Meanwhile, do you have links to increased leftist violence?
#67 | Posted by Danforth

Best he can do is leftists reacting to right-wingers getting murdered.
It should go without saying: None of the murders were done by leftists.

There's certainly been a few instances of what's portrayed as "leftist" violence targeting ICE and DHS. An easily understandable reaction to the state-sponsored right-wing violence that's defined Trump's domestic legacy.

The violence will be more bipartisan when the energy and food shortages really kick in.

"The thread is directly related to polls of both parties being asked if they approve of violence for political means"

So why do you think right-wingers are so tolerant of all the political violence Rpubilcans are doing right now, even as they say to the pollsters they don't approve of political violence.

Are they lying?
Do they not understand it's political violence when their side does it?

You're a right winger. What's your answer? Why are you so tolerant of all this violence, why do you not see the kiliings of Goode and especially Pretti as creeping fascism? Or maybe it's because you do approve of political violence. You do approve of what the UnitedHealth CEO does to maximize profits, right?

"The thread is directly related to polls of both parties being asked if they approve of violence for political means."

Are you capable of entertaining the concept of fighting fire with fire, that the numbers on the left are a reflection of and a reaction to all the political violence Republicans have unleashed in Trump's second term?

Maybe discuss the topic a little bit. Is that in your wheelhouse?

Two examples, the reactions to the killing of Charlie Kirk, and the CEO of United Health.
Not the actions, the celebrations.
#57 | Posted by kwrx25

You seem to want to judge the reactions, without ever mentioning the actors being reacted to.
Without contextualizing the reactions in the milieu of the life's work of a CEO who let people die for profit. A hate preacher who said gun murders are a fair price to pay for living in America.

Charlie Kirk preached political violence.
Being happy he's dead isn't preaching political violence.
It's being happy a preacher of political violence is dead.
That's pretty much the opposite of endorsing political violence.

I'm not aware of anyone on the Left who said Charlie Kirk needs to be murdered. It was Nick Fuentes who said that. And that's what Trump says about his political opponents too. Charlie Kirk was a a political opponent of Trump on both the Epstein Files and the Gaza Ethnic Cleansing.
What we on the left said, and still say, is that by Charlie Kirk's beliefs, Charlie Kirk believes Charlie Kirk's murder was justified.
If you can't understand that, you're unfathomably stupid and I'll just stop wasting my time on you. Deal?

From The River To The Sea.
Palestine Will Be Ethnically Cleansed.

"Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot, who operated as state atheists, killed from roughly 60 million to over 100 million people."

Christians fought on Stalin's side, against Hitler
Christians fought on Hitler's side, against Stalin.

What an absurd thing.

The Washington Post keeps dutifully referring to it as a "shooting."

It's not really a shooting if the alleged assailant did not fire any shots.

Party of Small Government doing authoritarian things. What a surprise.

Meanwhile, the right is blowing up Planned Parenthood, shooting up schools, threatening school teachers, murdering politicians, and acting like none of that matters.
#45 | Posted by ClownShack

Republicans here including Eberly can't understand that Trump's War with Iran is Politically Motivated Violence.

That idea has never occurred to them.

Neutrality went out the window
#93 | Posted by kwrx25

Go back several decades and give us some examples of when we had neutrality.

Are you saying the coverage of Watergate or Iran Contra was "neutral?"

Are you saying Walter Cronkite was "Neutral" in his coverage of the Vietnam War?

I don't think neutrality went out the window.

I think fake "both sides" pseudo neutrality replaced honrst men like Walter Cronkite. Men who knew, and told the audience, the difference between Right and Wrong.

That's what got replaced with "lets hear from both sides of the moon landing debate, the global warming debate, the flat earth debate."

Fake-ass "debate" replaced objective analysis of facts.

You shouldn't be left alone with children.
#86 | Posted by ClownShack

His own children agree with that assessment.

"All I posted is what his daughter wrote in her diary"

She never said Biden touched her, liar.

Teaching that slavery was evil?

That's a no-no.

According to Republicans, saying slavery was Evil makes the White Children feel Bad for being White.

"But... recent polls showing a marked difference in the percentage of people who are accepting of political violence"

Hey KWRX25.

You are so dumb, you can't figure out that what ICE is doing, rounding up people and sending them to camos, is political violence.

ICE mass detention is Political violence.

All Republicans support it.

You don't care.