his could result in the President of the United States issuing a pardon to a war criminal. Let that sink in, voters,

He already has

"Let's make one thing crystal clear: That guy over there is the guy you want."

LOL

reasons for mri for brain in older adults

Tools
AI Overview
Brain MRIs in older adults are performed to diagnose conditions causing symptoms like memory loss, dizziness, or headaches, and to investigate changes related to aging. Key reasons include evaluating for strokes, tumors, or Alzheimer's-related changes, and identifying conditions like white matter disease. The scans can also check for injuries, monitor disease progression, and pre-plan or follow up on brain surgery.
Diagnostic and evaluative purposes
Diagnosing cognitive issues: MRIs help determine the cause of symptoms related to dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by showing the extent and location of brain damage.
Investigating neurological symptoms: They are used to find the cause of problems like seizures, migraines, vertigo, and unexplainable vision or hearing loss.
Identifying specific conditions: MRIs can diagnose or reveal signs of stroke, brain tumors, and multiple sclerosis.
Assessing age-related changes: The scans can show age-related brain changes like atrophy and white matter lesions, which are common in older adults and can be linked to cognitive decline.
Diagnosing vascular disease: They are crucial for identifying white matter disease, which is often caused by small vessel disease and can be associated with dementia.
Surgical and monitoring purposes
Pre-surgical planning: A brain MRI provides detailed images to help surgeons plan for head surgeries.
Post-surgical monitoring: It is used to ensure healing is going well after brain surgery.
Monitoring disease progression: For chronic conditions, follow-up MRIs can monitor how the disease is progressing.
Other reasons
Evaluating head injuries: A brain MRI can be ordered after a significant head injury to check for bleeding, swelling, or other damage.
Investigating hormonal imbalances: Scans can help evaluate issues with the hypothalamus and pituitary gland.

Yeah, dementia

Department of Defense Law of War Manual,
Sec. 183.2.1 states the "requirement" to
refuse illegal orders.
What's its key example? Wait for it... It's
"orders to fire upon the shipwrecked."

Imma just gonna point out the obvious. No one is disobeying these OBVIOUSLY illegal orders

We had one resignation (early retirement) and he ain't in front of cameras screaming the truth

I believe we have had a few lawyers in So. Command quit too, I may be incorrect as I am going by memory

This does not give me confidence that the military will refuse to shoot American citizens.

I give a shit

I don't want my country doing shit that we prosecuted nazis for

Heinz-Wilhelm Eck, who was executed for ordering his crew to shoot the survivors of a torpedoed ship. Karl Dnitz, commander-in-chief of U-boats, was prosecuted at the Nuremberg Trials and found guilty of waging unrestricted submarine warfare.

This is exactly what we did

As for the argument that these people were carrying drugs (as if that matters)

Trump can just pardon whomever he throws under the bus, it's not a state crime.

#34 | Posted by Alexandrite

Seems like the system has a problem imbedded in it.

Just a reminder that President Piggy promised to pardon a major drug kingpin.

Let us be clear

Every
Single
Bomb
Dropped
or
Missile
Fired
is
ILLEGAL

Full Stop

Even by their OWN standards every attack is illegal.

They want it to be an armed conflict?

They had 60 days to get authorization

They did not

it is not even close

EVERYONE in the chain-of-command, from Hegseth to the man or woman pulling the trigger, should be prosecuted

And President Piggy should be impeached.

Immediately

" It is HIGHLY illegal"
As opposed to what, lowly illegal? Mediumly illegal?

#11 | Posted by sentinel

Point being is that it is criminal enough in wartime but this regime can't even argue that justification

I know it is pretty wild but if I remember correctly the Akagi was only hit with one bomb that exploded.
Was that when they got caught with their pants down trying to rearm planes from land to naval attack formations?

#9 | Posted by jpw

yeah, but there is debate about how actually out of timing they were. The Americans also lucked out with the --- cap being drawn low to fight torpedo bombers (which the ---anese thought was a greater threat-though American torpedo bombers decidedly were not-irony being ---anese torpedoes and torpedo bombers were far superior than Americans at this point in the war) So you had a situation where the ---anese were very sensitive to torpedoes because they were so good at them while downplaying the threat to dive bombers which they viewed as far less of a threat due to the difficulty of hitting a moving carrier. The first successful DB attacks on CVs was at Coral Sea

But yeah that was a rough 10 minutes for the ---anese.