Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, July 07, 2025

President Trump's Justice Department and FBI have concluded they have no evidence that convicted sex offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed powerful figures ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

A Department of Justice memo says there is no evidence Epstein kept a "client list" or blackmailed prominent individuals.

[image or embed]

-- Newsweek (@newsweek.com) Jul 7, 2025 at 5:48 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

MeidasTouch

@meidastouch.com
Pam Bondi in February: The Epstein client list is sitting on my desk right now to review.

Pam Bondi today: There is no Epstein client list and no "further disclosure" of Epstein-related material "would be appropriate or warranted."

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-06 10:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 4

no "further disclosure" of Epstein-related material "would be appropriate or warranted."

Why would she be covering up for Bubba?

#2 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-07-06 10:50 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

The last time the Epstein files were to be disclosed by Pam Bondi but weren't, CIA released an unclassified UFO report from the USSR. The distraction worked; Joe Rogaine was talking about the 'nothing-burger' ad nauseum. Now CIA released a small batch of JFK assassination records, one showing that CIA was covertly monitoring Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK's assassination (something they denied for decades). CIA officer George Joannides used the alias 'Howard Mark Gebler' to monitor Lee Harvey Oswald and pro-Castro groups: www.cia.gov

We'll see how effective this latest distraction from CIA will be to make us forget about Jeffrey Epstein.

Endnote: I'm sure Ghislaine Maxwell (USMS # 02879-509) knows more than she has admitted to. She is in Tallahassee FCI and will be released 17 July 2037.

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-06 11:09 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Bull ------- ----.

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-07 12:42 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

i.ytimg.com

#5 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-07 12:51 AM | Reply

Schrdinger's Epstein client list. It's simultaneously on Pam Bondi's desk and also non-existent.

#6 | Posted by lee_the_agent at 2025-07-07 08:20 AM | Reply | Funny: 3 | Newsworthy 2

I've stopped caring about this topic because I suspect it's largely made up bulls(*& that was used to rile up the rubes. It was all about insinuation and suggestion, not any real knowledge or reality of a list or known information.

Even if a list as released at this point, I probably wouldn't put much trust in it since any name could be put on it for whatever reasons the people releasing it want or, conversely, names removed or omitted at will.

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-07 09:59 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

The Epstein client list mysteriously vanished as soon as they found Trump's name on it.

#8 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-07-07 10:30 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 5

Must have fallen off of Blondi's desk and into the trash. Those things happen. Oh well. And Epstein is still dead. Case closed...

#9 | Posted by catdog at 2025-07-07 11:59 AM | Reply

Top MAGA voices stunned by Trump administration debunking Epstein theories
www.axios.com

#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 12:00 PM | Reply

Some Republicans and conspiracy theorists wanted to stick it to Bill Clinton with the Epstein files, but Pam Bondi realized it will also expose sexual maniac Dummkopf Trumpf, so now she attempts this sudden and clumsy legerdemain.

Links:

sun9-35.userapi.com

www.theguardian.com

#11 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-07 12:29 PM | Reply

There was a client list; and Epstein was murdered by Trump.

#12 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-07 12:29 PM | Reply

Of course Bondi had been implying that she has the goods. All she has is egg on her face.

#13 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-07 12:29 PM | Reply

#13 | Posted by BellRinger

"Implying" This is why you are a joke. She literally said "it is on my desk right now" in an interview on the news. You saw her face, her lips moving, her voice, yet somehow she just implied that she had it. It is not egg on her face, it is the same dirty orange smear you wear here everyday from kissing Trumps ---.

#14 | Posted by justagirl_idaho at 2025-07-07 12:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 9

This is why you are a joke.

There's a plethora of reasons.

#15 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-07-07 12:48 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 5

She literally said "it is on my desk right now"

#14 | POSTED BY JUSTAGIRL_IDAHO

1) There is a List

2) Trump's name was obviously on it.

3) Trump had motive and opportunity to have Epstein killed.

#16 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-07 01:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

#14 | Posted by justagirl_idaho at 2025-07-07 12:42 PM | Reply | Flag:

FFS the Biden Admin had 4 years to do something with it and they just sat on their hands.

#17 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-07-07 01:12 PM | Reply

FFS the Biden Admin had 4 years to do something with it and they just sat on their hands.

#17 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

FFS were you cowering in a cave for those 4 years?

#18 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-07-07 01:15 PM | Reply

@#17 ... the Biden Admin had 4 years to do something with it ...

The Biden admin did not "disappear" the list, though, as AG Bondi has said that it was on her desk.

And, if Pres Trump's name were on the list, wouldn't the Biden admin have published it, according to the "lawfare" allegations your current alias so often says about that admin?


#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 01:27 PM | Reply

FFS the Biden Admin had 4 years to do something with it and they just sat on their hands.

#17 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Duhhhhh BiDenZ!!!

#20 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-07 01:30 PM | Reply

Duhhhhh BiDenZ!!!

#20 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-07 01:30 PM | Reply | Flag:

LMAO @ this moron. Fkking raetard wants someone he didn't/wouldn't vote for to do something the guy he DID vote for wouldn't do....

#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-07-07 01:37 PM | Reply

Tim Hannan
@TimHannan

Follow
Donald Trump is going to have to bomb another country to get this latest Epstein ---- out of the news cycle.
8:40 AM Jul 7, 2025

#22 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-07 02:02 PM | Reply

LMAO @ this moron. Fkking raetard wants someone he didn't/wouldn't vote for to do something the guy he DID vote for wouldn't do....

#21 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Look at my post above you stupid pile of s(*&.

Now tell me again what your stupid a*& thinks I want...

F*&^ing idiot.

#23 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-07 03:17 PM | Reply

MAGA Stunned by Officials Debunking Epstein Theories

www.axios.com

Lol

#26 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-07 03:55 PM | Reply

It's a comedy, not a tragedy.
#27 | POSTED BY FREEWILLY

It's a comedy AND a tragedy.

#28 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-07-07 04:02 PM | Reply

" 14 | POSTED BY JUSTAGIRL_IDAHO AT 2025-07-07 12:42 PM | FLAG: | "

JFC. Calm the eff down. I don't recall exactly what she said and went off memory, which is imperfect.

You people lose your minds every time you see: posted by Bellringer

#31 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-07 04:20 PM | Reply

This is what I found regarding Bondi and a client list:

Asked if the Department of Justice would be releasing a list of Epstein's clients, Bondi said on Friday, February 21: "It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump."

www.newsweek.com

#32 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-07 04:29 PM | Reply

There's flight logs.

#33 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-07 04:37 PM | Reply

You people lose your minds every time you see: posted by Bellringer

#31 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Why is that do you suppose?

#34 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-07 04:42 PM | Reply

Cross-examination, anything further of this witness?

Yes, Your Honor, thank you.

Just one more question, Ms. Bondi. Back in February, you said you had a long list of Mr. Epstein's clients. Yet today you say there is no such thing. My question to you, ma'am, is, were you lying then or are you lying now?

(Dramatic music)

#35 | Posted by cbob at 2025-07-07 04:42 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 2

POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Let me give you a hint:

You do things like run away when asked to defend Trump's cuts to the National Weather Service.

You won't even say that you can't defend them. You just go away.

#36 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-07 04:43 PM | Reply

You people lose your minds every time you see: posted by Bellringer
#31 | POSTED BY BULLBRINGER

When JustAGirl (hi there!) takes the time to log in to tell you to shut up, perhaps the issue isn't, "you people" and in fact, you.

Take a moment and gain some perspective.

#37 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-07 04:44 PM | Reply

" You do things like run away when asked to defend Trump's cuts to the National Weather Service"

Those cuts occur in October and are unrelated to this flash flood because they haven't taken place yet.

#38 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-07 04:56 PM | Reply

Patricide Jeff lies again.

Hundreds of weather forecasters fired in latest wave of DOGE cuts

www.click2houston.com

#39 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-07 05:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#39: Mexicans? Coming across the border to help with the Texas floods? Were any of these invaders shot at the Special Military Zone?

#40 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-07 05:04 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

You people lose your minds every time you see: posted by Bellringer

#31 | Posted by BellRinger

First of all, you love it. It's the only reason you come here.

Second, you always seem taken aback when your ignorance or stupidity is called out and treated as such. It would be funnier if you weren't so confident and loud about it.

#41 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-07 05:15 PM | Reply

Those cuts occur in October and are unrelated to this flash flood because they haven't taken place yet.

#38 | Posted by BellRinger

Why don't you try taking Trump's balls out of your mouth long enough to actually look into something before speaking?

Well over 1,000 NWS employees were canned immediately following Trump's inauguration.

apnews.com

#42 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-07 05:18 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

And once again, JEFF runs away when proven wrong.

#43 | Posted by rstybeach11 at 2025-07-07 05:53 PM | Reply

Those cuts occur in October and are unrelated to this flash flood because they haven't taken place yet.

#38 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

The ATTACKS on the NWS and the gutting of it's personal and expertise started happening almost immediately.

What you've done is regurgitate what MAGA has settled on for it's defense.

It works only on very ignorant people.

#44 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-07 05:56 PM | Reply

Curious that no one wanted to put their signature on the FBI Memo making this announcement. ( www.justice.gov )


Stated differently, the FBI memo is unsigned.

No one seems to want to take responsibility for publishing it.

Why?


#45 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 06:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 5

@#31 ... You people lose your minds every time you see: posted by Bellringer ...

Pass coffee through my nose? Yes.

Lose my mind? Not a chance.

Your current alias has, in the past, stated (I paraphrase) it likes the attention it gets.


#46 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 06:23 PM | Reply

Lose my mind? Not a chance.
~ Gaslighter

true, this alias can't lose its mind twice.

No one seems to want to take responsibility for publishing it.

Its unverified this has been released to the public.
You know how I know you aren't the techie you claim to be, just look at the URL, then find one that is actually released.

The ATTACKS on the NWS and the gutting of it's personal and expertise started happening almost immediately.
~ Zedinsky

So what ... it didn't have any affect on the quality of forecast or the warnings.

Tom Fahy, the legislative director for the National Weather Service Employees Organization, a union that represents government employees, said the San Antonio weather forecasting office did not have two of its top positions filled " a permanent science officer (a role that conducts training and is in charge of implementing new technology) or a warning coordination meteorologist (who coordinates with the media and is the public face of the office), though there are employees acting in those leadership roles. Overall, Fahy said, the offices had enough meteorologists to respond to the event.

"The WFOs [weather forecasting offices] had adequate staffing and resources as they issued timely forecasts and warnings leading up to the storm," Fahy said Saturday, but he added that he was concerned about the unfilled senior positions and vacuums of leadership.

www.nbcnews.com

#47 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-07-07 07:10 PM | Reply

@#47 ... Its unverified this has been released to the public. ...

In my comment your current alias responded to there is a link to a PDF of the memo on the Justice Dept website.


#49 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 07:27 PM | Reply

The weather service for that county increased staff for the weather event and the first of multiple flash flood warnings (each following warning was more severe) was given 3 hours before the water began to rise. . As the water settles and investigations ensue to see if certain actions or protocols weren't taken that should have, then yeah let's call that out if the evidence shows that to be the case.

Preliminary assessment shows more than adequate staffing and first flash flood warning was well in advance of the water rising.

" Why don't you try taking Trump's balls out of your mouth long enough to actually look into something before speaking?

Well over 1,000 NWS employees were canned immediately following Trump's inauguration.
apnews.com

#42 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2025-07-07 05:18 PM | REPLY "

I DID look into it and right now the facts don't show any evidence that weather service was hampered for this event. You currently have nothing to show otherwise. Of course, that doesn't keep you from running with a narrative anyway.

#50 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-07 07:31 PM | Reply

"I DID look into it and right now the facts don't show any evidence that weather service was hampered for this event."

So, no job cuts after all?

#51 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-07 07:32 PM | Reply

Deaths caused by the-------------'s staffing cuts were predicted.

Our worst nightmare is that weather forecast offices will be so understaffed that there will be needless loss of life.

www.theinvadingsea.com

#52 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-07 07:42 PM | Reply

Interesting.

Why the deflection from this thread's topic?

#53 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 07:47 PM | Reply

I DID look into it and right now the facts don't show any evidence that weather service was hampered for this event.

#50 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

You didn't really look at all.

Come on. The predicted consequences of Trump's behavior came true and people died.

This only surprises you.

#54 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-07 07:55 PM | Reply

Hey, Zed, please put this weather stuff on the proper thread.

#55 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 07:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

0 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Donald is going to kill more people.

It will be a repeat of his first term.

Sociopaths don't value lives.

At all.

#56 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-07 07:57 PM | Reply

Any evidence that existed was destroyed under Biden when the case was handled by the NYC FBI office - or, is being used now to blackmail the people on the list. For me, I believe Epstein was Mossad, which also explains how Israel has so much control over our country. Part of this being closed could simply be to shield Israel and avoid disruptions to the economy and government. But, I say actually release all the files and those that did wrongs need to be punished - and I 100% believe there is client list.

#57 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-07 08:12 PM | Reply

Bondi had the client list but ran it through a shredder after the brain dead-------------'s name kept appearing.

#58 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-07 08:14 PM | Reply

" Bondi had the client list but ran it through a shredder after the brain dead-------------'s name kept appearing.

#58 | POSTED BY REINHEITSGEBOT AT 2025-07-07 08:14 PM | FLAG: "

That was the first thought that crossed my mind. But then I backed up and thought about how hard Democrats tried to throw Trump in jail and have him removed from the ballot. If a list does (did?) exist and Trump's name was on it, no way that doesn't get leaked to the press while Biden was in office.

#59 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-07 08:21 PM | Reply

"If a list does (did?) exist and Trump's name was on it, no way that doesn't get leaked to the press while Biden was in office.
#59 | Posted by BellRinger"

BINGO!

The only logical conclusion is that 'too big of names' were on it (not Trump) and or the FBI shredded it under Biden.

On the 'too big of names' - the justification I can see is it if contained US military and or politicians that were blackmailed into committed treason against the US. That would move it outside simple embarrassment to calls for public execution. I could see Rubio on that list - he is the exact type of person that they would target and his 100% support for Israel may be the result.

#60 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-07 08:36 PM | Reply

@#59 ... If a list does (did?) exist

Why did AG Bondi say she had the list?

Bondi says Epstein client list sitting on my desk' for review (Febrile 2025)
thehill.com

... The alleged "client list" of disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is on Attorney General Pam Bondi's desk, she said in an interview Friday, making the elusive document one step closer to potential public release. ...

"It's sitting on my desk right now to review," Bondi told Fox News. "That's been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that." ...



#61 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 08:46 PM | Reply

@#61 ... Febrile 2025 ...

Wow, spell check gone awry ...

Should be ...

February 2025

Apologies for that.

#62 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 08:49 PM | Reply

Translation: Trump is a regular on Epstein's client list and we are covering it up.

#63 | Posted by a_monson at 2025-07-07 08:58 PM | Reply

" Why did AG Bondi say she had the list?"

Good question. She has certainly made herself look bad by doing so.

#64 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-07 09:14 PM | Reply

"Good question. She has certainly made herself look bad by doing so.
#64 | Posted by BellRinger"

Either she is a liar or made the assumption that it was included in the files the FBI were hiding in NYC and was wrong.

#65 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-07 09:32 PM | Reply

#65 Either way she comes out of this looking bad.

#66 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-07 09:39 PM | Reply

@#64 ... She has certainly made herself look bad by doing so. ...

She did not just make herself look bad, as your current alias seems to assert.

She, the AG, has shown herself to apparently be a liar.

So, the question becomes, why did she apparently deliberately mislead?


#67 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 09:51 PM | Reply

" So, the question becomes, why did she apparently deliberately mislead?"

I have no idea. It worked out badly for her.

#68 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-07-07 09:59 PM | Reply

And you stupid ------- ---- thinks Vince Foster was murdered. You're a ------- joke, little boy

#69 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-07 10:18 PM | Reply

@#68 ... It worked out badly for her. ...

Well, yeah. But why?


From #45 ...

... Curious that no one wanted to put their signature on the FBI Memo making this announcement. ( www.justice.gov )

Stated differently, the FBI memo is unsigned.

No one seems to want to take responsibility for publishing it.

Why? ...



Why did it, as your current alias has said, work out badly for her?

Maybe because the AG flat-out lied?

I wish I knew.


#70 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 10:20 PM | Reply

Jeff is a pathetic loser and a ------- coward.

#71 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-07 10:22 PM | Reply

"#65 Either way she comes out of this looking bad.
#66 | Posted by BellRinger"

Yep - she needs to be fired and they need to appoint Matt Gaetz at the next Senate recess to win back the trust of MAGA.

#72 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-07 10:25 PM | Reply

@#72 ... she needs to be fired ...

Why, because she may have told the truth back in February?



#73 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-07 10:51 PM | Reply

Matt Gaetz? ---- off Jeff.

#74 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-07 10:52 PM | Reply

"Why, because she may have told the truth back in February?
#73 | Posted by LampLighter"

Because she lost the public trust - she lied then (or assumed wrong - incompetence) or she is lying now. There is no explanation under which she deserves to keep her job.

#75 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-07 11:06 PM | Reply

Fat Donnie Loser lies EVERY ------- DAY, imbecile.

#76 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-08 12:08 AM | Reply

@#75 ... Because she lost the public trust - she lied then ...

What public trust has she lost for telling the apparent truth? Please be specific.

But more to the point of your current trolling alias' point ... Did she lie then?

How does your current alias know that?

#77 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-08 12:15 AM | Reply

"#77 | Posted by LampLighter "

As anyone with reading comprehension can gather from what I already posted: she lied then, she is lying now, or she is incompetent. At least one is true - thus, she should be fired.

#78 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 01:07 AM | Reply

@#78 ... As anyone ...

So, the usual MAGA excuse, i.e., nothing more in the way of substantiation besides saying, agree with me, otherwise you are clueless?


And, yes, I do agree that she is clueless.

Yet Pres Trump seems to want her in that position.

Why? Unfettered adulation instead of competence?


imo, that's the main issue here to discuss.



#79 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-08 01:15 AM | Reply

Ahhh the "list." I have two views on it, either there was never a formal list (only flight logs) that give you a hint. The other view is that the clearly very powerful people were partying with Epstein and we were never going to find out. Because let's face it, to the elites we are but plebs. Some plebs have more than others, but at the end of the day again we are plebs. We aren't them, we do not live in their world where rules are "bent" or outright trampled on. Thus there's the potential this was collectively swept under the rug during administrations from Bush part deux electric boogaloo until now.

I always thought if there was a list and Trump was on it, it was Biden's ace in the hole. Alas, perhaps there never was a list to begin with.

#80 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-07-08 01:24 AM | Reply

@#80 ... I always thought if there was a list and Trump was on it, it was Biden's ace in the hole. Alas, perhaps there never was a list to begin with. ...

Your current alias has "always" thought that?

I remain to be convinced of that.

... perhaps there never was a list to begin with ...

Yeah, that seems to be the current MAGA talking point, apparently trying to deflect.

No surprise there.

But why that apparent attempt?



#81 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-08 01:39 AM | Reply

Tubes - What Do You Want From Life (1975)
www.youtube.com

Lyrics excerpt ...

genius.com

...
What do you want from life?
To kidnap an heiress
Or threaten her with a knife?
What do you want from life?
To get cable TV
And watch it every night?

There you sit, a
Lump in your chair
Where do you sleep
And what do you wear
When you're sleeping

What do you want from life?
An Indian guru
To show you the inner light?
What do you want from life?
A meaningless love affair
With a girl that you met tonight?

How can you tell when you're doin' alright?
Does your bank account swell
While you're dreaming at night?
How do you know when you're really in love?
Do violins play when you're touching the one
That you're loving?
See pop shows near Foxborough
Get tickets as low as $255
You might also like
Don't Touch Me There
The Tubes
Smoke (La Vie En Fumer)
The Tubes
Boy Crazy
The Tubes
What do you want from life?
(What do you want from life?)
Someone to love
And somebody you can trust?
What do you want from life?
(What do you want from life?)
To try and be happy
While you do the nasty things you must?

What do you want from life?
What do you want from life?
What do you want from life?
What do you want from life?

Well, you can't have that, but
If you're an American citizen you are entitled to:
A heated kidney shaped pool
A microwave oven--don't watch the food cook
A Dyna-Gym--I'll personally demonstrate it in the privacy of your own home
A kingsize Titanic unsinkable Molly Brown waterbed with polybendum
A foolproof plan and an airtight alibi
Real simulated Indian jewelry!
A Gucci shoetree!
A year's supply of antibiotics
A personally autographed picture of Randy Mantooth
And Bob Dylan's new unlisted phone number
A beautifully restored 3rd Reich swizzle stick
Rosemary's baby!
A dream date in kneepads with Paul Williams
A new Matador
A new mastadon
A Maverick
A Mustang
A Montego
A Merc Montclair
A Mark IV
A meteor
A Mercedes
An MG
Or a Malibu?
A Mort Moriarty
A Maserati
A Mac truck
A Mazda
A new Monza
Or a moped
A Winnebago-- ----, a herd of Winnebago's, we're giving 'em away
Or how about a McCulloch chainsaw?
A Las Vegas wedding
A Mexican divorce
A solid gold Kama Sutra coffee pot
Or
A baby's arm holding an apple?
...


#82 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-08 01:43 AM | Reply

@#82 ... baby's arm holding an apple ...

Oh, that's an interesting reference.

baby's arm holding an apple
www.urbandictionary.com

Yeah, I'll leave it at that.

#83 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-07-08 01:45 AM | Reply

#82: Great lyrics. Reminds me of Pleasant Valley Sunday by the Monkees and an immortal song which I'll post in the Ozzy Osborne thread.

#84 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-08 02:05 AM | Reply

Working on behalf of my employer, who was an Epstein bosom buddy (both liked them vulnerable and young) until he says he wasn't, I can say without hesitation that my benefactor's name does not appear on Epstein's list of clients. If there was such a list. Which there isn't. Which is not the same as saying there wasn't. Know what I mean?
~ Pam Bondi
Flunky

#85 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-08 06:13 AM | Reply

WELL, Trumpers?

Were they lying THEN or are they lying NOW?
Because both the past hysteria (Epstein had a huge client list and its on the desk of...!) and the present statements (client list? We don't have no stinking client list!) cannot be true.

#86 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-07-08 06:28 AM | Reply

FFS the Biden Admin had 4 years to do something with it and they just sat on their hands.
#17 | Posted by lfthndthrds at his batcave (Mom's basement)

"Captain! The deflectors are already at 'maximum'!"

#87 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-07-08 06:32 AM | Reply

Hello Elon, do you have a copy of the list? You already made a pointed comment that Trump's name was on the Epstein list. DOGE had access to all files so it is logical DOGE would be digging to provide you with future leverage. Are you concerned about rapid unplanned disassembly or a rapid unplanned sudden stop? You have to know deportation will not be enough for your former paranoid friend group buddies.

It is already programmed for auto release in the event of any unforeseen or unfortunate future event. What can we infer if your name never finds its way back into Trump's mouth?

#88 | Posted by Hickory at 2025-07-08 08:38 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Bondi's "politics over reality" MO finally burned her stupid ass. Not nearly enough. This is "our" Attorney General that praised Bove for lying to a federal judge. The only idiots that ever believed in her did so because she covered Trump's ass from the start (e.g. dismissing the Florida action against Trump University and receiving a nice "campaign dontation" for it). She's unethical and scum - and always has been. No morality, no regard for what's right or what's legal.

She's a perfect representation of everything Trump and his administration is all about. Perfect.

#89 | Posted by YAV at 2025-07-08 09:29 AM | Reply

PAM.
Not even the most hardened criminals stick!

PAM.
Not just for cooking the books!

#90 | Posted by YAV at 2025-07-08 09:31 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

Do I believe anything the says under Pam Bondi or the FBI under Patel? ---- no. Do I believe a video showing Donald Trump partying with Epstein? Of course unless some Trumpie liar is going to pretend that was AI before AI was developed? If they wanted to figure out who his clients were there are plenty of ways they could do it but they don't want to.

#91 | Posted by danni at 2025-07-08 09:33 AM | Reply

#91: For almost 25 years Republicans have claimed water-boarding is an effective interrogation technique and not torture.

Ghislaine Maxwell (USMS# 02879-509) is in Tallahassee FCI with a release date of 17 July 2037. She knows everything. Start the taps....

#92 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-08 09:48 AM | Reply

Who thinks that any MRGA will care if the list is released and FDT's name is all over it? There is literally nothing he has done or will do that will break their belief that he's the next Messiah.

The DR fascists will find some reason to question the list, and move on from it, blaming Biden or some tinfoil hat conspiracy.

#93 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 11:07 AM | Reply

Who thinks that any MRGA will care if the list is released and FDT's name is all over it?

#93 | POSTED BY CHUFFY

No one.

But there is a List.

And Epstein wasn't a suicide.

#94 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-08 11:56 AM | Reply

There's a list. For sure. Whether it be one Epstein himself made or one that was produced based on other documents and witness testimony.

It was never going to be released. Too many powerful people on it, which is why they were targeted to begin with.

Wouldn't be surprised if that is at least a partial explanation for why so many Repubs have turned into spineless sycophants for Trump.

#95 | Posted by jpw at 2025-07-08 12:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Ahhh the "list." I have two views on it, either there was never a formal list (only flight logs) that give you a hint. The other view is that the clearly very powerful people were partying with Epstein and we were never going to find out. Because let's face it, to the elites we are but plebs. Some plebs have more than others, but at the end of the day again we are plebs. We aren't them, we do not live in their world where rules are "bent" or outright trampled on. Thus there's the potential this was collectively swept under the rug during administrations from Bush part deux electric boogaloo until now.

I always thought if there was a list and Trump was on it, it was Biden's ace in the hole. Alas, perhaps there never was a list to begin with.

#80 | Posted by Bluewaffles

If biden had released a list with trump's name on it you'd have called it fake.

Trump's whole pitch was "I'm not one of the corrupt elites. I'll fight against them for you." Hiding the esptein list is the most definitive proof yet that you got conned. But it's far easier to con a man than to get him to admit he was conned.

#96 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-07-08 01:23 PM | Reply

If there is an Epstein list and it is not being released then it is only because Trump does not want it released. Which is only true if he is prominently named numerous times on the list. Personally I believe this list is like the grenade that almost blew up in MAGA's hands. Meaning, there is a list, and it is mostly prominent right wing politicians and donors on that list. So, per the Trump administration, that means there is no list.

As the Talking Heads used to say, "same as it ever was."

#97 | Posted by moder8 at 2025-07-08 01:37 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Bondi also covered up for the orange rapist when his fraudulent university was under investigation.

americanoversight.org

#98 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-08 01:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Actually Speaks, if Trump's name had been on the list I would've accepted it for what it was. Because it's not a Left vs Right issue. It's a powerful vs powerless issue. I've stated previously, I support Trump for owning the Libs. That doesn't make him a paragon of virtue.

However, to take him down is to take them all down. So if there was a list, it would've meant taking out some deep pockets who donate to Dems as well ...

#99 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-07-08 03:35 PM | Reply

"Actually Speaks, if Trump's name had been on the list I would've accepted it for what it was."

Clear something up for me.

Are you saying you don't believe Trump raped underage girls during his documented visits to the island where underage girls get raped?

Or are you saying, you don't care if he did.

It's the latter, right?

#100 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 03:51 PM | Reply

The fact the list doesn't exist anymore.

After having been on Bondi's desk a week ago.

Is a cover up.

Whether you're willing to openly admit that or not, is a different matter.

#101 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 03:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"they have no evidence that convicted sex offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed powerful figures"

Now that's a narrowly tailored cop-out.

Epstein wasn't the blackmailer.

Epstein simply set up the powerful men with a thirteen year old offer they couldn't refuse.

#102 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 04:00 PM | Reply

I am only saying if his named appeared on the list, I would accept it. That is all.

#103 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-07-08 04:13 PM | Reply

What doubt do you have it doesn't.

There are over a dozen photographs of Trump and Epstein together, surrounded with girls who look like they're children.

Then there's the ones of him and Epstein and Maxwell.

There is a lot less proof of Hunter Biden's email and most republicans still think he's guilty.

#104 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 04:18 PM | Reply

If we are to make a comparison and I believe this is the correct one Clown solely based on the issue at hand... There's much more damning evidence that Bill Clinton was participating than Donald Trump.

#105 | Posted by Bluewaffles at 2025-07-08 04:47 PM | Reply

"There's much more damning evidence that Bill Clinton was participating than Donald Trump."

There is? Because there's a woman who claims Trump raped her at Epstein's parties when she was 13. What's more damning than that?

#106 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 05:20 PM | Reply

I am only saying if his named appeared on the list, I would accept it. That is all.
#103 | Posted by Bluewaffles

That doesn't answer the question, that just restates what was said.

What changes, when that is accepted?

Do you mean, you would acknowledge Trump is a rapist?

#107 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 05:22 PM | Reply

There's much more damning evidence that Bill Clinton was participating than Donald Trump.

Difference between us is, I have no issue with accepting the fact Bill was a regular at Epstein island. Based of photographs of the men together, Bill's fondness for promiscuity and the painting.

You on the other hand need DNA evidence before accepting Trump was friends with Epstein and very much a member of the island's vip club. The photographic evidence is abundant.

#108 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 05:25 PM | Reply

Actually Speaks, if Trump's name had been on the list I would've accepted it for what it was. Because it's not a Left vs Right issue. It's a powerful vs powerless issue. I've stated previously, I support Trump for owning the Libs. That doesn't make him a paragon of virtue.

However, to take him down is to take them all down. So if there was a list, it would've meant taking out some deep pockets who donate to Dems as well ...

#99 | Posted by Bluewaffles

So you vote for a guy who was party pals with epstein and then buried the evidence because he upsets the people that make you feel inferior.

The difference between repubs and dems is that dems WANT our corrupt rapist leaders to be taken down. Repubs do anything to keep their corrupt rapist leaders in power.

#109 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-07-08 05:40 PM | Reply

If we are to make a comparison and I believe this is the correct one Clown solely based on the issue at hand... There's much more damning evidence that Bill Clinton was participating than Donald Trump.

#105 | Posted by Bluewaffles

If you want quantity of evidence, there is much more for trump than for clinton. But find me any dems defending clinton hanging out with epstein at all.

#110 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-07-08 05:40 PM | Reply

"Difference between us is, I have no issue with accepting the fact Bill was a regular at Epstein island. Based of photographs of the men together, Bill's fondness for promiscuity and the painting."

Yup.

It doesn't much matter to me that Trump, or Clinton, or Bill Gates, rapes teenage girls in their personal time. Millions of American men do that.

That's not saying rape is okay. Of course it's not okay.

But I don't think of Trump or Clinton or Gates as heroes, so I don't need to worship them.

The fact that Trump, Clinton, and Gates all raped teenage girls just means that the patriatchy has strong bipartisan support.

#111 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 06:09 PM | Reply

The fact that Trump, Clinton, and Gates all raped teenage girls just means that the patriatchy has strong bipartisan support.

#111 | Posted by snoofy

No it means that israel has blackmail power over all of them since epstein was mossad. But only one of them is president.

#112 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-07-08 06:28 PM | Reply

Those cuts occur in October and are unrelated to this flash flood because they haven't taken place yet.
#38 | Posted by BellRinger

^
There's no lie you wouldn't tell, to protect Trump.

It's probably the most reliable thing about you, how you can be counted on to lie for Trump.

#113 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 06:36 PM | Reply

I don't really buy the blackmail thing. At least not with Trump.

Trump supporters simply do not care that he is a rapist.

There isn't a MAGA Republican who would stop supporting Trump, even if incontrovertible evidence came to light. There just isn't. Matt Gaetz has a career as a right wing pundit because I'm right about that.

#114 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 06:41 PM | Reply

"There isn't a MAGA Republican who would stop supporting Trump
#114 | Posted by snoofy"

I am as MAGA as they come. If there is evidence that Trump was raping kids on Epstein Island, he deserves to be in jail.

So, your entire argument is complete nonsense - which is pretty typical for you.

#115 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 07:20 PM | Reply

A lot of people are saying that Donald Trump raped children and that the DoJ is covering it up.

#116 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-07-08 07:23 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"A lot of people are saying that Donald Trump raped children and that the DoJ is covering it up.
#116 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce"

Dipshit liberals say a lot of nonsense. A lot of people (dipshit liberals) are saying there is a Donald hooker pee tape.

For me, the biggest evidence that this does not exist is that it 100% would have leaked under Biden. Hell, the Democrats tried to assassinate Trump two times and imprison him for 1000 years and you think they protected him under Biden for this? Utter nonsense.

#117 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 07:29 PM | Reply

If there is evidence that Trump was raping kids

You would
Pleasure yourself to it
Repeatedly

Then deny it's real.

Snoofy it right.

If your choice was Clinton / Harris or Donald "I love to grab pu**ies" Trump, you'd vote for Trump for a 4th time.

#118 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 07:30 PM | Reply

#117 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

No one tried to assassinate Trump.

Biden didn't go after Trump, as apparent.

There's dozens of photos of Trump with Epstein, with young girls, with Maxwell, partying. Over decades of his life.

Only the absolute devout cultist would ignore that as happenstance.

Is there proof Epstein raped girls. Maybe it's all just a huge conspiracy.

#119 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 07:33 PM | Reply

"If your choice was Clinton / Harris or Donald "I love to grab pu**ies" Trump, you'd vote for Trump for a 4th time.
#118 | Posted by ClownShack"

This part of your post is true. However, if there was evidence that Trump molested kids, he would be bounced from the GOP just like Epstein got bounced from Mar o lago. Epstein got bounced from mar o lago and landed in the laps of the Democrat's biggest donors - like Bill Gates. I would love to have Melinda under oath testifying on what she knows. GOP throws the trash out - Democrats embrace their degenerate members 'redemption story' - Hunter Biden being a prime example.

Also, you Dems should get off your high horse on completely fabricated Trump accusations when we all know FOR A FACT that Biden molested his own daughter and it did not cost him a single vote from you dipshits.

#120 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 07:36 PM | Reply

"No one tried to assassinate Trump."

Other than the guy that actually shot him and the sniper arrested on the golf course you mean - right?

"Biden didn't go after Trump, as apparent.
#119 | Posted by ClownShack"

Other than the unprecedented lawfare that tried to give him 1000x in prison for charges that have all gone away like a fart in the wind - right?

You need to lie harder dipshit - the Democrats are at 19% approval and still tanking so they need you to try to rewrite history that everyone witnessed with their own eyes.

#121 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 07:39 PM | Reply

Epstein got bounced from mar o lago

Bounced?

I'll need more proof than a "Trust me bro" from Trump.

The only confirmation seems to be a lack of membership starting in 2007.

FOR A FACT

Just because you write it in caps doesn't make it a fact.

#122 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 07:44 PM | Reply

"I'll need more proof than a "Trust me bro" from Trump.
#122 | Posted by ClownShack"

Like I said - you need to lie harder.

"Donald Trump severed ties with Jeffrey Epstein after the disgraced financier hit on the teenage daughter of a Mar-a-Lago member, threatening the Trump brand of glitz and glamour, according to a new book published about the president's Palm Beach club.
www.miamiherald.com

Now, please link to a single Democrat condemning Biden after the insider book was made public stating clearly that Biden molested his own daughter.

Or, is this like the deficit where child molesting only matters to Democrats when Republicans do it?

#123 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 07:50 PM | Reply

Other than the guy that actually shot at him and the sniper arrested on the golf course you mean - right?

Fixed that for you.

1) the official story is the MAGA kid who was spotted, several times, on the roof top, shot at Trump and some debris, shrapnel if you want, sliced his ear. But no photos of the ear were ever provided. Nor were and doctors or surgeons ever called in to do anything.

How fortunate, of all the campaigning rallies Trump had in 2024, that specific one happened to have been televised.

So the world could see the firefighter accidentally get shot and die.

Poor man. God bless the collateral damage left in Trump's wake.

2) some guy, in his car, with a gun, in Florida, is meaningless.

Do they check everyone within Trump's vicinity, in Florida, for guns. I'm willing to bet most have at least one on them.

#124 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 07:54 PM | Reply

according to a new book published about the president's Palm Beach club.

You'll have to excuse me while I laugh at you.

#125 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 07:55 PM | Reply

the insider book was made public stating clearly that Biden molested his own daughter.
#123 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

No such thing exists.

How do you expect to continue discussion when you constantly resort to lying.

#126 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 07:57 PM | Reply

FDT told Howard Stern he liked to hang out with the models backstage at a teen beauty pageant, and that he was allowed back there because he sponsored the event. He liked to ogle the naked girls, some of them underage. He also talked endlessly about wanting to bang his daughter. He bragged about grabbing women by the p, because "they let you do it." He hung out with Epstein, plenty of phot evidence. Epstein said FDT was his best friend. A woman officially charged him for sexually assaulting her when she was 13, but dropped the charges mysteriously (not a stretch to imagine why). He still owes E Jean Carroll $5 million in punitive damages for raping her in a dressing room. He was convicted of 34 felony counts for fraud, paying off a porn star to not disclose he had sex with her while his illegal immigrant wife was taking care of his infant son, Barron.

But sure, Jan, he's a real stand up guy, who would never do anything untoward with his buddy Epstein, "who liked them young."

If all you MAGAts have as a defense is that some imaginary leftists will defend Bill Clinton, LOL, good luck with that. Publish your evidence that this is true. You alleged "Christians" are the worst of the lot, given the rampant sexual abuse of children by faith leaders of whatever flavor of Christianity you claim to believe in. You won't ever own up to your acceptance of the vile, depraved, demented rapist.

#127 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 08:11 PM | Reply

"1) some debris, shrapnel if you want, sliced his ear."

Like I said before - lie harder. However, the fact that you even resort to this nonsense like as if a bullet fragment hit him rather than an intact bullet and it somehow makes it less of a Democrat assassination attempt. Pathetic.

"How fortunate, of all the campaigning rallies Trump had in 2024, that specific one happened to have been televised."

Good point - what did CNN know and when did they know it?

"2) some guy, in his car, with a gun, in Florida, is meaningless.
#124 | Posted by ClownShack"

So, he did not have the gun with him in the shrubs? Because that is what the Secret Service reported - a gun barrel sticking out of the shrubs. So, again, lie harder.

If you want to make this out as just your run of the mill deranged unarmed Democrat hiding in the bushes on the golf course with a gun just happening to be in his car - you are re-writing history because that is not what happened.

#128 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 08:17 PM | Reply

the insider book was made public stating clearly that Biden molested his own daughter.
#123 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

It's impressive how much you are in love with that lie.

It's a safe bet you were molested by your father and that's why it resonates with you. And why it seems so believable to you.

#129 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 08:18 PM | Reply

"the insider book was made public stating clearly that Biden molested his own daughter.
#123 | POSTED BY SCOTTS
No such thing exists.
#126 | Posted by ClownShack"

LOL - it is from the ultimate insider - Biden's own daughter and author of the book. But, you reject this direct proof of Biden's molestation - why? Why do you accept Biden molesting his daughter?

#130 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 08:19 PM | Reply

"#129 | Posted by snoofy"

So, it is a lie that Ashley wrote about that in her diary? Exactly what is the lie here? Or, am I lying that he didn't lose and Dem support over it. Did you condemn Biden for it? Or, did you simply ignore Ashley's own words and pretend it didn't happen?

#131 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 08:23 PM | Reply

LOL - it is from the ultimate insider - Biden's own daughter and author of the book. But, you reject this direct proof of Biden's molestation - why? Why do you accept Biden molesting his daughter?

#130 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

You sure about that, Sparky? Someone stole her diary and published it, but please, tell us more about how he "molested" her. Be specific.

#132 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 08:25 PM | Reply

?I am a private citizen, targeted only because my father happened to be running to be President. In other words, the extensive work I have done to move past my trauma was undone by Ms. Harris's actions. ...

Although this criminal act happened more than three years ago, because of the publicity it drew"exactly as Ms. Harris intended"I am constantly re-traumatized by it. I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online.

Repeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love.? - Ashley Biden, not claiming that her father molested her.

#133 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 08:27 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

I wonder if Scotty manages to love his father despite the abuse.

Based on his demeanor, I don't think he has the emotional fortitude.

#134 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 08:29 PM | Reply

Trump's Strange Reaction to Epstein Question (today)

www.youtube.com

#135 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-08 08:38 PM | Reply

Squats, Ballwasher, Turdfyck, Shrimpfyck, Jeff, all losers, idiots, cowards and liars.

#136 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-07-08 08:53 PM | Reply

Epstein IMPLICATES TRUMP In New UNEARTHED Video!

www.youtube.com

fun stuff.... "He's been my best friend for 10 years."
"He can't read a balance sheet." "... the only thing he knows is real estate."

#137 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-08 08:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Someone stole her diary and published it, but please, tell us more about how he "molested" her. Be specific.
#132 | Posted by chuffy"

By all means - define for us what 'inappropriate showers' means. Also, why did this not sway your support for Biden? Just admit it - child molestation only matters to Dems if they think the GOP are the ones doing it.

#138 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:07 PM | Reply

By all means - define for us what 'inappropriate showers' means. Also, why did this not sway your support for Biden? Just admit it - child molestation only matters to Dems if they think the GOP are the ones doing it.

#138 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

Nice try, man. The onus is on you, not me, to back up your own claims. Please show us where she claimed she was molested. We'll wait.

#139 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:11 PM | Reply

In the meantime, maybe you can read my post at #127 and defend your boy some more.

MAGA creeper

#140 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:12 PM | Reply

I know that "shower" does not mean "touching."

#141 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 09:13 PM | Reply

"Nice try, man. The onus is on you, not me
#139 | Posted by chuffy"

I accept the words as they are written - Joe Biden molested his own daughter AND NOT A SINGLE DEMOCRAT OR MSM member had the balls to ask him about it to clarify. They didn't do it because they know he is a pedophile but they were willing to overlook it because they thought he was the best bet to beat Trump. It is sick and you all should be ashamed.

#142 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:13 PM | Reply

"Also, why did this not sway your support for Biden?"

Probably the #1 factor is the alleged "victim" denies the claims of molestation.

Why doesn't that sway you?

#143 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-07-08 09:15 PM | Reply

"I know that "shower" does not mean "touching."
#141 | Posted by snoofy"

Does it? You have Biden confirming that fact or it is pure speculation on your part? Why don't you want Biden to answer this? We are not talking about a vague rumor like the Trump hooker pee tape - we are talking about his daughter's own words. Also, you have not answered - did this cause you to lose any of your support for Biden when he was running in 2024?

#144 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:16 PM | Reply

"Probably the #1 factor is the alleged "victim" denies the claims of molestation.
Why doesn't that sway you?
#143 | Posted by snoofy"

Link to Ashley stating that she was not molested or took inappropriate showers with Joe Biden - I want to see those exact words.

#145 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:17 PM | Reply

#128 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

If it was a bullet, he would have lost that ear.

#146 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 09:21 PM | Reply

we are talking about his daughter's own words.

You're not.

#147 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 09:25 PM | Reply

Link to Ashley stating that she was not molested

Link to Ashley stating that she was molested.

It's your claim.

#148 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 09:26 PM | Reply

Here you go AGAIN:
"I am a private citizen, targeted only because my father happened to be running to be President. In other words, the extensive work I have done to move past my trauma was undone by Ms. Harris's actions. ...

Although this criminal act happened more than three years ago, because of the publicity it drew"exactly as Ms. Harris intended"I am constantly re-traumatized by it. I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online.

Repeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love."

Your turn. Link to Ashley stating that she was molested.

Why do you support a guy who, on multiple occasions, claimed that he wanted to bang his own daughter?

#149 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:26 PM | Reply

child molestation only matters to Dems if they think the GOP are the ones doing it.
#138 | POSTED BY SCOTTS

Is that why you've spent the entire thread making excuses for Trump's pedophilia.

#150 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 09:27 PM | Reply

"probably not appropriate" could also apply to a mother who breast feeds her son until the age of 4, but even that's not in the same ballpark as molestation.

I'm sure there are Christian wackos who think that me changing my daughters' diapers was inappropriate, but who knows what you weirdos think is wrong? You are obsessed with peeing and looking at kids' privates before they can play sports. Creeper

#151 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:31 PM | Reply

www.snopes.com

Snopes link for you.

YOUR TURN. LINK TO HER CLAIMS THAT SHE WAS MOLESTED OR STFU, you pedophile defender.

#152 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:33 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Trumpers are only still talking about Biden as a Whataboutism to Trump; as if two wrongs make a right.

Which, maybe they do in TrumpWorld. Otherwise, it's just another logical fallacy.

#153 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-08 09:34 PM | Reply

"If it was a bullet, he would have lost that ear.
#146 | Posted by ClownShack"

So says the dipshit militant homosexual now cosplaying as a ballistics expert. Now, I have no doubt you have taken countless shots to the face, but that does not make you an expert in ballistics.

#154 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:35 PM | Reply

"Repeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love."
#149 | Posted by chuffy"

Challenge - FAILED. No where does she state that Biden did not take inappropriate showers with her.

But, again, this goes WAY beyond that.

Why have YOU not demanded answers from Biden on this? Why has the MSM not asked a SINGLE QUESTION on this? The answer is obvious - YOU do not really care about child molestation. PERIOD. So, don't act like you do now.

#155 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:37 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

"Trumpers are only still talking about Biden as a Whataboutism to Trump
#153 | Posted by Corky"

It is not 'whataboutism' because we don't have ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Trump molested a kid. Meanwhile, we have Biden's own daughter saying he did. And yet - you bury the Biden story. This is a YOU problem.

#156 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:38 PM | Reply

Lose the argument, change the topic.

I'll believe he was shot in the ear when the medical reports show he was shot in the ear. Until then, it's all kayfabe for his idiot hordes, LOL

#157 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:38 PM | Reply

So says the dipshit militant homosexual

I love when you have no argument so you resort to meaningless insults.

Bravo.

#158 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 09:41 PM | Reply

"Is that why you've spent the entire thread making excuses for Trump's pedophilia.
#150 | Posted by ClownShack"

Why do I defend Trump from the completely made-up hooker pee tape hoax? Same reason here. Because you dipshit liberals simply make shit up while IGNORING documented cases of abuse. Again, did your support for Biden waver AT ALL due to Ashley identifying him as a child predator? The answer is no. So, don't pretend that you are care over your new hoax - once again - that is not supported by ANYTHING.

Now, I can understand you ignoring Hunter's crimes with the "I didn't vote for Hunter" excuse - but, we have direct evidence of Biden molesting his own daughter and you ignore that too in favor of fapping over completely fabricated stories about Trump. This is a YOU problem.

#159 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:42 PM | Reply

#137: fun stuff.... "He's been my best friend for 10 years."
"He can't read a balance sheet." "... the only thing he knows is real estate."

Some pal, huh?

https://steffanco.weebly.com/uploads/5/4/3/7/54377351/467817456.png

Makes you wonder what the Russian intelligence dossier has about money-laundering sexual predator Dummkopf Trumpf (AKA Krasnov Fats).

#160 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-08 09:47 PM | Reply

"I'll believe he was shot in the ear when the medical reports show he was shot in the ear. Until then, it's all kayfabe for his idiot hordes, LOL
#157 | Posted by chuffy"

Hey look - another dipshit liberal turned ballistics expert. Here is Trump's doctor stating it dipshit.

""the bullet track produced a 2 (centimeter) wide wound that extended down to the cartilaginous surface of the ear."

www.reuters.com

Let me guess - you don't accept THAT medical report....dipshits gonna dipshit I guess.

#161 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:47 PM | Reply

The only person on this thread who referenced a hooker pee tape is YOU, creepy. But there's plenty of evidence to back up everything I said in #127, including this: archive.ph

#162 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:49 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Snopes link for you.
#152 | Posted by chuffy"

The Snopes link you posted said that my claim was TRUE. Funny, it even details how it changed from 'unproven' to true - it never should have been listed as 'unproven'. Once Biden sends the Feds to raid journalists to recover a diary that was never claimed to have been stolen - you know it is true using common sense.

#163 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:51 PM | Reply

Ronny "Pill dispenser" Jackson is not a credible source. So no, not acceptable.

#164 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:51 PM | Reply

Reading comprehension issues - where in the snopes link claims that she said she was molested?

"probably inappropriate" does not equal "molested me"

But you have a nice day. Bless your heart.

#165 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:52 PM | Reply

ScottS is just trolling.

Just another waste of time, useless, deplorable Trumping MAGAt.

He posts whatever lies he's wants to and acts like it's a fact.

#166 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 09:53 PM | Reply

"everything I said in #127
#162 | Posted by chuffy"

Link to a single source from Trump stating: " He also talked endlessly about wanting to bang his daughter."

Go ahead - post him stating those specific words.

#167 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:53 PM | Reply

"Ronny "Pill dispenser" Jackson is not a credible source. So no, not acceptable.
#164 | Posted by chuffy"

Exactly as I predicted - you won't accept THAT report. What a predictable dipshit.

#168 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:54 PM | Reply

Fact is.

ScottS is an incel.

If he was around a 14 year old girl.

He'd definitely rape her.

#169 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 09:54 PM | Reply

#169

We should warn 1Nut right away!

#170 | Posted by Corky at 2025-07-08 09:57 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

LOL,

You got me there, he never said on video that he wanted to "bang his daughter" but he did say this:

www.independent.co.uk

#171 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

""probably inappropriate" does not equal "molested me"
#165 | Posted by chuffy"

Great - so, tell the class how one takes an inappropriate shower with their teen daughter that does not constitute molestation.

Also - and be 100% honest here - would you be okay with the Ivanka stating that Trump took inappropriate showers with her as you are with Biden? Would you just gloss over it? Of course NOT. You do it for Biden because you don't really care about child molesters. You only care if there is an R after their name. Just be honest with yourself. We are not in hypothetical territory now - WE HAVE YOUR PAST AND CURRENT HISTORY WITH BIDEN AS PROOF.

#172 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:57 PM | Reply

"You got me there, he never said on video that he wanted to "bang his daughter"
#171 | Posted by chuffy"

Great, so you lied as per usual for you dipshit liberals. I will give you credit for at least admitting it. More than I can say for dipshits like Danforth.

#173 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:58 PM | Reply

I'm bored. SCOTTYS is in love with a pedo rapist and nobody can stop him.

#174 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 09:58 PM | Reply

"If he was around a 14 year old girl.
He'd definitely rape her.
#169 | Posted by ClownShack"

You have me confused with Rein. And again - I don't see one word out of your mouth against him when he is 99.99999% a pedophile. Why is that?

#175 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 09:59 PM | Reply

"SCOTTYS is in love with a pedo rapist and nobody can stop him.
#174 | Posted by chuffy"

I am not in love with Joe Biden. What he did with Ashley and Tara Reade is vile and disgusting and he should be locked in a cage for the remainder of his miserable life for it.

#176 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-07-08 10:01 PM | Reply

tell the class how one takes an inappropriate shower with their teen daughter that does not constitute molestation.

Easy.

The fact that he was in the shower with her was inappropriate. But they had probably taken showers together throughout her childhood. Yet now it felt inappropriate. Because she was no longer a child.

The only molestation is in your putrid imagination. It's projection. Reflection of your desires to molest young girls.

#177 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-07-08 10:03 PM | Reply

I mean, if you took the time to read the link I sent you, maybe you wouldn't be making your stupid point that FDT didn't say the EXACT words, but it's pretty clear to anyone with half a brain. That doesn't include you, I suppose. You think Ronny "no longer a doctor, demoted liar" Jackson is a credible source. I'll believe the doctors that actually treated FDT, when you can bring a real doctor to the table, instead of the musings of a guy who lost his medical license, I'll give you the win.

So far, you're still a loser who can't read.

#178 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 10:04 PM | Reply

Hey, CLOWNSHACK, be careful, SCOTTY might not even be into little girls, he seems more interested in the boys, if you know what I mean...

#179 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 10:05 PM | Reply

This: "After I met Ivanka and praised her to her father, he said, Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father...'"

This: "I don't think Ivanka would do that, although she does have a very nice figure. I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her."

"Isn't that terrible? How terrible? Is that terrible?"

This: Trump: "My daughter is beautiful, Ivanka."

Stern: "By the way, your daughter ... "

Trump: " - she's beautiful"

Stern: "Can I say this? A piece of ass."

Trump: "Yeah."

and this: "Don't you think my daughter's hot? She's hot, right?"

#180 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 10:08 PM | Reply

Now, be a good boy and look up the definition of the word, "Infer"

#181 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 10:10 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#181: Blech!

https://cdn4.iconfinder.com/data/icons/stomach-cancer/213/stomach-cancer-006-512.png

#182 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-08 10:20 PM | Reply

Creepy MAGA weirdo thinks that, because he didn't say in public, "I, Donald, hereby declare that I want to bang' my daughter," all the other stuff he said is A/OK.

Creeper

#183 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 10:21 PM | Reply

Since you can't actually use the Internet, I'll print out the charges filed against your role model (sorry, censors):

11. On the third occasion involving the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson was forced to engage in an unnatural lesbian sex act with her fellow minor and sex slave, Maria Doe age 12, for the sexual enjoyment of Defendant Trump. After this sex act, both minors were forced to orally copulate Defendant Trump by placing their mouths simultaneously on his erect penis until he achieved sexual orgasm. After zipping up his pants, Defendant Trump physically pushed both minors away while angrily berating them for the "poor" quality of their sexual performance. 12. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, was tied to a bed by Defendant Trump who then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff Johnson. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff Johnson loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to "please wear a condom". Defendant Trump responded by violently striking Plaintiff Johnson in the face with his open hand and screaming that "he would do whatever he wanted" as he refused to wear protection. After achieving sexual orgasm, the Defendant, Donald J. Trump put his suit back on and when the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, in tears asked Defendant Trump what would happen if he had impregnated her, Defendant Trump grabbed his wallet and threw some money at her and screamed that she should use the money "to get a fucking abortion". 13. On the first occasion involving the Defendant, Jeffrey E. Epstein, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, was forced to disrobe into her bra and panties and to give a full body massage to Defendant Epstein while he was completely naked. During the massage, Defendant Epstein physically forced Plaintiff Johnson to touch his erect penis with her bare hands and to clean up his ejaculated semen after he achieved sexual orgasm. 14. On the second occasion involving the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson, was again forced to disrobe into her bra and panties while giving Defendant Epstein a full body massage while he was completely naked. The Defendant, Donald J. Trump, was also present as he was getting his own massage from another minor, Jane Doe, age 13. Defendant Epstein forced Plaintiff Johnson to touch his erect penis by physically placing her bare hands upon his sex organ
and again forced Plaintiff Johnson to clean up his ejaculated semen after he achieved sexual orgasm.
3CV.126 109/0911

#184 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 10:26 PM | Reply

13 year olds, dude.

#185 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 10:30 PM | Reply

That's from a court document.

#186 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 10:31 PM | Reply

Scatberg is a NAMBLA member who rapes toddlers.

#187 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-08 10:36 PM | Reply

Trump loved hanging around Epstein because he could always deliver 13 year olds who resembled Ivanka.

#188 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-08 10:37 PM | Reply

If the circulating rumors posted in the link below are true, trollop Ghislaine Maxwell and abominable Jeffrey Epstein learned their nefarious tradecraft from the late Robert Maxwell, who was suspected of being a Mossad asset. That would mean both the Kremlin AND the Mossad have damaging files on sexual deviant Dummkopf Trumpf: www.jfeed.com

The Israeli Consulate-General is located in Manhattan at 800 2nd Avenue, New York, NY 10017, near the UN.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/e53bac_91f63333ce7a4b4aaf63f724584a7709~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_1110,h_623,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/e53bac_91f63333ce7a4b4aaf63f724584a7709~mv2.jpg

#189 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-07-08 10:42 PM | Reply

Ronny "Stolen Valor" Jackson isn't a credible source:

www.navytimes.com

www.medpagetoday.com

The same doctor who claimed that FDT was Adonis reborn (again, an "inference")

#190 | Posted by chuffy at 2025-07-08 10:48 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort