Who can introduce something like that and not expect to be crucified for it?
#67 | Posted by eberly

The only one who could do it for Republicans is Your Cult Leader.

But you raise a good point.
Why raise taxes on people making less than $190K, but exempt people making more than $190K?
Republicans know why.

I simply pointed out to TrueBlue that there was a military installation immediately adjacent to the school.
#31 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Yeah and we simply pointed out that exists all over the world, including specific examples in the United States.
There's 160 schools on military bases, right here in the Untied States.
Are you too stupid to know that? I bet you are.

"This wouldn't be the first time a foreign military used children for cover."

They didn't use children for cover.
You are using the existence of a nearby military base, to cover for bombing children.

Unless you're saying the United States military is using children for cover.
Is that what you're saying?

No, you never say anything when pressed.
You're a pussy.

My father was a fireman. My brother was a fireman. My son was a Smoke Jumper.
#38 | Posted by donnerboy

^
"And I'm an Arsonist, because it's good for the family business" vibes... :)

"Flathead Lake somewhere?"

Wow.
Is this where Zork got some of their names from?

Are you saying our government bombed that building?
#19 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Let's review:
You know who the cowards are? The schittbag governments who put high value targets in/under/next to places like schools and hospitals.
#15 | Posted by lfthndthrds

I'm saying
That you're saying
That our government is just as cowardly as Iran.

How come you can't figure out how conversations work?
That's a rhetorical question. But if you really want to know, ask your children.

The IRGC naval compound. Located immediately adjacent.
#27 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Okay, but the Tomahawk explicitly targeted the school, not the IRGC.
There was no malfunction. The target was destroyed as intended.
What's so hard about accepting these facts for you?

Are you saying our government bombed that building?
#19 | Posted by lfthndthrds

It's not impossible.
To this day, we still do not know the identity of the third co-conspirator.

Are you saying our government bombed that building?
#19 | Posted by lfthndthrds

^
You're saying it would be okay for our government to bomb that building in Iran.

^
You are unaware there *was* a military base there, 40 years ago.
It's because you aren't interested in facts. Just feelings.

You know who the cowards are? The schittbag governments who put high value targets in/under/next to places like schools and hospitals.
#15 | Posted by lfthndthrds

^
Like the time they put a Children's Day Care for workers at the Alfred R. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
Same exact thing!

"Capital & Empire is explicitly biased, openly operating from a Marxist and anti-imperialist political viewpoint."

So like,

"The Wall Street Journal is explicitly biased, openly operating from a Capitalist and pro-imperialist political viewpoint."

"The Fauci Files were a complete flop."

Not on my Facebook feed it isn't!
The old white men are posting multiple anti-Fauci things a day.

Everybody Wang Chung tonight!

It wouldn't surprise me if the OP and some of the other posters in this thread are actually on either Israel's or the RNC's payroll, to post stuff to try to discredit criticisms Israel by association with over the top, often borderline if not outright antisemitic crap.
#9 | Posted by sentinel

^
We wouldn't be surprised if you are one of those people.