" No, for "Persons". That law thing again.

#57 | POSTED BY REDIAL AT 2026-01-26 01:04 AM | FLAG: "

That will be the legal issue. It will ultimately go down to original intent IMO. I don't think an argument can be made that when "persons" was written the intent was to open our borders and shuffle non citizens around so they could passively participate in our electoral process.

" That's the way it's supposed to work.

#54 | POSTED BY REDIAL AT 2026-01-26 12:58 AM | FLAG: "

Yes. Absolutely. For citizens. If the US were to have a red state exodus to blue states then blue states should gain seats and electoral college votes based upon their CITIZEN population.

" Do "non-citizens" pay taxes? Yes. Therefore, they are due representation, you stupid fucking drooling MAGAT cocksucking fucktard.

#53 | POSTED BY LEGALLYYOURDEAD AT 2026-01-26 12:53 AM | FLAG: "

Nope. You're stupid. Doesn't work that way.

Cont ... ..when districts are redrawn based upon census numbers.

" Um. Aren't the House seats already capped legally?

#45 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE AT 2026-01-26 12:30 AM | FLAG: "

Yes. It's a zero sum game. Put in very simple terms (and basic numbers) hypothetically let's say 200K left Minnesota and went directly to Texas. The end result would likely be Minnesota loses a seat and Texas gains a seat.

" I retract my 41. I'm not actually sure what that question is asking.

#43 | POSTED BY REDIAL AT 2026-01-25 11:11 PM | FLAG: "

Non-citizens (this includes those who are here legally) are not permitted to vote in national elections because non-citizens have no business anticipating in our political process.

Extrapolated out, non-citizens shouldn't be able to passively participate by flocking to certain areas of the country to inflate the population in said areas to increase representation for those areas via more House seats and electoral college votes.

That is why I say this SHOULDN'T be a partisan issue.

" The topic is that Trump wants subjects, not citizens, is willing to to kill to get that, and you're willing to help in your own small way ay.

#39 | POSTED BY ZED AT 2026-01-25 10:07 PM | FLAG: "

Try commenting on topic.

" ICE isn't law enforcement"

Yes, they are.

" They have no right to abuse and kill Americans"

I 100% agree with you on this.

"#35 | POSTED BY HORSTNGRABEN AT 2026-01-25 09:24 PM | FLAG: "

Maybe try commenting on topic.

#36. I knew you'd say that. I don't mean that in a negative way because I don't think you come to that belief fr9m a bad place. For me, citizenship has privileges. If I were to be transferred to the UK for work for an indefinite period of time I would never presume to be allowed to vote in their elections nor would I expect to have my presence in any way be any kind of participant in their political processes.

" What was the reasonable suspicion to approach the woman and push her to the ground? You're acting as though ICE has complete impunity to do anything they want."

I don't know why she was shoved to the ground. It's entirely possible it was an abusive use of power. However, it might not have been. But just about everyone on this site believes they are clairvoyant and are 100% convinced they assaulted her for fun. Dare to question how they are so completely certain and you're a fascist Nazi who deserves to be ass reamed by a spike laden baseball bat.

" But on the streets of Minnesota is suddenly verboten.

#27 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE AT 2026-01-25 07:47 PM | FLAG: "

It's not to me. MN is an open/concealed carry state and this guy who was shot was licensed to carry.

" Are you claiming non-citizens are not "Persons", according to the Constitution???

#26 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2026-01-25 07:44 PM | FLAG: "

Square that with 3/5's persons. Also, why aren't non-citizens (allegedly) not allowed to vote in national elections.