Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

x.com
man this one makes my boil!

__________
Musk's SpaceX in merger talks with xAI

xAI is also in talks with Tesla, and Tesla is also in talks with SpaceX about possible mergers and/or SpaceX IPO before/after merger with xAI - depending on who is doing pre-IPO valuation analysis that would yield maximum capitalization.

This self-dealing is similar to Musk making "sweetheart deal" acquisition of near-bankrupt SolarCity, partly-owned and run by his cousins, by publicly-owned Tesla, and renaming it Tesla Energy.

Remember the much talked about bloated valuation - and Musk's debt - of eX-Twitter that was merged into xAI? When Musk merged eX-Twitter into xAI in March of last year, he valued it at $33B on balance sheet of xAI (when money-losing X was estimated at still high $8B-$9B).

Guess who will "participate in ownership" of this debt after xAI eventually goes public, in whichever merged formed it will be? Yep - the shareholders of new Musk-controlled public entity. And that $45B ($33B of estimated "goodwill" value + $12B in Twitter debt) on xAI balance sheet will provide nice multi-year tax write-offs to acquiring/surviving merger entity.

That's why the Twitter bonds - that were sold to PE institutions by banks which loaned Musk money - went for very solid 97% of nominal value, and not 10% as some "analysts" here were hoping. Whoever bought them understood that Twitter was not going to be kept stand-alone; rather a leveraged stage 1 eventually merged into one of the public entities, with nearly assured payout.

Hiding and amortizing weak spots in bigger, seemingly financially stronger entities is the art of financial engineering.

Just like some subprime and/or substandard mortgages were packaged into AAA-rated MBS and CDOs and sold to public for years before financial meltdown and GFC of 2008.

Similarly, Trump unloaded his personal loans on several casinos when he made them public, one just a year before it went BK - that's how he, once again, avoided what should have been a personal bankruptcy - by making it "not personal - strictly business."
__________

I didn't say they killed him because they recognized him.
Don't imply I meant something I didn't.
What I meant was when they discovered a gun on him and possibly knew his reputation, they may have felt more threatened by him and that made them react.
I have a question if anyone has read anything that would answer it.
At the point where someone yells "gun", people moved in on him tighter and one man manages to retrieve the gun by reaching into the swarm of men on him.
My question based on what I can see in the videos, is there any chance the man who shot him missed the part where another agent got the gun and turned to leave. Did the man who shot him possibly think the gun was still in play?
Reading about that, there does seem to be the possibility. They didn't know he even had a gun at all and was surprised by it.
It was a split second between one agent reached into the mess of people on him, retrieved the gun and turned away and then the shooter fired his gun.
It's seems possible the man who shot him still thought the gun was in Pretti's possession.
Try to resist all the name calling and answer like a civil human being.
#27 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-01-31 04:54 PM

One who fired is apparently a Neo Nazi.

"that made him react."

You have not acknowledged the "challenge coins" whatsoever, and I doubt you listened to the William Sascha Riley interview.

ICE's purpose is to terrorize the population, thus Nazi's zip-tying naked US children and loading them into moving vans.

Wake up. Doesn't the abandonment of the Second Amendment seem.. suspicious?

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy