Officials have identified the person accused of fatally shooting conservative activist Charlie Kirk as 22-year-old Utah resident Tyler Robinson. Utah Governor Spencer Cox said at a press conference on Friday morning that investigators arrested and identified Robinson after analyzing surveillance footage, interviewing Robinson's family members and reviewing online messages between Robinson and his roommate.
Yep, Republicans know he is one of theirs:
Razzball
@razzball.bsky.social
guys, we have a tone shift
Universities don't produce assassins. They produce educated people.
#88 | POSTED BY RCADE
You sure?
Luigi Mangione's path from valedictorian, engineer, Ivy League grad to murder suspect
www.usatoday.com
The casing engravings could be a red herring to throw off the investigation... or merely an inside joke.
Inside joke, and who they are, their culture, reasons why.
You can't be right of the right wing, and accuse Charlie Kirk is spreading hate, again seems illogical.
As the Gov of Utah stated,
x.com
See anything in common with the most dangerous people in America? quixote.org
Now we can add Tyler Robinson to the catalog. There! img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net
Tyler fits right in, doesn't he?
BTW, you'll never guess who Bebe thinks killed him:
Netanyahu Unveils Most Unhinged Theory Yet on Charlie Kirk Shooternewrepublic.com
The Israeli prime minister decided it was high time he weigh in.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has offered his own unhinged theory as to who shot Charlie Kirk, asserting without any evidence that the Turning Point USA founder was killed by a team of "radical Islamists and ultra-progressives."
"This is a worldwide problem. The people on the extremes, the Islamists ... the radical Islamists and their union with the ultra-progressives, they often speak about human rights. They speak about free speech. But they use violence to try to take down their enemies," Netanyahu said on Fox News on Friday. "Whether it's President Trump, who's been almost assassinated twice, or they try to kill me here too. But they got Charlie Kirk, and it's just heartbreaking."
Stephen King Apologizes After Claiming Charlie Kirk "Advocated Stoning Gays To Death"
King's original claim refers back to comments made by Kirk in 2024, when attacking YouTuber Ms. Rachel for quoting "love your neighbor" to defend Pride celebrations.deadline.com
Kirk said: "Ms. Rachel, you might wanna crack open that Bible of yours, in a lesser referenced part of the same part of scripture is in Leviticus 18 is that thou shall lay with another man, shall be stoned to death." He added: "Just sayin'."
Kirk appeared to be referring to Leviticus 18:22, which states: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."
Leviticus 20:13 adds: "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."
I found a number of sources who accused him of saying something like that but couldn't find actual quotes. One source would copy/paste maybe a full sentence usually less and then fill in the blanks with no links to his quote in full context. That raises a big flag for me. The other sources on the first page and a half assigned positions without any actual quotes at all. One source said he referenced Leviticus 20:13 in the Old Testament. Now, if one were to read the actual text and only the text, I can see how it would apply to gay people (the text doesn't even imply trans). Anyone who spent some time studying religion understands that the reason the various Christian sects beyond the Bible itself exist is because the Bible is not a literal document. Catholic, Lutheran, Baptist, etc are all religious institutions not just a book.
This is what AI says:
" Interpretations of the verse:
Timeless divine law: Some interpret the passage as establishing a universal and enduring moral standard from God.
Cultural/historical context: Others see it as a cultural artifact reflecting the specific societal norms of ancient Israel, suggesting that it may not be directly applicable today.
Reinterpretation: A third perspective suggests reinterpreting the passage within more inclusive theological frameworks."
#209 | Posted by BellRinger
Damn. How can you twist this much to defend Kirk? It's amazing.
It wasn't hard to find. Took less than a minute.
Other interpretations are pointless. We are talking about what KIRK said he believes and should happen.
Charlie Kirk: "Thou shall lay with another man, shall be stoned to death. Just saying... The chapter...affirms God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matter."
x.com
Breakdown of the shell casing memes, there's plenty out there. www.theverge.com
If you don't think Laura Loomer and Nick Fuentes didn't scrape their socials immediately, I've got a golden ballroom to sell you. That is, until the president of the USA decided to blame black people and trans people and Democrats ... fascists gotta fasch.
Dude was part of the gamer community, which means male, gun enthusiast, typically white, typically fundamentalist religious upbringing, typically misogynistic, typically xenophobic, typically has some issues with their sexual identity (incel, latent homosexual, etc.) - That's a right wing guy, not a "radical leftist" guy. Violence is overwhelmingly a right-wing protocol.
Drudge Retort Headlines
Shutdown Begins (166 comments)
Hegseth's Speech to Our Military Leaders (54 comments)
GOP Silent After Church Gunman Identified as 'Ultra MAGA' (22 comments)
Porny Republican Quits Wisconsin Governor's Race (19 comments)
ICE Agent Fires Chemical Weapon at TV Reporter (14 comments)
25 US States Do Not Have Money to Pay Their Bills (10 comments)
US Cedes Its Share of China's Beef Market to Australia (10 comments)
Trump's Tariffs Trigger Crime Wave Across U.S. (9 comments)
YouTube to Pay $24.5 Million to Settle Trump Lawsuit (8 comments)
Despite Russian Interference, Moldova Pro-EU Party Wins Election (8 comments)