WSJ: DOJ Told Trump in May That His Name Is in the Epstein Files
Bondi also told president at the meeting that Justice decided to not release more Jeffrey Epstein documents because of the presence of child pornography and the need to protect victims.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
qcp
Joined 2007/07/05Visited 2025/07/24
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Trump Is Asking People to Venmo to Pay Off the National Debt (5 comments) ...
Epstein Cagey on Trump in Video (4 comments) ...
AI Just Hit A Paywall (1 comments) ...
Amid Epstein Investigation Refusal, Bondi Okays Hillary Clinton Email Probe (27 comments) ...
Judge Denies Request to Unseal Epstein GrandJury Transcripts (16 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
White House says WSJ report on Trump being told name in Epstein files "fake news" reut.rs/3IK12iU[image or embed]" Reuters (@reuters.com) Jul 23, 2025 at 4:15 PM
White House says WSJ report on Trump being told name in Epstein files "fake news" reut.rs/3IK12iU[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More: When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
In May, Bondi and her deputy informed the president at a meeting in the White House that his name was in the Epstein files, the officials said. Many other high-profile figures were also named, Trump was told.
#1 | Posted by qcp at 2025-07-23 03:18 PM | Reply
He knew he was, everyone that Epstein talked to was in the files.
It doesn't matter who is in the files, the question is what did they do
This doesn't really mean anything.
#2 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-07-23 03:23 PM | Reply | Funny: 3
@#1 ... In May, Bondi and her deputy informed the president at a meeting in the White House that his name was in the Epstein files, the officials said. ...
This is looking more and more like a cover-up.
But. what is there to cover-up?
#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-23 03:29 PM | Reply
MAGAs love their pedo king
#4 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-07-23 03:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Release the videos! President Pedo for Prison!
#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-23 03:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
This doesn't really mean anything. #2 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT
So you're saying Trump can stop squirming?
#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-23 03:43 PM | Reply
Oh no Trump lied again
#7 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-07-23 04:09 PM | Reply
Reminder that one of -------- first acts upon taking office was getting the sex pest Tate brothers out of a Romanian prison
#8 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-07-23 04:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3
www.youtube.com
these kids do an excellent job on this story
#9 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-23 05:10 PM | Reply
Release the files or stop pretending it's about justice when it's really about covering for Trump
#10 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-07-23 05:20 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
[...]
#11 | Posted by zarnon at 2025-07-23 05:21 PM | Reply
Pedo apologist says what?
#12 | Posted by zarnon at 2025-07-23 05:22 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
Trump denies he was told his name was in the Epstein files, and flails and fails to deflect to everyone but him.
#13 | Posted by YAV at 2025-07-23 05:34 PM | Reply
#2 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT AT 2025-07-23 03:23 PM | REPLY
Right. The AG told the POTUS this (and didn't tell the public) and then abruptly ended an investigation ... . because it really doesn't mean anything.
#14 | Posted by anton at 2025-07-23 05:42 PM | Reply
Its a great irony that QAnon helped trump get elected when their entire platform is stopping pedophiles.
#15 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-23 05:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
I'm sure Republican-Led Congress will get right on this and not go on summer break!
#16 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-23 05:43 PM | Reply
Yawn.
#17 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-23 05:44 PM | Reply
yeah trump constantly lying is getting pretty boring.
i wish we had a human being for a president.
#18 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-23 05:49 PM | Reply
#17 | Posted by visitor_
Careful Trump doesn't try to slip his dingy in your gaping mouth, cultist!
#19 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-07-23 05:49 PM | Reply
Odd that when Democrats had to power to release the documents it was crickets. Now that Biden's auto-pen stooges had time to obliterate all chain of custody of the documents, these claims are being made. Given all of the false charges leveled against Trump over the last 12 years if there was anything incriminating it would have been leaked by now. So yawn.
#20 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-23 05:57 PM | Reply
This isnt going away.
im betting the WSJ releases the birthday card soon. Murdoch should counter sue so trump is forced into discovery.
#21 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-23 05:59 PM | Reply
Ghislaine Maxwell Subpoenaed By House Oversight Committee
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer announced Wednesday that he issued a subpoena for sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell, the accomplice of the late Jeffrey Epstein.
It will require her to testify at a deposition Aug. 11 at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, Florida.
via huffpost
#22 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-23 06:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
#17 | Posted by visitor_ Careful Trump doesn't try to slip his dingy in your gaping mouth, cultist!
#19 | Posted by rstybeach11
Visitor is over the age of 15 so he is probably safe.
#23 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-07-23 06:04 PM | Reply
#20 | Posted by visitor_
What did the Dems leak? It seemed like all the leaks against Trump were by his own administration. And the Steele dossier wasn't released, or even seriously talked about, until after the election. If they actually wanted to use it for their gain, why did they not release it before the election?
Just because you, and other Republicans, would and do leak things for your personal and political gain does not mean that Dems lack the same morals and ethics.
#24 | Posted by gtbritishskull at 2025-07-23 06:13 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
PRESIDENT PEDO HAS TO GO!
#25 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-23 06:14 PM | Reply
The "Biden didn't release it, ergo Trump is a saint" defense/dodge is spectacularly stupid, even by MAGAt standards.
#26 | Posted by anton at 2025-07-23 06:15 PM | Reply
#26 - yeah, I don't think they hear themselves.
#27 | Posted by YAV at 2025-07-23 06:23 PM | Reply
#2 | Posted by oneironaut
LOL!!!
This clown, like ol' visitor, is just pure stupid.
#28 | Posted by Angrydad at 2025-07-23 06:25 PM | Reply
@#22 ... It will require her to testify at a deposition Aug. 11 at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, Florida. ...
But apparently not before Pres Trump's former defense attorney, Mr Blanche, has had a chance to sit down with Ms Maxwell for a ~chat.~
#29 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-23 06:27 PM | Reply
@#27 ... I don't think they hear themselves. ...
Conspiracy theorists don't realize they're on the fringe arstechnica.com
... Belief in conspiracy theories is often attributed to some form of motivated reasoning: People want to believe a conspiracy because it reinforces their worldview, for example, or doing so meets some deep psychological need, like wanting to feel unique. However, it might also be driven by overconfidence in their own cognitive abilities, according to a paper published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. The authors were surprised to discover that not only are conspiracy theorists overconfident, they also don't realize their beliefs are on the fringe, massively overestimating by as much as a factor of four how much other people agree with them. "I was expecting the overconfidence finding," co-author Gordon Pennycook, a psychologist at Cornell University, told Ars. "If you've talked to someone who believes conspiracies, it's self-evident. I did not expect them to be so ready to state that people agree with them. I thought that they would overestimate, but I didn't think that there'd be such a strong sense that they are in the majority. It might be one of the biggest false consensus effects that's been observed." ...
However, it might also be driven by overconfidence in their own cognitive abilities, according to a paper published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. The authors were surprised to discover that not only are conspiracy theorists overconfident, they also don't realize their beliefs are on the fringe, massively overestimating by as much as a factor of four how much other people agree with them.
"I was expecting the overconfidence finding," co-author Gordon Pennycook, a psychologist at Cornell University, told Ars. "If you've talked to someone who believes conspiracies, it's self-evident.
I did not expect them to be so ready to state that people agree with them. I thought that they would overestimate, but I didn't think that there'd be such a strong sense that they are in the majority. It might be one of the biggest false consensus effects that's been observed." ...
#30 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-23 06:30 PM | Reply
Odd that when Democrats had to power to release the documents it was crickets. Now that Biden's auto-pen stooges had time to obliterate all chain of custody of the documents, these claims are being made. Given all of the false charges leveled against Trump over the last 12 years if there was anything incriminating it would have been leaked by now. So yawn. #20 | Posted by visitor_
The Biden administration and DOJ were bound by federal grand jury secrecy laws and court precedents, which prohibit them from releasing the Epstein files unless a judge specifically orders their disclosure through an established legal process. Neither the Trump nor Biden administrations had the legal authority to release the files on their own[1][2][3][9].
[1] www.bbc.com [2] www.foxnews.com [3] 6abc.com [4] www.npr.org [5] www.newsweek.com [6] abc7ny.com [7] www.opb.org [8] www.politico.com [9] abcnews.go.com [10] oversight.house.gov
Biden followed the law. Trump and Bondi promised to break this law, then decided to lie to the public stating that the Epstein files didn't exist at all. Then lied again claiming the files were manufactured by B. Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton, something he now refers to as a witch hunt. And guess what's now being leaked? HAHAHA! Nice self-own, cultist!
#31 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-07-23 06:31 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3
Isn't it ironic what started with Pizzagate, the Right's fixation on pedophilia (which weirdly parallels the Catholic church ... hmm), may be the undoing of the Orange Pedo?
#32 | Posted by gavaster at 2025-07-23 06:38 PM | Reply
#2 | POSTED BY ONEIRONAUT
And just like that, this isn't really that big of a deal.
You're such a piece of s*^%.
#33 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-23 06:51 PM | Reply
#17 | POSTED BY VISITOR_
And just like that, sex trafficking children isn't a big deal.
You're a piece of s^*+.
#34 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-23 06:53 PM | Reply
#20 | POSTED BY VISITOR_
You. Are. A. Piece. Of. F^*+ing. S*^%.
#35 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-23 06:54 PM | Reply
The Biden administration and DOJ were bound by federal grand jury secrecy laws and court precedents, which prohibit them from releasing the Epstein files unless a judge specifically orders their disclosure through an established legal process.
These pieces of s%^* project their own lack of character, integrity, principles, morals ect onto everyone else around them.
#36 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-23 06:56 PM | Reply
You are delusional if believe grand jury testimony implicating Trump would not have been leaked. Hell, they imagineered the Russiagate hoax out of nothing.
#37 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-07-23 07:31 PM | Reply | Funny: 1
they were sealed dumb ----. trump ran on unsealing them.
you will defend trump no matter what. no morals.
#38 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-23 07:35 PM | Reply
#37 talk about delusional.
MAGA is a mental disorder.
#39 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-23 07:37 PM | Reply
I expect that Maxwell will be happy to tell MAGA whatever Trump wants her it for a Pardon.
#40 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-23 07:43 PM | Reply
Pardon me I didn't catch that. Please repeat that Corky.
#41 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-07-23 07:46 PM | Reply
"You are delusional if believe grand jury testimony implicating Trump would not have been leaked."
You mean, like, what the Wall Street Journal is reporting?
#42 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-23 07:47 PM | Reply
Odd that when Democrats had to power to release the documents it was crickets. #20 | POSTED BY VISITOR_
Aren't Republicans supposed to be better than Democrats?
Why not prove it by releasing the documents.
Everybody knows why.
#43 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-23 07:48 PM | Reply
Yup. Trump is a pedo.
Sorry, according to jeff j the girls he boned weren't pre pubescent. He's also not surprised Trump is mixed up in the files. (see how vile this sounds, jeffy?)
#44 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-23 08:10 PM | Reply
Jeffrey Epstein Update: Read The Deposition That Ghislaine Maxwell Fought To Hide (2020) www.npr.org
... Ghislaine Maxwell's answers to questions about the sex-trafficking operation she allegedly ran with the late Jeffrey Epstein were made public Thursday as a federal court released Maxwell's 2016 deposition. The transcript is more than 400 pages long, but it has been redacted to protect the privacy of some people it mentions. The transcript is finally being unsealed after a back-and-forth legal battle between Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre, who has accused Maxwell, Epstein and others of sexually abusing her when she was a minor. In it, Maxwell repeatedly denies "recruiting" girls for Epstein or taking part in orgies and other activities. ...
The transcript is finally being unsealed after a back-and-forth legal battle between Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre, who has accused Maxwell, Epstein and others of sexually abusing her when she was a minor. In it, Maxwell repeatedly denies "recruiting" girls for Epstein or taking part in orgies and other activities. ...
#45 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-23 08:13 PM | Reply
No surprises.
www.npr.org
In Giuffre's deposition unsealed earlier this year, she ran down a list of prominent men with whom she said she was told to have sex, including Britain's Prince Andrew, former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell and the attorney Alan Dershowitz. All of those men have denied the allegations.
#46 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-23 08:17 PM | Reply
Oh and I think this story breaking in the WSJ again is the early moves in the plan to depose Trump.
They were able to use him to get the foundation laid and now the fall guy is going down since the constant chaos and bulls^%# isn't needed for cover anymore.
So, they're gonna use the very outlets and stories that brought maga to power to destroy it.
#47 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-23 08:34 PM | Reply
Surely, when the DOJ and Pam Bondi met with Trump in May, they also told him in what context his name was mentioned. Therein lies the crux.
#48 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-07-23 08:38 PM | Reply
- they also told him in what context his name was mentioned.
And it's pretty obvious that it is in an incriminating context; were it in a benign context, he wouldn't be scared sh-less and Distracting to Obama, of all people.
#49 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-23 08:41 PM | Reply
Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney Roy Black died at age 80 in Florida: thehill.com
#50 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-23 09:10 PM | Reply
"Release the videos! #5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"
Why am I not surprised that LegallyRetarded is calling for child porn videos to be released....
I think we can all agree - if there was a video of Trump having sex with a minor, the FBI/CIA would have leaked it by now or Rein would have leaked it from his personal collection.
Same goes with this nonsense - "Trump's name is in the file" - this is an attempted smear. We know Trump appeared on flight logs between NYC and Miami. We know he never went to Pedo Island. However, the Democrats are going to run with this new nonsense because they know their followers are too stupid to differentiate between a plane ride commute between NYC and Miami and a pedo-blackmail flight to his island.
And again - if there was ANYTHING incriminating against Trump - it would have already leaked. We know this because Obama and the Deepstate had to 100% fabricate the entire Russian Collusion Hoax and the ------- Crazy Carroll case because they have literally no dirt on Trump. You think they would have ran with Trump paying Stormy not to talk about him banging her if they had Trump having sex with minors documented?
You Democrats are dumber than a bucket of pig ----.
#51 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-23 09:12 PM | Reply
#50
That was convenient/s. Is there 3 mins missing from the tape?
#52 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-23 09:24 PM | Reply
dekerivers.wordpress.com
This is just a coincidence, by any 'stretch' of the imagination.
#53 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-23 09:45 PM | Reply
"bla bla bla You Democrats are dumber than a bucket of pig ----."
OK Pedo
#54 | Posted by dibblda at 2025-07-23 11:22 PM | Reply
"OK Pedo #54 | Posted by dibblda"
I have no problem with pedos getting their necks stretched for their crimes against children. That would apply to Trump should your wildass, unsupported allegations prove to be true, or the pedos we have that regularly post on this board (LegallyRetarded and Rein among them).
#55 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-24 12:07 AM | Reply
"I have no problem with pedos getting their necks stretched for their crimes against children. That would apply to Trump should your wildass, unsupported allegations prove to be true"
Sure, whatever you say scooter. Keep running defense for pedos.
#56 | Posted by dibblda at 2025-07-24 12:26 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
"#56 | Posted by dibblda"
Now you are blaming MAGA? Your potato-brained, pedo was president from 2021 to 2024 and did nothing with this 'data' - which suggests it does not exist or they would have used it.
#57 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-24 02:01 AM | Reply
#22 | Posted by Alexandrite
It smells of cover up with Blanche visiting Maxwell in prison before she testifies before the committee. To dangle an eventual pardon if she plays ball and denies Trump involvement before the committee, like Tom Hagen's visit to Frank Pantageli in The Godfather II before his Senate testimony?
#58 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-07-24 04:29 AM | Reply
#58 - Yep. This is the most corrupt "pResident" in this nation's history.
#59 | Posted by YAV at 2025-07-24 08:00 AM | Reply
MAGA said the same crap about Trump's "beautiful" tax returns. After they were obtained through about seven years of litigation by Trump to keep them secret, he was sued and found liable for hundreds of millions in tax fraud, banking fraud, insurance fraud, etc.
If there is any information about Trump in these files that is favorable to him it would already be on Truth Social and in downloadable pdf files on the WH homepage,
It's time to grow up MAGAts and be larvae no more. Your cult leader is a pedo.
#60 | Posted by anton at 2025-07-24 08:35 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
#51 | Posted by ScottS
Says the stupid pile of s(*& who's argument boils down to 'everyone isn't as big a corrupt piece of s*&^ as myself or Trump, so it can't be true!'
#61 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-24 09:10 AM | Reply
Your potato-brained, pedo was president from 2021 to 2024 and did nothing with this 'data' - which suggests it does not exist or they would have used it.
#57 | Posted by ScottS
Or, more likely, you're such a stupid pile of s*&^ that you're unaware of how unusual Trump's forced involvement with DoJ is.
#62 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-24 09:11 AM | Reply
The future POTUS and First Daughter Ivanka: img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net
#63 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-24 10:30 AM | Reply
That would apply to Trump should your wildass, unsupported allegations prove to be true, or the pedos we have that regularly post on this board (LegallyRetarded and Rein among them).
#55 | POSTED BY SCOTTS Why are you still talking about this?
You must be one of the foolish stupid maggats Trumpy is referring to. He doesn't need YOU any more!
Them Dems done duped you again! Did you enjoy your hook line and sinker?
#64 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-07-24 11:34 AM | Reply
On the one hand given the measures Dems took to try to jail, bankrupt and have Trump deliver
Removed from the ballot, logic would follow that if anything within all of the Epstein stuff implicated Trump in any way, it absolutely would have been leaked during Biden's term. On the other hand given how Trump and Bondi played up releasing the files and had an abrupt about face and are now desperately trying to make all of this go away, I totally get the theory that this is now a Trump cover up.
#65 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-24 11:42 AM | Reply
#65 | POSTED BY BULLBRINGER
Donald Trump, on one hand he's a convicted criminal, on the other hand he's a failed businessman, and to top that, he's a pedophile.
He's who you wish you were, but you're too fat, stupid and ugly.
#66 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-24 12:06 PM | Reply
" the measures Dems took to try to jail, bankrupt and have Trump ... Removed from the ballot"
Since what you're claiming is Lawfare, you must have an example of him being treated differently than you or I would.
Can you point to them? How about ONE?
I mean ... you can't really pretend it's a witch hunt if you can't produce a single example. Especially after being asked dozens of times.
#67 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-07-24 12:16 PM | Reply
The Whataboutism logical fallacies here are Legion!
Who knew that if Dems (supposedly) did something wrong before, that made it OK for someone else to do it now?
Rwing "logic". It's almost like they don't want to discuss THIS case.
#68 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-24 12:28 PM | Reply
#69!!!
With LeetheAgent... coming to a Holiday Inn near you soon!
#69 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-24 02:54 PM | Reply
" Odd that when Democrats had to power to release the documents it was crickets."
Not odd at all; Bill Clinton's name is on the list as well.
At this point, you can assume the same regarding Trump.
Frankly, I don't believe either of them should be protected.
Bondi's lie dug a huge hole. Trump's lie about (not) learning in May is an even deeper one.
Couldn't happen to a more deserving pair!
#70 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-07-24 03:26 PM | Reply
Democrats never campaigned on releasing the list.
Trump did.
Now he's not.
And all you can do is cry about democrats.
Womp womp.
#71 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-24 03:33 PM | Reply
Trump is bleeding Independents like 1Nut on the rag:
thehill.com
#72 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-24 04:15 PM | Reply
If it walks like a duck ... and quacks like a duck ... and swims in a pond like a duck ... . It almost certainly a duck.
I personally have no doubt that Trump is a pedophile.
#73 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-07-24 04:30 PM | Reply
"Since what you're claiming is Lawfare, you must have an example of him being treated differently than you or I would. I mean ... you can't really pretend it's a witch hunt if you can't produce a single example. Especially after being asked dozens of times. #67 | Posted by Danforth"
And thus completes Danforth's transformation from a repeatedly debunked liar into a dumber version of Lamplighter repeatedly asking for links to information that is already common knowledge.
#74 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-24 07:52 PM | Reply
Can Ghislaine Maxwell be trusted to tell the truth about Jeffrey Epstein? July 24, 2025, 4:02 PM CDT / Updated July 24, 2025, 5:20 PM CDT
As the uproar over the Epstein files continues, prosecutors say the late sex offender's longtime accomplice has a history of lying. Her defense lawyer says she will speak truthfully.
On Thursday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Jeffrey Epstein's longtime accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell for several hours in a Florida U.S. attorney's office. On Aug. 11, Maxwell is scheduled for a jailhouse deposition sought by the House Oversight Committee.
As the uproar over the Epstein files continues, a central question is whether Maxwell can be trusted to tell the truth.
#75 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-07-24 08:59 PM | Reply
"#75 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY"
It is very easy for liberals to determine if she is lying:
1.) If she implicates Trump - she is telling the truth 2.) If she does not implicate Trump - she is lying
So, we just need her actual testimony and then the lying MSM can run with their pre-written articles.
#76 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-24 09:26 PM | Reply
Maxwell knows what Trump did to Epstein.
She's not stupid.
She won't implicate Trump.
#77 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-24 09:39 PM | Reply
Dear MAGA: You Stormed the Capitol to Protect Epstein's Best Friend?
#78 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-24 09:40 PM | Reply
I;m not gonna believe anything she says, regardless. She's already perjured herself.
#79 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-24 09:44 PM | Reply
They appear to setting her up to implicate Dems and to exonerate Trump... if she wants a Pardon.
#80 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-24 09:45 PM | Reply
Where are our resident screechers, yelling WITNESS TAMPERING ... ?
#81 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-07-24 09:48 PM | Reply
She's a sex trafficker.
She contributed the Donald Trump Raping underage girls.
Anyone defending Trump doesn't see anything wrong with a grown man raping a 14 year old girl.
#82 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-24 09:51 PM | Reply
"nformation that is already common knowledge."
Feel free to link to that common knowledge.
So far, NO ONE has been able to point to a single Trump indictment which the average Joe could commit without fear of legal repercussions, despite dozens of asks.
Go ahead. Be the first.
#83 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-07-24 10:03 PM | Reply
Preview of the Congressional Testimony:
So, Ms. Maxwell, did you ever see Donald Trump-?
"Oh, no, never! Especially not that time with the 14yr old, and especially ESPECIALLY not that time with the 13yr old."
Well, who did you see?
"Democrats"
Could you be more specific?
"Bill Clinton. Barack Obama. Al Gore. Alan Dershowitz"
He's a Republican.
"Oh, sorry...never saw him. Um...where was I? Oh yes...Clinton...Hilary! And Michelle Obama! And JFK! And McGovern and Hubert Humphrey! Do I get my pardon now???"
#84 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-07-24 10:13 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
