Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, November 20, 2025

Remember five days ago when Trump told Bondi to investigate any Democrats with links to Epstein. Well any active investigation can stop the DOJ from releasing the files, or at least all the files.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

The guy who could release the Epstein Files at any time can now release the Epstein Files at any time[image or embed]

-- Michael McDonald (@electproject.bsky.social) Nov 18, 2025 at 7:27 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Trump will not release these files because if he does he will burn.

Everyone know this, so as he continues not to release the he burns anyway.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2025-11-20 01:12 PM | Reply

So far 85% has 100% redaction.

#2 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-11-20 01:15 PM | Reply

Pfffffftttt. What do you expect from a reality show preznit?

#3 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2025-11-20 01:33 PM | Reply

Meanwhile, Trump publicly calls for execution of Democrats. How far our country has fallen in such a short time!

For God's sake, is there not a woman out there who will give him a BJ in the White House?
Because that, apparently, is the ONLY THING that Republicans find grounds for impeachment!

#4 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-11-20 01:35 PM | Reply

I'm shocked! Shocked I tells ya!

Trump is like the hunted criminal running out of time and excuses and distractions. The Bill says it is Illegal for the DOJ not to release the Files. And the Exception for an ongoing Investigation, which Trump started up last week, is Temporary.

Republicans smell blood in the water, including the Economic Bleeding News... Ted Cruz has now stared his 2028 Presidential Campaign, lmao... and MTG is in Open Revolt.

(ok, she was always revolting, but you know whut ah mean)

#5 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-20 01:37 PM | Reply

Saw this coming

"Option 3:
Support release of the files while having the DoJ open a new investigation that blocks the release of a portion of the files (anything that makes Trump or other republicans looks bad) and then spin the rest of it in an attempt to hurt democrats.
Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-11-17 01:50 PM "

#6 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-11-20 01:38 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Nixon tried this. It didn't work then either. The scandal has escaped the lab.

#7 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-11-20 01:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

The files are under audit, or something.

#8 | Posted by censored at 2025-11-20 01:47 PM | Reply

"Vhy hee not deed?"

-Melania

#9 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-11-20 02:19 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

prediction: They will investigate banks or anyone who wants out of the release.

#10 | Posted by Brennnn at 2025-11-20 02:21 PM | Reply

blessing for the Democrats

anyway, they can't release all the files; some are Grand Jury testimony, victim privacy rules, items to discusting for the public, etc.... we will never see all the files

#11 | Posted by Maverick at 2025-11-20 02:45 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#11 Which is exactly why the Epstein files is the gift that keeps on giving... to Democrats.

While the Epstein files is the gift that keeps on taking away talking points... from Republicans.

No matter how you look at it, it is a Win-Win situation.

#12 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 02:47 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

So far 85% has 100% redaction.

#2 | Posted by redlightrobot

Link?

#13 | Posted by boaz at 2025-11-20 02:48 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Releasing the Epstein files without redactions could pose a national security risk." - Mike Johnson

The Republicans will never release the Epstein files while Trump is still alive.

#14 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-11-20 02:50 PM | Reply

FDT is not the only monster in this story. Even if he completely redacts his name, the empty space will continue to tell a story. The prominent people he is willing to toss under the bus on this are prominent, and will respond. Larry Summers is already out at Harvard, and good riddance, but the women who are bravely coming forward have claimed there are around 1,000 victims in this. FDT is going to slip. His lies about this are starting to conflict, and he is too demented to keep them straight anymore.

#15 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-11-20 02:53 PM | Reply

"Releasing the Epstein files without redactions could pose a national security risk." - Mike Johnson

Yep....what's what I said.

It could be an international nightmare.

Trump's enemies will assume Trump is covering for himself.

Just like Boaz, I flip between wanting them released and not.

#16 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 02:55 PM | Reply

The problem is the files aren't isolated to Americans.

And honestly, is it America's job to be the world's morality police?

#17 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 02:58 PM | Reply

Trump's enemies will assume Trump is covering for himself.

#16 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

LOL.

Trump is covering for himself.

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2025-11-20 02:59 PM | Reply

is it America's job to be the world's morality police?

#17 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Jesus.

Just release the files.

It shouldn't be this hard.

#19 | Posted by Zed at 2025-11-20 03:00 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"It could be an international nightmare."

And?

Do you believe the possibility of an international nightmare is a good reason to allow the rich and powerful to traffic underage girls for sex?

You're making an excuse for evil.

#20 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-20 03:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Bill Johnson is a ------- clown. ---- off, Bill.

#21 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-11-20 03:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" is it America's job to be the world's morality police?"

Cain asked as much.

He put it a little differently, but it means the same.

Tell us: are you your brother's keeper?

#22 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-20 03:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#16 Know what's a real international nightmare, BJ boi?

Donald F****** Trump.

He's the international nightmare.

#23 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 03:03 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Tell us: are you your brother's keeper?"

I'm responsible for my brother.

America doesn't have to be responsible for seven billion people who aren't.

#24 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 03:07 PM | Reply

So far 85% has 100% redaction.
#2 | Posted by redlightrobot
Link?
#13 | Posted by boaz at 2025-11-20 02:48 PM

While I hate making links to X, the auditor that I watched last night doesn't have a published assessment, so here is a sample: Here's a look at the Epstein files after Bondi does her "national security" redactions

Several pages are 100% redacted. It's coming from people inside that Bondi has redacted 85% of the Epstein documents, so I didn't include "allegedly".

#25 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-11-20 03:08 PM | Reply

#24 And Jesus wept over the bastardization of His word.

#26 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 03:08 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

An example:

FDT has maintained that he did not know Epstein well. He claims to have kicked Epstein out of Mar a Lago (a claim Epstein refuted, supposedly not being a member of the club to begin with), because he was mad that Epstein was "stealing his girls." Just yesterday, he claimed he kicked Epstein out of Mar a Lago because he was a pervert. His story is changing, and even the anchors of his story are probably lies.

Before history gets rewritten by the Repubiclowns here and elsewhere, remember this: the Democratic Party was not clamoring for these files to be released. That was all MAGA. Fast forward to today, and you now see 100% of Democrats in support of releasing the unredacted (except for victims), complete release of the files. At this point, anyone who is against their release is either involved or complicit.

#27 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-11-20 03:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

The problem is the files aren't isolated to Americans.
And honestly, is it America's job to be the world's morality police?
#17 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 02:58 PM

Precisely how is foreign involvement a "problem" to expose?

Do you have a specific person in mind? Close ally to Epstein Prince Andrew, perhaps?

You seem to misunderstand - Epstein was an intelligence operative connecting world leaders in meetings a deals.

Trump brought him along to the UAE and offered Epstein a position in his cabinet in 2017.

And your response is to "just turn your head and do nothing", got it.

#28 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-11-20 03:13 PM | Reply

"America doesn't have to be responsible for seven billion people who aren't."

Sorry, but in my Bible, Jesus answered that question, when he said "Anyone doing My Father's work is my brother and sister".

You're not even allowing for Christians. And you've already identified a "least" of your brother.

Not really following Jesus' teachings, are you?

#29 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-20 03:15 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Do you believe the possibility of an international nightmare is a good reason to allow the rich and powerful to traffic underage girls for sex?"

What a stupid question.

Questioning the wisdom of detonating a global scandal is not the same as approving trafficking.

Seeing the nuance isn't approval.

But I get it. Some people can't tell the difference.

The world is full of legitimate conflicting goals, and pretending otherwise is childish.

#30 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 03:16 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Not really following Jesus' teachings, are you?"

Do you?

#31 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 03:18 PM | Reply

Dan,

Your supposed concern with the Bible is nonsense.

Get off your fake phony concern for Biblical scripture.

#32 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 03:19 PM | Reply

Your supposed concern with the Bible is nonsense.

Get off your fake phony concern for Biblical scripture.

#32 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

Thank you Fake Plastic Christian.

Your Fake Plastic opinion has been duly noted and filed appropriately. In the circular file.

#33 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-20 03:23 PM | Reply

#30 So, the concern over detonating a global scandal is more important than stopping and hunting down those responsible for human trafficking and the sexual exploitation of children.

Real "nuanced" thinking there, BJ boi.

#34 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 03:25 PM | Reply

Dan,
"Not really following Jesus' teachings, are you?"
Do you?
#31 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 03:18 PM

LOL! He's talking about justice for victims, while you are defending the perps.

CAREFULLY RE-READ THE RED PARTS OF THE BIBLE.

You like that color, it matches your hat.

#35 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-11-20 03:26 PM | Reply

All a show. If he wanted them released he would do it.

All of a sudden he wants congress approval?

Mf pls!

#36 | Posted by fresno500 at 2025-11-20 03:30 PM | Reply

Jesus answered the question, "who is my brother?" by saying that anyone who is a believer is my brother.

When asked who is my neighbor, he told the story of the Good Samaritan who gave aid and comfort to a Jew who was assaulted on the road and other Jews passed him by... astonishing his listeners because the Samaritans were considered to be trash by the Jews.

Meaning that even the lowest of the low is your neighbor.

And what did he say about neighbors? Love your neighbor as yourself.

These are NOT MAGAnite sayings.

In TrumpWorld, murdering 600,000 people by starvation, 2/3'rds of them children, isn't a problem at all.

#37 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-20 03:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

It could be an international nightmare.

T---p's enemies will assume T---p is covering for himself.

It's FDT's allies you should be worried about. Specifically, Russia.

It's nice to see you're starting to get it, even if you are slightly off target. Those of us who have not submitted to the cult of FDT have always recognized the blackmail targets within the Repubican Party, and the national security nightmare of electing a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist to the highest office. All those years of MAGA loyalists like yourself twisting yourselves into pretzel shapes to justify and defend this dangerously compromised crime boss, when we warned you repeatedly that he's a Russian asset, either as a useful idiot or under the thumb of Putin.

I hope the psychological crashout you experience when you finally discover reality doesn't match your fantasy dream world isn't too bad.

#38 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-11-20 03:37 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#31 That reply is a tacit admission that you don't.

#39 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 03:45 PM | Reply

Remember five days ago when Trump told Bondi to investigate any Democrats with links to Epstein. Well any active investigation can stop the DOJ from releasing the files, or at least all the files.

How did you guys not make that connection? This being a "banner headline" just shows you don't understand anything going on.

#40 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-11-20 03:48 PM | Reply

(and it's not just Russia)

The Saudis have their hooks in him. The Qataris have their hooks in him. The Chinese are laughing all the way to the bank. All the while, he is dismantling our cybersecurity, health care, education, financial stability, clean energy initiatives ... just about everything that has made America great, and a leader in the world, has been systematically dismantled or hamstrung.

#41 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-11-20 03:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Jesus answered the question, "who is my brother?" by saying that anyone who is a believer is my brother.

Not to worry, Snoofy thinks his "bro" is a fascist.

#42 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-11-20 03:49 PM | Reply

"Releasing the Epstein files without redactions could pose a national security risk." - Mike Johnson
#16 | Posted by BillJohnson

Johnson says it "could pose" a threat while he ignores the very real security threat created by Trump's murder of people who Trump, a person who recently falsely claimed the US Gov has paid Obama $40M in royalties, has unilaterally decided are smuggling drugs.
The biggest security threat to the nation that MJ should be concerned about is the felonious rapist sitting in the Oval Office who already tried to overthrow the Constitution.

#43 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-11-20 03:53 PM | Reply

- you don't understand anything going on.

No nothings are such know it alls.

"The Bill says it is Illegal for the DOJ not to release the Files. And the Exception for an ongoing Investigation, which Trump started up last week, is Temporary." from #5

#44 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-20 04:01 PM | Reply

Know nothings, lol.

#45 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-20 04:02 PM | Reply

Jesus answered the question, "who is my brother?" by saying that anyone who is a believer is my brother.
Not to worry, Snoofy thinks his "bro" is a fascist.
#42 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-11-20 03:49 PM

You obviously don't pay attention.

Trump administration is RIDDLED with fascists.

Even Loomer calls them NAZI.

#46 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-11-20 04:09 PM | Reply

Even Loomer calls them NAZI.

Winner of the Takes One to Know One award of 2025...

#47 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-11-20 04:13 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Get off your fake phony concern for Biblical scripture."

Not fake at all. I was raised in the Catholic Church, and was an altar boy back when Mass was still in Latin. I learned the Ten Commandments, and the danger of breaking ANY of them. Let's compare me with Trump, shall we?

I believe in a power higher than myself. Trump worships mammon.
I went to church regularly; now I pray regularly. Trump does neither.
I've honored my parents, both when they were alive, and after they passed. Trump does neither.
I've been faithful to my wife. Trump has not.
I've been fair to contractors, paying them better than agreed. Trump shortchanged them, and told them to find redress in court.
I'm careful to speak the truth. Trump lies so often, it's difficult to keep track.
I have no desire for my neighbors' wife. Trump has been a serial adulterer.
I have no jealousy over what my neighbors have. Trump wants EVERYTHING his neighbor has.

My guess is we swear about the same. And I accept a President may be forced to kill.

Frankly, I can't name two Commandments Trump follows. And neither can you; I've asked over a dozen times.

#48 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-20 04:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"...the Exception for an ongoing Investigation, which Trump started up last week, is Temporary."

So is Trump's "audit."

#49 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-20 04:30 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Frankly, I can't name two Commandments Trump follows."

It says a lot that you respect the 10 Commandments as a measuring guide.

Each of us answer for our own demons.

Trump answers for his, I answer for mine, and you will answer for yours.

#50 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 04:31 PM | Reply

His guilt is even becoming so obvious even to MAGAs though their ability to face hard truth about their cult leader will prevent them from admitting it even to themselves.

#51 | Posted by danni at 2025-11-20 04:35 PM | Reply

Full Epstein Files Not Likely Released Soon

When Pedo47 did the 180 from obfuscate and delay and hide to "release the files" there was a 1000% certainty they had devised a scheme to keep the files hidden while bragging about their "transparency".

Will it work? Doubtful.

Will they whine that their hands are tied and they absolutely cannot release them? Absolutely.

"Frankly, I can't name two Commandments Trump follows."

He does not follow any of them.

#52 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-11-20 04:35 PM | Reply

#50 What clueless individuals, like BJ boi, fail to grasp is:

While you and Dan may have to answer for your own demons, the demons being release now by the------------- are raining down on all of us ... now.

#53 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 04:36 PM | Reply

Dan,
"Frankly, I can't name two Commandments Trump follows."
It says a lot that you respect the 10 Commandments as a measuring guide.
Each of us answer for our own demons.
Trump answers for his, I answer for mine, and you will answer for yours.
#50 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 04:31 PM

There's something in your eye... doesn't just rhyme with "facism".

Trump is aiding starving and bombing children currently, not just sexual abuse of children for decades.

You have no soul, why would you possess critical thinking?

#54 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-11-20 04:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Which commandment forbids homosexuality?

#55 | Posted by danni at 2025-11-20 04:40 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#55 And out of nowhere, a grand-slam home run compliments of Danni.

#56 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 04:42 PM | Reply

- Each of us answer for our own demons.
Trump answers for his, I answer for mine

Trump appears to be yours, among others.

#57 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-20 04:47 PM | Reply

Just release the files.
It shouldn't be this hard.

Posted by Zed at 2025-11-20 03:00 PM | Reply

Imagine waging an all out war on non-existent transgender kiddy diddling while simultaneously protecting ACTUAL PEDOPHILE RAPISTS.

That is where the GOP is right now.

#58 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-11-20 04:54 PM | Reply

And honestly, is it America's job to be the world's morality police?
#17 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 02:58 PM | Reply

Bill Johnson covering for pedophiles. Cuz (R)easons.

#59 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-11-20 05:02 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I'm responsible for my brother.
America doesn't have to be responsible for seven billion people who aren't.

#24 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 03:07 PM | Reply | Flag

How about 1000---------- victims from a US citizen?

Pig.

#60 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-11-20 05:03 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

And honestly, is it America's job to be the world's morality police?

#17 | Posted by BillJohnson

Yeah, all that promotion of worldwide democracy and human rights has just been a hoax.

#61 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-11-20 05:21 PM | Reply

T---p answers for his, I answer for mine, and you will answer for yours.

#50 | POSTED BY BILLJOHNSON

In addition to naming two Commandments FDT hasn't broken, I challenge you to name two things FDT has had to answer for. You elected a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist to be president, don't come to us with your religious nonsense pretending that you didn't know about who he is.

#62 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-11-20 05:32 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

And honestly, is it America's job to be the world's morality police?
#17 | Posted by BillJohnson

You'd rather the Chinese or the Russians or the Saudis do it?

You probably would. Licking boots suits you.

#63 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 05:34 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

#63 Newsworthy... and thanks.

#64 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 05:36 PM | Reply

Db,

"Yeah, all that promotion of worldwide democracy and human rights has just been a hoax."

But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.
And whoever says to his brother, Raca!' shall be in danger of the council.
But whoever says, You fool' shall be in danger of hell fire."
" Matthew 5:22, NKJV

So...I won't say it.

I'll just say you're being childish and naive about how the real world works.

What Trump is dealing with would crush ordinary men.

Trump is not ordinary.

#65 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 06:45 PM | Reply

"What Trump is dealing with would crush ordinary men."

Sleeping through meetings? Rolling out the red carpet for autocrats? More golf than any other President?

You fetishize Trump. It's repulsive. It's cult behavior, and he's your cult leader, and you love him.

#66 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 07:04 PM | Reply

"I'll just say you're being childish and naive about how the real world works."

The real world works lots of ways.
Quid pro quo is how Trump's world works.
You probably don't know why civilized societies consider quid pro quo a bad way to govern.

#67 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 07:05 PM | Reply

#65 If the Trump is not ordinary, then what is he, BJ boi?

Extraordinary?

Or insignificant mediocre ; poor believable ; undistinguished boring ; predictable inferior ; unsurprising mundane.

#68 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 07:10 PM | Reply

So...I won't say it.
I'll just say you're being childish and naive about how the real world works.
What Trump is dealing with would crush ordinary men.
Trump is not ordinary.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 06:45 PM | Reply

Cultist much??

#69 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-11-20 07:23 PM | Reply

Alex,

"Bill Johnson covering for pedophiles. Cuz (R)easons."

Powerful men in other countries just do what they want. Been going on for centuries.

You think America should release a list of names of these people who do things we consider wrong.

What do you suppose might be the repercussions?

Answer my question with a serious answer. You won't because you know the truth.

Diplomatic relations take president over exposing people in other countries. This week, the 18th, Trump met with Saudi Crown Prince Who ordered...oops
.. approved a hit on Jamal Khashoggi.

Where's the outrage?

Global politics makes for strange bedfellows.

#70 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 07:31 PM | Reply

"Powerful men in other countries just do what they want. Been going on for centuries."

There was a big "No Kings" protest the other day.
I guess you prefer kings, to no kings.

#71 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 08:06 PM | Reply

"What do you suppose might be the repercussions?"

According to you, none: "Powerful men in other countries just do what they want. Been going on for centuries."

So, explain to us, what's the downside of knowing what these powerful men are doing?

#72 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 08:07 PM | Reply

BJ worships Trump as his Lard God... he's like the AC's First Recruit.

#73 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-20 08:18 PM | Reply

65.

I know you don't like personal attacks, but I'm sorry. You're nuts and getting worse.

#74 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-11-20 08:51 PM | Reply

Db,

"I know you don't like personal attacks"

Comments about my wife are the main thing.

Tell me exactly what I posted you don't agree with.

And tell me why.

If you don't, you're wasting my time.

And your insults have no merit.

#75 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 09:00 PM | Reply

1000 little girls deserve justice, bill.

And the next potential 1000 shouldn't become victims. This has to stop now.

#76 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-11-20 09:08 PM | Reply

Alex,

What are talking about?

Sex trafficking is bad and a terrible problem globally from what I read.

How many children did he save from that life when closing the border?

Epstein is out of business so what are you referring to?

#77 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 09:18 PM | Reply

---- you -------.

#78 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-11-20 09:20 PM | Reply

"How many children did he save from that life when closing the border?"

What are you talking about, what border is closed?

Trump is actively helping child predators, BillJohnson. And you are not able to deny it. You can't even acknowledge it.

I suspect you may be a child predator judging from all the smoke screening you are doing for child predator Trump.

US Funding Cuts Are Helping Criminals Get Away With Child Abuse and Human Trafficking
Services supporting victims of online child exploitation and trafficking around the world have faced USAID and State Department cuts"and children are suffering as a result, sources tell WIRED.
www.wired.com

#79 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 09:24 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

"Trump is actively helping child predators, BillJohnson"

How?

#80 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 09:27 PM | Reply

Uhh, trump DOJ intervened in Sex trafficker Andrew Tate's case. For starters.

#81 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-11-20 09:41 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Snoofy,

Your link has some merit, but the article never gets beyond speculation.

It fails to prove any real cause and effect.

#82 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 09:43 PM | Reply

There's no speculation about the FACT that your Hero abruptly cut off food and medicine, with no chance for others to take up the slack, killing 600,000 people, 2/3rds of the children.

And you couldn't care less, because it was Trump who did that. Imagine if Obama or Biden had done that.

#83 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-20 09:47 PM | Reply

"It fails to prove any real cause and effect."

So? That wasn't a problem for you when you fluffed up your cult leader with this statement:
"How many children did he save from that life when closing the border?"

You don't have a number, but you're sure it's true.

Meanwhile, I provide links to people directly involved in protecting children from predators, and you say it's just speculative.

You're a real piece of ----. It's a shame you get to blame that on society treating you badly because you're gay. Society treats you badly because you're a piece of ----.

#84 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 09:51 PM | Reply

Uhh, trump DOJ intervened in Sex trafficker Andrew Tate's case. For starters.
#81 | Posted by Alexandrite

BillJohnson can't address that head on, either.
All he does is smoke screen. That's his only "move."
All these predators are accustomed to operating in the shadows, I might add.

#85 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 09:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#77 The border is not closed.

The southern border with Mexico is exactly the same today as it was 1 year ago, 2 years ago, etc.

The difference today? Why is it that everyone is NOW convinced that the "border is secure"?

'Tis a simple matter:

When was the last time Fox, OAN, Newsmax, Breitbart, and all of the usual voices on the right spoke about caravans coming up from the south?

When was the last time all of those news "sources," plus all of the MSM coverage, talked about chaos at the southern border caused by so-called "patriots" heading that way to knock heads with the "illegals"?

Why, the last time all of that "news" coverage was front-and-center was when a Democrat was in office.

Now, the "border is secure" because Americans aren't being fed a daily line of bovine excrement that it isn't secure.

Exact same circumstances as 1, 2 or even 3 years ago.

You're just missing out on the necessary "bread and circuses" dance the Trump and company wanted you to dance before, but not so much now.

#86 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 09:56 PM | Reply

"Trump is actively helping child predators, BillJohnson"
How?
#80 | Posted by BillJohnson

Hey BillJohnson,
Here is a direct example of Trump helping an alleged child predator.
What do you have to say about it?

Jan 6 Rioter Pardoned by Trump Faces Child Sex Charges
www.newsweek.com

#87 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 09:58 PM | Reply

Alex,

Did Biden pardoning his son, siblings, and in-laws before they even faced charges strike you as blatant special treatment, or are we pretending that's just a "normal" presidential pardon?

I'm not getting into the Tate brothers.

That whole saga doesn't interest me, so I haven't bothered to read up on it.

#88 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 10:01 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Snoofy,

What happened to the Epstein thread?

#89 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 10:03 PM | Reply

#88 You're not getting into the Tate brothers?

Is that aspirational?

Or disappointment?

Enquiring minds want to know.

#90 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 10:04 PM | Reply

If anyone knows of a good Cult Help Line for BJ, pls post asap.

#91 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-20 10:09 PM | Reply

#91 You are you, stay that way,

everyday is a new day

don't let yourself fade away

you are enough

#92 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 10:15 PM | Reply

#89 On a thread entitled Full Epstein Files Not Likely Released Soon...

...you are actually asking "What happened to the Epstein thread?"

Really?

#93 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 10:24 PM | Reply

I'm not getting into the Tate brothers.
#88 | Posted by BillJohnson

Of course you aren't.
Then you'd be forced to acknowledge Trump is directly helping alleged child predators.

UK prosecutors say 21 charges authorised against Tate brothers
www.bbc.com

#94 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-20 10:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

...you are actually asking "What happened to the Epstein thread?"

I thought it got buried by Bible studies and mail-in voting?

#95 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-11-20 10:31 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

#95 Silly me. Trix are for rabbits.

#96 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 10:32 PM | Reply

Trix are for kids.

#97 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-11-20 10:38 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#97 Well, slap my ass, my friend Laura. You are correct: Trix are for kids! :-)

#98 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 10:39 PM | Reply

#97 One of my all-time favorite scenes from a movie:

The scene at the dam in the film Doctor Zhivago is the final sequence where Alec Guinness, as General Yevgraf Zhivago, interviews a young woman named Tania. Yevgraf believes Tania is the long-lost daughter of his half-brother, Yuri Zhivago, and Lara Antipova, but she remains unconvinced.

I will always associate the name "Laura" with my love of that movie.

#99 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 10:46 PM | Reply

Thanks my dear friend. :+)

#100 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-11-20 10:48 PM | Reply

#100 And a tip-o-my-Tilley to you, my good friend. :-) This is just an example of the actual good that can come from interaction on an anonymous message board...

Reaching though the hundreds of trillions of bits and bytes that traverse the information superhighway each day, some messages actually get through.

And those messages sometimes come with all the emotion and feeling behind them.

#101 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 10:54 PM | Reply

#101 Metadata and all! :-)

#102 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 10:57 PM | Reply

Laura,

"Trix are for kids."

I've mentioned before that I've kept a journal since I was 19, but I've barely read any of it over the years. A few months ago I finally pulled the books out and did some reading.

Back then, if I met a guy and went to his place, I'd write, "I tricked with a guy last night."

Doing research, it appears to still be in the vernacular used by some gays in some regions.

What do you know about it?

#103 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 11:06 PM | Reply

#103 Christ on a popsicle stick... are you really this stupid (rhetorical, don't bother answering, BJ boi...):

youtu.be

#104 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 11:09 PM | Reply

#103 Stop flooding the space with your perverted outlook on a kid's cereal ... that first appeared in a 1959 television commercial.

F*** ... is your penis the only thing you think about, BJ boi?

#105 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 11:12 PM | Reply

#103 You ask, "What do you know about it?"

Are you really asking a woman here a question about how you can pick up children ("Trix are for kids.")?

Seriously, BJ boi?

You're seeking such advice as if you are Jared Fogle?

That's creepy beyond belief.

#106 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 11:20 PM | Reply

Trix are for kids."
I've mentioned before that I've kept a journal since I was 19, but I've barely read any of it over the years. A few months ago I finally pulled the books out and did some reading.
Back then, if I met a guy and went to his place, I'd write, "I tricked with a guy last night."
Doing research, it appears to still be in the vernacular used by some gays in some regions.
What do you know about it?

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 11:06 PM | Reply

You've never heard the trix cereal commercials?? Seriously??

#107 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-11-20 11:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Trix are for kids!" is the famous tagline for the Trix cereal brand, a slogan used in commercials where children tell a rabbit that the cereal is not for him. The phrase has become widely recognized and has been referenced in other media.

Origin: The tagline was created by the advertising executive Paul Harris.
Mascot: It is associated with the Trix Rabbit, a mascot who tries to get the cereal but is always outsmarted by the children.
Commercials: The children's response to the rabbit is always "Silly rabbit, Trix are for kids!".
Cultural impact: The phrase has become a well-known part of popular culture, used even in other TV shows and films, notes Reddit users.

#108 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-11-20 11:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#107 He seems to be thinking with what passes for as his penis.

Such as it is.

But that's just an educated guess, my friend.

#109 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 11:30 PM | Reply

Laura,

I didn't word my question well.

Nevermind.

#110 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-20 11:33 PM | Reply

#110 Because you thought with your penis, instead of what passes for your brain.

See also: Knee-jerk

Ready... FIRE... Aim ... is a stupid way of going through life.

#111 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-20 11:39 PM | Reply

I'm not getting into the Tate brothers.

Because it answered your stupid question, and destroys your dumb opinion.

Your brain is broken.

#112 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-11-20 11:48 PM | Reply

Alex,

I'm well aware of the contradictions in life.

And the compromising we all have to do. We believe one thing and do another.

Even Paul in Roman's 7:15. "I want to do what is good but I don't. I don't want to do what I know is wrong but I do it anyway'.

The human condition.

I think many Christians understand this conflict and see the necessity for God's grace.

Trump is caught between rocks and hard places that are difficult to navigate.

Better him than me.

I wouldn't have the strength.

#113 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 12:02 AM | Reply

Nevermind.
#110 | Posted by BillJohnson

Why in the ---- would you relate sex, let alone gay sex, to an extremely well-known catch phrase for a children's cereal, Bill?

#114 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-11-21 12:02 AM | Reply

There was a gay joke that went around in my day that tied trix and tricks into a funny line.

Keep in mind, 50 years ago peopke weren't thinking along those lines. Most people didn't know pedophiles or didnt talk about it.

Just a play on words. That's it.

#115 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 12:16 AM | Reply

Just a play on words. That's it.
#115 | Posted by BillJohnson

More like you're just a product of your time, eh Bill?

#116 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-11-21 12:19 AM | Reply

Had nothing to do with kids. It was a adult joke I heard decades ago.

So do gays still refer to it as tricking? That was my question. I see how you would tie them together. I wasnt.

Actually tricks was more aligned with drag queens who had sex for money than than anything about kids.

#117 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 12:22 AM | Reply

Rsty,

"More like you're just a product of your time, eh Bill?"

We all are.

#118 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 12:22 AM | Reply

Rsty,

Or will be if you live long enough.

I am 100% sure I would never have made it to my 70s the path I was on.

#119 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 12:28 AM | Reply

And he wonders what happened to the Epstein thread. It is to laugh.

#120 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-11-21 12:30 AM | Reply

#119 | Posted by BillJohnson

Take heed, Bill. When you bring up "Trix" in the current lexicon, the immediate reference for people will be "are for kids."

But your naivete about this aspect of our society speaks volumes. So, appreciate your slip here. Learned quite a bit about you.

#121 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-11-21 12:47 AM | Reply

Trix? I believe that is what Epstein called the encounters Trump had with the underage girls at his house. He had them turning trix.

#122 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-11-21 01:54 AM | Reply

Well I know I got one am shocked, SHOCKED, that billjohnson turned out to be a pedo protector.

#123 | Posted by jpw at 2025-11-21 08:47 AM | Reply

Jpw,

"Well I know I got one and I'm shocked, SHOCKED, that billjohnson turned out to be a pedo protector."

It's not that and you know it. You know from my posts I would NOT defend sex trafficking or abusing minors.

What I've been saying is that the decision not to release the Epstein files may have more to do with protecting relationships with other countries, than Trump worrying about himself.

And that raises two questions.

1. What would be the impact on international relations if powerful people in other countries were exposed?
2. Is it America's responsibility to act as the world's morality police?

Lastly, those files were already in DOJ custody during the Biden administration. If there had been something solid implicating Trump, it's hard to imagine that administration just quietly sitting on it.

#124 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 12:30 PM | Reply

protecting relationships with other countries, than Trump worrying about himself.

Lewzer doesn't give the tiniest bit of a fuck about anything other than himself.

#125 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-11-21 12:35 PM | Reply

- more to do with protecting relationships with other countries, than Trump worrying about himself.

That's one of the least plausible assertions ever made on these hallowed yellow pages... Trump concerned about anyone or anything other than himself? Blasphemous!

And the constantly obtuse Biden Whataboutism?

"But both agencies have cited longstanding legal restrictions as well as the sensitive content of certain materials"including evidence of child sexual abuse and personally identifiable information about victims"as reasons why some files could not be publicly released.

The Justice Department under Biden did not unilaterally release all Epstein-related files, in large part due to these established legal constraints.

According to congressional records and DOJ statements, more than 33,000 pages of documents related to Epstein have been provided to Congress, some of which have since been made public by the House Oversight Committee."

from "Why Biden DOJ Didn't Release Jeffrey Epstein Files"
Published Nov 20, 2025 at 11:26 AM

www.newsweek.com

BJ's undying admiration and defense of this lying criminal rapist traitor child murderer is.... well, it's obviously Jim Jones level Cult Behavior.

#126 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-21 12:39 PM | Reply

The network news broadcasts should announce the number of days the DOJ delay lasts every night; if they aren't hiding damaging info about Trump then there is no reason for the delay and everyone knows it! What is Bondi hiding for Trump? It must be serious or they wouldn't be hiding it!

#127 | Posted by danni at 2025-11-21 01:20 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" It says a lot that you respect the 10 Commandments as a measuring guide."

It says even more that YOU DON'T.

You are clearly worshiping a guy who breaks most of the 10 Commandments on a regular basis, and checks all six boxes of the antichrist daily.

You'd be condemning him if there was a (D) after the name.

#128 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 01:38 PM | Reply

Danni,

You're speculating.

#129 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 02:03 PM | Reply

#129 Speculation? Here? On the Retort? Speculation? Perish the thought.

#130 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-21 02:07 PM | Reply

Rep Stansbury: Epstein Files Say Trump Accused Of Raping 13 Yr Old

crooksandliars.com

#131 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-11-21 02:09 PM | Reply

hey, bill. did you get your trump bible in the mail?

#132 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-11-21 02:14 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Dan,

"You'd be condemning him if there was a (D) after the name."

Your arguments are getting weaker and weaker.

You've yet to answer my question. If Trump is the anti-Christ, where is the Christ he's in opposition to.

And you'd be defending him and keep him hidden from the press seeing that he's senile, if he had a (D).

#133 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 02:20 PM | Reply

Said they'd likely be held up because of the Democratic investigation he directed Pam Bondi to start back around the 14th or so. Sort of knew this would come. The question will be how it is released. How much black ink will be used to cover over things or what will be held back. Everyone knows there's a reason Trump doesn't want to have those files in public hands.

#134 | Posted by BBQ at 2025-11-21 02:30 PM | Reply

Rein,

"Rep Stansbury: Epstein Files Say Trump Accused Of Raping 13 Yr Old"

The 13-year-old rape allegation against Trump came from a 2016 civil lawsuit filed under the pseudonym "Katie Johnson," a case that was filed multiple times with different lawyers and different versions of the story.

The accuser never appeared publicly, never testified, and never produced corroborating evidence. Her own lawyers eventually withdrew, and the accuser dismissed the lawsuit herself right before the election, citing threats.

No criminal case was ever opened, no verified witnesses ever came forward, and no evidence ever survived basic scrutiny. Even media outlets hostile to Trump ultimately concluded the accusation was unverifiable.

#135 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 02:32 PM | Reply

Bathhouse Bill, the decomposing orange child rapist threatened to have Katie Johnson killed.

#136 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-11-21 02:34 PM | Reply

Rein,

"the decomposing orange child rapist threatened to have Katie Johnson killed."

That's a huge claim. Show me some evidence, not allegation, evidence.

If you can't produce a source that verifies an actual threat, then you're just repeating internet gossip.

#137 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 02:41 PM | Reply

#135 The normalization of pedophilia continues unabated by BJ boi.

#138 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-21 02:42 PM | Reply

Lady B, stuff this is in your bathhouse ballot box.

www.politico.com

#139 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-11-21 02:44 PM | Reply

"You've yet to answer my question. If Trump is the anti-Christ, where is the Christ he's in opposition to."

Everywhere.

Everywhere there's honesty, good intentions, good works, and honorable treatment. Trump offers none.

Now name two commandments Trump follows, or two aspects of the antichrist he doesn't.

#140 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 02:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"If you can't produce a source that verifies..."

Interesting. That's your barometer for others, but not for yourself.

For example, Oregon has been using mail-in ballots for 30 years. You can't produce a source that verifies your claim about stolen ballots.

The Military has been using mail-in ballots for over 150 years. You can't produce a source that verifies your claim about stolen ballots.

Are you just repeating internet gossip?

#141 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 02:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

" stuff this is in your bathhouse ballot box."

I checked the link. Twenty-Four mentions of threats.

I wonder if BillJohnson will admit his lie and apologize..

#142 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 02:52 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Interesting. That's your barometer for others, but not for yourself."

I couldn't find anything after looking.

Actually, you're the "show me the links" person, not me.

#143 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 02:52 PM | Reply

"I couldn't find anything after looking."

Search the word "threat".

24 hits.

#144 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 02:53 PM | Reply

Dan,

There's no shortage of accusations.

I can't find any information about evidence.

Actual, verifiable, documented evidence.

#145 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 03:03 PM | Reply

Dan,

Yea...talk about ballots...make Laura's day.

I have errands to run. Wife need get stuff for our vaca.

#146 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 03:04 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Are you just repeating internet gossip?"

Mail in ballots, even absentee ballots have a built in inherent risk because they are uncounted ballots being transported.

In small numbers, the risk is less.

Larger numbers of these such as millions is a higher risk and I predict will lead to another catastrophe in a future election.

My own experience with these kind of setups make me my own authority on the matter.

#147 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 03:32 PM | Reply

#147 Just making sh*t up and trying to pass it along as intelligent discourse.

#148 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-21 03:35 PM | Reply

Mail in ballots, even absentee ballots have a built in inherent risk because they are uncounted ballots being transported.
In small numbers, the risk is less.
Larger numbers of these such as millions is a higher risk and I predict will lead to another catastrophe in a future election.
My own experience with these kind of setups make me my own authority on the matter.

Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 03:32 PM | Reply

ROFLMMFAO HEHEHEHEHE THAT'S HILARIOUS

They're coming to take me away hehe oh oh.

#149 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-11-21 03:36 PM | Reply

#149 The flip side of that single: "!aaaH-aH ,yawA eM ekaT oT gnimoC er'yehT"

#150 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-21 03:42 PM | Reply

"Mail in ballots, even absentee ballots have a built in inherent risk because they are uncounted ballots being transported."

States have confirmation systems. If you were correct, there would be lots of folks who complained of mailing in, but the system didn't confirm. Where are they??? Oregon, in particular, has 30 years of data you could check.

"Larger numbers of these such as millions is a higher risk..."

You have no proof of that, and the links above literally prove you wrong.

"... and I predict will lead to another catastrophe in a future election"

ANOTHER catastrophe?!? The "catastrophe" you're referring to is Trump's honest loss. The "catastrophe" was liars like you who made untrue claims. And FIVE YEARS LATER, you still have no proof...and you're calling it a CATASTROPHE?!?

You're just upset "certain" people got to vote who you wish wouldn't.

Ultimately, every legal voter should be able to choose the way they cast their legal vote.

#151 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 03:50 PM | Reply

#151 'Twas a sick burn, Danforth. Excellent writing. Congratulations!

#152 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-21 03:56 PM | Reply

"My own experience with these kind of setups make me my own authority"

It shows. You've never acknowledged ballots are serialized and watermarked. You've never admitted a returned mail-in ballot not requested is investigated. You've never even addressed the math problem of any minor incidences being offset by similar incidences from the other side. Nor have you accepted the impossibility of crime at scale, at least by the individual voter. And you've NEVER admitted if no one has come forward, especially five years after a close election, your theory is statistically impossible.

FTW, the Heritage Foundation's compendium on vote fraud convictions shows a few fascinating things:

States average about one conviction per state per year.
Most of the crimes are done by canvassers, cullers, or counters...not voters.
When voters do it, it's almost always the garden-variety kind: either voting for a newly-deceased member of the household, or voting twice because of a move, and land ownership (and the ability for voting registration) in two states.
The number of fraudulently-cast votes is almost always ONE.
Never fraud at scale (except for the "Three Cs", above)
Never fraud by trying multiple votes at the same precinct, disguised.

Oh, and the most common reason given when a reason was given? I thought the other side was doing it.
electionfraud.heritage.org<>

#153 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 04:08 PM | Reply

Dan,

"Ultimately, every legal voter should be able to choose the way they cast their legal vote."

With voting, the opportunity to vote without hinderance or pressure to vote a particular way, is very important.

Voting out of sight of family members or anyone who might pressure you, is critical for a free election.

Considering the dynamics of home settings and the ease of pressuring members of the family, in person private voting is the only solution.

Providing the option to vote with mail ballots, the leader of a group or family may dictate how they will all vote. That would negate your idea that "every legal voter should be able to choose the way they cast their legal vote". I do agree with you but the dynamics of family may prevent that.

Requiring in person secure private voting is critical for a true democracy.

Setting up early voting is a fair way to give people time to get to the polls.

Then scan the ballot as they leave.

KISS.

"Keep it simple stupid."

#154 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 04:09 PM | Reply

"Setting up early voting is a fair way to give people time to get to the polls."

Manning the polls for weeks on end before the election costs about 100x more than simply mailing them a ballot.
But mailing them a ballot is not 100x as risky.
It's not even 2x as risky.

I thought you said you understood accounting.
I think you only understand how to lie.

#155 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-21 04:14 PM | Reply

Dan,

"You've never acknowledged ballots are serialized and watermarked. You've never admitted a returned mail-in ballot not requested is investigated. You've never even addressed the math problem of any minor incidences being offset by similar incidences from the other side."

WAAAY too much to do and keep track of and too many processes and check and balances.

Or...mark your little circle, feed your ballot into the scanner and leave...

You voted and your vote was counted.

#156 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 04:15 PM | Reply

"Considering the dynamics of home settings and the ease of pressuring members of the family, in person private voting is the only solution."

It would have to happen A LOT MORE on one "side" to make any statistical difference.

"Requiring in person secure private voting is critical for a true democracy."

It's also much, MUCH easier to control. You'd be suppressing more votes than any proven fraud.

"the opportunity to vote without hinderance or pressure to vote a particular way, is very important."

Just seal the envelope before you give it back to your wife.

#157 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 04:15 PM | Reply

Re 152

Dan's the Man!

Sadly it will be to no avail. No offense to either of you for trying.

Bill is a lost soul and no amount of reality will dissuade him from his delusions.

His attempts to rewrite the facts and the truths of history to ease the storms in his "soul" will come to naught.

A believer believes what he wants to believe no matter what Life or History teaches them. Many have gone to their graves that way. I suspect BJ will just be another lost soul who thinks he knows stuff and will go to his grave with a smug look on his face when he really knows nothing of the Nothing. Until he enters the "Nothing".

Another Life full of sound and fury signifying nothing (about nothing).

#158 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-21 04:17 PM | Reply

Mail in voting has been going on since 1775 without issues. Why would there be issues now?? Let's face facts.

#159 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-11-21 04:18 PM | Reply

#154 So, BJ boi claims that "papa bear might make mama bear vote against what mama bear wants."

Did he really say that as a reason against voting by mail?

Because of his imaginary nightmare of papa bear and mama bear?

#160 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-21 04:19 PM | Reply

Snoofy,

I'm talking about risk management, not cost.

You're questioning my accounting knowledge and experience?

That's bold. Let me know when you've spent decades dealing with accounting information systems where accuracy matter.

#161 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2025-11-21 04:20 PM | Reply

"WAAAY too much to do and keep track of..."

Not if you want the voter to participate.

You want to be able to exclude certain folks, with long lines, too-few precincts, lane closures, bus line disruptions, and targeted windows of voting.

My belief is every legal voter should be empowered to cast their legal vote in the manner of their choosing.

#162 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 04:20 PM | Reply

Oh good Lord. Do we have to go through this one over and over?? It's been 5 years now and we're STILL going over the ssdd. Give it up BillJohnson. You're full of BS and you know it too. Sighhhhhhhhhhhhhh

#163 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-11-21 04:28 PM | Reply

"You're questioning my accounting knowledge and experience?"

You certainly flunk at probability and statistics. Not to mention logic and human nature.

Tell us again how you're your own expert.

#164 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-11-21 04:28 PM | Reply

- WAAAY too much to do

No one ever said that Democracy is easy; what Thomas Jefferson said was we would likely lose it to banks and corporations and the elite because that's what usually happens throughout history.

And with the first White House for Sale! Billionaire President and his wealthiest Cabinet in History and his wealthiest Elite donors in history... Democracy is well on the way down the toilet as Jefferson predicted.

And Trump's Cult? They couldn't care less about the failure of Democracy to the bullying of Capitol.

Because they still think they won something... and they did; what I just described.

#165 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-21 04:41 PM | Reply

Or, Capital, sheesh!

#166 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-21 04:47 PM | Reply

Re 166

The bullying of THE Capitol OR of Capital.

No one likes bullies except wannabe bullies.

(Bullies-in-waiting)

Bullies do not believe in YOUR liberty. Only their own.

#167 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-21 05:47 PM | Reply

They seem incapable of thinking beyond their own interests...

"The behavior you are describing is generally referred to as egocentrism or a lack of empathy.
Egocentrism is a cognitive bias where a person is unable to understand or consider that other people may have a different perspective, opinions, or feelings than their own.

While common in childhood development, some adults retain this self-focused mindset and struggle to imagine a viewpoint other than their own.

A lack of empathy is the inability to understand or share the feelings of another person. This can be a trait in various personality types or conditions.

The inability to think beyond one's own interests can also be associated with:

Narcissism: This personality trait involves a constant need for admiration and an excessive focus on oneself, often stemming from a need to feel important and valued.

Cognitive Bias: People may exhibit biases, such as the false consensus effect (overestimating how much others share their perspective) or the Dunning-Kruger effect (overestimating their own competence due to a lack of knowledge in a specific area).

Personality Disorders: Certain personality disorders, such as schizoid personality disorder or aspects of Borderline Personality Disorder, can involve being absorbed in one's own thinking or difficulty maintaining stable relationships due to a limited perception of others.

Lack of Theory of Mind: This is the ability to recognize that other people's experiences and thoughts are separate from one's own.

Most people develop this skill in childhood, but some do not.

If you are dealing with someone who exhibits this behavior, it can be emotionally challenging, and you may need to set boundaries or seek support for yourself."

www.google.com

#168 | Posted by Corky at 2025-11-21 06:00 PM | Reply

"I'm talking about risk management, not cost."

You aren't, though.
You are hinting at risk.
But you are not able to quantify the risk.

And you're especially not willing to quantify the number of eligible voters who won't be able to vote if their vote by mail is taken away.

You have decided, instead, those voters deserve to be disenfranchised if they can't make it to the polls in person.

#169 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-21 06:01 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort