Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.


This mini-pogrom, also known as the "Flag Dance," commemorates the Israeli conquest of East Jerusalem during the Six-Day War in 1967. A scholar recently wrote that because of Israeli persecution against Palestinian Christians, none will be left in the country by 2050.

In Gaza, an Israeli Death Forces sniper shot Hasan Abid (24) in the head while he was distributing bread to starving people near an UNRWA clinic in the Jabalia refugee camp. Two more Palestinians were liquidated by drones, bringing the death toll to 72,782 human beings; 20,179 children, 12,500 women. The IDF has wounded or maimed 172,588 Palestinians since 7 Oct 2023.

Since 1948 under both Democratic and Republican Party administrations, the peace-loving, hardworking American taxpayer has sent both the Labor and Likud governments of Israel, a prosperous and nuclear-armed country, over $317.9bn, the most US economic aid given to any nation in the world.

This Pariah nation and Rogue state has been globally condemned for its inhuman ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, except inexplicably by the US government under either Republican or Democratic Party administrations.

US midterm elections are scheduled for Tuesday 3 Nov 2026.

... "$1.7 billion compensation fund for allies.

The way disgusting traitor PV1 Michael Flynt scored in court.

Between the slush funds to "compensate" his minions, the lucrative insider defense and interior contracts, and the mass pardoning of 6 Jan heathens (and the 250 coming), Dummkopf Trumpf is a sort of kind of a wealthy, but stupid, Robert Deveraux, Earl of Essex (10 Nov 1565 - 25 Feb 1601).

This good-for-nothing Elizabethan misadventurer relied on the Crown (government) for his wealth (through property and rents) and was a favorite of Queen Elizabeth I because this handsome wastrel "made her feel young."

As a high lord, the Earl of Essex had the power to knight men, so he overabused that privilege to amass himself a small, loyal army.

When Robert Deveraux failed to quell the Irish rebellion after his masterful boasting, this egomaniac fell out of favor with Queen Elizabeth. He and his loyal army of followers then attempted a 6 Jan-style putsch against the Crown, but failed.

Like the Earl of Essex, Dummkopf Trumpf is profiting off the "Crown" and amassing himself a small legion of loyal followers.

Except for one thing. Robert Deveraux didn't get away with it like the Dotard and the diabolical Trumpf Crime Family (TCF).


Endnote: The Earl of Essex knew the man wielding the axe because the executioner was none other than Thomas Derrick, a man Essex had personally pardoned for rape on the condition that he become an executioner. This infamous headsman separated 3,000 souls from their bodies during the Shakespearean Era.

ATLANTA (AP) After losing the White House and both houses of Congress, Democrats are grappling with how to handle transgender politics and policy following a campaign that featured withering and often misleading GOP attacks on the issue.

There is plenty of second-guessing after President-elect Donald Trump anchored his victory over Vice President Kamala Harris with sweeping promises on the economy and immigration. But Democrats also will not soon forget the punchline in anti-transgender Trump ads that became ubiquitous by Election Day:

"Kamala is for they/them; President Trump is for you."

Again ...

"AIPAC" is nowhere to be found, Coriolanus.

Sweeping trans-people under the rug seems to be your take. Their concerns are clearly not your concerns.

Interesting.

Jefferson was concerned about an uneducated democracy... so, he basically predicted 1Nut.

"Thomas Jefferson believed democracy was a fragile, worthy experiment requiring an educated citizenry to function. He advocated for a republic supported by local self-government, fearing that a centralized, uneducated democracy would fail. He considered informed public opinion essential to governance and feared the tyranny of both minority wealth (aristocracy) and majority rule.

www.google.com

"The system of banking we have both equally and ever reprobated. I contemplate it as a blot left in all our constitutions, which, if not covered, will end in their destruction, which is already hit by the gamblers in corruption, and is sweeping away in its progress the fortunes and morals of our citizens.

Funding I consider as limited, rightfully, to a redemption of the debt within the lives of a majority of the generation contracting it; every generation coming equally, by the laws of the Creator of the world, to the free possession of the earth he made for their subsistence, unincumbered by their predecessors, who, like them, were but tenants for life ...

And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."

