Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

Heart Full Of Soul - The Yardbirds {DES Stereo} 1965

#9 U.S. Billboard Hot 100, #12 U.S. Cash Box Top 100, #2 UK Singles, #2 Canada
Original video edited and remastered with HQ stereo sound. To find out more about spectral editing and sound source separation, go to
www.monotostereo.info

"Heart Full of Soul" is a song recorded by English rock group the Yardbirds in 1965. Written by Graham Gouldman, it was the Yardbirds' first single after Jeff Beck replaced Eric Clapton as lead guitarist. Released only three months after "For Your Love", "Heart Full of Soul" reached the Top 10 on the singles charts in the UK, US, and several other countries. (more)

www.youtube.com

For Your Love

www.youtube.com

Republicans want Americans to vote at polling stations because they can control who gets to vote.

Texas just reduced polling stations in predominantly democratic districts by 30%.

www.fox4news.com

(This is after redistricting the state at Donald Trump's command)

It's a lie republicans are worried about voter fraud.

What's they're worried about is allowing Americans the opportunity to vote.

If the democratic process can so easily be subverted, are we really a democracy?

Dan,

"Yet The Heritage Foundation's website proves you're wrong. Are you afraid to explore the website?"

The Heritage Foundation is a conservative organization, but its Election Integrity Scorecard is not a comprehensive audit of how states administer elections.

Heritage analyzes state election laws and regulations and scores them against its own recommended standards. It does not examine each states underlying election records to verify that officials followed those laws.

What I'm suggesting is a congressionally required audit and not federal laws replacing the states underlying election rules.

States would continue operating under their own election laws and procedures. The audit would examine actual records to determine whether all state and federal laws and procedures were followed and identify mistakes, violations, or possible illegal discrepancies that might otherwise remain undetected.

Under my proposal, Congress would establish a common audit framework for elections involving federal offices. Because those elections affect the entire country, each state would undergo the same basic level of verification even though its election laws may differ.

A congressionally required audit would go far beyond Heritage's scorecard.

Federal law already requires election officials to preserve covered federal election records for 22 months. It also permits the Attorney General to demand those records for inspection when the written demand states its basis and purpose.

There is currently no national election audit standard. The broader, routine nationwide audit I'm proposing would have to be established by Congress.

" Biden administration took Texas to court over immigration enforcement."

And lost. www.houstonpublicmedia.org

So ... Texas officials DO arrest illegals.

Why did you leave out the salient part?

Ignorant? Or gaslighting?

Dan,

"I'm a gentleman, so...You choose. I want to know what you think. What's your opinion?"

I thought I had answered. I'll restate it here for you.

You asked for my opinion.

If states are "cooking the books," as they say, and significant systemic voter fraud is being overlooked by people responsible for running federal elections, my guess is that Democrat controlled states are where I would expect to find the most.

That's my opinion. I'm not presenting it fact.

I'm also not particularly concerned with small-time voter fraud. Even you've shown that's not where you're likely to find fraud on a scale large enough to matter.

I'm talking about organized voter fraud involving people responsible for election integrity, possibly in collusion with people in state government. Sort of like the classroom/school analogy I wrote earlier.

Think that can't happen?

Look at how many documented cases have involved collusion between two or more of government officials, financial institutions, corporate officers, management, auditors and accountants.

Sometimes it continues for years until some major financial failure finally exposes it.

I've personally seen embezzlement hidden through collusion between corporate officers and management.

I've also seen collusion between CPAs filing corporate tax returns and officers of a corporation.

That doesn't prove election fraud is happening.

It does prove that people in positions of trust are capable of working together to hide wrongdoing.

And you think something as important as control of an election wouldn't be tempting?

In these times we're living in, when too many people's ethical standards seem to have become "just don't get caught," I believe anything is possible.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy