Labeling is SO juvenile.
Or it's, you know, using language to communicate and understand. Why are you afraid of the label?
Let me ask you, when you see a new model car on the street, what is your assumption?
Do you assume that it was the result of hundred of billions of years of molecular shenanigans in a mindless process, or do you assume there was a car designer and builder?
Do you not understand the biological underpinnings of evolution? Because only in that context could you ask this question with a straight face.
Snoofers is right about the Universe, btw. We really haven't a clue... current debates in astrophysics include does matter really exist, does dark matter exist?
What about gravity, how does that really work?
You're playing God of the Gaps. BTW they just directly measured dark matter.
And science has a really low bar, btw... if we find phenomena that we can attribute to an even semi-plausible source, then that assumed source... some effect that we see... it becomes a working theory.
No, it doesn't. Don't throw around the lay usage of the word theory and expect to be taken seriously.
So, I take into account all sorts of information when I consider my opinions, which, also btw, I know are opinions rather than confusing them with facts.
#135 | Posted by Corky
So, all of that just to avoid saying yes, you are an intelligent design proponent. Got it.
Corky,
"I have about as much pull around here as Matt Drudge."
Oh...that's funny.
I've read about Matt Drudge having pull.