Thomas Jefferson

Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response
Nothing in there about your clear hatred of Jews, Caius Marcius Coriolanus.

Not even a mention of "AIPAC".

Nothing whatsoever.

#4 Oops:

Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response
Again, nothing in there about your clear hatred of Jews, Caius Marcius Coriolanus.

Nothing whatsoever.

#4 Oops:

Five Reasons Harris Lost

Why Kamala Harris lost: A flawed candidate or doomed campaign?

Wrong voters, wrong message: progressives' autopsy lays bare Kamala Harris failures

Why Kamala Harris lost the election

Brookings: Why Donald Trump won and Kamala Harris lost: An early analysis of the results

There is no one reason Harris lost

Politicians and activists are trying to sell disingenuous and nonfactual explanations of why Harris lost to push their ideology. Don't fall for it.
Democrats were united and turned out. Harris lost anyway.
Voters issued a broad repudiation of not only Harris' campaign but the Democratic Party's vision for the country.
A Former Republican Strategist on Why Harris Lost
Inflation, moderation, and candidate effects
What Was the Biggest Factor in Kamala Harris's Defeat?
Nothing in there about your clear hatred of Jews, Caius Marcius Coriolanus.

Nothing whatsoever.

#4 Oops:

Throughout the month of October, 2024, the Trump campaign (and associated entities) spent $300,000,000.00 on ads in all 7 swing states during televised NFL and NCAA football games. The topic of all of those ads? Then-CA Attorney General Kamala Harris' 2019 response to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming (read: trans) care for federal inmates


click graphic above for actual She's for They/Them ad

And the amount of money the Harris campaign spent countering those She's for They/Them ads in the swing states during NFL and NCAA football games? You know, to point out the truth that she was simply responding to a question about a Trump administration dictate on gender-affirming for federal inmates? To counter the deceptive, the lying-by-omission ads run by Trump & company?

Zero dollars

The efficacy of this strategy was born out election night, 2024, when Steve Kornacki was calling individual counties (starting with Pennsylvania) and highlighting that the Harris/Walz ticket was falling short of votes as opposed to the votes in the 2020 election for the Biden/Harris ticket. His reporting was, in effect, a death by 1,000 cuts for Harris/Walz.

Trump & company knew that all it would take would be the suppression of Biden votes in 2024 by just a point or two for Trump to carry those counties, all 7 swing states and, ultimately, the election. They judged, correctly, that men - men of color and white - would be turned off enough by the "pro-trans" Harris that they voted for Trump, or didn't vote at all.

Either way, mission accomplished.

"Adding two exclamation points, Ingraham quoted from the article in her caption to write,

"Mr. Trump and Xi Jinping are reportedly considering a deal to allow China to invest $1 trillion in the U.S. largely to build factories on American soil.' Trump on verge of making massive error " against aides' advice: report."

The linked article by Raw Story's Tom Boggioni reported that Trump was "giving serious consideration to allowing China to make a massive investment in the U.S. " against the advice of some of his closest advisors," heavily drawing from a column that conservative economist Oren Cass had written for The New York Times.

That deal would be "an unforced error of world-historic proportions," wrote Cass, and Boggioni added a comment that such a deal would be "undermin[ing] the very trade agenda [Trump] championed."

;;

"Trump was operating with a "fundamental misunderstanding of the relationship" between the U.S. and China, wrote Boggioni, because of how the Chinese Communist Party " can offer virtually unlimited financial support and access to a virtually unlimited labor pool."

Boggioni cited Cass's calculations that a "trillion-dollar infusion of Chinese capital would exceed the total direct investment in the United States made by any other country since the Declaration of Independence," and "even a fraction of that amount would devastate what remains of American economic defenses, weakening national security and supply-chain resilience while handing the Chinese Communist Party a powerful tool to subvert U.S. markets."

;;

Donnie must of really liked all that Chinese junk he bought from them to scam his Cult with.

#5 The actual title of Scott Anderson's piece is...

Operation Epic Fury, Meet Operation Colossal Blunder
Nothing to do with AIPAC.

Nothing whatsoever.

Does your obvious hatred of Jews make you believe anyone would believe your obvious lie, Caius Marcius Coriolanus?

Seriously?

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy