"Early voting takes care of nearly any obstacle."

That's not what's being proposed. And same-day voting is currently up to each state.

"Nothing would please you except getting everything to be your way."

My way isn't to please ME, it's to cater to every legal voter, who should be able to cast every legal vote the way THEY want to cast it. You want to be able to make it harder on certain people you wish wouldn't vote. You've already admitted you don't believe it should be made easier for the legal voter to cast a legal vote.

"That's twisting my words."

I asked you directly if it should be made harder or easier for a legal voter to cast a legal vote, and you said it certainly shouldn't be made any easier.

Why won't you address the real world ability to suppress votes on Election Day??? More votes get suppressed that way than ALL THE FRAUD you can find.

"You're still talking about past elections."

You want to alter current and future elections with limitations based on lies you've told, and fantasies you've made up in your head. Thanks, but no thanks.

You've already admitted you don't believe it should be made easier for the legal voter to cast a legal vote. Not much else needs to be said.

You've never addressed ANY of the half-dozen methods of suppressing votes if mail-in ballots are disallowed.

Ultimately, it's clear: You're a vote suppressionist, hiding behind the skirt of false premises.

"My point is you can't honestly say "mail-in ballots are perfectly fine""

If anything WASN'T fine, at a scale needed to influence a Presidential election, THOUSANDS of people would be screaming about it.

At long last...where are they? They can't ALL be holding their tongues, that defies human nature and macro-statistics, not to mention common sense. Does it exist? Of course. At any scale? NFW.

The fact NO ONE has come forward with "BJ's Complaint" should tell anyone with a room temperature IQ or better it's imaginary.

Let me guess: you graduated first in your class at Dunning-Kruger???

Years back, AG Kris Kobach of Kansas famously begged the legislature for millions in funding, saying he had "over 100 cases" ready to file against illegal immigrant voters.

After four years, and millions of wasted dollars, Kobach found NINE: Two addled seniors, 4 folks who moved from (super red) Western KS to (super red) Eastern CO and voted twice, a pair of garden variety instances, where someone voted for their dead spouse or dead MIL (One got caught when he put the actual signature date on his wife's "signature"), and ONE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT. All 9 of these are detailed on the Heritage Foundation website.

When asked who these folks voted for, Kobach's team said they "didn't track" that. Anybody believe that manure??? No doubt, all 9 voted Republican, or you'd be hearing about it.

And the most common reason given, when a reason was given? I believed the other side was doing it.

I thought I had dyslexia at 55.

Turned out, I just had the number backwards.

"You believe my opinion on mail-in ballots has anything to do with religion?"

Well, since you have no evidence of this EVER happening ANYWHERE, it's obvious science, math, logic, and human nature are all eliminated. What else is left if not blind faith???

^"I believe you're in favor of mail-in ballots ..."

Should be:

"I believe you're AGAINST mail-in ballots..."

Apologies for the 180 degree screwup.

"You believe my opinion on mail-in ballots has anything to do with religion?"

I believe you're in favor of mail-in ballots because they're the hardest to suppress. It makes voting easier, for a voting bloc you don't want to have easier access to the ballot box.

Meanwhile, In-person, same-day voting is the easiest to suppress, with small windows to vote, same-day voting on a workday, disrupted bus lines, construction along main thoroughfares, minimal precincts, and four-hour waits.

I believe it should be made easier for the legal voter to cast their legal vote, and the voter should be able to choose THEIR METHOD of voting. I don't see where you get to make that decision for them.