So even though the cases aren't at all related to military matters and the Army has no interests in the case, military lawyers can be used to prosecute civilians in Trump's America.

Brief written by 11 former JAG officers in support of the defendant:

And while the Bible doesn't record Him singling out homosexuality the way some people do today, that doesn't mean He would have approved of the behavior either.

No, but if you're going to cling to your Bronze Age goat herder myths with any level of rigor or good faith, you'll not insert your personal beliefs when ambiguity is present and will limit your statements to what is explicitly stated in the text.

'Hey guys, how come you're not paying super close attention to this guy I just learned about through spoon fed chain email talking points like you are to the guy who is a neo-Nazi white nationalist who was a significant player in the 2020 election denial and January 6 insurrection?!?! Stupid libruls!'

-pedoringer

STFU idiot.

I saw this guy's name mentioned here a few times last week.

Looked him up and learned he's a podcaster who apparently was meh about a few stolen lemons.

And for some reason pedoringer has his panties all wadded over him.

I mean, I'm not surprised he's full of fauxrage over something he's been told to be fauxraged over, that's his MO.

More purity test nonsense.

Yes.

It's not 100% (nothing in science is), but the evidence and biology do not align with that conclusion.

I always laugh at the relatively high frequency event of MAGA people in my life being absolutely shocked that their support of and belief in MAGA has consequences.

They seem genuinely flummoxed that those beliefs, and what they say about the person holding them, cause feelings of revulsion and disgust in those around them.

where you need DNA to get a living cell, and you need a living cell to get DNA; the biggest of all chicken and egg problems.

It's always painful when lay people try to be all sciencey.

An interesting way of slamming one person's hopes and beliefs as he can, and turn it into a punch line.
Because ridicule is a terrible thing to waste.

#47 | Posted by A_Friend

He needs to steer the narrative towards a place where he can C&P you to death with arguments that don't or marginally apply to what you've said.

His is little more than mental ------------ on his part to justify his "faith." Nothing else.

In any case, why is this argument even occurring on a thread about government officials arguing about rotisserie chicken?

I hear the immigration line into Somalia is short these days.

#57 | Posted by boazreborn

That literally has nothing to do with anything, dumbf*&^.

But since we're on this terarded line of "thinking," why didn't you and every other MAGA cuck leave when Biden was in office?

They are barely distinguishable from Moderate Republicans.

This is nothing more than an indication of how far left you are, not any reasonable assessment of reality.

But, I suppose in the minds of people like Caius Marcius Coriolanus, this country is better off with an AIPAC-dedicated Republican/Trump sycophant in the US Senate than with so-called AIPAC-dedicated Democrats.

Yeah.

Those facts.

#10 | Posted by A_Friend

I think he blocked me for pointing out that not only is his position self-defeating, but that it also guarantees the election of people who are WORSE than any Dem could ever be while also obliterating any chance of change.

It's cutting off your head to spite your face.

The Democratic party needs to stop being owned by the corporate America. Until they do they won't get my vote. Just sayin

#7 | Posted by LauraMohr

Thereby removing yourself from being part of the solution.

You're angry because the cart can't be in front of the horse.

The Dems seem to be getting too confident of it occurring.
#1 | Posted by LampLighter

It happens every time.

Whenever the conditions become highly favorable for significant Dem gains, they try to run on their niche issues with passing reference to the core issues that are creating the favorable conditions.

So, they'll give lip service to high prices of damn near everything, but no real solution beyond subsidies or government payouts.

Instead of fixing the education problems and student loan issues, they'll just...wait for it...promise to throw more money at it. Again, little meaningful change is likely.

But all these bills will be stuffed to the hilt with niche issues that will hold up their passage, acting more as poison pills than incentives.

You're right I thought it was a protein but it's a sugar.

#41 | Posted by visitor_

But yet you think you can say, with confidence, that these things are "engineered"?

Things republicans claim to be against, but yet seem to dominate in the news:

1. Election fraud
2. Human traffickers
3. Sexual predators/abusers

Did I miss anything?