NRA LOL

I'm guessing this is designed to fail.

In order to bring about the Final Transgender Solution.

The only way we can protect society from a Transgender person who has every right to get a gun is to institutionalize all the Transgenders.

the DoJ is going to declare transgenders are "mentally defective".
#5 | Posted by oneironaut

The DOJ isn't qualified to make that determination.

But that doesn't matter to the people who want to send transgenders to camps.

Where's the stats that trans people with guns are any more dangerous than, I dunno, Black people with guns.

"take the guns away from the crazies."

Repeal the Second Amendment.

Guns are the leading cause of death for children.

What percentage of children killed with guns were killed by a transgender with a gun?

And don't forget to count the suicides by transgender children, whose parents are happy their defective kids are dead.

"Sensible Gun Control" is the "Thoughts And Prayers" of the Left.

Trump has the loony left fighting for gun rights.
#80 | Posted by lfthndthrds

And what are you fighting for?

And what are you fighting for?
#82 | Posted by snoofy

Not gun rights for the mentally insane.
#86 | Posted by lfthndthrds

So you're saying transgender people are mentally insane.

Who else? How about the gays?

I've never had an issue with keeping guns away from crazy people or people on certain meds.
#87 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Which crazy people, and which meds?

LGBTQ no guns for you.
#93 | Posted by visitor_

There we go!
First they came for the Transgenders.
Then they came for the Gays.

"deviancy"

Is it deviant or healthy normal for adult men to have sex with thirteen year old runaways?

Lawrence v Texas was poorly adjudicated.
--JeffJ

It's sooo obvious where this is going.

We can't control guns, we have to institutionalize the Bad People so they can't get guns.

and this is where the left loses the issue
"banning assault-style weapons"
What it really means, ban 'scary' looking guns.
#98 | Posted by kwrx25

Fact is:
Uvalde Police were scared of a scary looking gun.

Fact is:
Uvalde Police were scared of a scary looking gun.
#103 | Posted by snoofy

No, they were scared of the round it fired.
#104 | Posted by jpw

But why?

Didn't they have guns that fire similar rounds, and more lethal rounds?

Educate me.

AWBs. A type of law so easily circumvented it's a waste of energy to talk about.
#102 | Posted by sitzkrieg

Setting aside any impact of the 1994-2004 AWB:

What is a gun law that isn't easily circumvented, and compatible wit the Second Amendment, and could significantly reduce gun violence?

I don't think there are any as about 200 years of history have shown.

You are correct. It won't be a gun control law that meaningfully reduces gun violence.
#111 | Posted by sitzkrieg

You dodge questions better than American students dodge bullets.

"Trump will ban numerous groups from owning firearms."

He will send them to camps, because gun bans can't withstand the Second Amendment.

You need better drugs.

Are there any school shooters that didn't have the initiative?

"There was a high chance of taking a bullet if you were first or second in line"

Isn't that the job?

Taking a bullet is a risk of the job, it's not the job.
#123 | Posted by jpw

Standing around while kids die is the alternative, so you're kinda insane for saying it's okay for the police to let Uvalde happen.

You've normalized him violence to the point where it's a thing that the police shouldn't even try to stop.

It's like RFK Jr saying we shouldn't police diseases.

The police heard him shooting and didn't engage.

There was one bad guy with a gun on a killing spree, and 182 good guys with a gun loitering in the parking lot on a coffee break.

The Second Amendment is why civilians can easily purchase a weapon that police won't engage without a ballistic shield.

Just like the Founders wanted it.

"Recent reports also say the school doors were faulty and not secured properly"

Like a locked door is going to stop someone who wants to enter a school and massacre the people inside.

It's a school, not a cockpit.

Just why being equally armed didn't even the odds.
Taking a bullet is a risk of the job, it's not the job.
#123 | Posted by jpw

Oh come on.
A hundred cops vs one guy and you say the one guy has the edge?
Cops being ------- is what evened the odds.

"95% of school shooters are on psych drugs."

100% of school shooters use guns.

"Form 4473 explicitly asks are you on psych drugs."

Narrator: Form 4473 does not in fact ask about psych drugs.

"tbh these attacks are not a knife problem per se, but an immigrant problem."

This nation is 99% immigrants, however it you'd like to self-deport nobody is going to stop you. Especially not the natives.

French government overwhelmed by school knife attacks
#137 | Posted by easy_meat

Civilized people are horrified by school violence.

Republicans see it as a sales opportunity.

"tldr: psych drugs kill"

guns kill more.
Guns kill more when functioning as intended, not as an unfortunate side-effect.

"The point is, the tool used is secondary to the user."

Is it?

What's the intended use of the tool we call a gun?

"The point is, the tool used is secondary to the user."

What difference is that supposed to make?

Nobody's made a point in opposition to the fact that the tool needs to be used in order to do something.

Tell us again, what is the use of a gun? What is the result when that tool is used as intended?