What were the consequences I listed?
No job. No home. Everyone all at once.
#12 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-06-25 01:04 PM
Domestics that cost more than foreigners are parasites on profits.
#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-25 01:15 PM
... you two aren't even close to the same page. "No job". There's a job. It's just elsewhere now. The parasitical framing is inexorably linked to the person that took the job.
f you guys, now southpark is in my head. THEY TOOOOKED URRRR JUBZ!
Just go ahead and hold hands with the anti H1-B crowd, it's the same message.
#15 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-06-25 03:15 PM
In the SF Bay area housing is extremely expensive and jobs were all moved offshore.
At the same time police were rounding up all of the homeless to drop them off downtown.
Thousands and thousands flooding the city - schools were shut down, businesses shut down - by design.
It was to increase funding for militarization of police and to purchase the properties - that's it.
Destroying and entire city with an incredible economic opportunity is parasite capitalism at it's more real.
So, you believe that it's fine, people will survive and move on. To where? Work where?
They simply don't want liberals or socialists or whatever else they frame us poors as.
Most of my workforce were under 30 - so these were their first homes, families and careers.
They weren't let go because of work ethic or capabilities - it's because of imposed costs and no assistance from or prevention of offshoring.
Ownership societies should be eliminated instead, imo.
"Totalitarianism in power invariably replaces all first-rate talents, regardless of their sympathies, with those crackpots and fools whose lack of intelligence and creativity is still the best guarantee of their loyalty."
Hannah Arendt