By advocating doxing (the correct spelling), you are contributing to the very problem that you are bitching about.
#11 | Posted by sentinel

Make all the excuses you want.
Fact is, only fascists support Secret Police.

The anti-ICE stance is just baffling to me.
#20 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

You're confused why other police show their faces and badges?

We believe you.

"Whom is at risk from ICE."

Everyone.
They raid citizens homes without a warrant.

What's the Republican reason ICE goes masked, it's Officer Safety right?

So why aren't other police masked?

They (ICE) just randomly bust into the houses of US citizens?
#35 | POSTED BY MADBOMBER

Are you really this clueless?
I suppose you are.

"They just randomly bust into the houses of US citizens?"

No, they plan assaults on US citizens homes.

"I guess you've never seen pictures of Portland Police during the 2020 riots, have you?"

Which pictures do you have in mind?

"How many US citizens have been deported?"

What's the number where you say "that's too many?"
Spoiler alert: there is no number where you say that's too many.

There's the one where ICE rammed the lady's car in front of them, then shot her.

"anyone else who interferes with their assigned missions."

What's the mission?

Is merely existing in public near ICE the same as interfering with their assigned mission?

Your answer has to be "yes" if you want what you're saying to match what's happening.

"They are enforcing federal policy."

Which Federal policy gives the government the right to enter homes without a warrant?
Be specific.

Google "Portland Riot 2020."

I saw police in gas masks, after they fired tear gas.
You're saying everywhere ICE goes is a riot?

"If you truly believe that, then you shouldn't feign outrage when the other side uses doxing to intimidate and physically endanger their opponents."

Like Trump deporting protesters against ethnic cleansing in Palestine?

We shouldn't be outraged by that, because we think we have the right to know who is receiving government paychecks.

Where's the connection?

"ICE is simply enforcing policy."

Again, what policy is ICE enforcing when they zip-tie naked children?
???

"ICE Officers have become targets."

Targets of what?

"ICE Officers have become targets."

Innocent civilians have become targets of ICE.

Which Federal policy makes innocent civilians targets of ICE, exactly?

"Never before has the west looked so favorably on Islamism"

You're reaching for something that isn't there.

Opposing ethnic cleansing in Gaza has nothing to do with Islam.

"Targets of what?"
People like you.
Zed has stated several times that ICE Officers are fair game.
#75 | Posted by madbomber

You're not saying anything.
Name the threat, or admit you're making it up.

MadBomber has ---- enough of this thread and moved on to greener pastures.

"The way I see it, it's no different than when US aviators at overseas bases used to cover their faces and remove any sort of identifying features."

Were US aviators engaging in police activity against other US base personnel?
Did they cover their faces to prevent other US personnel from knowing their identities?

"You rightly complained when they doxed jurors and judges who ruled against them"

Judges are already doxxed. Their names are public. They don't cover their faces while they work.

"A retired libertarian (meaning white Republican in his late fifties or early sixties)"

I think he's in his mid 40s, maybe 50.
And he's retired from the military but he works for a military contractor now.
The Libertarian part you got right. Born on third, thinks everyone born at home plate should be able to hit a triple like he did.

They're (ICE) protecting the country from foreign invaders
#134 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

Yeah.
Those naked American children zip-tied in the streets were actually being protected by ICE.
That would make perfect sense to someone like you.

They do have warrants. When ICE conducts a raid, a warrant is required.
#120 | Posted by madbomber

You're lying.

Other than illegal immigrants, who has ICE deported?
#145 | Posted by madbomber

They don't have Google in Germany?
That's a shame.

"Police do wear masks in high-risk situations."

How is walking down the street a high risk situation?

"So you're saying, we don't know that ICE has deported anyone who wasn't illegal, but we don't know that they haven't."

Actually we do know ICE has deported citizens.
You don't know that, though.
You're not hear to learn things either.

"They don't have Google in Germany? That's a shame."
This is the kind of thing you say when you can't actually answer a question. You do it a LOT.
#152 | Posted by madbomber

You have the tools to answer your own question.
You simply choose not to use them.

"Police do wear masks in high-risk situations."

What kind of risk?
Name the "high-risk" thread that is reduced by wearing a mask.

"U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been documented to deport U.S. citizens, a practice that is illegal under U.S. law. Reports indicate that between 2015 and 2020, ICE deported at least 70 U.S. citizens, arrested 674 potential citizens, and detained 121, with the true numbers likely higher due to poor record-keeping.
Recent developments under the second Trump administration have intensified these incidents, with multiple reports of U.S. citizens, including children and disabled veterans, being wrongfully arrested, detained, and deported, often during mass enforcement operations." --AI

Sounds like you are okay with ICE detaining US citizens indefinitely, but you draw the line at deporting US citizens.
And you are okay with ICE detaining tourists indefinitely too, over paperwork issues.
Correct me if I'm mistaken.

Or were you just gaslighting with the question about ICE deporting US citizens.
Any comment on ICE illegally deporting immigrants who have protected status, like Kilmar?

"Even legal residency is not subject to the constitution."

So what's your point?
It won't be fascism when legal residents get sent to camps too, that must be it.
It can't be fascism if it's legal!

"With the other party deceased, there's not a lot they can add to the story."

You can't pencil in something to defend Ashli?
If you can't be bothered to put up a defense for one of your heroes, it's because their actions are indefensible.

Should they have kept the kids and sent the mom home?
#200 | Posted by madbomber

Why would they keep the kids?

Are you denying we deported citizens, or are you acknowledging we deported citizens?

"It's technically illegal under international law to deprive someone of statehood."

The United States is not bound by international law.
You're really not very good at this. You never were.
You've been denying Palestinians statehood as long as you've known what a Palestinian is, and what statehood is.

"Why was the mother deported at all?"
"Was she in the US legally?"

Why was Anne Frank sent to a camp?
Was she a Jew?
Same energy.

Why were the United States citizen children not afforded an opportunity to stay with relatives legally present in the United States?

"I think if you did a legal deep-dive, you'd find that the kids were not deported"

I think if you understood English, you'd understand the kids were deported along with their mother.

"those deported were underage minors born to illegal immigrants."

So that make it okay to deport citizens.
Some citizens more equal than others.

"If so, then you can make the argument she should not have been deported"

What kind of argument would you like me to make, how about an economic one?
Deporting her costs taxpayers a lot and gets taxpayers nothing in return.
That's an incontrovertible economic argument that she should not have been deported.

"Then what you are arguing is that the US should have an open-border policy."

What's an open-border policy?
What kind of border policy does the United States have right now?

"They are US citizens."

So why weren't they allowed to stay with relatives in the United States?

What kind of border policy does the United States have right now?

"One requiring that you have valid entry credentials prior to crossing the border."

That's the same border policy the United States has had your entire life.

"And additionally, requiring that once you cross the border, you adhere to the limits of stay, whatever that may be."

That's also the same border policy the United States has had your entire life.

So I'll ask again, but in a slightly different way:
When you were born, did the United States have a closed border, or an open border?

They are US citizens. With a passport and the consent of a legal guardian, they can come and go as they please in the US.
#218 | Posted by madbomber

No, they weren't able to come and go as they please. Their choices were be taken into government custody, or leave.

So long as they have a passport and the legal guardian approves, they can.
#223 | Posted by madbomber

ICE did not give any relatives the opportunity to take guardianship of the United States citizens.

Why do you support ICE not allowing United States children to contact adult relatives who could take care of them?

You have no respect for basic human rights and no concept of common human decency.

MadBomber will tell us ICE did not "deport" the citizens.
ICE simply "sent" the citizens to a foreign country.
#191 | Posted by snoofy

^
Snoofy was right.

"Do you mean like Elian Gonzales?"

Elian was an illegal immigrant. You'd support sending pobrecito Elian to Alligator Auschwitz, would you not?

"DC cops were not killed by the public."

I dunno, what's the Back The Blue website with all the police officers who died in 2021 have to say about them?

Everyone who says George Floyd was a clean kill says Ashli Babbit was murdered in cold blood.

Racism is why.

I mean, how do you think ICE plans its operations?
#256 | Posted by madbomber

They go to where lots of brown people are and start harassing civilians based on skin color.

I mean, how do you think ICE plans its operations?
#256 | Posted by madbomber

They go to where lots of brown people are and start harassing civilians based on skin color.

Nice to see the left is onboard with cops shooting un armed people for not complying with orders
#267 | Posted by lfthndthrds

If she was truly murdered by libs, why isn't Trump prosecuting the killer?

You know why. You're just embarrassed to say it.

"From the river to the sea" is literally a call for the destruction of Israel. All of it.
You OK with that?
#253 | Posted by madbomber

For the third time,
There was good Genocide on Both Sides:

Knesset votes 71-13 for non-binding motion calling to annex West Bank
Symbolic resolution calls West Bank inseparable part of the Land of Israel'; critics say it reflects misplaced priorities as PA calls it dangerous escalation'
www.timesofisrael.com
#60 | Posted by snoofy

A jury said differently in a court of law.
#259 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You are a liar, and you know it, and you like it.

And what for those of us who say both ------ around and found out?
#274 | Posted by madbomber

Those people are stupid and racist.

For the second time:
George Floyd was under arrest and in handcuffs in the back of a police car, when police removed him from the car and murdered him.
#188 | Posted by snoofy

If Ashli Babbit was acting alone she would not have been shot.

Racism is probably the overriding factor in your world view. Either that or fascism, but the two go hand in glove.

You being Bougie is just a product of your environmental.

"George did."

When did he resist arrest? While he was being murdered, or at some other time?

You're doing a great job displaying your racism here.

Keep up the good work.

I don't watch snuff films for a living like you do.

But are you claiming George Floyd was resisting arrest when he was already under arrest, in handcuffs, and in the back seat of a police car?

Or was it when he was being murdered while under arrest that he started resisting arrest.

Thanks in advance for clearing that up.

"a protester"

There were about five thousand protesters that day, and hundreds inside The Capitol. She wasn't acting alone.

"Geroge could not have done anything wrong"

Your words, not mine.

Man up and tell us specifically what he did wrong, if you can. You probably can't though.

How many cops do you know who killed unarmed people and got away with it because of the results of an "internal investigation"?
#295 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Hey kid,
I have some Bad News for your George Floyd comparisons!

Furthermore, it's likely that the Trump Admin stepped in on the original $30 million lawsuit and offered $5 million to avoid inconvenient things from coming out.
#295 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Why would Trump bury the story that Biden's DEI Hire murdered a White Patriot?

You tried. You tried very, very hard and this was the best you could come up with.

Nothing gets LftHndThrds more excited than the thought of a man's penis entering a man's rectum.

"You could watch the video"

If you can't make your point with words, it's because you don't have one.

You could watch the video and find out why George died.

A video is not an autopsy.

Floyd died because Chauvin kneeled on his neck for nine minutes and asphyxiated him.

Or, as the police described it, "Man dies after medical incident during police interaction."