It's only for childbirth. Beyond that. They couldn't care any less what happens to the child or the family.
#21 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-04-23 04:20 PM | Reply
The "useless eaters" already receive free medical care for their pregnancy, in addition they get refundable tax credits, free housing vouchers, free school meals even when school is out, and food stamps, contingent on and proportional to, the number of fatherless larval future gang member "useless eater" offspring they disgorge.
People that pay their own way, 5K isn't a big deal.
#22 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-23 04:30 PM | Reply
" People that pay their own way, 5K isn't a big deal."
Thanks for admitting this cockamamie plan will end up creating more of the people you don't want around.
#23 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-04-23 04:32 PM | Reply
...rereading ^ makes me sound sort of biased. I feel the need to admit that there are exceptions, and some will eventually mature into productive citizens, perhaps as many as one per busload. Thanks to DEI.
#24 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-23 04:33 PM | Reply
" rereading ^ makes me sound sort of biased."
NS, Sherlock.
#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-04-23 04:40 PM | Reply
"The "useless eaters""
Dr. Phil lived out of his car. Suze Orman lived out of her van. JK Rowling was homeless at one point. Halle Berry lived in a homeless shelter. James Cameron lived out of his car. Jim Carrey lived in a VW van. Chris Pratt lived in a van. Shania Twain lived in a homeless shelter with family. Daniel Craig used to sleep in the park in London. Dolly Parton used to make a meal out of swiped ketchup packets.
You would've had us give up on them all.
God forbid you are ever down on your luck, and expecting empathy.
#26 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-04-23 04:50 PM | Reply
#26 "I only dreamt I lived in a drum."
#27 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-04-23 04:53 PM | Reply
Not to worry: it's already painfully obvious. Especially this part:
" ... some will eventually mature into productive citizens, perhaps as many as one per busload."
That's when FULL-ON RACIST became obvious.
#28 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-04-23 05:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Think of it this way Snoopy Trump will give your daughter $5000 to swallow instead of spit. #13 | Posted by fortfisher
The extent of MAGAt sex education knowledge in a nutshell.
#29 | Posted by censored at 2025-04-23 05:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Suze Orman lived out of her van. Jim Carrey lived in a VW van. Chris Pratt lived in a van.
Barrack Obama got high in a van.
#30 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-04-23 05:13 PM | Reply | Funny: 1
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy