Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

__________
#9 | Posted by Twinpac at 2026-06-07 06:43 AM
In your opinion, what makes the difference if the "deal" needed a few adjustments? In fact, under the current condition, I'd be surprised if it didn't.

You bet it would, and need more than just "few adjustments" - "under current circumstances" it's essentially null and void, given that Russia is also under sanctions.


The main point, with or without, Mr. Putin just put BFF Trump in a most awkward position and a badly bruised ego.

That makes no sense.

This didn't "just" happen, as I explained... and there is no such thing as shameless Trump finding himself in "awkward position"... and if anyone couldn't care less about Trump's ego, it's Mr. Putin and Mr. Xi, for different reasons.

In fact, Trump keeps trying to "normalize" the US relations with Putin's Russia by emulating Nixon's China "ping-pong diplomacy" by sending hockey team to Moscow... Very "original", no?


Both he and Netanyahu left holding the bag, so to speak.

Don't conflate the two - for Trump it's a matter of ego, for Israel it's a matter of existence.

Even if this eventually happens, if it's a nuclear energy reactors agreement there would be at the very least an IAEA observation and monitoring regime.

If not, what difference does it make, except proving that Iran is a client state of Russia and intends to have WMDs, which Saudi Arabia and most of Iran's neighbors do not want but have no ability to stop by themselves?

Was Biden "left holding the bag" when something similar happened in Iraq in 2022-2024?

www.washingtoninstitute.org - Iraq Pledges Nuclear Cooperation with Russia and China - June 11, 2025

|------- ... Iraq is still a governance basket case and a huge U.S. sanctions risk. The ruling coalition that appointed Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani includes several U.S.-designated, Iran-backed terrorist organizations, and nuclear chief Aboudi is a member of one such group, Asaib Ahl al-Haq (AAH). ...

U.S. and international policymakers have ample reason to view Iraq's nuclear energy ambitions with caution. Although a single small training reactor is unlikely to pose a threat, anything more than that would raise multiple concerns.

First, the militias that essentially run Iraq have a poor record on safety, corruption, and smuggling, so trusting them to responsibly oversee nuclear infrastructure would be unwise. ...

Second, can a government controlled by Iran-backed militias be counted on not to transfer nuclear technology to and from Iran? For example, Iran has vowed to retain its uranium enrichment capabilities and could conceivably become the main and most proximal supplier of nuclear fuel to Iraq... Worse, Iran may try to use militia-run Iraq as a way to circumvent U.S. nuclear sanctions. To give an adjacent example, after the National Iranian Oil Company was hit with heavy sanctions, it established offices inside Iraq's Oil Ministry, which is free from such sanctions. Since then, Iraq's ministry has repeatedly purchased excess oil and gas equipment and transferred it to Iran. Such abuses make clear why it is so important for Washington not to repeat the error it made during Iraq's 2022 government formation process, when U.S. officials raised no objection to a member of a designated terrorist group running key scientific and nuclear research agencies. ...
-------|

www.iina.news - Iraq and Russia Sign Nuclear Energy Agreement at IAEA - Sep. 18, 2024

__________

AIPAC Public Enemy Number One, Muslim NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D):

"People want to know: What are you going to do for rent? What are you going to do for housing? What are you going to do for gas? What are you going to do for groceries? We have to have answers to that."

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Mamdani, who was mayor-elect at the time, was "clearly the leader of the Democratic Party" and US Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) pointed to Mamdani's successful campaign as a playbook for how to mobilize the party.

~snip~

Link: DNC Hypocrisy Exposed

BLUF: Corporatist and AIPAC Democrats are "GOP Lite" who want to maintain DHS and ICE and treat progressives like David Hogg, Graham Platner (D-ME), and Zohran Mamdani (D-NYC) as the enemy because these three are not warmongers who support the mass murder of Muslims in the Gaza Strip, West Bank, Lebanon, or Iran. Progressives like them want the US government to spend money on the US health care system, not mass surveillance of Americans or funding Israel's world class universal healthcare system.

__________
#10 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-06-07 07:19 AM
Legally, why is it that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons? Not arguing the advisability, but the legality

Good that you don't argue advisability of Iran (and some other countries in the Middle East) having nukes.

Legality: UN's NPT is the general basis in principle for non-proliferation of nuclear WMDs, otherwise what have IAEA inspectors been doing in Iran all these years?

en.wikipedia.org - Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - June 1968

Parties 191
membership in dispute: North Korea
non-parties: India, Israel, Pakistan and South Sudan

|------- Iran was found in non-compliance with its NPT safeguards obligations in an unusual non-consensus decision because it "failed in a number of instances over an extended period of time" to report aspects of its enrichment program. -------|

Iran has also for many years openly expressed policy and will to destroy "Little Satan" (Israel) and then "Big Satan" (USA), and used terrorist proxies in other countries (Lebanon, Syria, Yemen etc, including number of "Palestinian" terrorist organizations) to attack Israel. That's just history.

[Mostly Shi'a] Islamist-governed Iran also has long been a threat to [mostly Sunni] neighbors like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Yemen and others.

Saudis openly stated that if Iran gets nuclear weapon, they are going to get one too, buying from Pakistan, and/or building their own. Neighbors are not concerned about Israel, yet most of them are worried about Iran having nukes, and as we see Iran attacking their Arab/Islamic neighbors with their "conventional" weapons, not without reason.


Israel introduced such weapons of mass destruction and has hundreds aimed straight at Iran

"Introduced" where? "Hundreds"? "Aimed"? "Straight at Iran"?

That's an amazing new intelligence!

Why hasn't Israel used a couple of them? Any other country Israel would "aim" nukes at?

Why did UAE ask Israel to provide Iron Dome to defend them from Iranian missiles?

Well, at least you understand concept of "self-defense" when the country has been constantly threatened with annihilation and attacked by several of its neighbors since Day 1 of its existence. You just don't see it from Israel's point of view.

Iraq, Libya and Syria have tried developing various NBC WMDs, with varying success.

Libya: finally agreed to abandon their WMD program in 2003, days after Saddam Hussein was captured in Iraq.
www.armscontrol.org - Chronology of Libya's Disarmament

Syria: has been stopped several times from developing or importing WMDs:
en.wikipedia.org - Syria and weapons of mass destruction

en.wikipedia.org - Operation Orchard / Outside the Box

2 weeks ago: www.devdiscourse.com - Syria Uncovers Bashar al-Assad's Hidden Secret Chemical Weapons Program Arsenal - 2026 May 26


... it is about stealing Iranian oil

Oh, not this pablum again! Who and how would be "stealing oil" from Iran? Same people who were "stealing oil" from Iraq, Libya or Syria?

Was it also about "stealing Iranian oil" during Biden administration when Iran first attacked Israel to support their terrorist proxy Hezbollah in Lebanon?
__________

And then there's this bullsh*t image, compliments of C0RI0LANUS, determined to trash Democratic candidates:

Why is C0RI0LANUS determined to undermine Democrats?

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy