"Release the videos!
#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead"

Why am I not surprised that LegallyRetarded is calling for child porn videos to be released....

I think we can all agree - if there was a video of Trump having sex with a minor, the FBI/CIA would have leaked it by now or Rein would have leaked it from his personal collection.

Same goes with this nonsense - "Trump's name is in the file" - this is an attempted smear. We know Trump appeared on flight logs between NYC and Miami. We know he never went to Pedo Island. However, the Democrats are going to run with this new nonsense because they know their followers are too stupid to differentiate between a plane ride commute between NYC and Miami and a pedo-blackmail flight to his island.

And again - if there was ANYTHING incriminating against Trump - it would have already leaked. We know this because Obama and the Deepstate had to 100% fabricate the entire Russian Collusion Hoax and the ------- Crazy Carroll case because they have literally no dirt on Trump. You think they would have ran with Trump paying Stormy not to talk about him banging her if they had Trump having sex with minors documented?

You Democrats are dumber than a bucket of pig ----.

"OK Pedo
#54 | Posted by dibblda"

I have no problem with pedos getting their necks stretched for their crimes against children. That would apply to Trump should your wildass, unsupported allegations prove to be true, or the pedos we have that regularly post on this board (LegallyRetarded and Rein among them).

"#56 | Posted by dibblda"

Now you are blaming MAGA? Your potato-brained, pedo was president from 2021 to 2024 and did nothing with this 'data' - which suggests it does not exist or they would have used it.

"Since what you're claiming is Lawfare, you must have an example of him being treated differently than you or I would.
I mean ... you can't really pretend it's a witch hunt if you can't produce a single example. Especially after being asked dozens of times.
#67 | Posted by Danforth"

And thus completes Danforth's transformation from a repeatedly debunked liar into a dumber version of Lamplighter repeatedly asking for links to information that is already common knowledge.

"#75 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY"

It is very easy for liberals to determine if she is lying:

1.) If she implicates Trump - she is telling the truth
2.) If she does not implicate Trump - she is lying

So, we just need her actual testimony and then the lying MSM can run with their pre-written articles.

"Feel free to link to that common knowledge.
#83 | Posted by Danforth"

I will get right on that Lamplighter. ---- raetard...

"Jail: He sexually assaulted a woman, cooked the books he gave the government of New York, and stole documents he refused to return.
#86 | Posted by ClownShack"

1.) the 'sexual assault' was not a criminal charge and was not even the impetus of the case. The case was about defamation. So, if you want to say he should he be in jail for it, have the balls to demand ------- Crazy Carroll file a criminal charge - I 100% support that. She won't - because everyone knows this would be tossed out of court immediately due to lack of evidence.

2.) He 'cooked the books' in a case that was not prosecuted during the valid statute of limitations because what he did was a standard practice and the accurate way to record the transactions for payments to your lawyer. The Dems needed to invent a new crime - which they never clarified or that he has been convicted of or even charged with to this day.

3.) Stole documents that WERE UNDER HIS SOLE DISCRETION TO DECLASSIFY and thus, perfectly legal for him to possess. Very different from Pedo Biden that stole documents from a SCIF as a senator (no right to take the documents from the SCIF) then stored in his unsecured garage because he wanted to feed them to a ghostwriter. However, you give him a total pass because he allowed the Fed to seize them. Like a bank robber being given a total pass if they give the money back. It is either a crime or it is not - and the Democrats used an unprecedented view of the law to charge Trump.

Your constant repetition of already debunked talking points seem to be a symptom of late stage syphilis - given your degenerate lifestyle and a syphilis infection rate of homosexuals, you should get this treated before your brain is Biden-ized.

""I will get right on that"
Well?
#89 | Posted by Danforth"

Seems your inability to detect sarcasm is on par with Lamplighter. Good job ------- - your transformation is complete!

"#88 | POSTED BY SCOTTS
Sexual assault isn't a crime?
#90 | Posted by ClownShack"

It is if charged and proven in a CRIMINAL COURT - which did not happen in Trump's case. You continually stating this while being continually corrected on it shows that it is not a case of ignorance for you but an intention to lie.

"Trump also had a bad habit of claiming 30,000 sq ft on his apartment on loan applications, and 10,000 on tax rolls.
#92 | Posted by Danforth"

2 different numbers for 2 different purposes -------. If you are talking valuation for tax purposes, it should be stated as the property current stands. If you are talking about the value for a loan officer which may reflect development potential (which is the case for Trump given zoning permissions), you state the values based on the development potential allowed under the law.

For Trump's property, it has triple-height ceilings. Thus, he is able to simple install the 2 floors above and sell the unit for 3x the square feet under the zoning an construction permissions. For the loan officer, this is the value that is relevant to their decision as they want to know what could be recovered in the case the loan failed and they seized the collateral and resold it.

The same applies to Mar a lago. The tax basis for property tax purposes has NOTHING to do with the value of the property in the case it is seized as collateral.

You would understand this if you actually had any wealth or financial sense. However, as you have repeatedly proven - you have neither.

"It's also a crime if proven in civil court. Victims have the legal option to pursue either.
#97 | Posted by Danforth"

Your understanding of the courts is just as bad as your understanding or taxes and economics.

CIVIL COURTS find LIABILITY

CRIMINAL COURTS find GUILT

No person in the history of United States has been found liable and served a jail sentence based on the finding in a civil court. They are found liable for a TORT.

You have now been fully educated on this. You further repeating your nonsense no longer shows ignorance on your part, but the intention to lie.

""2 different numbers for 2 different purposes"
Which is illegal."

Again, your understanding of the law is just as bad as your understanding of taxes and economics.

In NYC, the property tax is based on the current property descriptions and use - NOT DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL. Hence, if Trump's 10,000sqft home has triple height ceilings, it will base the value on a similar triple height property. For a loan officer, if the value is materially higher assuming you add the 2 floors to triple the salable sqft and that results in a higher resale value, they will use that number because a loan office is concerned with MARKET VALUE INCLUDING DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL.

"For Trump's property, it has triple-height ceilings"
That doesn't allow you to claim three times the truth.

If it is fully zoned to allow for it, YES - YOU CAN.

"Loan applications don't work that way."

Yes, THEY DO. It is obvious that you have never done a real estate transaction in which there is development potential for the property. For instance, let's say that you have rental property that is zoned for 4 units, but some past owner combined all the units into a single unit so that is it currently being used as a single unit dwelling (despite the zoning). How will the loan office assess the building - as a single unit or as a 4 unit property?

"For the loan officer, this is the value that is relevant to their decision"
Nonsense. It completely ignores the renovation costs, which is a fraudulent misrepresentation.
#99 | Posted by Danforth"

IN EVERY real estate transaction, the loan applicant puts forth the property in the best possible light and supplies their internal assessment of the properties value. It is the responsibility of the loan officer to apply discounts to that number to assess what they believe the true value is. For instance, if Trump took out a $50M loan and supplied $500M worth of real estate as assessed by him to collateralize it, the $500M valuation from Trump is meaningless. The loan office will assess for themselves and they may conclude the actual value, in their estimation, is $100M. At the end of the day if they assume 2x collateral coverage is sufficient as the original 10x coverage was ridiculously high, they will still give the loan. They don't even need to tell the borrower what their collateral assessment was - just whether it was sufficient for the loan.

Again, in your repeated ridiculous talking points, you prove you have no clue how business actually works.

"That wasn't your barometer. it was CRIME.
#104 | Posted by Danforth"

Again, raetard, civil courts don't find CRIMES, they find TORTS. Please look up the definitions of each before further embarrassing yourself -------.

Or, ask pretend lawyer LegallyRetarded to explain it to you as I am pretty sure they covered that at the Wakanda U School of Law.

"I grew up around real estate. There's a huge difference between a 30,000 sq ft apartment, and a 10,000 sq ft apartment with tall ceilings. If you can't admit the former is purposely leaving out the conversion costs, you're a math moron."

Please tell me the difference -------. If it is zoned to allow for the 3 floors and sqft can be tripled, why would you ignore this in the valuation.

"It is the responsibility of the loan officer to apply discounts to that number to assess what they believe the true value is."

"But they don't physically inspect every nook and cranny"

So, you think they did not assign a single appraiser to check? Or, do you think that appraiser did not know the difference between 30,000 and 10,000 sqft?

"and they expect, under penally of perjury, the information is correct."

What is under perjury? You seem to not understand the difference between you - as a poor ------- doing a standardized home loan vs. a complex real estate transaction with a group like Deutsch Bank. DB does not even do traditional home loans in the US -------.

"I understand "good light". But claiming 30,000 when you've got 10,000 and tall ceilings? Single-family homes certainly can't do that.
#110 | Posted by Danforth"

Again, it is not a traditional home loan -------.

"#112 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY "

1.) A civil court does not rule on guilt
2.) The jury explicitly rejected rape

I know you have been informed of this already multiple times which means what you are doing now is LYING.

But, I guess when you are a Liberal, that is all you have left at this point.

"What did the jury explicitly accept?
#114 | Posted by snoofy"

NOT RAPE. It was explicitly asked on the jury form and they checked NO. No matter what you say now does not change that fact. So again, repeating it after you already know it is false is called LYING.