Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

There is not 'right" temperature as it has been in flux since the atmosphere formed on the planet.
#11 | Posted by MSgt

You are SO INCREDIBLY ARROGANT AND STUPID that you don't even realize you're lying.

"Take a hundred modern humans, give them stone-age tools, and drop them into a random point in Earth's 4.6 billion-year history. The question is not when they would die, it is when they would thrive. The answer turns out to be surprisingly recent. For most of Earth's existence, the atmosphere was either too thin in oxygen, too rich in carbon dioxide, or too unstable to keep a community alive for more than a few weeks. The honest floor is roughly 298 million years ago. Anything earlier, and the air itself would kill them."
cosmosunveiled.com

"What is the earliest, geologically, that humans could have survived on Earth?
Fancy a trip to the Jurassic or Cambrian era? In order to survive the environments of the past people would need a number of things...

"If we used a time machine to travel back to a prehistoric period, the earliest we could survive would be the Cambrian (around 541 million years ago). Any earlier than that and there wouldn't have been enough oxygen in the air to breathe.

"At the beginning of the Cambrian, the air at sea level would have felt like base camp at Mount Everest, but the climate was milder and more uniform than today. A bigger problem would be finding something to eat because there were no land plants or animals. You'd need to find a way of catching trilobites and other strange-looking shellfish, without wood to make a spear or plant fibre to make a fishing net. And you'd have to eat them raw, unless you could find a way to extract oil from these animals, or burn dry seaweed."
www.sciencefocus.com

There G wagons in Atherton going to government food pickups....

It's really about effort. US gives away more social benefits than any country in the world

#15 | Posted by oneironaut

You fall for every turd of republican propaganda I swear.

"There G wagons in Atherton going to government food pickups

No, this claim is false.
The Daily Dot
Atherton's Context

Atherton, California is consistently ranked as the most expensive zip code in the United States.

No Government Food Pickup Program: There is no government-run food distribution program or public food pantry operating in Atherton.

Demographics: The town's ultra-wealthy residential baseline means there is no local public infrastructure set up for government food aid pickups.

Origin of the Rumor

This claim stems from a recurring internet viral trope and social media rage-bait.

Viral Social Media Posts: Photos and videos frequently circulate showing luxury luxury vehicles (such as Mercedes-Benz G-Class SUVs, Teslas, or Audis) in lines at drive-through food banks across Northern California and the Bay Area.

Context Misunderstandings: When luxury cars do appear at regional food banks (such as Second Harvest of Silicon Valley, which serves the broader San Mateo and Santa Clara counties), there are usually clear logistical reasons:

Volunteers and Delivery: Drivers in luxury vehicles are often volunteers picking up boxes to distribute to homebound seniors, low-income neighbors, or local shelters.

Sudden Job Loss / Asset Rich, Cash Poor: Individuals who recently suffered tech layoffs or financial crises may still own a vehicle purchased before their economic hardship.
Reddit

Borrowed Vehicles: Families without reliable transportation often borrow cars from family, friends, or employers to pick up groceries.


"FUNNY 2"

More from the article ...

... Doctors across the nation are alarmed that skepticism fueled by rising anti-science sentiment and medical mistrust is increasingly reaching beyond vaccines to other proven, routine, preventive care for babies.

A recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which analyzed more than 5 million births nationwide, found that refusals of vitamin K shots nearly doubled between 2017 and 2024, from 2.9% to 5.2%. Other research suggests that parents who decline vitamin K shots are much more likely to refuse getting their newborns the hepatitis B vaccine and an eye ointment to prevent potentially blinding infections. ...

Innumerable social media posts question doctors' advice on safe and effective measures like vitamin K and eye ointment. And the Trump administration has repeatedly undermined established science. A federal advisory committee whose members were appointed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. -- a leading anti-vaccine activist before joining the administration -- voted to end the longstanding recommendation to immunize all babies against hepatitis B right after birth. ...

One common thread that ties together anti-vaccine views and growing sentiments against other protective measures for newborns is the fallacy that natural is always better than artificial, said Dr. David Hill, a Seattle pediatrician and researcher.

"Nature will allow 1 in 5 human infants to die in the first year of life," Hill said, "which is why generations of scientists and doctors have worked to bring that number way, way down." ...


Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy