Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

Menu

Subscriptions

Drudge Retort RSS feed RSS Feed

Links

Recent Comments

Recent comments from all news stories on this site. Users must follow the site's moderation policy. Personal attacks, profanity, abusive conduct and expressions of prejudice are not allowed. If you want to retrieve a comment of yours that was recently deleted, visit your user page and click the Moderation link.

States milking the Federal Government on these assistance programs are going to be penalized.
#12 | Posted by lfthndthrds

You think the states are getting penalized?

The States, along with the SNAP beneficiaries, are simply pass-throughs for Federal dollars to end up in private business nightly deposits.

This is yet another move that reduces GDP and harms the economy. That's a price Republicans are happy to pay, if if harms the poor.

As with every policy you support, you support it because it kicks people when they are down!

SNAP cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will significantly impair recession response
www.brookings.edu

"USDA has estimated that each additional dollar spent on SNAP benefits causes total economic activity to increase by $1.40 to $1.50 in a general economic downturn."

"A recent study found that when a state receives federal assistance that allows it to avoid $1.00 in program cuts, at least $1.70 in additional economic activity results."

"Rigorous research evidence finds that SNAP work requirements do not increase employment, as we describe more fully in this primer and these proposals. Further, expanded work requirements will diminish SNAP as an automatic stabilizer and will penalize workers during recessions, as discussed below."

"even among low-wage service workers without minor children in the household who meet work requirements on an annual basis (i.e., who work an average of more than 80 hours per month over the year as a whole), 42 percent have at least one month with less than 80 work hours, and 25 percent have at least one month of unemployment. This was the case in 2022, when the economy was not in a recession and labor market conditions were improving."

"To be clear, SNAP's 10 percent unemployment rule under OBBBA stands out as an exceptionally high standard. At the national level, 10 percent unemployment was reached in only one month during the entire Great Recession. About 40 percent of the population lived in a county where county-level unemployment never reached 10 percent for even a single month during the Great Recession, the deepest and longest recession in recent decades."

I was reluctant to post this, but it is relevant:

This pole is far worse than any Flock Camera 64K views 9 days ago

This one might also explain some of the detentionsplaining:

Bombshell: a new DOJ rule on prisons - sorry it's in shorts format, but again - it's relevant.

Decent analysis. Something seems to be brewing on the ground as Russian air defenses get thinner and thinner.

What were the consequences I listed?
No job. No home. Everyone all at once.
#12 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-06-25 01:04 PM
Domestics that cost more than foreigners are parasites on profits.
#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-06-25 01:15 PM
... you two aren't even close to the same page. "No job". There's a job. It's just elsewhere now. The parasitical framing is inexorably linked to the person that took the job.
f you guys, now southpark is in my head. THEY TOOOOKED URRRR JUBZ!
Just go ahead and hold hands with the anti H1-B crowd, it's the same message.
#15 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2026-06-25 03:15 PM

In the SF Bay area housing is extremely expensive and jobs were all moved offshore.

At the same time police were rounding up all of the homeless to drop them off downtown.

Thousands and thousands flooding the city - schools were shut down, businesses shut down - by design.

It was to increase funding for militarization of police and to purchase the properties - that's it.

Destroying and entire city with an incredible economic opportunity is parasite capitalism at it's more real.

So, you believe that it's fine, people will survive and move on. To where? Work where?

They simply don't want liberals or socialists or whatever else they frame us poors as.

Most of my workforce were under 30 - so these were their first homes, families and careers.

They weren't let go because of work ethic or capabilities - it's because of imposed costs and no assistance from or prevention of offshoring.

Ownership societies should be eliminated instead, imo.

Drudge Retort

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy